| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Siigari Kitawa
Gallente
The Aduro Protocol
   |
Posted - 2009.09.03 11:13:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Siigari Kitawa on 03/09/2009 11:13:10
/tinfoil
Is it because you no longer want our honest opinions on what we think?
Feedback generally insinuates that you don't want to listen to what we actually have to say and that you will go through with your planned motives whether we agree with you or not. You just want to hear what we think.
Feedback:
3. a reaction or response to a particular process or activity: He got very little feedback from his speech.
4. evaluative information derived from such a reaction or response: to study the feedback from an audience survey.
|
Abrazzar
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 11:23:00 -
[2]
*Drops a 1600mm Reinforced Layered Aluminum Plating on Siigari*
Feeling safe yet?
It was because people were confusing this forum with the Features and Ideas forum. So they changed the name to make the difference in purpose more clear.
--------
Ideas for: Mining
|
Siigari Kitawa
Gallente
The Aduro Protocol
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 11:30:00 -
[3]
Well, lol @ Aluminum plating -- that's strong stuff!
Anyway, I'm upset because there has been a severe lack of communication recently. The recent "Faction Balance Test" was to me what felt like almost a scam in terms of actually balancing the ships.
We've got some 50 posts in the "feedback" thread and I doubt any of those responses are going to be listened to.
Instead, we post dozens of ideas every day and those seem to get blown over by CCP. Now more than ever, they're apparently looking to balance faction ships and you don't see any CCP response saying "This is sort of where we are thinking of going, what do YOU think?"
Once it gets to the test server, it's most likely set in stone.
|
|
CCP Ytterbium
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 12:23:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Siigari Kitawa
Anyway, I'm upset because there has been a severe lack of communication recently. The recent "Faction Balance Test" was to me what felt like almost a scam in terms of actually balancing the ships.
We've got some 50 posts in the "feedback" thread and I doubt any of those responses are going to be listened to.
Instead, we post dozens of ideas every day and those seem to get blown over by CCP. Now more than ever, they're apparently looking to balance faction ships and you don't see any CCP response saying "This is sort of where we are thinking of going, what do YOU think?"
Once it gets to the test server, it's most likely set in stone.
Can't tell much more for now, but you are wrong  . |
|
Siigari Kitawa
Gallente
The Aduro Protocol
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 13:17:00 -
[5]
Originally by: CCP Ytterbium
Originally by: Siigari Kitawa
Anyway, I'm upset because there has been a severe lack of communication recently. The recent "Faction Balance Test" was to me what felt like almost a scam in terms of actually balancing the ships.
We've got some 50 posts in the "feedback" thread and I doubt any of those responses are going to be listened to.
Instead, we post dozens of ideas every day and those seem to get blown over by CCP. Now more than ever, they're apparently looking to balance faction ships and you don't see any CCP response saying "This is sort of where we are thinking of going, what do YOU think?"
Once it gets to the test server, it's most likely set in stone.
Can't tell much more for now, but you are wrong .
o.o
|
Washell Olivaw
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 14:16:00 -
[6]
In answer to your topic title: There wasn't much difference between "Game Development" and "Features and Ideas". "Test server feedback" covers the intended use (according to stickies) of this section much better.
Originally by: Signature
Everybody has a photographic memory, some people just don't have film.
|
Gypsio III
Dirty Filthy Perverts
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 14:16:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Siigari Kitawa
Instead, we post dozens of ideas every day and those seem to get blown over by CCP.
Possibly something to do with the fact that most of those ideas are utterly stupid. Only about 1% of the ideas are even worth reading.
|
Ivanna Nuke
Daralux
|
Posted - 2009.09.03 19:44:00 -
[8]
Originally by: CCP Ytterbium
Originally by: Siigari Kitawa
Anyway, I'm upset because there has been a severe lack of communication recently. The recent "Faction Balance Test" was to me what felt like almost a scam in terms of actually balancing the ships.
We've got some 50 posts in the "feedback" thread and I doubt any of those responses are going to be listened to.
Instead, we post dozens of ideas every day and those seem to get blown over by CCP. Now more than ever, they're apparently looking to balance faction ships and you don't see any CCP response saying "This is sort of where we are thinking of going, what do YOU think?"
Once it gets to the test server, it's most likely set in stone.
Can't tell much more for now, but you are wrong .
*begins buy orders*
|
Roemy Schneider
Vanishing Point.
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 12:50:00 -
[9]
'discussion' implies a mutual exchange
the polygon excuse was the first input from their side to any topic for the past months if not years and im not even sure that lolbomb was dropped here -.-
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Dictum Factum
Dark-Rising
|
Posted - 2009.09.05 07:42:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Siigari Kitawa
generally insinuates
Just because you inferred something does not mean that it was implied.
Fight my Brute! |
Arkady Sadik
Minmatar
Gradient
Electus Matari
|
Posted - 2009.09.05 13:25:00 -
[11]
The reason was that too many people used the "Game Development" forum to propose ideas for new features - but that's what "features and ideas" is for. CCP changed the name to make it clear that this forum is for actual SiSi discussions. It has always been, just not named appropriately. So, name changed, nothing else did.
hth, hand
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |