Greetings capsuleer,

Your original discussion on the influence of Local was moved to Features and Ideas. You then spammed the forum by repeating the topic, despite having them locked. Admittedly, capsuleer Crimson, Lord Zim and Cutter was instrumental in getting one of those threads locked, but as capsuleer Crimson has said:



He is a stickler for the forum rules and you should listen to him. What the owners of this board says is what the rules are. And these rules have determined that your discussion should go to Features and Ideas and that repeated occurences of that topic will be locked.

I am correct in this, am I not capsuleer Crimson?

Regards,

Shian Yang

Noted VV. So essentially using ones intellect is against the rules and posts must appear as idiotic to not upset the majority of the forum go'ers who are in fact idiotic.

There was no reason for either thread sans the bias moderation to be locked or moved. The others were moved to prevent general discussion of the mechanics. So stating that they were moved for the sake of being moved doesn't answer the question. Are you one of the idiots we're refering to?

And im not whining, im just not scared of consequences when I know im in the right. So why don't you scuttle of to a dark corner troglodyte?

Look up the definition of general you simpleton before you involve yourself in a conversation of which you aren't really capable of providing any worthwhile point.

No it doesn't. Because it wasn't asked in the sense of a feature or idea to be implemented. The topic revolved around how local chat generally hinders EVEs gameplay. And the third fill in the blank thread didn't mention local at all. Pure bias plain and simple. Unjust censorship and abuse of power.

And once again for the most remedial of our community general discussion covers any and all and warrants very little moderation or topic shuffling. Unless of course there is a bias driven agenda behind the shuffling.

It can end however. Im not that pressed. i'm in the right and if i'm martyred for expressing myself within the forum guidelines then OGP itll have to happen. My battle has been chosen. Let the chips fall where they may. And hopefully others will see how whats happening to me can and probably will affect them as well and respond accordingly.

Witty no? It plays on the whole Muslim stereotype. I never considered Joan, but I suppose that works too.

No im playing on the fact I often endure trolls and slurs that are based on the assumption i'm Arab Muslim do to my name. I only brought it up in answer to your comment about me using the word martyr.

Its that a violation of the very EULA they love quoting so much?

A petition does not allow the community to weigh in on the issue presented. And further any response recieved from the petition wouldn't be allowed to be discussed with the public. Therefore what you are suggesting is in essence never posting that which I feel affects the community in any way that the community would be allowed to involve themselves in the discussion.

No im not. Im asking for clarification on topics that are allowed or disallowed in EVE general discussion and toying with incompetents.

Im asking for clarification on topics that are allowed or disallowed in EVE general discussion

Okay can you provide an example of a topic that would fall under EVE General Discussion while not falling under another subforum. And If you can't could it be stated that the rules are selectively applied to posters and or ideas that certain people do not care for? And in doing so what that not indicate clear bias from a party that professes neutrality for the sake of the game?

Okay can you provide an example of a topic that would fall under EVE General Discussion while not falling under another subforum. And If you can't could it be stated that the rules are selectively applied to posters and or ideas that certain people do not care for? And in doing so what that not indicate clear bias from a party that professes neutrality for the sake of the game?

EVE GD is for EVE-related discussions that do not fit in the context of the other sections. If you posted a thread in GD asking about the sweet spot between DPS and tank on a Proteus it'd be moved to Ships and Modules. If you posted a thread asking what setup is best for blitzing Guristas missions it'd be moved to Missions and Complexes. The moderators are not obligated to agree with your wish to reach out to the largest possible audience.

And once again can we get one example of a topic that would uniformly fall under general discussion?

Or are we at the point of open air admission of bias?

No I don't. There seems to be no apparent ruleset that determines whether something falls under general discussion. Which takes us back to open air admission of bias and censorship.

If you had bothered to actually read Richards post you would have noted something. The key to posting on GD is to make sure that your thread does not fit in to the context of one of the other forum sections. Your idea about the feature known as "local" clearly falls under the heading of Features and Ideas.

He doesn't now nor will he ever "Get it". Just stop posting and let this thread die. That way he can post another later.