EVE Search - T2 Claymore setup

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

T2 Claymore setup

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
LordDerekSegan	Posted - 2009.09.05 03:32:00 - [1] Bit weak on the DPS, but this is a mid-size gang set up, so its not really important at all. Wonderful tank. 1350 DPS tanked, more is possible with small tweaks. [Claymore, EVEMON 1189 DPS tanking claymore] Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Co-Processor II Medium Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I, Cap Booster 800 Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon I Microwarpdrive Caldari Navy X-Large Shield Booster 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet EMP M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet EMP M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet EMP M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet EMP M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet EMP M Siege Warfare Link - Active Shielding Siege Warfare Link - Shield Harmonizing Siege Warfare Link - Shield Efficiency Ancillary Current Router I Semiconductor Memory Cell I Hammerhead II x3 Warrior II x2
Doll	Posted - 2009.09.05 08:00:00 - [2] I know the Claymore is the only CS with 8 high slots, but wouldn't you be better off with a Vulture is you are going to run those links? I would at least switch one of the siege links for the "Skirmish Warfare - Evasive Maneuvers" link because it's pure awesome, and the ship bonus makes it even better.
Sidephex Genos Occidere	Posted - 2009.09.05 08:03:00 - [3] lacks damage control imo. would remove one gyro and add dc. u said yourself that dmg isnt great and it shouldnt be your primary concern imo.
ArmyOfMe The Athiest Syndicate Advocated Destruction	Posted - 2009.09.05 13:15:00 - [4] needs a dc imo, and u should also drop a invuln for a point
Enden Assulu Caldari Blood Money Inc. The Blood Money Cartel	Posted - 2009.09.05 13:36:00 - [5] I agree change out the links for the ones the clay gives its bonuses too Click the image!
Lenartowicz Caldari Hive Bound Technologies Paxton Federation	Posted - 2009.09.05 13:51:00 - [6] stacking a third same module gives pitiful bonus's
Lindsay Logan	Posted - 2009.09.05 14:03:00 - [7] Its not there for tis dps, I'd use this: [Claymore, EVEMON 1189 DPS tanking claymore] Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Damage Control II Co-Processor II Medium Capacitor Booster II, Cap Booster 800 Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II Shield Boost Amplifier II 10MN MicroWarpdrive II Caldari Navy X-Large Shield Booster Dual 180mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M Dual 180mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M Dual 180mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M Dual 180mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M Dual 180mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M Siege Warfare Link - Active Shielding Siege Warfare Link - Shield Harmonizing Siege Warfare Link - Shield Efficiency Medium Core Defence Capacitor safeguard I Medium Ancillary Current Router I Hammerhead II x3 Warrior II x2
debbie harrio	Posted - 2009.09.05 16:39:00 - [8] Edited by: debbie harrio on 05/09/2009 16:44:38 Edited by: debbie harrio on 05/09/2009 16:42:23 Edited by: debbie harrio on 05/09/2009 16:39:51 Claymore command ship Dread Gurista's Co Processor Co Processor II Co Processor II Co Processor II command processor 1 command processor 1 command processor 1 command processor 1 Alumel Ladar ECCM empty slot Skirmish warfare link-Evasive manoeuvres Skirmish warfare link-Interdiction manoeuvres Skirmish warfare link-Rapid Deployment Information warfare link- Recon operation Armoured warfare link-Passive Defence Armoured warfare link-Rapid Repair Armoured warfare link-Damage control empty slot rigs particle dispersion augmentor 2 or if you want to run the full 8 warfare links change the dg co proc and 2 co proc II's to estamel and change the rigs to 1 ccc and 1 * ancillary current router or you could play with gypsy implants but for one extra link it becomes expensive... park up in safe spot and use, you won't get scanned down, of course you need the skirmish mindlink implant. This is what a command ship is supposed to do, or as the OP's ( 1 less gyro and a DC2) and use as bait...
Yarinor	Posted - 2009.09.05 16:41:00 - [9] Originally by: ArmyOfMe needs a dc imo, and u should also drop a invuln for a point I lold. With those gangmods you really think he's going solo?
VaderDSL Invicta. Advocated Destruction	Posted - 2009.09.05 16:54:00 - [10] Originally by: Yarinor Originally by: ArmyOfMe needs a dc imo, and u should also drop a invuln for a point I lold. With those gangmods you really think he's going solo? You can never have enough points and people hardly ever primary fleet CS' especially with logistics support, all my fleet cs ships have points/webs or some ew/utility. Also debbie harrio what is up with those rigs? They only affect ECM modules and that poor ECCM mod? use the conjunctive LADAR it's the same stats as Tech 2 and much less CPU requirements. The Recon mod also doesn't affect sensor strength, it just affect range of EW which isn't the most effective. The sensor integrity mod is what you want to increase sensor strength.

debbie harrio	Posted - 2009.09.05 16:59:00 - [11] Originally by: VaderDSL [ Also debbie harrio what is up with those rigs? They only affect ECM modules and that poor ECCM mod? use the conjunctive LADAR it's the same stats as Tech 2 and much less CPU requirements. The Recon mod also doesn't affect sensor strength, it just affect range of EW which isn't the most effective. The sensor integrity mod is what you want to increase sensor strength. ah ok, my bad lol, but you get the idea......checks fits, yep you're right, the rest is correct though.
VaderDSL Invicta. Advocated Destruction	Posted - 2009.09.05 17:00:00 - [12] Originally by: debbie harrio Originally by: VaderDSL [ Also debbie harrio what is up with those rigs? They only affect ECM modules and that poor ECCM mod? use the conjunctive LADAR it's the same stats as Tech 2 and much less CPU requirements. The Recon mod also doesn't affect sensor strength, it just affect range of EW which isn't the most effective. The sensor integrity mod is what you want to increase sensor strength. ah ok, my bad lol, but you get the idea......checks fits, yep you're right, the rest is correct though. You did have me worried I thought I'd missed a whole type of rig available
debbie harrio	Posted - 2009.09.05 17:13:00 - [13] Originally by: VaderDSL You did have me worried I thought I'd missed a whole type of rig available yep so the 7 ganglink one is rigless and uses the Information warfare link- sensor integrity, the 8 ganglink though needs the rigs mentioned above but in reality is too expensive unless you have 3 estamel co processors just lying around.
Doll	Posted - 2009.09.06 15:59:00 - [14] Just to prove you don't need 3x Estamel's co-proc to field 8 ganglinks. This one requires the 'Gypsy' KMB-75 implant for +5% CPU, but you should be able to get it plus the co-procs for 500M total. [Claymore, Claymore max ganglink] Dread Guristas Co-Processor Dread Guristas Co-Processor Dread Guristas Co-Processor Setele's Modified Co-Processor Command Processor I Command Processor I Command Processor I Command Processor I Command Processor I 10MN Analog Booster Rockets Skirmish Warfare Link - Rapid Deployment Skirmish Warfare Link - Interdiction Maneuvers Skirmish Warfare Link - Evasive Maneuvers Armored Warfare Link - Rapid Repair Armored Warfare Link - Passive Defense Armored Warfare Link - Damage Control Siege Warfare Link - Shield Efficiency Siege Warfare Link - Shield Harmonizing Capacitor Control Circuit I Ancillary Current Router I According to EFT this fits with 0.67 CPU and 12.25 PG to spare and is cap stable when the AB is turned off.
debbie harrio	Posted - 2009.09.06 16:53:00 - [15] Originally by: Doll Just to prove you don't need 3x Estamel's co-proc to field 8 ganglinks. This one requires the 'Gypsy' KMB-75 implant for +5% CPU, but you should be able to get it plus the co-procs for 500M total. [Claymore, Claymore max ganglink] Dread Guristas Co-Processor Dread Guristas Co-Processor Dread Guristas Co-Processor Setele's Modified Co-Processor Command Processor I Command Processor I Command Processor I Command Processor I Command Processor I 10MN Analog Booster Rockets Skirmish Warfare Link - Rapid Deployment Skirmish Warfare Link - Interdiction Maneuvers Skirmish Warfare Link - Evasive Maneuvers Armored Warfare Link - Rapid Repair Armored Warfare Link - Passive Defense Armored Warfare Link - Damage Control Siege Warfare Link - Shield Efficiency Siege Warfare Link - Shield Harmonizing Capacitor Control Circuit I Ancillary Current Router I According to EFT this fits with 0.67 CPU and 12.25 PG to spare and is cap stable when the AB is turned off. cheers for that, good fit, I personally would fit ECCM ladar II, helps with not getting scanned down.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.