EVE Search - [Official Press Release] Xetic's Stance Towards Celestial Apocalypse

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

[Official Press Release] Xetic's Stance Towards Celestial Apocalypse

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
The End	Posted - 2004.10.23 20:37:00 - [1] Originally by: Ithildin XETIC is torn between two good friends - we have had good relations with Celestial Apocolypse in the past and would like to keep those relations. On the other hand, we have a strong, official relationship with Stain Alliance and cannot stand by and watch Celestial Apocolypse attack them without helping our strong ally. We would really appreciate it if Celestial Apocolypse would stay out of the war zone which stretches across XETIC, Stain and Catch. If Celest discontinue's attacks on SA and ATUK in Stain, XETIC and Catch we will keep them at neutral status but if Celest insists on attacking our ally in our territories or in the Catch warzone we will be forced to set our standings as corporations to a -10 for Celest. This is a step we really do not wish to take. It is a measure of our respect for Celest that we have not done so already. and its official! fight to the death as you know celest arent going to pull out of the area :p btw change the topic. your refering to celestial apocalypse not Horizons
The End	Posted - 2004.10.23 20:37:00 - [2] Originally by: Ithildin XETIC is torn between two good friends - we have had good relations with Celestial Apocolypse in the past and would like to keep those relations. On the other hand, we have a strong, official relationship with Stain Alliance and cannot stand by and watch Celestial Apocolypse attack them without helping our strong ally. We would really appreciate it if Celestial Apocolypse would stay out of the war zone which stretches across XETIC, Stain and Catch. If Celest discontinue's attacks on SA and ATUK in Stain, XETIC and Catch we will keep them at neutral status but if Celest insists on attacking our ally in our territories or in the Catch warzone we will be forced to set our standings as corporations to a -10 for Celest. This is a step we really do not wish to take. It is a measure of our respect for Celest that we have not done so already. and its official! fight to the death as you know celest arent going to pull out of the area :p btw change the topic. your refering to celestial apocalypse not Horizons
The End	Posted - 2004.10.23 21:32:00 - [3] Originally by: Jazz Bo I don't mean to disrespect you, but what exactly is Hegemonic Core's position in Xetic? (I honestly don't know) You are the only Xetic corp we have at -10 because your members have attacked us in fleets together with SA, all other Xetic corps are at neutral or positive standings. Nothing personal, but I think we'd like to hear that same message from some other high ranking Xetic member's mouth as well, before we act accordingly. Hmm. topic says official xetic press release.. click on topic and it shows a person with a xetic banner and it says press release... looks at sig and say xetic diplomat* hmm i wonder what this all means
The End	Posted - 2004.10.23 21:32:00 - [4] Originally by: Jazz Bo I don't mean to disrespect you, but what exactly is Hegemonic Core's position in Xetic? (I honestly don't know) You are the only Xetic corp we have at -10 because your members have attacked us in fleets together with SA, all other Xetic corps are at neutral or positive standings. Nothing personal, but I think we'd like to hear that same message from some other high ranking Xetic member's mouth as well, before we act accordingly. Hmm. topic says official xetic press release.. click on topic and it shows a person with a xetic banner and it says press release... looks at sig and say xetic diplomat* hmm i wonder what this all means
The End	Posted - 2004.10.24 14:17:00 - [5] Edited by: The End on 24/10/2004 14:20:51 Originally by: Casius Maybe SA can clarify something for me why is it that CELES can fly through Catch and fight our enemies without killing noob corps/non sa corps YET SA cannot? We did agree with SA that catch area below u-q is up to them as it is fairy obvious that they will be heading to sa space BUT up to u-q there is no need to kill noob corps/non sa corps that is unfair to ask as SA has been fighting a war with CA for months & months Celest does not live next to an enemy as huge as CA SA must adapt constantly to fight them, whether it be killing n00b alts/ nuetrals that can be an enemy spy or to just simply changing set ups. CA does this too for security reasons. Dont go into other people's space dictating how they should run their policies. that is something us pirates do
The End	Posted - 2004.10.24 14:17:00 - [6] Edited by: The End on 24/10/2004 14:20:51 Originally by: Casius Maybe SA can clarify something for me why is it that CELES can fly through Catch and fight our enemies without killing noob corps/non sa corps YET SA cannot? We did agree with SA that catch area below u-q is up to them as it is fairy obvious that they will be heading to sa space BUT up to u-q there is no need to kill noob corps/non sa corps that is unfair to ask as SA has been fighting a war with CA for months & months Celest does not live next to an enemy as huge as CA SA must adapt constantly to fight them, whether it be killing n00b alts/ nuetrals that can be an enemy spy or to just simply changing set ups. CA does this too for security reasons. Dont go into other people's space dictating how they should run their policies. that is something us pirates do
The End	Posted - 2004.10.24 15:12:00 - [7] Originally by: Casius Originally by: The End Dont go into other people's space dictating how they should run their policies. Catch is not SA space it is disputed space There is less danger from non sa corps and noob corps now due to cloaking devices We will have the problem as sa from noob corps trying to get close to us and a fleet warping to us or spying on us but at the end of the day we dont kill pilots who are not hostile to us Why are u answering for SA anyway? Im trying to elighten you guys in the term called "common sense" Catch region is claimed by SA and CA thus disputed space. however both entities will use put their policies into effect as if they 100% own this. You guys fail to understand this and which is part of the reason you are in the situation that you are in right now... You have no juristiction in other people's space. Did you tell SA that you were coming through before hand an sorted out full details? doesnt look that way. you invaded disputed space without your "friends" prior knowledge or consent and eventually ended up shooting at each other.
The End	Posted - 2004.10.24 15:12:00 - [8] Originally by: Casius Originally by: The End Dont go into other people's space dictating how they should run their policies. Catch is not SA space it is disputed space There is less danger from non sa corps and noob corps now due to cloaking devices We will have the problem as sa from noob corps trying to get close to us and a fleet warping to us or spying on us but at the end of the day we dont kill pilots who are not hostile to us Why are u answering for SA anyway? Im trying to elighten you guys in the term called "common sense" Catch region is claimed by SA and CA thus disputed space. however both entities will use put their policies into effect as if they 100% own this. You guys fail to understand this and which is part of the reason you are in the situation that you are in right now... You have no juristiction in other people's space. Did you tell SA that you were coming through before hand an sorted out full details? doesnt look that way. you invaded disputed space without your "friends" prior knowledge or consent and eventually ended up shooting at each other.
The End	Posted - 2004.10.24 15:40:00 - [9] Originally by: Casius Originally by: The End You have no juristiction in other people's space. Did you tell SA that you were coming through before hand an sorted out full details? Why do u keep saying catch is SA space? We didnt fly through anyone's space we didnt even go as far as u-q Why should we have to ask permission to fly in space that no1 owns? Thats odd come to think of it we did not ask PA permission to go into vale, we did not ask CFS if we could go to a2 do you have a problem with reading? you quoted what i wrote and asked a queston that can easilly be answered if you read the other part of it! jeez.... Catch is disputed space.. SA claims it and so Does CA how hard is that to understand. ----------------------- you use Vale as an example since when does PA own Vale? Fact is you go into other people's space and try to impliment your policies in order to fight people... an example of this is your incident with sa and now xetic.
The End	Posted - 2004.10.24 15:40:00 - [10] Originally by: Casius Originally by: The End You have no juristiction in other people's space. Did you tell SA that you were coming through before hand an sorted out full details? Why do u keep saying catch is SA space? We didnt fly through anyone's space we didnt even go as far as u-q Why should we have to ask permission to fly in space that no1 owns? Thats odd come to think of it we did not ask PA permission to go into vale, we did not ask CFS if we could go to a2 do you have a problem with reading? you quoted what i wrote and asked a queston that can easilly be answered if you read the other part of it! jeez.... Catch is disputed space.. SA claims it and so Does CA how hard is that to understand. ----------------------- you use Vale as an example since when does PA own Vale? Fact is you go into other people's space and try to impliment your policies in order to fight people... an example of this is your incident with sa and now xetic.

The End	Posted - 2004.10.24 15:48:00 - [11] Originally by: Casius That is my point PA owns Vale as much as SA owns Catch horrible point....
The End	Posted - 2004.10.24 15:48:00 - [12] Originally by: Casius That is my point PA owns Vale as much as SA owns Catch horrible point....
The End	Posted - 2004.10.24 16:55:00 - [13] Originally by: Malken Originally by: The End Originally by: Casius That is my point PA owns Vale as much as SA owns Catch horrible point.... very valid point since SA didnt have any claim on catch until after they had shot at our ships. they started to claim it after they had attacked our ships. another unintelligent point. You dont not live in the southern space You are not involved in the war they fight everyday. But you do down into a warzone and think you know everything. just look at the SA guy posting. that is first hand proof of how your logic is flawed. You have a brain now use it. good day
The End	Posted - 2004.10.24 16:55:00 - [14] Originally by: Malken Originally by: The End Originally by: Casius That is my point PA owns Vale as much as SA owns Catch horrible point.... very valid point since SA didnt have any claim on catch until after they had shot at our ships. they started to claim it after they had attacked our ships. another unintelligent point. You dont not live in the southern space You are not involved in the war they fight everyday. But you do down into a warzone and think you know everything. just look at the SA guy posting. that is first hand proof of how your logic is flawed. You have a brain now use it. good day

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.