Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ntrails
Caldari Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.11.22 14:25:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Hanabi Kazan
The opposing FCs should contact each other beforehand to ensure even fights. Only allow pre-approved honour fittings, and dreads must line up at 30 paces with both sides entering siege simultaneously. Any other way is unfair.
God you know nothing - Dreads only fight from long range.
|
Audri Fisher
Caldari VentureCorp Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2009.11.23 20:45:00 -
[62]
I wish to subscribe to your service and/or newsletter.
|
Jugger Takashi
Caldari Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.24 00:31:00 -
[63]
CAOD is without a doubt the worlds most anti-emo communications channel on the net. The mental age is well above 45, and the discussions and threads are both deep and civil.
Therefor I will be awarding the 24th annual "A$$HAT TINFOIL EMORAGEQUIT" award to all and anyone posting in a "OMGWERULEYOUSUCKIWINZ" thread. The award comes with a lifetime supply of dipers.
|
Sephiroth CloneIIV
Gallente Doomheim. Shadow of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2009.11.24 00:59:00 -
[64]
I think NAP (non-aggression pact) is the wrong word to describe NC
NAP is where you are neutral to the other side and have agreement not to wage war against them for mutual benifit, ie Germany and Russia during WW2 (lets divide up Poland). But you are not allies, you donĘt call up the other for help you just agree not to fight one another. On the other hand being allies or being part of an alliance (not eve sense) means that you mutually help each other out in a organized fashion aiding one another. Being that NC have a active and positive relationship, where one helps the other they would be considered part of a alliance, or they are allies.
A big difference exists between a blue you would help and work with, and a blue or neutral who you are just in agreement not try not shoot, which is a step up from having hostile relationships with, and actively waging war.
|
Liam Fremen
Gallente Insurgent New Eden Tribe Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2009.11.24 07:23:00 -
[65]
Originally by: Sephiroth CloneIIV I think NAP (non-aggression pact) is the wrong word to describe NC
NAP is where you are neutral to the other side and have agreement not to wage war against them for mutual benifit, ie Germany and Russia during WW2 (lets divide up Poland). But you are not allies, you donĘt call up the other for help you just agree not to fight one another. On the other hand being allies or being part of an alliance (not eve sense) means that you mutually help each other out in a organized fashion aiding one another. Being that NC have a active and positive relationship, where one helps the other they would be considered part of a alliance, or they are allies.
A big difference exists between a blue you would help and work with, and a blue or neutral who you are just in agreement not try not shoot, which is a step up from having hostile relationships with, and actively waging war.
NAP, Allieds, is all just words, a lot of people in this game try to be the "hardcore dude" saying that they reset everyone, then, as soon as the need arrive they go back fight togheter with "temporary blue".
I don't know why some people "MUST" prove to themself to have not many blues and then as soon as something happens this group run everywhere in eve helping eachoter... is like lieing to yourself.
My alliance have a big list of blues, we fight togheter with them as much as possible against common enemies, what's the point in trying to "fake" that you don't have blues like Goons / NC (they should have resetted eachoter or something, but they keep fighting togheter), or Pandemic legion... how come that when goons are in trouble pandemic legion arrives? (when they are not busy loosing r64 i mean).
Be honest to yourself and to your members, don't try to hide your bluelist, is just worst trying to "cover" the real allieds list when something happen... a lot of drama avoided :)
-- Systematic-Chaos, Executor |
Kage Toshimado
Gallente GK inc. Panda Team
|
Posted - 2009.11.24 19:30:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Sephiroth CloneIIV I think NAP (non-aggression pact) is the wrong word to describe NC
NAP is where you are neutral to the other side and have agreement not to wage war against them for mutual benifit, ie Germany and Russia during WW2 (lets divide up Poland). But you are not allies, you donĘt call up the other for help you just agree not to fight one another.
I like how your example of a NAP was one in which Germany completely though it out the window and invaded anyhow. (ala EVE style)
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |