| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aiko Intaki
Lodizal Shield Tek
Lodizal Conglomerate
   |
Posted - 2009.11.05 13:52:00 -
[31]
I personally chose to read the devs comment as an acknowledgement that CCP failed with respect to level 5 missions and that they'll soon be going away entirely. This will impact me in no way what so ever.
|
Marxam
|
Posted - 2009.11.05 22:38:00 -
[32]
I just think they can put lvl 5s in all secs just maybe nerf em' a bit, maybe not have faction, maybe ballance them so they dont screw u over so much in high sec, then keep them the way they are in low and null sec, they dont all have to be in low and null sec and i didnt say just in high sec only, ALL SECS SHOULD HAVE LVL 5s
|
Trigos Trilobi
Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 00:15:00 -
[33]
 Originally by: Marxam
I just think they can put lvl 5s in all secs just maybe nerf em' a bit, maybe not have faction, maybe ballance them so they dont screw u over so much in high sec, then keep them the way they are in low and null sec, they dont all have to be in low and null sec and i didnt say just in high sec only, ALL SECS SHOULD HAVE LVL 5s
Hisec certainly doesn't need any better paying missions. Even L4s are hilariously out of place there if you consider the amount and size of ships compared to hisec belts, exploration plexes/encounters and anomalies.
|
Verela
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 03:39:00 -
[34]
That or cut high sec lvl 5 missions in half, leave low sec as is, and double 0.0 lvl 5 missions. that way the risk to reward is even. just my thought on the matter.
I may be young, but i will still fight for what i belive in. |
King Rothgar
Death of Virtue
MeatSausage EXPRESS
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 05:47:00 -
[35]
There really shouldn't be high sec lvl5's at all, the risk/reward is just too slanted on reward side. As the system is it isn't too insane because you take a huge LP hit from the fact that they must be created at high sec borders (0.4 sec) and must run them in a group (no carriers in high sec, almost). On top of this those running them in high sec are rejecting all the low sec ones so they'd be lucky to get one lvl5 every 2-3 days of playing.
Still, they just shouldn't be in high sec. Many of us are arguing lvl4's shouldn't even be there or should be but have their rewards nerfed to oblivion. Mining in high sec is sucky, plex's in high sec are sucky, pvp in high sec is sucky, why should missions be any different?
Low sec is not the death trap many seem to think it is. I've lived there the past year, have yet to lose a pve ship in pvp. Lost dozens of pvp ships in pvp but that's expected. Had a lot of fun doing it too. I just don't understand the carebear mentality. Why would you want to kill the exact same npc's over and over and over for 5 years straight without ever trying something else? It just boggles the mind. That kind of play is precisely the reason I don't play wow, L2 or any other MMO atm, every last one of them is a grindfest for the sake of grinding. Eve is different, let's keep it that way.
-----------------------------------------------------
|
Marxam
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 08:05:00 -
[36]
Wrong, the reason ppl do missions is so they can pay for pvp or obatain items that are givin in missoins for pvp, plus why the hell would you take lvl 4s out of high sec????!!!!! see i dont understand why the lol and null sec babies try to nurf all the high sec stuff so they become dominate lol.......
Having lvl 5s would be coo to have in high sec, btr lp missions cause lvl 4s truthfully arnt that great, wtf to those peeps that think they are too much, wtf!? lvl 5s would give mission running corps their next step, btr and way more difficult missions, and also for the low and null sec babies if you wanted go ahead and wardeck a couple carebear corps, catch them being noobs and running missions during a lvl 5 mission
|
wallenbergaren
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 11:56:00 -
[37]
People want level 5 missions in highsec because they want it easy for themselves. Guess what: you can't have it
Low-sec should have better rewards than highsec because there's more risk in low-sec. If you get level 5s in highsec then we'd need level 6s, and then you'd want those too. No.
If you're too afraid to do missions in low-sec then that's your problem, not a problem with the game because lots of people do them in low-sec. People do worse things than that. Ever tried plexing? Heard of escalations? 
|
Marxam
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 07:53:00 -
[38]
LOL, who hasn't heard of plexing, and no they wouldn't have to make lvl 6s for you whiners just make the rewards btr duh.
|
Muad' Dib
Gallente
Beyond Divinity Inc
Beyond Virginity
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 08:03:00 -
[39]
You can't treat lvl 5's as lvl 4's, can't view them clumped together because lvl 4's are very very very easy. Lvl 5's do not scale with 'better equipment' but with better tactics and general knowledge. Not to mention that local tank in them is almost always irrelevant.
---
I smack just for myself.
Allow faction cap boosters to be traded via normal market ! |
Marxam
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 23:23:00 -
[40]
YES I KNOW HOW A LVL 5 IS PLAYED CAUSE I HAVE RUN LVL 5 IN LOW SEC AND SOME IN NULL. yes they are very difficult and yes i know they require tactics im not a high sec carebear lol im like you peeps just sayin i think itd be cool to have them in high sec so you dont have to worry about probers for once, just saying it would be nice. a lot of corps up here can get a chance to start maybe funding operations to run these lvl 5s, corps would make lots of money players in that corp would learn tactics if they haven't alrdy from more experienced players running the mission.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |