|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Fiat Money
The Privy Council
Majesta Empire
   |
Posted - 2011.03.25 23:25:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Akita T
Edited by: Akita T on 25/03/2011 01:33:07
If you are to believe what several people in NC are saying, most NC tech moon owners don't give a damn about long-term marketability, they want whatever ISK they can get their hands on "RIGHT NOW", and therefore can't sometimes even be bothered to put up sell orders, instead dumping it on buy orders the first chance they get to move it to Jita.
What you see happening on the market certainly supports that claim.
If there's any stockpiling going on, it's from a very small portion of tech moon holders. Might as well not even exist for practical purposes, if true.
So, you know, basically the exact opposite of what you said, but still just a hypothesis.
On alliance and corp level there is no need for stockpiling due to the fact cash is always needed asap.
Also selling Tech directly is a waste of money, and dumping it on buy orders is a no-go. Most Tech portions are reacted and put on the market, so Tech gets bullish due to low market input and reactions builds up more supply.
Current issue is that Tech is rising too fast and reactions can't follow in price.
So I guess it's just pure speculation of private Tech holders causing the current up and downs.
Just take the time for the reactions (Nanos, Fullerides) to rise in price and Tech will follow soon... 
|
Fiat Money
The Privy Council
Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 00:05:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Fiat Money on 26/03/2011 00:06:50
Originally by: Akita T
Edited by: Akita T on 25/03/2011 23:32:35
Nanotransistors and Fullerides remained the most profitable reactions to run out of all possible reactions for most of the duration of the Technetium climb those past few months.
So what exactly are you trying to say anyway ?
I don't disagree with you here.
What's the current Tech price to break even current Nano reaction? It's about 120k. So that's the psychological barrier we reached last days.
|
Fiat Money
The Privy Council
Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2011.04.25 17:02:00 -
[3]
CCP doesn't like PASSIVE revenue sources, but on the other hand with the latest anomaly changes (see http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=883) they revealed there intention to shift null sec back into a space of conflicts. And conflicts are made by imbalances such as Tech distribution. Current DRF invasion is driven by both anomaly changes (less valuable space) and rising tech prices.
As tech moons are changing hands constantly in Vale / Geminate within the conflict supply is kind of shrinked. So from my POV Tech / Nanos / Fullerides will keep their uptrend.
As for the Supercap statements:
Yes some NC alliances do Supercapital SRP to support their use for alliance combat purposes and to compensate bounces in private wallets. Tech helps a lot but isn't the main source for building supers. Private wallet plays a much more important role here.
And the NC isn't a unbeatable god as you are highlighting, but just humans as you and me, driven by morale in combat. 
Current conflict situation is ofc challenging, but not severe.
|
Fiat Money
The Privy Council
Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2011.05.08 18:55:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Nomad III
Edited by: Nomad III on 06/05/2011 10:20:54
The DRF controlls Vale. Until they have full control over the north, they won't raise a cartell. I don't believe the DRF make a BFF v2.0, so long term: SELL
NC didn't establish a cartell either.
|
Fiat Money
The Privy Council
Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2011.05.09 15:09:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Kesper North
Haha! How little you know.
We tried, during my administration of Majesta.
And you know what happened? Prices went above our target price, and we stopped bothering.
Yeah, I know ... I would emphasize the word "tried". For how long was it ... 2 - 3 month?
I'm becoming old... 
|
Fiat Money
The Privy Council
Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 22:55:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Gnulpie
Originally by: Khanid Voltar
CCP are planning to do something about 0.0 this winter. That's all her post (and the dev blog she linked) said.
The devblog says in pretty clear words that they are looking for more ways of conflict/pvp than just the sov-system. Sources of high income are most certainly one way to fuel conflicts.
That's the point.
I also don't see any indication for Tech nerv in the blog statement.
|
Fiat Money
The Privy Council
Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 23:59:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Fiat Money on 11/05/2011 00:00:09
Ah, I see. It really will be a big topic...
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
No disagreement. Better resource distribution, more pvp goals etc.
Does this mean that you might take a look at current moon goo locations and/or T2 production pipelines?
-Liang
Yes, those are most definately prime candidates. Things like trit and datacore supplies, production slots etc.
source: Linkage
|
|
|
| |
|