| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 36 post(s) |
L'Artest
   |
Posted - 2009.11.07 00:10:00 -
[1]
Well, guess we'll just hold sov in r64 and station systems then. No one else is going to want any other systems beside those.
|
L'Artest
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 00:58:00 -
[2]
Edited by: L''Artest on 07/11/2009 00:58:19
Exodus: Empire Edition
|
L'Artest
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 14:20:00 -
[3]
Edited by: L''Artest on 07/11/2009 14:20:33
 Originally by: CCP Soundwave
When we have 10 anomalies, that will be enough for 10 people. I wrote this earlier in the thread too.
When you scan for an anomaly, that anomaly will be based on your upgrade tier, making a specific number superflous (since the tier collectively replaces that).
You will not be told if anyone is in it, that is not something I would prefer to see implemented.
When you run the highest tiers of anomalies, you will financially be on par with Motsu.
I love you man but that's really disapointing. Paying isk to make money on par with level 4 missions? That's not being on par at all.
|
L'Artest
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 14:34:00 -
[4]
It's no fun when your opponent goes home because they don't have the money to hold ground instead of crushing them yourself~
|
L'Artest
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 14:40:00 -
[5]
I honestly don't like that it's even considerable not to hold sov in station systems because it would cost too much. Monthly payments this high don't favour small Alliances at all. I can imagine all the logistics departments (I know ours is) are currently figuring out if its even worth it to keep their jump bridge networks up and running when the space is worthless.
|
L'Artest
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 14:50:00 -
[6]
Also Soundwave, in reguard to eliminating fuel costs, Goonswarm currently shells out about 50b per month for fuel for our towers. To hold our current space we're quadrupling this value.
What I'm saying is eve mail me for prices to rent space in Delve
|
L'Artest
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 14:56:00 -
[7]
Edited by: L''Artest on 07/11/2009 14:56:52
Originally by: Rainus Max
words
Unfortunatly giving a discount for holding more space is the opposite of what CCP seems to want. A constellation bonus would be great, but I'm still curious as to what "Sov 5" will do exactly.
Originally by: RedClaws
Personally I don't really like the "lvl 4 agents in 0.0" idea. It's just too ...fake.
Imo, the devs should not make 0.0 income "on par with lvl 4".
Add the risk of hostile players, the cost of the system + upgrades + losses over wars + expanding the alliance and THAT should be your isk/hr.
Disapointed atm but I believe CCP will adjust the values enough before release to make it an alternative to lvl 4's.
Why not? More risk, more reward. You should know this.
|
L'Artest
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 20:08:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Kuzim Blaky'all
sup sup,
a dawg talk to a dawg an him explain to a dawg that recyclien industry in mad trubblz.
dig it, recyclien a rouff gig to get into, an now if a dawg aint got so much places to go, its gonan be even harder.
cant sustaine more than maybe a few recycliars, an top dawgs want to make it so a dawg cant even see whats goin on?
i been playing eve side since i can remember
sad to see it burn in the start of december
for christmas, a dawg just wanted black magic
instead you givein dawgs a piece of black coal? tragic.
a dawg what a buff to recyclien goods
in places him call his neighborhoods
but you aint doing nothin for a posse who thrive
(even tho we've been a thousan tims brought alive)
looks like re-re gonan take a final nap
kuz da ccp posse, them dont give a crap
a dawg cant afford to run him posse
if him gonan be forced to be runnin at a loss, see
hope to see a posse post December come an go,
but da wind of change be blowin, so dawg, i dunno.
no dawg,
say it aint so dawg
otherwise its time fo da re-re to never again log.
this cant be quoted enough
|
L'Artest
|
Posted - 2009.11.08 16:53:00 -
[9]
Dominion was about improving the lifestyles of those in 0.0 and about making it so smaller groups could get into 0.0
There will be plenty of empty space, but who will want it? No one. Is it easier, safer, and more profitable to run L4s in highsec where you are mostly safe? Yes.
0.0 should be more profitable. We risk more, we earn more. Is it that hard to understand?
|
L'Artest
|
Posted - 2009.11.08 17:03:00 -
[10]
(At least) Double rat bounties. Problem solved
holy balls that was hard
|
L'Artest
|
Posted - 2009.11.08 21:40:00 -
[11]
Edited by: L''Artest on 08/11/2009 21:41:24
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Originally by: Hertford
I like how Jade spews forth a veritable wall of words that is just a rehash of CCPs aims without mentioning any of the issues brought up in the rest of this thread. But then this is a terrible thread; Can you blame Jade for not reading it?
To be brutal. This thread is pretty much the same 20 people repeating "waaa-waaaa-it's-not-fair-waaaaa!" again and again and again interspaced with some more spam. As I said earlier - you guys are missing the point with Dominion. Its not about preserving the status quo its about blowing the status quo into a thousand little pieces and seeing what happens to 0.0 without an omni cyno-jammer security blanket for its current occupants.
You will need to struggle to pay upkeeps in Dominion. Thats the point. You will need to retract the size of your claims and focus to keep your head above water. You will need to adapt or die and if you can't survive there will be other players and player entities that can.
The status quo is boring and deeply unattractive. Eve 0.0 endgame needs to change.
Not sure how I can explain that any better for you.
Great, now read the thread and realize that there have been some great suggestions on how to fix it, and that CCP agreed with a pile of them and is probably going over what they are doing wrong.
Your no content trolling isn't appreciated here. Do you even know what 0.0 is like now? Maybe you should experience it first before criticizing it.
Also regarding your post on this page, everything in this game costs money. Not everyone trade e-sex for items here.
|
| |
|