|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

ChaeDoc II
Gallente DEAD RABBITS SOCIETY Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2009.11.21 11:59:00 -
[1]
Originally by: nunun GF guys i miss it but at least we Win it So IT Play in low sec ur not ready for 0.0 guys GL all .... and fun what evry one looking for ... nice Job guy Well Done PL/Goon/SOT/CH/Razor great job Lads :) ....

lol. I'm no fan of IT, i've nothing to base an opinion on so i'll remain neutral, but i do find it humourous that after it took the combined might of 5 alliances to win a battle against their 1 alliance you decide they're not ready for 0.0.
Congrats of course but please, perspective.
|

ChaeDoc II
Gallente DEAD RABBITS SOCIETY Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2009.11.21 16:58:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Zybourne Clark
Originally by: ChaeDoc II
lol. I'm no fan of IT, i've nothing to base an opinion on so i'll remain neutral, but i do find it humourous that after it took the combined might of 5 alliances to win a battle against their 1 alliance you decide they're not ready for 0.0.
Congrats of course but please, perspective.
I, too, am shocked that they didn't have the common decency to tell friends not to come. IMHO, PL and Goonswarm should have been cynoing out dreads to match each IT dread they killed.
Wow, congratulations there for that completely ******ed interpretation of what i actually said. That must have taken some effort. Or maybe not.
|

ChaeDoc II
Gallente DEAD RABBITS SOCIETY Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2009.11.23 01:26:00 -
[3]
Arn't the numbers irrelevant in determining who 'won'?
PL and Co's objective was obviously to stop any further IT progress. IT made progress even though they lost more caps than PL and Co.
Surely the determining factor as to who "won" is whose objectives were completed and whose were not. Excuse me if that is a little simplistic but you lot are the ones saying 120 > 70 therefore PL & co > IT.
In the Vietnam War the US and allies killed more than 3 times the number of Vietnamese than they lost themselves but i dont hear anyone saying the US won that war.
State objectives and if they were completed or not. Then the rest of us will decide for ourselves whether a) we believe you, and b) who we think won. Unless you two groups of children would like to continue your "We won!", "No, we won!" arguement.
|
|
|
|