| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Manivald Kostaja
   |
Posted - 2009.12.07 18:15:00 -
[1]
According to some random csm member some ccp dev had proposet a lowsec boost:
Prevent all fighting at gates or stations! It would be a nice fix because people don't go to lowsec because of gatecamps.
Discuss.
|
Dirk Magnum
Royal Hiigaran Navy
Maru Ka'ge
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 18:19:00 -
[2]
lol.
|
Olthel
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 18:20:00 -
[3]
This will be dealt with.
also
Fail troll is fail.
|
Intense Thinker
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 18:21:00 -
[4]
I have 17m can I help?
 Originally by: Hamshoe
Don't **** down my back and tell me it's raining.
|
Lady Karma
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 18:21:00 -
[5]
According to some random ccp moderator, some ccp dev proposet a forum boost:
Prevent all posting from idiots and trolls! It would be a nice fix because people don't have to scroll past tons of useless crap
Discuss
|
Mr Opinions
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 18:30:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Manivald Kostaja
According to some random csm member some ccp dev had proposet a lowsec boost:
Prevent all fighting at gates or stations! It would be a nice fix because people don't go to lowsec because of gatecamps.
Discuss.
lol, well it would end complaints about low-sec docking games 
|
Arec Bardwin
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 18:39:00 -
[7]
Locked. No content.
|
Captian Conrad
Minmatar
Empyrean Warriors
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 18:42:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Arec Bardwin
Locked. No content.
Hey Arec, imma let you finish. But CCP do the best thread locks
|
Alex Raptos
Caldari
Phoenix Rising.
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 18:43:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Arec Bardwin
Locked. No content.
Warning incoming.
Originally by: Dirk Magnum
I've become gay for Mark Harmon despite my initial reservations about the show NCIS but nobody will ever know
|
Abrazzar
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 18:58:00 -
[10]
I heard they'll add faction police protection to lowsec, if you have enough positive security rating (2 for 0.4, 3 for 0.3, etc.) *and* higher standing with the sovereign faction of the system than the pilots attacking you.
This will of course not help with FW as those parties are at a war and wouldn't even call CONCORD in highsec, but it'll protect the FWers from random unaffiliated pirates in their own turf. 
--------
|
5pinDizzy
Amarr
Pillow Fighters Inc
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 18:58:00 -
[11]
About as likely to happen as warp core stabilisers losing their penalties.
|
Lady Spank
Amarr
Sekret Kool Klubb
HYDRA RELOADED
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 19:03:00 -
[12]
Where are these secs boots?
Originally by: Tirus Sinobi
Your response has set your intelligence barrier so low that anything you post from here on that breaches it, will have to be considered posted by somebody else.
|
Red Thunder
tr0pa de elite
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 19:04:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Manivald Kostaja
According to some random csm member some ccp dev had proposet a lowsec boost:
Prevent all fighting at gates or stations! It would be a nice fix because people don't go to lowsec because of gatecamps.
Discuss.
actually not a bad idea tbh
|
Zeba
Minmatar
Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 19:04:00 -
[14]
I herd gate gunz waz gittin titan dd's fer christmas.
Originally by: CCP Casqade
The forum does not represent anywhere close to 90% of the users. In fact it represents a clear minority of them.
|
Captian Conrad
Minmatar
Empyrean Warriors
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 19:08:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Zeba
I herd gate gunz waz gittin titan dd's fer christmas.
I also heard CONCORDE is setting up an alliance and pushing into lowsec, to weed out the weak and pop everyone with under -5 sec 
|
JitaPriceChecker2
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 19:09:00 -
[16]
It aint such a bad idea .
You could still fight at planets,moons,belts,missions,anomalies,plexes.
You could still wardec to be able to fight at stations,gates.
Suicide ganking still possibile i belive.
|
Kerfira
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 19:45:00 -
[17]
It's actually a good idea that would restore the balance between high-sec, low-sec and 0.0.
In High-sec you'd be secure (apart from suicide ganks).
In low-sec, your TRAVEL would be secure, but your activities not.
In 0.0, you'd not be secure!
It would remove the choke-points of low-sec, and enable newbies to get their feet a little wet instead of getting thrown into the shark-pool when they first set their feet in low-sec.
It would also mean that cheap gate gankers would be gotten rid of, and only real pirates would be successful.
All in all, a very good idea!
Originally by: CCP Wrangler
EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world.
|
Doom Viper
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 19:51:00 -
[18]
Posting in a "locked" thread. Oh and I disagree with OP troll
|
Captain Tardbar
State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 20:15:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Doom Viper
Posting in a "locked" thread. Oh and I disagree with OP troll
Its a legitimate idea actually.
|
Coylter
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 20:22:00 -
[20]
Good idea it would be a more gradual way to zero space. They could also make concord gradually weaker the lower you go.
|
Captian Conrad
Minmatar
Empyrean Warriors
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 21:10:00 -
[21]
At first i saw a troll, and the more i think about it...the more it makes sence...mabye 0.1-0.2 still can have gatecamps so its not just 0.0 alliances
|
Mr Opinions
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 22:50:00 -
[22]
I've been speculating about how lowsec would evolve if you actually did this.
At first, you'd get a LOT more transit across lowsec and the stations there would get a lot more use; the population would definitely increase. That would start to spill over into people actually trying to do stuff there simply because they are in the vicinity, especially if this was accompanied by a boost in the value of lowsec income sources. Piracy becomes more involved, but the number of potential targets increases.
|
Professor Tarantula
Hedion University
|
Posted - 2009.12.07 23:09:00 -
[23]
Gate camping is most pathetic form of "PvP" i've ever witnessed in a MMO. It's about time CCP made those mouth breathers work for their kills.
My deepest sympathies.
Prof. Tarantula, Esq. |
Cory Sopapilla
Minmatar
Kiroshi Group
|
Posted - 2009.12.08 16:40:00 -
[24]
It would bring about some very creative locations for warp bubbles between stations and gates ;)
|
Insa Rexion
Minmatar
CTRL-Q
|
Posted - 2009.12.08 16:42:00 -
[25]
Edited by: Insa Rexion on 08/12/2009 16:42:32
Originally by: Manivald Kostaja
According to some random csm member some ccp dev had proposet a lowsec boost:
Prevent all fighting at gates or stations! It would be a nice fix because people don't go to lowsec because of gatecamps.
Discuss.
Complete troll or just plain ignorant, but heh, if they did that, there would be even less ppl there than there are now.... think you can figure out why ?
--------------------------------------------
well mannered ****ole |
|
CCP StevieSG
|
Posted - 2009.12.08 16:49:00 -
[26]
Moved to Features and Ideas from EVE General.
|
|
Wacktopia
Dark Side Of The Womb
|
Posted - 2009.12.08 16:59:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Kerfira
In High-sec you'd be secure (apart from suicide ganks).
No, hi-sec is not secure. You can get war-dec'd, can-flipped, scammed, suicided, robbed (ninja). CONCORD are there to punish players who break the law but players can cause a lot of greif without breaking any laws. :)
Originally by: Kerfira
In low-sec, your TRAVEL would be secure, but your activities not.
Travel is an activity. Please explain why you think that low-sec missioners, miners and ratters should not be 'secure' but travelling traders should be?
Originally by: Kerfira
In 0.0, you'd not be secure!
Actually, you can be pretty secure in null-sec. If you're in a decent alliance or friends of one or in a NRDS area then you are probably safer than low-sec.
Originally by: Kerfira
It would remove the choke-points of low-sec, and enable newbies to get their feet a little wet instead of getting thrown into the shark-pool when they first set their feet in low-sec.
EVE is supposed to be one big shark pool. Not some hello-kitty, penguin-island, kinder-garden. Ok, when you're new you need to do the tutorials and learn fast but after that, you're on your own in the nasty, dark universe.
Originally by: Kerfira
It would also mean that cheap gate gankers would be gotten rid of, and only real pirates would be successful.
Last time I got attacked on gate or station in low-sec it was by someone in a T3 or a Dread. In fact, I think they lost one recently.
Originally by: Kerfira
All in all, a very good idea!
All in all, an ill-thought-through idea.
----------------------
They're angry there was damage done to their ship. It's not difficult! |
Koyama Ise
Caldari
Equestrian Knight Order of Lolicon
|
Posted - 2009.12.08 17:07:00 -
[28]
This thread is now about China.
Discuss.
______________________________
"Well done, Fisher. Now we need to find out what's inside."
"I could open it."
"...and you could play Russian Roulette with a clip-loading pistol." |
Aalu Aullard
|
Posted - 2009.12.08 18:05:00 -
[29]
IŠve never really understood why faction navies patrol only in high sec
Isnt the armies/navies job to patrol and secure the borders of any nation, or in Eve case, low sec?
|
Ancy Denaries
Forever Unbound
|
Posted - 2009.12.08 18:46:00 -
[30]
Sex boost?
----
The Demigodess with a Conscience - An EVE IC Blog
Personal Killboard |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |