| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Damark
   |
Posted - 2010.01.16 00:13:00 -
[1]
Hello,
We in the wormhole community have been mulling over this idea for a while now and I'm sure K-space miners (and likely pirates too :p) will love it as much as I and everyone else have loved the idea. So here it goes:
Develop an ORE Faction control tower (small, med and large...or at least large) with bonuses to either:
1. Refine wastage percentage
or
2. CPU and Power Requirements of refinery array equipment
Now obviously there has to be some sort of downside to being so industry awesome. I propose that the towers just have no bonuses to defenses like normal towers do. But this is open to discussion of course.
This would provide the needed industry love CCP needs to give us AND! a nice fat juicy target for harvesting care bear tears for those pirate-y types :D
|
Marcus Eurealus
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 00:19:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Marcus Eurealus on 16/01/2010 00:20:23
Edited by: Marcus Eurealus on 16/01/2010 00:19:47
This would Def Be Interesting ....
a .25% bonus ... to max out the refining
|
IamBeastx
Redcoats
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 00:24:00 -
[3]
Anything that possibly increases wormhole traffic/life is good for my killboard.
C5's are too empty imo
http://iambeastx.mybrute.com |
Song Li
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 00:52:00 -
[4]
I like the idea.
The issue I see is that CCP may want to keep refining levels low to force players to decide to take the lower return on refining or go back to a stationed system. Similar to the decision to give the Rorqual the ability to compress ore instead of refine.
|
Damark
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 01:14:00 -
[5]
Perhaps maybe give the ORE tower the ability to compress? I'd be content with that as well.
|
Marcus Eurealus
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 01:22:00 -
[6]
 well I did not want to increse traffic, I like my "Fairly" quiet piece of Eve ...
I just wanted a refining bonus ... i get enough random traffic in the C3 I currently occupie ... an exit opens mostly to low sec, occationally to Null Sec and once every couple weeks to a high sec exit ... with one exit bouncing around between more Locus Space and the occational Null Space Exit ...
|
Layla
Redcoats
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 05:53:00 -
[7]
I like the idea also.
Altho I think a more substantial review of all things "Wormhole" would be useful with the opportunity for those of us that have spent any length of time in WHs to contribute these and other ideas.
|
Don Pellegrino
Helljumpers
Aeternus.
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 06:33:00 -
[8]
Numbers need tweaking, but good idea.
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 09:25:00 -
[9]
I like this idea.
|
H3llHound
Blacksteel Mining and Manufacturing
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 10:40:00 -
[10]
Interesting idea. I like it. Maybe boost the max refinery effeciency to 90% on the intensive array. To have a middle ground between normal pos and outpost/npc refinery.
__________________________________________________
We are Recruiting |
|
|
Comminor
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 11:06:00 -
[11]
nice idea
|
Drake Draconis
Shadow Cadre
Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 15:28:00 -
[12]
Supported so long as its balanced.
=========================
CEO of Shadow Cadre
http://www.shadowcadre.com
========================= |
Chronos Chi
Redcoats
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 16:51:00 -
[13]
as a worm hole resident i fully endorse this product
chronos
|
Orhan
Hatori Mining Services
The Unforgiving.
|
Posted - 2010.01.16 19:57:00 -
[14]
Like the idea. Supported
|
Lehaul
|
Posted - 2010.01.17 10:11:00 -
[15]
I like this idea....
Although the two things I see missing from pos life are better refine rates & the ability to repackage. |
destinationunreachable
Hello Kitty Fanclub
|
Posted - 2010.01.17 12:27:00 -
[16]
sounds like a good idea. Alternatively a ORE faction refinery array would be fine as well, I guess...
|
XXSketchxx
Remote Soviet Industries
|
Posted - 2010.01.18 00:23:00 -
[17]
Whatever it takes to get at around 90% refine at a POS.
Supported.
_____________________________________________
-Sketch, Certified Pharmacist
Need a Boost?
|
Xarhariel
|
Posted - 2010.01.18 05:03:00 -
[18]
I like the idea
|
GIGAR
Domini Umbrus
DEFI4NT
|
Posted - 2010.01.18 12:26:00 -
[19]
Great idea, this would definitely be nice!
|
Shuckstar
Hauling hogs
|
Posted - 2010.01.18 12:33:00 -
[20]
Nice idea
You are going to fast! Wait five minutes and try again. |
|
|
Kayakaue
|
Posted - 2010.01.18 12:57:00 -
[21]
NICE IDEA
|
Kyle Cataclysm
Blue.
|
Posted - 2010.01.18 17:54:00 -
[22]
Thumbs up.
|
Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises
Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2010.01.18 21:55:00 -
[23]
Edited by: Bagehi on 18/01/2010 21:56:47
 Originally by: Song Li
I like the idea.
The issue I see is that CCP may want to keep refining levels low to force players to decide to take the lower return on refining or go back to a stationed system. Similar to the decision to give the Rorqual the ability to compress ore instead of refine.
I think the concept of WH space runs contrary to the "haul to a station" alternative. ORE towers with refining bonuses make sense.
Of course, with the Dominion changes, I think the bonuses for towers need to be rethought in general, as the "place holder" function that was their primary use is no more.
Fix Local |
Klyria
Agent-Orange
|
Posted - 2010.01.19 00:19:00 -
[24]
I remembering talking about this and wanting it, so yeah supported.
|
Herschel Yamamoto
Agent-Orange
|
Posted - 2010.01.19 00:33:00 -
[25]
As long as these don't even come close to obsoleting Minmatar outposts, I can support it. Might be interesting.
|
Voddick
|
Posted - 2010.01.19 04:26:00 -
[26]
Good Idea
|
Kulani
Cobalt Dragon Exploration Company
|
Posted - 2010.01.19 18:21:00 -
[27]
Wonderful idea! Maybe make it so they can only be anchored in a WH class <= C4, so that rorqs wouldn't get shafted in C5/6's.
|
XXSketchxx
Gallente
Remote Soviet Industries
|
Posted - 2010.01.19 21:53:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Kulani
Wonderful idea! Maybe make it so they can only be anchored in a WH class <= C4, so that rorqs wouldn't get shafted in C5/6's.
That would be saying its wormhole specific. How is that fair to k-space dwellers?
_____________________________________________
-Sketch, Certified Pharmacist
Need a Boost?
|
Echo Mande
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 01:42:00 -
[29]
Supported, including a drop in refinery loss/reduction in refinery CPU.
However, it might also be an idea to think about a faction ore compression POS module that essentially duplicates the Rorqual's ore compression abilities. To balance this this module would have to have a fairly hefty CPU/grid use and only provide 1-2 slots. Such a compression module is aimed squarely at WH miners but might also find use in 0.0 and even Empire, reducing transport overhead.
|
Quivering Palm
SI Radio
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 19:27:00 -
[30]
well... I'd say that ORE created the Rorqual so they wouldn't have to build a POS... Although I believe that Rorquals would be more efficient in deep space assignments than this tower, however this POS isn't a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |