EVE Search - Petition to CCP to disolve the ISD team

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Petition to CCP to disolve the ISD team

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] [12]:: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)
Cutter Isaacson Peace N Quiet 632	Posted - 2012.06.26 15:44:00 - [331] - Quote This got off topic a little I think. Perhaps it's time to get back on it? Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue.
Goremageddon Box Guerrilla Flotilla 210	Posted - 2012.06.26 15:49:00 - [332] - Quote Cutter Isaacson wrote: This got off topic a little I think. Perhaps it's time to get back on it? thats what she said?
Ghost Xray Hedion University Amarr Empire 102	Posted - 2012.06.26 15:55:00 - [333] - Quote Din'stalor Alaric wrote: I took the liberty of highlighting and underlining the part of your spluge of rubbish which i found most interesting. Now, since its page 8 and no one has said it, Can i haz your stuff? Actually, I already took care of this: Ghost Xray wrote: I enjoy watching the nerdrage and the fists of [EvE] God crushing every malcontents soul. This isn't a democracy. This is a dictatorship. You don't get to vote by committee how things are to be run around here. If you quit because of this, then I'll give you the proper goodbye salute o7 and say "about your stuff, yeah, you know what I want". Get out old forum sperglings.
Morganta Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia 1648	Posted - 2012.06.26 15:56:00 - [334] - Quote Delen Ormand wrote: Vaju Enki wrote: Balak Ragnek wrote: -1 We need more ISD members on this forum with more robust deletions and threads locked. The forums are garbage and I'm bored of having to wade through the junk and drivel spouted by so many people in order to get to the useful info. ISD keep up the good work Some people love the EvE Online forums, it is (was?) part of the EvE Online experience. Transforming the forums in some type "blizzard style" forum is a very bad choice, it's boring, bland and goes against the EvE Online culture. Are you seriously saying that the only thing that makes a forum interesting is the shitposting? Seriously? welp, when the entire forum is as compartmentalized as EVE-O the only thing you can do in GD is make posts with no approved home or what we generally see here, meta-gaming, theory-crafting and general banter. lets not even go into what the outside perception of the title "general discussion" is "You were the chosen one Anakin, you were supposed to bring order to the galaxy, not destroy it!" -Obi Wan (Ben) Kenobi -á
Jade Constantine Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction 2540	Posted - 2012.06.26 16:01:00 - [335] - Quote Khanh'rhh wrote: You're claiming this was to help large alliances yet the question you are refusing to answer is whether large or small alliances had it worse to begin with, which is laughably obtuse. Clearly large alliances were worse off in 1.0 than 1.1. I'm not really sure what point you are making. The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedomInferno Wardecs - Shoot Goons for ~~FREE~~ $300,000 dollars :(-á
Ituhata The Scope Gallente Federation 30	Posted - 2012.06.26 16:04:00 - [336] - Quote Unfortunately I didn't actually see what happened, but it sounds like a thread was posted, replies were made that devolved into trolling, and the entire thread was locked wholesale without the OP getting an answer. Then a repeating feedback loop was created as subsequent threads were made to get that answer and of course, threads were locked for duplication and/or discussing moderation (first thread locked, continued BZZT! discussing moderation, etc.) What probably should have happened was the moderators should have taken the time to remove or edit the offensive posts and make a post reminding people to politely stay on topic. Afterwards if the thread continued on course it could be locked wholesale and the forum users would not have much of a leg to stand on if they opposed the action. I also feel there is a language barrier issue and the 'personal attack' angle of locking or editing posts is, quite frankly, used too liberally. Combined with discussing forum moderation, it seems to be quite an effective way to curb any open criticism whatsoever, which I feel is a bad precedent to set. Having individuals file petitions which in all likelihood will be ignored individually rather than having a community discussion is alot like Walmart being able to fight discrimination cases on a case by case basis rather than a class action basis. The results are the same, anyway....but that is purely my opinion on the matter.
Atrocitus Parallax Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 14	Posted - 2012.06.26 16:08:00 - [337] - Quote "Our goal is to provide a warm, friendly atmosphere for the EVE community on our forums and we are constantly working towards this goal - even though we sometimes have to work a little harder" I appreciate your goal but warm and friendly and anonymous internet forums are two things that rarely coincide. Perhaps if we were all forced to post with our highest skilled characters it might improve slightly.
Lapine Davion Outer Ring Applied Logistics 492	Posted - 2012.06.26 16:08:00 - [338] - Quote Jade Constantine wrote: Khanh'rhh wrote: You're claiming this was to help large alliances yet the question you are refusing to answer is whether large or small alliances had it worse to begin with, which is laughably obtuse. Clearly large alliances were worse off in 1.0 than 1.1. I'm not really sure what point you are making. But how were they worse off? It's easy to just say "Oh, well they were worse off." without having to back anything up. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Verone Veto Corp 277	Posted - 2012.06.26 16:15:00 - [339] - Quote Jesus christ I agree with Jade Constantine Eve has become too full of Something Awful culture these last few years. On a more serious note, I love the volunteer teams. They're an awesome idea, and generally they're full of good, skilled and helpful people. One thing I'll get behind is for sure is the re-introduction of the Eris Discordia. ERIS MY LUB!, WHERE ART THOU??!! It has been so many years since the fuchsia laz0rs of thine holy pink Revelation hath cleansed the forums of such tomfoolery. Verone CEO & Executor Veto Corp WWW.VETO-CORP.COM
Din Chao Seraphim Initiative 15	Posted - 2012.06.26 16:25:00 - [340] - Quote ISD Athechu wrote: We are players of the same game as you and we enjoy it like you. The difference is that we have decided to contribute our time to the community that makes EVE so great. Pomposity noted. You're just better than us. Got it.

CCP Navigator C C P C C P Alliance 1249	Posted - 2012.06.26 16:44:00 - [341] - Quote Please post any comments regarding ISD and the future of moderation to this thread. Locked. CCP Navigator -Community Manager


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] [12]:: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.