| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
justin666
   |
Posted - 2010.02.09 15:32:00 -
[1]
Edited by: justin666 on 09/02/2010 15:32:09
Edited by: justin666 on 09/02/2010 15:31:56
this is a message for ccp but i dont now how well you can code sisi but this is just a suggestion for all the rule breaks
why not edit concord a little in the fd system to shoot any who agresses any one who is not present in any of the marked becons? it would stop fighting outside station for sure but it wont stop caps in ffa1 though but yeah just a suggestion
|
LastPride
Caldari
Xupa Xups Corp
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 16:25:00 -
[2]
its kinda sad how ppl can't respect simple rules wihout someone enforcing then, now that i think about it its truly pathetic ... lol
|
justin666
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 21:16:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: LastPride
its kinda sad how ppl can't respect simple rules wihout someone enforcing then, now that i think about it its truly pathetic ... lol
yep wich is why im with the idea of special sisi concord to punish the kids :)
|
Amneamnius
|
Posted - 2010.02.10 02:22:00 -
[4]
wont happen. too much work; and it would severely change the mechanics for testing in fd-mlj.
A) 0.0 nodes do not use the script that tracks agressive actions in high sec.
B) modifying that script to ignore 350km of a beacon, certain ship types, and all the special cases and people that want to fight in safespots or moons, it's completely illogical to waste dev time.
so no. things will go as they are now. some rules will be broken, people will get caught, others will get a way with it.
The testing gets done. If any real testing like the mass-testing coming up is inhibited by rule breaking, the punishment will be more drastic.
|
Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
|
Posted - 2010.02.10 10:56:00 -
[5]
Why not just UberBuff the station guns?
Simply give them a x10 damage mod or something.
------------------------
Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer
"I've got a couple of Strippers on my ship... and they just love to dance!"
------------------------ |
Ancy Denaries
The Confederate Navy
|
Posted - 2010.02.10 11:59:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Ancy Denaries on 10/02/2010 12:01:24
Or permaban (not just until next mirror) offenders. They're not helping anyway. Hell, I could even go so far as to extend the permaban to TQ, only reducing it to a couple of days, a week tops for serious offenses.
Otherwise people will just keep being asshats everytime there's a new mirror being made. They're on SiSi ONLY to cause grief, because they, for some twisted reason, think it's fun to flip the finger at CCP and lol at annoyed people.
A substantial punishment is required to stem the flow of increasing bumhattery on SiSi, imo.
EDIT: Grazer gin's reply in this thread is a prime example of the intentions and opinions of these trolls. They simply don't care about the rules and don't think it's that bad "since everything is free on Sisi anyway".
----
The Demigodess with a Conscience - An EVE IC Blog
Originally by: CCP Dropbear
rofl
edit: ah crap, dev account. Oh well, official rofl at you sir.
|
Ildryn
The Inf1dels
En Garde
|
Posted - 2010.02.13 08:16:00 -
[7]
Cry some more...
There are plenty of people out there to help you kill someone off in a place he/she does not belong.
You don't need to come here and be a snitch.
|
Blane Xero
Amarr
The Firestorm Cartel
|
Posted - 2010.02.13 11:46:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Ildryn
Cry some more...
There are plenty of people out there to help you kill someone off in a place he/she does not belong.
You don't need to come here and be a snitch.
 Someone is about to recieve a vacation from Sisi.
The rules are in place for a reason.
_____________________________________
Haruhiist since December 2008
Originally by: CCP Fallout
:facepalm:
|
Lt Forge
Pilots From Honour
Aeternus.
|
Posted - 2010.02.14 15:15:00 -
[9]
A giant invisible POS bubble around the stations will fix this.
No targets for everyone!
|
Sunset Rogue
|
Posted - 2010.02.14 16:29:00 -
[10]
Hand out perma sisi bans
+
2 week TQ bans.
It is safe to say that the amount of people hindering bug testing will decline sharply 
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |