Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ammon Dei
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 07:21:00 -
[1]
ATTENTION:
THE ISHUK-RAATA ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE Alliance members in the system known as INTAKI this day fired and destroyed a QCAT Cruiser while on patrol in Intaki. The cruiser was enforcing directives to deny State sympathizers goods and services at the Plant 5 station in the Intaki system. This criminal attack upon a member of QCATS will not go unpunished.
1. QCATS will inflict damage or receive compensation from I-Raata equal to 10 fold that which was lost due to this action. 2. I-Raata will publicly apologize to QCATS for their blatant hostile act in the system of Intaki. And reimburse QCATS and its allies all expenses that result from our actions to recover the 10 fold compensation requested above.
Should I-Raata chose not to comply with the above demands, you will leave us with no choice but to respond with deadly force and take our 10 fold compensation by force of arms. QCATS will authorize the use of deadly force upon all of I-Raata and their allies, this includes industrial targets. This will action will continue until our demands are met. Or satisfactory compensation has been obtained by QCATS.
In addition, preparations are being made to bring the System of Intaki back under Federation control. The State sympathizers that reside around Intaki will no longer be allowed to influence policy in the region.
Luminaire General Ammon Dei Quantum Cats Syndicate - DIR
|
Bacchanalian
Stimulus Rote Kapelle
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 08:01:00 -
[2]
Not a cruiser. No! Say it isn't so! Oh, the post-humanity! ____________________ GM Sunshine > oops Neurotica > Hate to see a GM in your gang say 'oops'
|
Juan Rayo
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 08:03:00 -
[3]
Cruiser hull, BS, frig, it matters not. They opened fire on a Qcat pilot, that's enough. Endurecete cabr=n! |
Eran Mintor
Minmatar Valklear Guard
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 08:30:00 -
[4]
Quote: QCATS will inflict damage or receive compensation from I-Raata equal to 10 fold that which was lost due to this action.
Do you honestly think that's reasonable or you are just trying to push for war?
P.S., it's "You're". Your digital artist could use a spell-checker. ------------------------------------------------
|
Juan Rayo
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 08:53:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Juan Rayo on 19/02/2010 08:55:50
Originally by: Eran Mintor
Quote: QCATS will inflict damage or receive compensation from I-Raata equal to 10 fold that which was lost due to this action.
Do you honestly think that's reasonable or you are just trying to push for war?
P.S., it's "You're". Your digital artist could use a spell-checker.
Different dialect in our corner of space. Apologies to language purists. Not "Pushing" for war either. OUR pilot got shot. Endurecete cabr=n! |
Darina Rea
Sovereign Hospitaller Order of Saint Katherine
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 09:17:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Ammon Dei
ATTENTION:
THE ISHUK-RAATA ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE Alliance members in the system known as INTAKI this day fired and destroyed a QCAT Cruiser while on patrol in Intaki. The cruiser was enforcing directives to deny State sympathizers goods and services at the Plant 5 station in the Intaki system. This criminal attack upon a member of QCATS will not go unpunished.
Ehh, I might be a little slow here, but if I read this correctly a QCAT cruiser was effectively blocking, and presumably firing on, Ishuk-Raata personel, because I'm sure they would've heartily laughed at just a threat and verbal blocking of the station.
So.. assuming my assumption is correct and your pilot opened fire on them or at least threatened to do so in an attempt to uphold that denial of service, I am not surprised they took the liberty to remove a potential troublemaker and threat from the station.
My friendly suggestion is that you change the name of your operation to "Operation Vengeance" or the like since I really can't see where payback enters the picture after provoking a deliberate reaction from the side of Ishuk-Raata.
If you want an excuse for war, sure, that's fine, but please be honest about the reasoning. Just state your real intention, namely that you're unhappy with Caldari pilots in Intaki and you're trying to 'liberate' it.
_________
_________ Time is on our side. |
kermit 3
Gallente Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 09:58:00 -
[7]
"THE ISHUK-RAATA ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE Alliance members in the system known as INTAKI this day fired and destroyed a QCAT Cruiser while on patrol in Intaki. The cruiser was enforcing directives to deny State sympathizers goods and services at the Plant 5 station in the Intaki system. This criminal attack upon a member of QCATS will not go unpunished."
your comarades ship was outclassed by a superior force why did it try and figth and i assume it opened fire first as we have a strict NRDS poilcy .
"1. QCATS will inflict damage or receive compensation from I-Raata equal to 10 fold that which was lost due to this action."
your ridiculus claim for compensation will be treated with the contempt it deserves.
2. I-Raata will publicly apologize to QCATS for their blatant hostile act in the system of Intaki. And reimburse QCATS and its allies all expenses that result from our actions to recover the 10 fold compensation requested above. i-red do not have anything to apolgise for other than defending them selfs and there allies.
"Should I-Raata chose not to comply with the above demands, you will leave us with no choice but to respond with deadly force and take our 10 fold compensation by force of arms. QCATS will authorize the use of deadly force upon all of I-Raata and their allies, this includes industrial targets."
As for this threat be advised that ANY ATTACK ON I-RED OR THERE ALLIES WILL BE MET WITH DEADLY FORCE
|
Juan Rayo
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 10:03:00 -
[8]
Originally by: kermit 3 As for this threat be advised that ANY ATTACK ON I-RED OR THERE ALLIES WILL BE MET WITH DEADLY FORCE
So be it then, we will get our compensation. Terms are now 20 fold that was lost. Endurecete cabr=n! |
kermit 3
Gallente Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 10:18:00 -
[9]
Ah so that is all you can say no shouting that we are the aggressors just that it will be 20 fold lol. you have set this up as an excuse to attack a peaceful orgainstion that is helping there allies, but be warned we may be nrds but we will strike hard if requried. My own advise would to be that you stand down and accept the lose, he aggressed first and thus deserved to be destroyed. May be that you should look at your pilots training and re teach them the rules of engaggment as we would not have engaged unless he engaged first.
|
Juan Rayo
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 10:27:00 -
[10]
A peaceful organization that blew up one of our pilots? helping their allies how, exactly, and pretending to remain a peaceful organization?
We are NRDS, as well, unless we come upon the enemies of our people. Your pilots chose to engage with "superior force" and destroy our corp mate's ship. Let's see what happens when forces in the field are a bit more on the even side.
We do not go to war lightly, pilot. If you look at the history of the Quantum Cats you will see I mean what I say. We can't stand by and tolerate this kind of aggression however. We offered terms to resolve this in a peaceful, diplomatic manner. Our first communication was made by our corp diplomat. It is up to you to agree or disagree. You have chosen to disagree. Endurecete cabr=n! |
|
kermit 3
Gallente Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 10:38:00 -
[11]
(Should I-Raata chose not to comply with the above demands, you will leave us with no choice but to respond with deadly force and take our 10 fold compensation by force of arms. QCATS will authorize the use of deadly force upon all of I-Raata and their allies, this includes industrial targets. This action will continue until our demands are met. Or satisfactory compensation has been obtained by QCATS.)
I have chosen to disagree due to the ridiculus nature of your requests and of the blatent warmongering of the intial comunique, you do not open diplomatic convos with open threats of war.
|
kermit 3
Gallente Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 10:59:00 -
[12]
We do not go to war lightly, pilot. If you look at the history of the Quantum Cats you will see I mean what I say. We can't stand by and tolerate this kind of aggression however. We offered terms to resolve this in a peaceful, diplomatic manner. Our first communication was made by our corp diplomat. It is up to you to agree or disagree. You have chosen to disagree.
ha i just checked out your corps bio your nothing more than a merc corp so whos paying you this time, you have offered nothing for terms your just trying to justify your actions when all can see thru this as i have.
Qcats is OPEN FOR MERC CONTRACTS in GALLENTE or MInmatar highsec/lowsec)
|
Suitonia
Gallente Genos Occidere Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 11:06:00 -
[13]
Could the Quantum Cats Syndicate comment on their NRDS policy in regards to their mercenary work, will they take contracts against neutral organisations? ---
|
Silly Petey
Minmatar The Fruit Flys
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 13:14:00 -
[14]
I also want to know what happens when your pilots lose ships after you declare war? Will you not stop till their losses equal 20x your own?
-pytor
|
Gemma Naquist
Kuomi Logistics
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 15:33:00 -
[15]
I wouldn't be afraid of a group who has a PR department that can't remember the difference between ôyourö and ôyouÆre.ö
-C
Poor effort.
KUOMI LOGISTICS: The bright future, today!Ö |
Ammon Dei
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 16:28:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Gemma Naquist I wouldn't be afraid of a group who has a PR department that can't remember the difference between ôyourö and ôyouÆre.ö
Sr. Naquist: That is it? That is best you can come up with? Not every one uses English as their first language.
Second it is clearly stated Here regarding our Mercenary services. This incident has nothing to do with our Merc Services.
Diplomacy has had a chance, and it was ignored, our position was stated clearly Here. The members of I-RED were warned to stay out of this conflict.
2. As directed above compensation will now be equivalent to 20 fold of the original offense plus any expenses accrued by QCATS from this time forward.
QCATS will not stand by and allow this malice act of defiance to go unchallenged. We gave diplomacy a chance. And the leader of Revenent Defence Corperation, chose to ignore that and escalate this already crumbling situation in the system of Intaki. With all of the problems and conflict that I-RED is involved with in and around the region known as Providence. You would think I-RED would want to focus there, instead of drawing more enemies against an already overwhelming force knocking on their door.
Luminaire General Ammon Dei Quantum Cats Syndicate - DIR
|
Suitonia
Gallente Genos Occidere Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 16:35:00 -
[17]
It would have been easier to say "yes, we do not take our NRDS policy into the equation when considering mercenary contracts".
Quote:
High sec Griefer's have you running for cover? Some one Wardec you for no reason and you lack the skill or ships to take them on? Need a Pirate assassinated and can not do it yourself? Some new mining corp moving in on your territory? Do they need to be convinced to relocate? Some Corp drop prices on your industrial cash cow and need a reminder to play nice?
Doesn't that effectively make you NBSI? ---
|
Ammon Dei
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 16:42:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Suitonia It would have been easier to say "yes, we do not take our NRDS policy into the equation when considering mercenary contracts".
Quote:
High sec Griefer's have you running for cover? Some one Wardec you for no reason and you lack the skill or ships to take them on? Need a Pirate assassinated and can not do it yourself? Some new mining corp moving in on your territory? Do they need to be convinced to relocate? Some Corp drop prices on your industrial cash cow and need a reminder to play nice?
Doesn't that effectively make you NBSI?
The First Line of our Mercenary Services Announcement.
Quote: Large Alliance 160+ Members, looking to expand our list of targets
Not all of the members of the MDP are NRDS. However QCATS are NRDS, that clear enough for you?
|
Rhedyn
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 17:39:00 -
[19]
Wait a sec here, let me make sure I have the facts: -the QCATS pilot aggressed upon a neutral, and was subsequently destroyed by said neutral and neutral's corp. -QCATS now claim right to ridiculous compensation for the foolish act of their pilot attacking said neutrals.
In what universe does this make sense? Plus, it's not a criminal act to defend oneself from an agressor.
|
X Gallentius
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 18:09:00 -
[20]
John Reverent did not act to defend himself. He was the aggressor as evidenced by the station guns firing on his ship and not mine (find the killmail if you doubt these words). Either the members of I-RED are lying about their strict NRDS policy, or they had already set Gallente militia members to red.
But this incident is just the straw that broke the camel's back. I-RED (as stated in Ammon's post) was repeatedly warned to not interfere in Intaki. I-RED then declared war on Moira.. At that point the Gallente Militia corporations should have stepped in, but they held back for whatever reason.
It is clear that John Reverent decided to personally escalate the situation himself knowing the full consequences of his actions. This war has been a long time coming and is exactly what I-RED was looking for.
|
|
Gemma Naquist
Kuomi Logistics
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 18:23:00 -
[21]
デイさん。
私の謝罪。
私は心インチ停止積極的にされると続けるあなたが傷つくことはありません。
ありがとうございました。
(Dei-san. My apologies. Stop being aggressive and you won't get hurt. Thank you.)
KUOMI LOGISTICS: The bright future, today!Ö |
Zagamesh
Strix Armaments and Defence
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 18:32:00 -
[22]
It is unfortunate that another stalwart defender of Liberty, such as our comrades in arms in the Quantum Cats Syndicate has fallen prey to the duplicitous nature of Ishukone Corporation. To speak of neutrality and peace yet to have the dagger ready to stab in the back of those who are taken in by such false platitudes is the path of craven cowards. I may say I am surprised, but I am not.
Strix Armaments and Defence stands by our Villore Accord partners in the Quantum Cats Syndicate and CONCORD sanctioned warfare shall be filed against the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive in support of our allies and comrades in the Quantum Cats Syndicate.
May Ishukone Corporation and the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive burn.
Mjalnar Gessanier. CEO, Strix Armaments and Defence.
|
Jyotmimana Karana
Intaki Pure
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 18:38:00 -
[23]
Originally by: X Gallentius It is clear that John Reverent decided to personally escalate the situation himself knowing the full consequences of his actions. This war has been a long time coming and is exactly what I-RED was looking for.
Gallentius, you are as prime an example of a Gallentaki as I could ever hope to find. You serve as a shining example of everything that is corrupt and repulsive about Gallente society.
For months, you have carried out attacks on unarmed transport ships above Intaki as if killing civilians somehow proved that you were anything other than a morally bankrupt pirate.
Your very public demonstrations of disrespect proved you to be little more than a belligerent child seeking punishment as a form of attention. Now that you have gotten the beating you so desperately asked for, you run to your corporation and cry out for justice. I would say that it has been served.
Now, don't get me wrong though, I personally endorse this war in the hopes that both sides will ultimately weaken the other to the point when they can be swept away like the refuse they are.
|
Atraxerxes
Caldari 22nd Black Rise Defensive Unit OWN Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 18:50:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Juan Rayo
Originally by: Eran Mintor
P.S., it's "You're". Your digital artist could use a spell-checker.
Different dialect in our corner of space. Apologies to language purists.
LMAO.
AX WTFFTW podcast
|
X Gallentius
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 18:53:00 -
[25]
1. The attacks on the Ishukone haulers are perfectly legal. Otherwise, station guns would have fired upon me and other Gallente pilots who have participated.
2. I understand now that the Mordus thugs aren't there to protect the Ishukone haulers from forces outside the station. They are there to intimidate the station owners into allowing them to dock.
3. This pilot also endorse this war. For far too long we have had outside forces interfering with Gallente affairs. Yes Gallente. Intaki are and always will be Gallente.
|
Jyotmimana Karana
Intaki Pure
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 19:21:00 -
[26]
Originally by: X Gallentius Intaki are and always will be Gallente.
You show your ignorance of history and lack of vision for the future with statements like this, beklaand. You are a traitor to your people and a posterchild for the effects Gallente brainwashing.
|
Julianus Soter
Gallente Moira.
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 19:22:00 -
[27]
Atraxerxes, good to see you're still winning friends and influencing people.
I welcome QCAT's confirmation of our statements regarding I-RED's hostile disposition to the Federation, which was already evidenced by their funding of a State Protectorate member corporation.
Please contact me regarding intel sharing arrangements.
|
Cheiftan
Minmatar Shinryaku
|
Posted - 2010.02.20 02:12:00 -
[28]
Do not try and play the innocent party here QCats, you provoked the said attack even if you did not fire on the I-RED vessel Directly.
You have stated here that you fired upon a Caldari transport, now whatever you means for doing this, that transport belonged to the Ishukone Mega Corporation, by attacking not only a Caldari asset but an Ishukone asset you made yourself a valid target for the I-RED organisation under the I-RED RoE.
Your actions to continue this is both foolish and futile so I suggest before you continue this you take a long hard think about what you are saying.
Farewell
Freedom will come through respect not the barrel of a gun |
Juan Rayo
Quantum Cats Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.02.20 06:19:00 -
[29]
Innocent? nobody is trying to play innocent here. We are soldiers, nothing innocent about what we do.
The facts are, however, Luminaire General X Gallentious was acting in accordance to Federal Militia and Gallente Federation policy in Intaki. Previously considered neutral (to us) and therefore never shot at by Qcats pilots Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive pilots decided to engage and destroy his ship.
We consider this an act of aggression. It's all really simple. Endurecete cabr=n! |
Cheiftan
Minmatar Shinryaku
|
Posted - 2010.02.20 07:23:00 -
[30]
And like i said I-RED was Defending the Ishukone transport you was trying to blow up.
I-RED has Cleary stated before if you attack its allies I-RED will step in, the minute you shot that Ishukone Hauler your neutral status became null and void.
as far as IÆm concerned you seem to simply be looking for an excuse for war as reasons have clearly been given for the assault on your ship.
Freedom will come through respect not the barrel of a gun |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |