EVE Search - New Scorpion model: FIX IT BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE (symmetry)

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

New Scorpion model: FIX IT BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE (symmetry)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
GIGAR Caldari Domini Umbrus	Posted - 2010.02.26 15:32:00 - [1] The new Scorpion model is AWESOME. Now, please make it symmetrical! :) Click here to see the symmetry failure That's all -------------------------- Originally by: Akita T Actually, GIGAR is right. Wtf? Originally by: Akita T Well, at least sort of. A little bit. Conceptually speaking. That's more like it.
Mag's the united Negative Ten.	Posted - 2010.02.26 15:36:00 - [2]
sg3s Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2010.02.26 15:37:00 - [3] Intentional, and it looks good.
James Tritanius	Posted - 2010.02.26 15:52:00 - [4]
mchief117	Posted - 2010.02.26 16:19:00 - [5] dude the ship looks friken awesome and no longer looks like its gona break apart if i corner hard , also very ver ship in game are symetrical to a t , even the rokh has diferances on each side.
GIGAR Caldari Domini Umbrus	Posted - 2010.02.26 16:33:00 - [6] Originally by: mchief117 dude the ship looks friken awesome and no longer looks like its gona break apart if i corner hard , also very ver ship in game are symetrical to a t , even the rokh has diferances on each side. I know they have. That's why I'm asking them to do it right this time.. -------------------------- Originally by: Akita T Actually, GIGAR is right. Wtf? Originally by: Akita T Well, at least sort of. A little bit. Conceptually speaking. That's more like it.
darius mclever	Posted - 2010.02.26 16:37:00 - [7] looks perfect for me. lets move to other ships.
Daedalus II	Posted - 2010.02.26 17:00:00 - [8] As long as the major features are symmetrical, minor asymmetrical features only make it look better imo. Just look at the Millennium Falcon.
Winters Chill Amarr Shadow Legion. Talos Coalition	Posted - 2010.02.26 17:04:00 - [9] Originally by: darius mclever looks perfect for me. lets move to other ships. /thread
sg3s Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2010.02.26 20:22:00 - [10] Perfect symmetry is ugly, especially with thinks with heaps of detail... Best example: faces. I bet you like it if a girl has a symmetrical face, however I think you will be horrified if you took a picture, cut it in half and then copy/flipped one half over the other to make it be perfectly symmetrical.
DuKackBoon	Posted - 2010.02.26 20:57:00 - [11] Originally by: GIGAR Originally by: mchief117 dude the ship looks friken awesome and no longer looks like its gona break apart if i corner hard , also very ver ship in game are symetrical to a t , even the rokh has diferances on each side. I know they have. That's why I'm asking them to do it right this time.. It's already right.
Lui Kai Better Than You	Posted - 2010.02.26 21:05:00 - [12] ----------------
Ms Murda	Posted - 2010.02.26 22:49:00 - [13] If CCP remade the hull to that id fu*king fly a widow evey day.... They fixed the Ferox, Why cant they fix the scorp???? TY for post /supported
Newbear	Posted - 2010.02.26 22:57:00 - [14] Should rename ship flounder. http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1213058 Hi-sec R&D corp boosting is open for business!
Athanasia Samsa Amarr Institute for Mental Hygiene	Posted - 2010.02.27 02:16:00 - [15] space is full of... well.. almost nothing, so there's no drag. slight asymmetry, as long as the mass on both sides is about equal, works and just adds to the overall look imho. now the placement of engines on the other hand... there are some models out there that wouldn't be able to fly in a straight line even if they wanted to - but i guess (without a certain example in mind, but there are enough) the one engine on the far right is simply three times as powerful as the 3 engines placed on the other side of the ship... that's at least what i'm telling myself all the time. :)
Jerid Verges	Posted - 2010.02.27 03:30:00 - [16] Just be glad they even made it look symmetrical at all.
Ris Dnalor Minmatar Ex Cruoris Libertas	Posted - 2010.02.28 06:57:00 - [17] meh, i hate the new model
Danton Marcellus Nebula Rasa Holdings	Posted - 2010.02.28 10:02:00 - [18] Symmetry is boring. Should/would/could have, HAVE you chav! Also Known As
Ospie Core Impulse	Posted - 2010.02.28 11:28:00 - [19] To be honest I like the lack of symmetry in the current scorpion model, would be nice to see a few more asymmetrical ships
Chainsaw Plankton IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE	Posted - 2010.02.28 12:00:00 - [20] Originally by: Athanasia Samsa space is full of... well.. almost nothing, so there's no drag. slight asymmetry, as long as the mass on both sides is about equal, works and just adds to the overall look imho. now the placement of engines on the other hand... there are some models out there that wouldn't be able to fly in a straight line even if they wanted to - but i guess (without a certain example in mind, but there are enough) the one engine on the far right is simply three times as powerful as the 3 engines placed on the other side of the ship... that's at least what i'm telling myself all the time. :) it is off center like that to uhhh increase orbit velocity!
Cygwin Gaad Caldari The Element Syndicate Hand That Feeds	Posted - 2010.02.28 14:08:00 - [21] Caldari ships are utilitarian and designed by committee. i liked it back in Red Moon Rising when they were ALL asymmetrical. there was a charm about the ships that said "this isnt every other space game". theres no drag in space so there is no penalty for flat faces and asymmetry. personally im dissappointed with the new scorp model. im quite happy with the strange over the shoulder scorp we have atm. when they 'fixed' the ferox i was sad. and gradually more and more great ship models have been gradually been pressed back into a symmetrical mould possibly to reduce texturing complexity, possibly because the symmetry crowd shout louder than the asymmetry supporters. in short, break a wing off the new scorp and leave iconic models be. -
Galega Ori	Posted - 2010.02.28 14:12:00 - [22] ok if your that picky about how the ship looks id be willing to bet that your one of those types that needs everything to be JUST right. I'd also bet that you can't stand it when the M&Ms in the bowl have two of the same color touching each other.
Psyentific	Posted - 2010.02.28 21:50:00 - [23] The new scorpion...It's just TOO symmetrical. The old one is jarringly asymmetrical, the new one is "Hey guys I'm symmetrical Can I join the pretty ship club now?" in the "trying too hard" way. Y'know? It just looks ugly. Everything in moderation. Wait. I take it back. Its mostly just bad camera angle. But its still too symmetrical.
Miss Xerox	Posted - 2010.02.28 22:19:00 - [24] Simple fix for both sides & nightmare for the drunken art dept: MK1 and MK2 versions! MK1 is what we have now. MK2 is the same ship, but cut bow to stern and mirrored one side to the other. Functionality is identical for both vessels. As are blueprints (you can select MK1 or MK2 when you initiate the job or maybe even assemble the ship after you buy it).

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.