Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Last Wolf
Rage For Order
|
Posted - 2010.03.31 20:23:00 -
[1]
Including guns/nuets/nos/
Where having more than 3 of the same type of gun starts to add very little for its fitting requierments. (each gun after the first does less damage, each nos less cap etc...)
Would lead to some interesting fits if you had to fit 3-4 blasters and 3-4 rails.
Or 3-4 siege launchers and 3-4 cruise.
Typhoon would be overpowered though 
Yes I'm bored. Oh no you don't! Incoming witty reply, ETA: 300 seconds! |

Pa Thetic
Amarr 24th Imperial Crusade
|
Posted - 2010.03.31 21:05:00 -
[2]
I think they should have a written test before allowing people to post freely on the forums. Please re-size your signature to the maximum allowed of 400 x 120 pixels. Zymurgist OK
|

JJ Redic
|
Posted - 2010.03.31 21:49:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Last Wolf Yes I'm bored
Bored isn't exactly the word I was thinking of.
|

Sea Kitten
A Very Serious Mexican Freighter Company
|
Posted - 2010.03.31 22:17:00 -
[4]
I'd much rather they stacking nerf terrible posts.
_________________________________________________ Call me a fish and I will CASTRATE you (in game). |

Seriously Bored
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.03.31 22:37:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Last Wolf
Yes I'm bored.
No, I'M Bored!
|

omgevenmoarfreemoniez
|
Posted - 2010.03.31 22:50:00 -
[6]
NO!!! This is a STUPID TOPIC OP IS A FAIL NOOB WITH DUMB IDEAS GO BACK TO WOW LOLOLOL
         
|

Artemis Rose
Sileo In Pacis THE SPACE P0LICE
|
Posted - 2010.03.31 23:12:00 -
[7]
Split weapon systems would own the universe, everybody would cry. *** Currently Playing: Trolls from Outer Space Current Equipment: VISAcard chain mail, +2 Amulet of Epic Whine, Self Banstick +2 WTB: +666 E-peen killboard stats |

bff Jill
|
Posted - 2010.03.31 23:23:00 -
[8]
The idea that these huge spaceships dont fit multiple weapon systems always bothered me.
|

Footoo Rama
Gallente Caldari Illuminati
|
Posted - 2010.03.31 23:53:00 -
[9]
Originally by: bff Jill The idea that these huge spaceships dont fit multiple weapon systems always bothered me.
They can it is just non- optimal. ------- "Because the Dominix is the Chuck Norris of Eve!" |

Ghoest
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 01:02:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Pa Thetic I think they should have a written test before allowing people to post freely on the forums.
win
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
|

AnonyTerrorNinja
Minmatar Buggers' Advanced Interstellar Transport
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 01:05:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Footoo Rama
Originally by: bff Jill The idea that these huge spaceships dont fit multiple weapon systems always bothered me.
They can it is just non- optimal.
Could make things interesting though, thinking about it... Ship HP (and structure hp) would need to be adjusted again to accommodate the fact that ships would do easily half, when not less, of their former DPS, but it could still be interesting to see ships potentially forced to use a wider variety of modules with more bonuses and maybe even some penalties... ---
|

Dethmourne Silvermane
Gallente SRS Industries SRS.
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 01:09:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Last Wolf Yes I'm ******ed.
Fixed that for you 
 ----- Regarding high-sec mining:
Originally by: AmarrettoDiAmarr 3-4 million ISK/hr is perhaps .15 0r .20 US$/hr; not quite prison wages and you are around less honest people.
|

bff Jill
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 02:29:00 -
[13]
you could just change the way hardpoints work. Give ships multiple sized hardpoints, hardpoints for their racial long range and short range weapons, etc. To mix things up.
say, a battleship with 2 large long range hardpoints, 2 large close range hardpoints, one large missile hardpoint, and three close range medium hardpoints.
as an example.
This would let certain ships that are not commonly used, be rebalanced for new exciting roles too by mixing up how hardpoints are distributed.
It would change everything and therefore would probably be a bad idea to implement, but i think its one of those things that are how it should have been.
|

Siigari Kitawa
Gallente The Aduro Protocol Talon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 02:54:00 -
[14]
I always though it'd be cool to have a rack rotate to accommodate smaller guns.
For example:
Neutron Blaster Cannon II == 4 Heavy Neutron Blasters == 16 Light Neutron Blasters
Or summat. Numbers could use work but you get the idea.
|

genette devo
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 03:00:00 -
[15]
so you want lolfits to be the rule?
|

bff Jill
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 03:07:00 -
[16]
I just want a way to be able to kill everything in my battleship, which is how god intended it.
battleships are for battle yo.
cruisers are for pickin up chicks only.
frig its are for pansies
|

genette devo
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 04:27:00 -
[17]
I don't think fittings would change much for weapons several weapons with penalties would still do more damage than 1 or 2 weapons with none, you cant really design a ship that would be effective for short or long range at the same time, so the other weapon systems would really just be wasted, dps would go down but i doubt design theory would change much, I could be off base though
|

Garresh
Minmatar Hole Patrol Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 06:57:00 -
[18]
8/10 Not a bad troll, but needs more self-righteous and worse spelling. |

Seriously Bored
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 07:30:00 -
[19]
Edited by: Seriously Bored on 01/04/2010 07:30:40
Originally by: genette devo I don't think fittings would change much for weapons several weapons with penalties would still do more damage than 1 or 2 weapons with none, you cant really design a ship that would be effective for short or long range at the same time, so the other weapon systems would really just be wasted, dps would go down but i doubt design theory would change much, I could be off base though
Behold my true form and despair!!!
[Typhoon, Swiss Army Trashcan 'O DOOM] Damage Control II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Ballistic Control System II Gyrostabilizer II
100MN MicroWarpdrive I X5 Prototype I Engine Enervator Phased Weapon Navigation Array Generation Extron Medium Capacitor Booster II, Cap Booster 800
Siege Missile Launcher II, Mjolnir Torpedo Siege Missile Launcher II, Mjolnir Torpedo Siege Missile Launcher II, Mjolnir Torpedo Dual 650mm Repeating Artillery II, EMP L Dual 650mm Repeating Artillery II, EMP L Dual 650mm Repeating Artillery II, EMP L Heavy Unstable Power Fluctuator I Large Plasma Smartbomb II
Large Trimark Armor Pump I Large Trimark Armor Pump I Large Trimark Armor Pump I
Garde II x3 Ogre II x2
This is kind of fun actually. (Because I'm an egregious EFT warrior.) Also, hilariously enough, the Tempest might be awesome because it has a double damage bonus.
I'm assuming I win some sort of nerd prize for actually providing a fit for this? 
|

AnonyTerrorNinja
Minmatar Buggers' Advanced Interstellar Transport
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 09:49:00 -
[20]
You don't, because your name implies you were simply seriously bored. ---
|
|

stoicfaux
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 11:34:00 -
[21]
Does "everything" include basic learning skills stacking with the advanced learning skills...? 
----- "Are you a sociopathic paranoid schizophrenic with accounting skills? We have the game for you! -- Eve, the game of Alts, Economics, Machiavelli, and PvP"
|

Exploding Tukey
|
Posted - 2010.04.01 13:55:00 -
[22]
You know, nothing is stopping you from putting lasers, hybrids, projectile and missiles on the same ship. you can even toss on a smartbomb and neut and fly around shooting people in the most messed up amazing ship in the game.
honestly i would cry if i saw my ship killing by a ship shooting me with lasers, hybrids, missiles and smartbombs while being neuted...
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |