EVE Search - Yarrbitrator

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Yarrbitrator

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Barokh Gallente Cult of Nihilism	Posted - 2010.04.03 11:09:00 - [1] Hello all. Just looking at possible new fits for my arby and came up with this one. I realise the rigs are costly but I would like you to disregard the cost factor and give advice on how you think this would fare with regard to taking on cruisers/battlecruisers. Constructive criticism greatly appreciated. Thanks in Advance! High: 1 x Med Neut 2 x Small Nos 1 x Med Electron Blaster Med: 1 x 10Mn AB 1 x Scrambler 2 x Tracking Disruptor Low: 1 x 1600mm RT 1 x DCU II 2 x EANM II Drones: 6 x Hammerhead II 6 x Vespa EC-600 6 x Warrior II Rigs: 2 x Medium Ancillary Current Router 1 x Trimark Armour Pump
Trader20	Posted - 2010.04.03 11:19:00 - [2] Edited by: Trader20 on 03/04/2010 11:21:54 lose the blaster and lose the nos and fit a mwd and lose the rigs just get a new setup
Gneeznow Minmatar Ship spinners inc	Posted - 2010.04.03 11:24:00 - [3] I use this, while it works solo in packs of 3 or 4 they are hilariously effective 1600mm Reinforced Crystalline Carbonide Plates I Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Emergency Damage Control I Small Armor Repairer II 10MN MicroWarpdrive I J5b Phased Prototype Warp Scrambler I X5 Prototype I Engine Enervator Tracking Disruptor II Small I-ax Regenerative Projector Small I-ax Regenerative Projector E5 Prototype Energy Vampire E5 Prototype Energy Vampire Vespa II x5 Vespa EC-600 x5 Valkyrie II x5
Barokh Gallente Cult of Nihilism	Posted - 2010.04.03 11:28:00 - [4] Thanks for the help Gneeznow, that's great.
Florio Blue Republic	Posted - 2010.04.03 14:21:00 - [5] Arbitrator is very slow, especially with the required 1600 plate. Luckily it is still effective at range. Controlling range is going to be a problem when you fit 1600 plate with this ship, regardless of propulsion mod. If you're going to be in an environment where you will not need an MWD or where one would not be so useful (where your opponents almost always have lots of scrams, for instance, or in low sec), then an AB is fine - ignore the MWD fascists :) Against a large turret opponent 2 tracking disruptors and a scram is great, but I've always gone for more dps in high rather than the neut/nos combos, cap has never been an issue. For smaller ships a single tracking disruptor and a web is good.
Darthewok Perkone	Posted - 2010.04.03 15:49:00 - [6] also consider if you will be fighting turret ships or drone/missile ships. if fighting turret ships, the TD(s) are fine. but if fighting drone/missile ships eg Drake/Myrm, the TDs will be useless, switch out them out to large shield extenders/invulnerability fields/web instead.
LonTas 5 Minmatar United Citizens of EVE	Posted - 2010.04.03 22:18:00 - [7] anything that can pump drones into the enemy is a agood for for the arbitrator, just make sure to carry at least 2 other sets. for example Scout drones Medium scout drones Logistics drones and dont cycle the same type right as you put them in. If you hav hammerheads out, dont put them in your bay and put them out in 5 seconds again. Watch out for smartbombs, as they make you drones toast. And drones dont like electronic warfare... dont bug people with fast tracking guns. There's this new thing called a stasis webifier. You should really read about it before you buy that interceptor...
Lillian Blu Gallente Red Federation	Posted - 2010.04.03 23:50:00 - [8] Originally by: LonTas 5 anything that can pump drones into the enemy is a agood for for the arbitrator, just make sure to carry at least 2 other sets. for example Scout drones Medium scout drones Logistics drones and dont cycle the same type right as you put them in. If you hav hammerheads out, dont put them in your bay and put them out in 5 seconds again. Watch out for smartbombs, as they make you drones toast. And drones dont like electronic warfare... dont bug people with fast tracking guns. I wish forums had ignore button.
Prof Alvin	Posted - 2010.04.06 14:18:00 - [9] Edited by: Prof Alvin on 06/04/2010 14:22:36 solo arbitror is not that good my opinion. if you plate it its gona be so slow that you cant catch anything to kill. align speed is slow so hard to escape gatecapms, damage is very low and range is around 12km with medium neuts. but thats just me, i am never giving this ship another try, better sticking to my assault poping thrasher. Also all battlecruiser wil pop this ship as they can catch it and have higher buffer, tbh, dont even think of killing battlecruisers in a tech 1 cruiser where even hacs have a had time agaisnt them
Ravenesa The Bastards The Tusker Bastards	Posted - 2010.04.06 14:39:00 - [10] Originally by: Prof Alvin Edited by: Prof Alvin on 06/04/2010 14:22:36 solo arbitror is not that good my opinion. if you plate it its gona be so slow that you cant catch anything to kill. align speed is slow so hard to escape gatecapms, damage is very low and range is around 12km with medium neuts. but thats just me, i am never giving this ship another try, better sticking to my assault poping thrasher. Also all battlecruiser wil pop this ship as they can catch it and have higher buffer, tbh, dont even think of killing battlecruisers in a tech 1 cruiser where even hacs have a had time agaisnt them Solo Arby is pretty cheap. I never use more then a mid level meta setup. It rips any frig class out there and does a number on destroyers. A lot of people make the mistake of thinking that an Arby is an easy kill and it is not. I will gladly fly it against turret ships with the TD bonus. For gang setups I will go to a T2 fit with long point, dual TD's, and an MWD with a host of ECM and Logi drones and a flight of warrior II's for smaller stuff. As far as fighting BC's, I would NOT take one against a Drake or a Myrm. That is basically death, but against a Harby or a Cane? definately give it a shot. Set the TD with a speed script, orbit close and fast, kill drones, dead ship. You should try it sometimes, it works surprisingly well.
Prof Alvin	Posted - 2010.04.06 15:56:00 - [11] Originally by: Ravenesa Originally by: Prof Alvin Edited by: Prof Alvin on 06/04/2010 14:22:36 solo arbitror is not that good my opinion. if you plate it its gona be so slow that you cant catch anything to kill. align speed is slow so hard to escape gatecapms, damage is very low and range is around 12km with medium neuts. but thats just me, i am never giving this ship another try, better sticking to my assault poping thrasher. Also all battlecruiser wil pop this ship as they can catch it and have higher buffer, tbh, dont even think of killing battlecruisers in a tech 1 cruiser where even hacs have a had time agaisnt them Solo Arby is pretty cheap. I never use more then a mid level meta setup. It rips any frig class out there and does a number on destroyers. A lot of people make the mistake of thinking that an Arby is an easy kill and it is not. I will gladly fly it against turret ships with the TD bonus. For gang setups I will go to a T2 fit with long point, dual TD's, and an MWD with a host of ECM and Logi drones and a flight of warrior II's for smaller stuff. As far as fighting BC's, I would NOT take one against a Drake or a Myrm. That is basically death, but against a Harby or a Cane? definately give it a shot. Set the TD with a speed script, orbit close and fast, kill drones, dead ship. You should try it sometimes, it works surprisingly well. lol trust, i made the same mistake thinking i could kill a cane, before i even knew i was half armour. also it works well against frigates and destroyer but full tech 2 fit will costs you around 30mill which isnt cheap.
Cpt Branko Retired Pirate Club	Posted - 2010.04.06 19:02:00 - [12] Originally by: Ravenesa That is basically death, but against a Harby or a Cane? definately give it a shot. I wish more Arbitrator/Pilgrim pilots had this attitude towards a Hurricane. Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint
Colonel Evans	Posted - 2010.04.06 19:51:00 - [13] Edited by: Colonel Evans on 06/04/2010 19:51:56 800m Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Enegized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Adaptive Nano Membrane II Damage Control II 10MN MicroWarpdrive II Warp Scrambler II Stasis Webifier II Tracking Disruptor II Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator Small Unstable Power Fluctuator Small Unstable Power Fluctuator Small Unstable Power Fluctuator Medium Trimark Armor Pump Medium Trimark Armor Pump Medium Trimark Armor Pump Hammerhead II x5 Warrior II x10 Medium Armor Maintenence Bot II x5

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.