| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Estel Arador
Minmatar
Estel Arador Corp Services
   |
Posted - 2010.05.06 08:53:00 -
[61]
 Originally by: Machete Visor
All of the changes i suggested require cooperation by multiple players. I can't just scream and have everyone run a test case. No one here works for me.
...I'll keep coming back to this... just because something has been discussed before doesn't mean it is wrong.
Originally by: Machete Visor
The idea of setting up public auditing standards/procedures has been rejected outright. And there is very little support for the standardized financial statement or audit report idea... You folks are damn good at shooting things down.
Consider the possibility that the people who are responding to you (who have been keeping track of MD for more than the 3 weeks you have) know how things work here. A lot has been tried already and even more has been discussed. To ignore that wealth of experience would be wrong.
Fact is, you want too much for too little added value - that means noone will bother with it. Even something simple as an IPO template gets ignored because it's too much work to use it and people can get their shares sold with less effort.
Free jumpclone service|Now 1092 stations! |
Check 1234
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 09:42:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Estel Arador
Consider the possibility that the people who are responding to you (who have been keeping track of MD for more than the 3 weeks you have) know how things work here. A lot has been tried already and even more has been discussed. To ignore that wealth of experience would be wrong.
Fact is, you want too much for too little added value - that means noone will bother with it. Even something simple as an IPO template gets ignored because it's too much work to use it and people can get their shares sold with less effort.
I agree with what Estel.
Nothing is going to come of this mache. You don't read replies and just keeps posting the same stuff over and over; it's like some really bad sitcom. No one seems interested in your idea at all; you win some, you lose some.
Your inaccurate and easily manipulated financial publications will not work and offer very little but a platform for scammers to create a tiny bit of credibility to pull off a scam.
You've lost this one; move on and do something more productive with your time.
|
Machete Visor
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 11:43:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Check 1234
Your inaccurate and easily manipulated financial publications will not work and offer very little but a platform for scammers to create a tiny bit of credibility to pull off a scam.
You've lost this one; move on and do something more productive with your time.
Check, can you explain how the financial publication in my post, if audited, is easily manipulated?
|
Check 1234
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 12:42:00 -
[64]
Edited by: Check 1234 on 06/05/2010 12:43:12
Originally by: Machete Visor
Originally by: Check 1234
Your inaccurate and easily manipulated financial publications will not work and offer very little but a platform for scammers to create a tiny bit of credibility to pull off a scam.
You've lost this one; move on and do something more productive with your time.
Check, can you explain how the financial publication in my post, if audited, is easily manipulated?
That is your suggestion for the automated financial reports you think would be amazing for everyone to take part in. Therefore, someone just needs to trade items to the person having their income statement automated by a programme, sell the item, and magically instant profit.
I can't be bothered any more - you're just an old fashioned record stuck on repeat. I the troll am being trolled by another troll. Do as you wish but don't expect anyone to follow you if you keep on posting the same thing over and over.
|
Machete Visor
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 16:18:00 -
[65]
Originally by: Check 1234
Edited by: Check 1234 on 06/05/2010 12:43:12
Originally by: Machete Visor
Originally by: Check 1234
Your inaccurate and easily manipulated financial publications will not work and offer very little but a platform for scammers to create a tiny bit of credibility to pull off a scam.
You've lost this one; move on and do something more productive with your time.
Check, can you explain how the financial publication in my post, if audited, is easily manipulated?
That is your suggestion for the automated financial reports you think would be amazing for everyone to take part in. Therefore, someone just needs to trade items to the person having their income statement automated by a programme, sell the item, and magically instant profit.
I can't be bothered any more - you're just an old fashioned record stuck on repeat. I the troll am being trolled by another troll. Do as you wish but don't expect anyone to follow you if you keep on posting the same thing over and over.
And which part of your manipulation is audit proof?
Counterparties are viewable to an auditor. Are you suggesting 1 big trade that accounts for all the profits, or thousands of little trades across thousands of accounts? Or are you suggesting many trades with one counterparty accounting for substantially all the auditees profit?
I am not trolling you, just trying to figure out if youve thought this through as much as you say that you have.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |