Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

My Postman
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 12:12:00 -
[31]
I fully support this idea!
|

PreZiDenT1
SteamWork Snatch Victory
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 12:15:00 -
[32]
Supported.
|

McFly
Peanut Factory BricK sQuAD.
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 12:23:00 -
[33]
./
|

Albetta
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 13:08:00 -
[34]
Supported
|

Dian'h Might
Cash and Cargo Liberators Incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 14:16:00 -
[35]
poasting to confirm I support this
|

Perastis
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 15:22:00 -
[36]
Supported
|

Gilbarun
Lone Star Partners
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 16:45:00 -
[37]

|

FOl2TY8
GoonWaffe SOLODRAKBANSOLODRAKBANSO
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 17:46:00 -
[38]
word
|

Shredder Jacksen
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:02:00 -
[39]
approve |

Eurulf Ofinur
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 18:18:00 -
[40]
This would be a minor but useful change. Supported.
|
|

Evolutius
|
Posted - 2010.04.13 23:56:00 -
[41]
This should be implemented.
|

I'thari
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 09:42:00 -
[42]
They should also do something with the way logs are displayed, but seeing drone damage is a good thing too. |

Seanbeansan
|
Posted - 2010.04.14 11:25:00 -
[43]
Great idea :)
|

Seeing EyeDog
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 13:09:00 -
[44]
|

Imigo Montoya
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 23:03:00 -
[45]
Agreed.
|

Battleangel Libby
Stellar Solutions Factory
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 09:50:00 -
[46]
|

night shiftstar
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 01:29:00 -
[47]
supported; do it fast, please
|

Brengholl
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 02:07:00 -
[48]
not much of a discussion here, is there if noone can disagree this seems like a must-have (and i personaly think so too)
|

Tobias Xiaosen
Total Xenophobia
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 02:25:00 -
[49]
There really isn't much to discuss with a proposal this small. Most people want it, and those that don't could simply turn it off. Not to mention the logs already track this, so it shouldn't be difficult to impliment ~
|

salanix
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 10:40:00 -
[50]
I do agree with this, even though this might cause more lag (even if you turn the option to show damage of drones off).
I think the only problem here would be the lag issue, and if that isn't a big issue, I'm not getting why CCP didn't implement this in game yet. |
|

Lord Kreza
|
Posted - 2010.04.20 14:12:00 -
[51]
Supported!
|

z0de
The Bastards The Tusker Bastards
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 05:07:00 -
[52]
So what happens now? how do things get picked up by the csm/ccp? á á
|

Seth Ruin
Ominous Corp Primary.
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 11:01:00 -
[53]
Originally by: z0de It could even be grouped for "your group of drones did a <hit type> for xx damage".
Did someone say grouped drones?
|

z0de
The Bastards The Tusker Bastards
|
Posted - 2010.04.25 04:02:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Seth Ruin
Originally by: z0de It could even be grouped for "your group of drones did a <hit type> for xx damage".
Did someone say grouped drones?
I think they did. á á
|

Ashina Sito
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2010.04.25 20:40:00 -
[55]
Originally by: bukchoi i wonder why this wasn't in the game to begin with. +1
The reason is simple, each drone is an independent entity. The server sees your drones as in independent ship when it comes to damage. Each drone would get it's own combat log. Additionally drones are bugged enough. I would hate to add another layer to it. The final issue is that CCP hates drones. From the node management position +1 drone is basically the same as +1 player. More drones = more lag.
Even so, I would very much like to see what my drones are doing. Although the coding for this may too complex to deal with. My CSM Election Announcement
|

z0de
The Bastards The Tusker Bastards
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 10:41:00 -
[56]
All of that has no impact on this proposal. the logs for drones already exist for drones proven by the fact that when a drone shoots someone it shows up in their log as "xxx's drone shot you for xx". All I want is that message to go to the aggressors log too. á á
|

Mynxee
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 19:15:00 -
[57]
Supported; the data is already captured; would be nice to see how well the little servants are performing. Wouldn't mind seeing damage listed for the drone group and would prefer the option to turn drone damage logging off.
z0de: To answer your CSM question, the current CSM delegates review Assembly Hall proposals to decide independently which warrant being brought up for a vote in a CSM meeting. Items that pass the CSM vote are placed on the roster of stuff to present to CCP. I'm unsure of what transition provisions are made for CSM-passed proposals when the current CSM is nearing the end of its term but will have no more meetings with CCP. But the more votes of support in this thread, the better your chances that this proposal will get championed by a CSM in this or the next term.
Life In Low Sec |

Cinori Aluben
Gladiators of Rage Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 07:48:00 -
[58]
Since the data is already captured, we're not talking about creating/farming new data. Servers should see no additional load, it's only a matter of the client taking what's already there and displaying it on-screen.
That being said, this is a great "little" idea, the likes of which my platform is based on: "Fix the Little Things first!" Just 5 little ideas just like this would create a synergy to greatly enhance and hone everyday EVE gameplay.
SUPPORTED.
If you value giving priority to little things like this, vote for Cinori Aluben. My priority is that CCP make these "Little Things" a priority. As such small items wouldn't require heavy coding time, devoting dev time to them is solely a matter of prioritization, which the CSM will have an active part in now.
Cinori Aluben CSM5 2010Fix the Little Things First!
------------ Cinori Aluben -- CSM 2010!! "Fix the Little Things First!" --- www.littlethingsfirst.com |

Arrhidaeus
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 23:09:00 -
[59]
I support this topic.
And z0de for CSM.
|

Wikkid One
D00M.
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 23:09:00 -
[60]
I support this man and his idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |