EVE Search - Dominion Lag Conspiracy Theory

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Dominion Lag Conspiracy Theory

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Amberlamps	Posted - 2010.04.13 03:04:00 - [31] Originally by: Grayclay Originally by: Amberlamps You are forgiven. Do I get a forgiveness point? Grayclay has received 1 forgiveness attribute point from Amberlamps.
Amberlamps	Posted - 2010.04.13 11:50:00 - [32] It appears we are requested to attend another testing with again no rewards for our time. I refuse to bother turning up either of my accounts now. I pay them to play, they don't pay me to test.
Tallaran Kouros Caldari	Posted - 2010.04.13 11:58:00 - [33] Originally by: Amberlamps It appears we are requested to attend another testing with again no rewards for our time. I refuse to bother turning up either of my accounts now. I pay them to play, they don't pay me to test. This. I am a busy man. I work in IT and part of my job is QA and testing. I do enough of this during the day for my employers that I want to come home and play a game to relax, not run around doing yet more QA except this time unpaid. At least register that someone has spend x number of hours on SIS doing CCP's unpaid QA and reimburse them with one week's extra play time, otherwise there is little incentive for someone to willingly give up their play time to do this.
Le Zyx	Posted - 2010.04.13 13:15:00 - [34] CCP should charge $100 a month, then they will be able to hire 500 new devs to bugtest large fleet fights in SiSi, once its fixed they can fire them all, and charge us 15 again. Victory
Stealthy Tiger	Posted - 2010.04.13 14:18:00 - [35] Originally by: Le Zyx CCP should charge $100 a month, then they will be able to hire 500 new devs to bugtest large fleet fights in SiSi, once its fixed they can fire them all, and charge us 15 again. Victory Confirming that charging $100 pm would fix the lag
Terminal Insanity Minmatar Gith Industries	Posted - 2010.04.13 14:27:00 - [36] Originally by: Epicbeardman I like how idiots still complain on the forums about crashes while not logging in for Mass Testing. We all love eve, but not everyone is willing to download and install a second copy of it, just to spend 30 minutes in the test server. Also, even though this is 2010, theres a lot of ISP's who still cap your bandwidth and transfer ammounts. Or, people like me who's harddrives are full of movies and tvshows, i have barely any room to download the latest Colbert Report, let alone install another copy of eve.
Issaries Valran Caldari	Posted - 2010.04.13 15:34:00 - [37] Originally by: Stealthy Tiger Originally by: Le Zyx CCP should charge $100 a month, then they will be able to hire 500 new devs to bugtest large fleet fights in SiSi, once its fixed they can fire them all, and charge us 15 again. Victory Confirming that charging $100 pm would fix the lag Ouch! 100 per month that would be pretty steep. Fix the lag aright the only people that would keep subscribing would be that guy who has 14 accounts and Chirbba.
Amberlamps	Posted - 2010.04.13 18:22:00 - [38] Originally by: Issaries Valran Originally by: Stealthy Tiger Originally by: Le Zyx CCP should charge $100 a month, then they will be able to hire 500 new devs to bugtest large fleet fights in SiSi, once its fixed they can fire them all, and charge us 15 again. Victory Confirming that charging $100 pm would fix the lag Ouch! 100 per month that would be pretty steep. Fix the lag aright the only people that would keep subscribing would be that guy who has 14 accounts and Chirbba. The way CCP works I doubt hiring more Devs would work... CCP's Dev's would solve the problem however as always they will pull the update from the patch and because fleet flights will now working they would believe it would affect the balance of the game therefore they would pull the update and say we need further testing for balance issues and thus we would never have our lag fixed. If CCP increased the cost of monthly subscription to increase the amount of Dev's to solve the problems WE ALL KNOW WHICH WERE CAUSED BY DOMINION then I would simply quit and not come back, I might of invested some time into this game but I'm not willing to invest more money purely due to someone incompetence. The 1st full paragraph was jokey however I wouldn't put it past them if it happened. End of the day I have said it before and I will say it again, We pay to play, not to work for them.
Zeba Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company	Posted - 2010.04.13 19:08:00 - [39] You guys waste moar time each day whooring the forums than ccp has ever asked of you for testing on sisi. So lulz at you good sirs. Originally by: CCP Zymurgist Get off the forums and go kill someone! Originally by: Amarr Supremacist Yeah, it(Jaguar) almost has cruiser level tank and gank!
Amberlamps	Posted - 2010.04.14 10:32:00 - [40] Originally by: Zeba You guys waste moar time each day whooring the forums than ccp has ever asked of you for testing on sisi. So lulz at you good sirs. We've made similar progress as CCP... None. Looking at the test results ( I have even attended all but one of the tests since Dominion ) and the results were shocking, I could load grid reasonably fast but wasn't able to do anything on each occassion. FPS turned out to be Frames Per Minute instead.
TheLordofAllandNothing Caldari NailorTech Industries RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2010.04.14 11:16:00 - [41] Edited by: TheLordofAllandNothing on 14/04/2010 11:16:29 Nice to see ccps efforts are focused: What did not one **ing person complain about: Deep safes What is everyone complaining about: Massive unbearable **ing lag. What are they fixing: Deep safes Also nice to see that you are putting walls into your game ccp, and are probably going to nuke a lot of supercapitals and faction bs, i couldn't of thought of a better(more terrible) implementation than that, instead of fixing the lag. _______________________ Fix rockets in '09 =(
Super Whopper I can Has Cheeseburger	Posted - 2010.04.14 12:24:00 - [42] Well, look at it this way, if CCP fixed the lag and some of the most pertinent problems the populace would have no reason to compare CCP's actions with Sony's. I am really worried Incarna is going to turn out like Sony's clever tinkering with SWG and kill EVE. I've been playing this game for years and the more time goes on the further out of touch CCP seem to be becoming with the playerbase.
Angry Poster	Posted - 2010.04.14 12:38:00 - [43] Edited by: Angry Poster on 14/04/2010 12:41:55 Originally by: TheLordofAllandNothing CCP needs to realise many peoples patience is running short. ... which might be the reason why the interest in these constant SiSi tests is less then stellar. I personally stopped playing EVE between january and the end of march simply because I didn't feel like getting an ulcer from all the lag and laughable 15 minute grid loads. And if I'm not willing to play this game on the live server then you can imagine how motivated I was about the test server. This is especially pronounced because the lag situation was pretty much "fixed" during Appocrypha (after 4 years of unplayable lag) and only got bad again after the role-out of Dominion. And I'm simply not willing to suffer through another 4 years of CCPs ineptitude and/or unwillingness to face up to the fact that Dominion totally destroyed the only end-game content this game has to offer. I'll either quit sooner or later (I can only deal with that many botched fleet fights before I'll puke and rage quit) or CCP will fix it. If I have time some Sunday to logon to SiSi then I'll do that but I'm not making any special excuses for CCP anymore and am also not willing to go out of my way to help them solve their god damn technical problems.... AGAIN! That's my take on the situation. tl;dr - fix lag in Dominion or roll back to Appocrypha. Either that or you'll sooner or later lose me as a customer (and with all the rubbish CCP has been doing the past few months I think it'll probably be sooner rather then later). Less marketing blather, more fix the **ing lag. Edit: Quote:** Also nice to see that you are putting walls into your game ccp, and are probably going to nuke a lot of supercapitals and faction bs, i couldn't of thought of a better(more terrible) implementation than that, instead of fixing the lag. Also ^ this. Perhaps you could completely ignore the lag (just claim it's our ISPs fault or perhaps boot.ini) and start fixing something that everyone is disturbed by..? Like not having walls in space...?
Verys Burning Technologies Cult of War	Posted - 2010.04.14 13:22:00 - [44] Although the op's conspiracy theory is nice I have the inside scoop! Apparently the hamsters powering CCP's tranquility servers are on strike and they pick their moment carefully by keeping an eye on the big fights. Inside source Add drone repair bays to carriers
Amberlamps	Posted - 2010.04.15 00:06:00 - [45] Originally by: Verys Although the op's conspiracy theory is nice I have the inside scoop! Apparently the hamsters powering CCP's tranquility servers are on strike and they pick their moment carefully by keeping an eye on the big fights. Inside source This news shocks me to the core.

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.