| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente
   |
Posted - 2010.04.27 13:21:00 -
[121]
Trolls that twist my words and quote out of context will not be replied to.
All your stuff has already been answered, some of which even in the post you're quoting parts of. I'm not going to repeat myself six times because you're too lazy to read.
---
Now running for CSM5.
Campaign focus available here |
Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 14:28:00 -
[122]
 Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
If we don't get rid of the free trips, at least ban alcohol and drugs so we don't have CSM showing up drunk and stoned. There is a clause in the initial CSM-CCP meeting trip that CCP expects CSM to remain sober, but some CSM couldn't even manage that.
Saying that CCP expects people to always show up to every meeting sober seems a bit unrealistic tbh. 
----
CEO - BDCI
"AAA is a collection of fail leftovers from cascaded alliances such as RISE, IAC, MC and ASCN." - Anton Marx |
Seeing EyeDog
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 14:36:00 -
[123]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
Oh, just because some 0.0 elitist thinks so? I think the majority of the EVE players will think, and vote, otherwise.
this has more to do with them thinking if they vote for you, you'll show ****...and less to do with your actual platform. |
Lady Spank
Amarr
Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 14:40:00 -
[124]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
Originally by: Pirc Balar
3. Why the concern with æfree trips?Æ The trips seem more a reflection of CCP company culture than a distraction for CSM members.
14.30 in.
If we don't get rid of the free trips, at least ban alcohol and drugs so we don't have CSM showing up drunk and stoned. There is a clause in the initial CSM-CCP meeting trip that CCP expects CSM to remain sober, but some CSM couldn't even manage that. I think that the CSM that do this **** display a great disrespect to the players they're supposed to be representing. (I'm not pointing at Darius Johnson here, he needs it for his flights and contributed well during the meetings)
Contrary to popular belief, I do actually drink, and I'm guilty of drinking too much at Cultura at some point during fanfest 2008 myself (thanks for all the free Black Russians). I caught and dealt with that in time, and was on time and sober the next day.
So free business trips are frowned on but free alcohol (which you are objecting to the imbibement of by CSM members) is somehow acceptable? Could you please clarify your stance on how you justify taking certain freebies and not others. At the moment this just sounds like a double standard.
~_~
(Retired from ship toasting. Now a professional.)
|
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 14:48:00 -
[125]
Trolls which twist my words and quote out of context will still not be replied to.
Originally by: Seleene
Saying that CCP expects people to always show up to every meeting sober seems a bit unrealistic tbh.
CCP: "In order to fully focus on the importance of the Summit, alcohol will not be provided during the event. Likewise, we request that Councilors approach this event with all seriousness, punctuality and sobriety."
They tried 
As usual, there was no enforcement of it. 
---
Now running for CSM5.
Campaign focus available here |
Liranan
H A V O C
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 15:19:00 -
[126]
Edited by: Liranan on 27/04/2010 15:28:02
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
Trolls which twist my words and quote out of context will still not be replied to.
This is getting very confusing. Are you calling everything a troll in the hope it gets cleared by the GM's, so you can pretend these questions were never asked?
Please, answer the question as to why giving one thing for free is acceptable and something else isn't? You make use of both the free alcohol as well as the free plane ticket and neither make a dent in CCP's budget. Can we safely assume that you would gladly pay for your own alcohol?
Farjung is my God
You people need to open your eyes and read threads before you mindlessly spam the New Thread link. |
xena zena
Comparative Advantage
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 15:22:00 -
[127]
Ankhesentapemkah, please explain how you'd protect the two key design principles of Eve, meaningful loss and no assured safety, in light of some of your previous posts that seem to indicate you wish to degrade these two principles. Thank you.
|
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 15:58:00 -
[128]
Originally by: Liranan
Edited by: Liranan on 27/04/2010 15:28:02
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
Trolls which twist my words and quote out of context will still not be replied to.
This is getting very confusing. Are you calling everything a troll in the hope it gets cleared by the GM's, so you can pretend these questions were never asked?
Please, answer the question as to why giving one thing for free is acceptable and something else isn't? You make use of both the free alcohol as well as the free plane ticket and neither make a dent in CCP's budget. Can we safely assume that you would gladly pay for your own alcohol?
The alcohol was paid for by a group of EVE players who decided that I wasn't having enough leisure, and took me to a bar. Not by CCP. Beer tickets given by CCP at fanfest are always given away to random players or traded for food tickets.
---
Now running for CSM5.
Campaign focus available here |
Lycanthis
StarHunt
Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 16:15:00 -
[129]
Originally by: xena zena
Ankhesentapemkah, please explain how you'd protect the two key design principles of Eve, meaningful loss and no assured safety, in light of some of your previous posts that seem to indicate you wish to degrade these two principles. Thank you.
Xena I like the questions you ask, they get the conversation stirring so I am going to jump in here and answer this one also.(note also, not instead of, I'd like to see Ankh and the other CSM Runners responses)
First to protect the principles that there is "no assured safety" I would leave the suicide mechanic exactly how it is.
Second to "meaningful loss" that one will be harder to answer until we see the final numbers from the Tyran insurance changes. I can say that if Concord is on your kill mail you shouldn't recieve any insurance. And I am not the biggest fan of T2 ship insurance, as it negates a bit of the meaning out of losing that HAC or recon, but I am open enough that I am willing to see how that change effects the game( not that there is much choice at this time)
|
Lykouleon
Trust Doesn't Rust
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 16:19:00 -
[130]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
Oh, just because some 0.0 elitist thinks so? I think the majority of the EVE players will think, and vote, otherwise.
Wow...way to alienate an entire voting block in a single foul swoop. Not to mention the fact that you've ****ed off the PVP populace (at least those that read the forums)
Fire your campaign manager, cuz hes an iiiiiidiot.
*fake edit*
Nice navy domi loss during a wardec 
Quote:
CCP Mindstar > Sorry - I've completely messed all that up. lets try again
|
Furb Killer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 16:36:00 -
[131]
Originally by: Lykouleon
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
Oh, just because some 0.0 elitist thinks so? I think the majority of the EVE players will think, and vote, otherwise.
Wow...way to alienate an entire voting block in a single foul swoop. Not to mention the fact that you've ****ed off the PVP populace (at least those that read the forums)
Fire your campaign manager, cuz hes an iiiiiidiot.
*fake edit*
Nice navy domi loss during a wardec
Which voting block are you talking about exactly? And why would they be ****ed off again? Because she calls someone a 0.0 elitist? You do realise there isnt exactly a shortage of 0.0 players who think they are better because they are in 0.0? And the same is also true for low sec and high sec players btw.
Btw I am active in 0.0, i pvp (before some smartass searches kb stats, main shiptype is logistics), i read the forums and i havent actually seen any reason why i would be ****ed off? Because someone likes the system in another game but admits it wouldnt work in eve? Or because she lost a navy domi? Do you really want to see how my care-o-meter reacts to someone losing navy domi?
|
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 16:48:00 -
[132]
Originally by: xena zena
Ankhesentapemkah, please explain how you'd protect the two key design principles of Eve, meaningful loss and no assured safety
There should never be a PVP switch, and thus highsec will never be totally safe. I hate PVP switches. My ultima online freeshard had a PVP ruleset which allowed playerkilling everywhere, and it resulted in interesting dynamics. EVE is a sandbox, and completely removing non-consensual PVP will just make it stale and boring.
To quote Raph Koster: "There are a substantial amount of people out there who enjoy player vs player conflict of all sorts, who get crowded out of a game when it is completely safe, and go play elsewhere. And these people aren't necessarily *******s. But it is easy for them to become *******s if they feel put upon enough or if they think they can get away with it."
Contrary to popular belief, I do not wish to focus on adding more limits to prevent crime from happening. I wish to add more options for players to police themselves. Players should be able to provide their own security, hence the call for things such as tradable killrights and mechanics for bountyhunting and vigilante playstyles. Don't fight crime with game mechanics, embrace crime and add game mechanics to let the players do the fighting. 
Regarding meaningful loss, I dislike the current insurance mechanic. Coupling payout to mineral values is the first step in the right direction, but it remains an artificial mechanic that is an ISK faucet and unbalances the economy.
---
Now running for CSM5.
Campaign focus available here |
Liranan
H A V O C
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 04:11:00 -
[133]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
The alcohol was paid for by a group of EVE players who decided that I wasn't having enough leisure, and took me to a bar. Not by CCP. Beer tickets given by CCP at fanfest are always given away to random players or traded for food tickets.
I apologise for this misunderstanding. However, what about someone who pays for their own trip and still attends meetings under the influence of a drug (alcohol or otherwise)? Don't you think banning, expulsion and, in effect, deportation from Iceland or CCP hq a more effective measure?
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
There should never be a PVP switch, and thus highsec will never be totally safe. I hate PVP switches. My ultima online freeshard had a PVP ruleset which allowed playerkilling everywhere, and it resulted in interesting dynamics. EVE is a sandbox, and completely removing non-consensual PVP will just make it stale and boring.
To quote Raph Koster: "There are a substantial amount of people out there who enjoy player vs player conflict of all sorts, who get crowded out of a game when it is completely safe, and go play elsewhere. And these people aren't necessarily *******s. But it is easy for them to become *******s if they feel put upon enough or if they think they can get away with it."
Contrary to popular belief, I do not wish to focus on adding more limits to prevent crime from happening. I wish to add more options for players to police themselves. Players should be able to provide their own security, hence the call for things such as tradable killrights and mechanics for bountyhunting and vigilante playstyles. Don't fight crime with game mechanics, embrace crime and add game mechanics to let the players do the fighting.
Regarding meaningful loss, I dislike the current insurance mechanic. Coupling payout to mineral values is the first step in the right direction, but it remains an artificial mechanic that is an ISK faucet and unbalances the economy.
Edit: One more Raph Koster quote
"Someday we WILL be able to hand over the reins of policing to players. It will be seen as just a meta-game for those who are interested in it (and what's more, I bet the cops will be the same people we're currently turning into grief players with our limited mechanics). But right now, neither players nor developers are ready."
Glad you see the error of your ways and that you are backpedalling on your end to PVP stance. I do agree that it'd be interesting if kill rights could be transferred, as it might (and this is really only a possibility in the remotest of senses) lead to a new occupation: bounty hunting. The agrieved party pays a sum for another party to deliver the corpse of their aggressor. It'd be an interesting development and might lead to lots of griefing.
Now what I'd like clarification on is whether you're advocating the removal of Concord and the establishment of CVA-like alliances that oversee the security of high-sec. How would this deter suicide gankers? Their target is still dead by the time they get there, if they're online at all.
Farjung is my God
You people need to open your eyes and read threads before you mindlessly spam the New Thread link. |
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 05:48:00 -
[134]
I'll answer the rest at a later time when I have the opportunity.
Originally by: Liranan
Glad you see the error of your ways and that you are backpedalling on your end to PVP stance. I do agree that it'd be interesting if kill rights could be transferred, as it might (and this is really only a possibility in the remotest of senses) lead to a new occupation: bounty hunting. The agrieved party pays a sum for another party to deliver the corpse of their aggressor. It'd be an interesting development and might lead to lots of griefing
It's not backpedalling, it's something I've been saying right from the start, ever since CSM 1.
Was something I clearly mentioned in my first campaign movie.
---
Now running for CSM5.
Campaign focus available here |
Promethian child
Amarr
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 11:14:00 -
[135]
Tradable kill rights on criminals
I see great potential in this 
|
Maxsim Goratiev
Gallente
Imperial Tau Syndicate
Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 12:01:00 -
[136]
Edited by: Maxsim Goratiev on 28/04/2010 12:03:15
I completely disagree that there should be any way to take away SP. Skills are directly related to the subscription, as you buy game time, and train skills using gametime, and tehrefore are sacred and cannot be touched. (ofcource you can pause your skill training if you are a tard)
Suiside gankers- i don't care too much about that. You can take away there insurance, but even there's sp is sacred.
I would like to know your opinion on:
Jump clones and their cost is there any point of having them?
Improving UI
Active tanking ships with cap hungry mwd and guns (we know it does not work very well, not that big of an issue though)
POS- they are horrible.
Null-sec upgrades- further improvement needed? (tip- currently the sanctums can be soloed in a cruiser class ship)
Allowing mwd for BS clas ships in missions (so you can use blasters if you really want to)
And it's untrue that suiside gankers can do what they want unpunished- I personally have killed suiside gankers and can-flippers. You have corpmates for a reason as well. Power in numbers. Probably the only thing i would like, is for them not to be in NPC corps, so you can always dec them if you feel like it.
I must, however, state that i am impressed by your commitment, and i would prefer you to be elected over many other candidates, even though i disagree with your position.
|
Seeing EyeDog
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 18:21:00 -
[137]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
As usual, there was no enforcement of it.
for you to expect CCP to enforce a rule for volunteers is laughable. |
Pirc Balar
Minmatar
Freedom Research Front
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 20:38:00 -
[138]
Thank you for the detailed responses; much more than what I was expecting or hoping for.
I totally understand your perspective on the conduct of previous CSM. However, considering the open 'player regulated' nature of Eve do you think players could use such conduct as political leverage?
It seems to me that you are approaching this from a professional standpoint, which in many ways is to be admired. However, as an elected position it seems to me CSM should be treated as politicians. In other words, getting drunk and sleeping in are legal, but such actions will not help you get reelected.
|
Leil Ren'Do
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 20:56:00 -
[139]
So you're not only ignorant, you're also spineless.
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
I must admit I am very fond of Ultima Online's justice system, where murderers could lose 20% of their stats and skills, and criminals tossed in jail for several hours or days. There are even games, where PK characters are deleted if they are caught within a certain time after the crime. Now that is consequence. If you destroyed someone's hulk, setting him back 15 hours, then you shouldn't get off the hook by whacking rats for an hour. Now as I said I don't see it practical to implement an UO-style system into EVE, but things should be brought more into balance, and there should be more long-term consequence to crime.
As pointed out before by others this illustrates your mindset and your inability to accept eve for what it is.
What is even worse is that once people critize you for it your response is not to stand your ground but to spin.
|
Dariah Stardweller
Gallente
Gung-Ho
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 21:23:00 -
[140]
Jesus Christ, could all the trolls plz stop putting things out of context and twisting words? It's getting a bit sad...
Plz stick to the facts. For instance, what do the trolls think of transferable kill rights? This should be interesting to hear. I think it's way more interesting than who pays for beer for instance
|
Vittorian
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 21:42:00 -
[141]
Let's just not call everybody who points out to Ankhesentapemkah that she's an ignorant spineless player a troll. And let's not call everybody who agrees with her an inexperienced noob carebear.
|
Dariah Stardweller
Gallente
Gung-Ho
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 21:51:00 -
[142]
Originally by: Vittorian
Let's just not call everybody who points out to Ankhesentapemkah that she's an ignorant spineless player a troll. And let's not call everybody who agrees with her an inexperienced noob carebear.
The very fact that she is still running for CSM after all the crap she has been getting from the start of her CSM career doesn't make her seem that spineless to me.
All the insults and trolling looks to me like proof those ppl can't handle the fact that there are other viewpoints than theirs in a civilized manner.
|
Vittorian
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 21:55:00 -
[143]
Originally by: Dariah Stardweller
The very fact that she is still running for CSM after all the crap she has been getting from the start of her CSM career doesn't make her seem that spineless to me.
That's because you're an idiot
|
Dariah Stardweller
Gallente
Gung-Ho
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 21:58:00 -
[144]
Originally by: Vittorian
Originally by: Dariah Stardweller
The very fact that she is still running for CSM after all the crap she has been getting from the start of her CSM career doesn't make her seem that spineless to me.
That's because you're an idiot
Oh boy, you were THAT eager to prove my point I see. 
|
Liranan
H A V O C
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 23:48:00 -
[145]
Originally by: Dariah Stardweller
The very fact that she is still running for CSM after all the crap she has been getting from the start of her CSM career doesn't make her seem that spineless to me.
All the insults and trolling looks to me like proof those ppl can't handle the fact that there are other viewpoints than theirs in a civilized manner.
- She's been on the CSM board in the past only because some elected members couldn't attend and she was the last resort.
- Her first post contained references to Ultima Online and how she wants suicide ganking and unconsentual PVP banned in empire.
- She wants the ban enforced through players being banned and characters deleted.
- She wants CSM members to pay for their own trips because most don't have the money and she'll be one of the few who will have a permanent seat on the CSM.
- She is an expoloiter who was proven to know less than nothing about FW.
- She has proven to be a hypocrite, by reporting players who exploited FW bugs better than her.
- She knows nothing about PVP and wants carebear heaven (aka Hello Kitty).
- She doesn't post in her own name but uses multiple accounts and others to answer posts in the hope it doesn't make her look bad.
EVE is a PVP game, remember that.
Farjung is my God
You people need to open your eyes and read threads before you mindlessly spam the New Thread link. |
Herschel Yamamoto
Agent-Orange
Nabaal Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 01:41:00 -
[146]
I'm hardly an Ankh fanboy, but there are some mistakes in your post.
Originally by: Liranan
- She's been on the CSM board in the past only because some elected members couldn't attend and she was the last resort.
False. She finished 3rd overall in the CSM1 vote and she was #2 overall in CSM2 voting. She made it on the CSM in her own right both times, with very healthy margins.
Originally by: Liranan
- Her first post contained references to Ultima Online and how she wants suicide ganking and unconsentual PVP banned in empire.
- She wants the ban enforced through players being banned and characters deleted.
She said some pretty amazingly dumb things, but I'm pretty sure even UO didn't delete characters for PvP. She's never advocated banning PvP that I've seen, merely making the penalties for doing so significantly harsher.
Originally by: Liranan
- She wants CSM members to pay for their own trips because most don't have the money and she'll be one of the few who will have a permanent seat on the CSM.
Ank's a recent grad in her mid 20s. At the time she sat on the CSM previously, she was still a student. Most of the other CSMs have been professionals in significantly older age brackets. I don't know the financial situations of CSM members, but if I had to guess, I'd say that she's likely to be one of the poorest of the lot.
Originally by: Liranan
- She is an expoloiter who was proven to know less than nothing about FW.
- She has proven to be a hypocrite, by reporting players who exploited FW bugs better than her.
She denies using the cloak exploit, and I've never seen any solid proof. Flinging mud is all well and good, but this one doesn't quite ring true to me.
Originally by: Liranan
- She knows nothing about PVP and wants carebear heaven (aka Hello Kitty).
Not Hello Kitty, just nerfed from where it is now.
Originally by: Liranan
- She doesn't post in her own name but uses multiple accounts and others to answer posts in the hope it doesn't make her look bad.
And stupider yet, she's even admitted to it. She does have her fanboys, I doubt she owns 2000 accounts to vote herself in, so a lot of her support in these threads will be genuine. But yeah, she's been known to seed it a bit at times(and of course, it's impossible for us to judge just how much).
I think her vision for the game is terribly skewed, and I think she'd be a sub-par CSM member. I think she gets in from the support of a lot of people who don't really "get" Eve, and that her lines of argument tend towards the laughable far more often than I'd ever be happy with(yeah, you're not affiliated with anyone, sure). But she's not the devil, even if we do treat her like it once in a while. As with most people who disagree with you in political stuff, they're not evil, they're just wrong. She's wrong, and she's a bad candidate. But you'd do well to avoid treating her like she's evil.
|
Liranan
H A V O C
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 04:08:00 -
[147]
Edited by: Liranan on 29/04/2010 04:08:43
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto
Originally by: Liranan
- Her first post contained references to Ultima Online and how she wants suicide ganking and unconsentual PVP banned in empire.
- She wants the ban enforced through players being banned and characters deleted.
She said some pretty amazingly dumb things, but I'm pretty sure even UO didn't delete characters for PvP. She's never advocated banning PvP that I've seen, merely making the penalties for doing so significantly harsher.
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
CCP would look into more permanent consequences for criminals, so far this hasn't happened. Probably because everyone with a few destroyer alts can do it, and punishing too harshly will only result in character recycling. I must admit I am very fond of Ultima Online's justice system, where murderers could lose 20% of their stats and skills, and criminals tossed in jail for several hours or days. There are even games, where PK characters are deleted if they are caught within a certain time after the crime. Now that is consequence. If you destroyed someone's hulk, setting him back 15 hours, then you shouldn't get off the hook by whacking rats for an hour. Now as I said I don't see it practical to implement an UO-style system into EVE, but things should be brought more into balance, and there should be more long-term consequence to crime.
You certainly have forgotten all the things she's said.
Anti-pvp = anti-EVE
Farjung is my God
You people need to open your eyes and read threads before you mindlessly spam the New Thread link. |
Herschel Yamamoto
Agent-Orange
Nabaal Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 05:12:00 -
[148]
Originally by: Liranan
Anti-pvp = anti-EVE
Agree, at least in the extreme case. Eve is a PvP game, and someone who ignores that is missing the point and quite frankly playing the wrong game.
Originally by: Liranan
You certainly have forgotten all the things she's said.
Disagree. What she said was that consequences should be dramatically more harsh than they are now. I personally consider that crazy talk, but it's not in the realm of banning PvP or even banning empire PvP.
|
Furb Killer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 08:50:00 -
[149]
Edited by: Furb Killer on 29/04/2010 08:51:45
Edited by: Furb Killer on 29/04/2010 08:50:31
Quote:
- She's been on the CSM board in the past only because some elected members couldn't attend and she was the last resort.
That is pretty much where i stopped reading. Come on cant you put a bit more effort in your trolling?
Originally by: Liranan
Edited by: Liranan on 29/04/2010 04:08:43
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto
Originally by: Liranan
- Her first post contained references to Ultima Online and how she wants suicide ganking and unconsentual PVP banned in empire.
- She wants the ban enforced through players being banned and characters deleted.
She said some pretty amazingly dumb things, but I'm pretty sure even UO didn't delete characters for PvP. She's never advocated banning PvP that I've seen, merely making the penalties for doing so significantly harsher.
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
CCP would look into more permanent consequences for criminals, so far this hasn't happened. Probably because everyone with a few destroyer alts can do it, and punishing too harshly will only result in character recycling. I must admit I am very fond of Ultima Online's justice system, where murderers could lose 20% of their stats and skills, and criminals tossed in jail for several hours or days. There are even games, where PK characters are deleted if they are caught within a certain time after the crime. Now that is consequence. If you destroyed someone's hulk, setting him back 15 hours, then you shouldn't get off the hook by whacking rats for an hour. Now as I said I don't see it practical to implement an UO-style system into EVE, but things should be brought more into balance, and there should be more long-term consequence to crime.
You certainly have forgotten all the things she's said.
Anti-pvp = anti-EVE
So where does she say she is anti pvp? And why should i possibly care if someone likes another game? If a candidate likes counter strike does it mean that candidate also wants to remove the meaningfull penalty dying has in eve? (Something ankh wants to reinstate for suicide gankers btw, meaningfull penalty, not remove it, just add some consequences instead of keeping it a walk in the park). If a candidate likes roller coaster tycoon does it mean they want to make eve a single player game?
Edit: And sad to see a 0.0 player still sees suicide ganking as all pvp going on in eve :/
|
Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial
Rooks and Kings
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 17:14:00 -
[150]
I will say this about Eva. She's driven, very dedicated and hard working, but so is the lumberjack who tries to cut an oak with a teaspoon for a year without getting anywhere... You don't want to hire either.
She's also incapable of having a constructive conversation with other members of the CSM, as such she's frequently ignored or ridiculed, as can be seen by the posts on this thread and others. At the end of the day the CSM is a group effort, where people have to talk together and agree on a common point of view and sadly, it doesn't matter if she gets elected, because her general contribution other than when it pertains to her pet peeve is basically zero.
It is my opinion that for a CSM member to be productive, he/she should have good knowledge of all aspects of the game, otherwise they are just dead weight for anything. I think you lack that knowledge, but to be a bit more productive, here are a few questions, should you decide to answer truthfully, that may help people decide how experienced you are. The following questions apply to you PERSONALLY, not to any friend/corpmate you may know, have heard of or have seen.
- Have you flown and regularly used (if so, in what situation and for how long) any of the following ship classes: light interdictor, recon, heavy assault cruiser, heavy interdictor, carrier, dreadnought, titan. Please provide killmails where appropriate.
- How well do you know PvP in general? Lowsec PvP? 0.0 PvP? Capital fights? Large engagements (100+ people on both sides). Please provide killboard detail for the ones where you do have experience.
- How good is your grasp on POS mechanics? Have you personally handled one or more (from set up to operation to dismantling)? If so, to what purpose and for how long?
- How would you rate your knowledge of booster manufacture? T2 manufacture? T3 Manufacture? Capital ship manufacture? For those where you have personal experience, how many of what did you personally produce. Over what time span?
- Have you personally moon-mined, if so what reactions and where? What volume?
- Have you ever done T2 Invention? How much and of what?
- Have you flown a freighter? A Jump Freighter? To what purpose?
Thank you.
Vote for Meissa Anunthiel for CSM 5! Balanced candite, well versed in all aspects of Eve.
http://www.rooksandkings.com/meissa |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |