| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Xencieth
Amarr
   |
Posted - 2010.05.16 20:32:00 -
[1]
Curious when we see next tech of battleships. We already have crusiers which are not bad at all, this would be awesome to see new battleships with simmilar capabilities like strategic crusiers vs hacs/recons.
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.05.16 20:33:00 -
[2]
Tech 3 frigates are next.
|
Xencieth
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.05.16 20:37:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: darius mclever
Tech 3 frigates are next.
Fixing Assault Frigates would be enough.
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.05.16 20:38:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Xencieth
Originally by: darius mclever
Tech 3 frigates are next.
Fixing Assault Frigates would be enough.
maybe the next patch will be frigate focused and we get fixes for rockets and AFs and our t3 frigates. :)
|
Robert Caldera
|
Posted - 2010.05.16 20:53:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Xencieth
Curious when we see next tech of battleships. We already have crusiers which are not bad at all, this would be awesome to see new battleships with simmilar capabilities like strategic crusiers vs hacs/recons.
I hope never.
|
Xencieth
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.05.16 20:58:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Xencieth on 16/05/2010 21:02:39
Well game must evolve, and best thing in t3 is that there are so many variants, you cant predict which one have other guy.
This makes game far more interesting than flying in t2 ships where there are allways just one (or close range and long range variants in some hacs) right setup per each ship, like vaga with 220mm ac and two lse.
|
Ciaa
Gallente
The Executives
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.16 23:11:00 -
[7]
mmm I'll just wish for t2 caps.... mmm caps....
DON'T PANIC! |
Simeon Tor
|
Posted - 2010.05.17 00:11:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Xencieth
Fixing Assault Frigates would be enough.
What!? Are you off your nut?
You don't want T3 Frigates and instead ask for an Assault Frigate fix (fair enough), but you want T3 Battleships?
|
PokinoCupra
|
Posted - 2010.05.17 11:30:00 -
[9]
i guess that a T3 BC for start will be good enough.....but when.....
|
Robert Caldera
|
Posted - 2010.05.17 12:02:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Xencieth
This makes game far more interesting than flying in t2 ships where there are allways just one (or close range and long range variants in some hacs) right setup per each ship, like vaga with 220mm ac and two lse.
what's fun in fully unpredictable outcome of an engagement, its like a dice roll, we have enough dice rolls in eve.
|
|
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.05.17 12:13:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Xencieth
Edited by: Xencieth on 16/05/2010 21:02:39
Well game must evolve, and best thing in t3 is that there are so many variants, you cant predict which one have other guy.
This makes game far more interesting than flying in t2 ships where there are allways just one (or close range and long range variants in some hacs) right setup per each ship, like vaga with 220mm ac and two lse.
you cant blame the game for lack of creativity of the player base no?
There are still some players who create some out of the box setups that actually work. but for most it is easier to take one of the cookie cutter setups and use that.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |