Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

caka ringrawer
|
Posted - 2010.05.22 22:18:00 -
[1]
I'm from USA,and I'm wondering what would happened to the world If
All the troops were to come home. Tell the world their on their own,as we are now minding our own business to fix thing at home?
Would the world change? If so,how and how much?
|

Intense Thinker
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.05.22 22:21:00 -
[2]
Well, I'm no expert but I'd think that other countries would stop exporting goods to the USA. No more cars from other countries, TVs, oil, etc... to show us that we need them too. then when gas hits $12+ a gallon we'd have another problem here
Originally by: a51 duke1406 The girls just dont understand that sunday is pvp night, not cuddle on the couch watching tv night.
|

Torque Daisy
Caldari School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2010.05.22 22:41:00 -
[3]
britain would take back over of course mwhahahahaha!
|

Tobias Sjodin
Ore Mongers Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2010.05.22 22:52:00 -
[4]
Peace in Afghanistan, maybe?
|

Intense Thinker
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.05.22 23:02:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin Peace in Afghanistan, maybe?
       
Originally by: a51 duke1406 The girls just dont understand that sunday is pvp night, not cuddle on the couch watching tv night.
|

vulnevia
The Exploited. Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2010.05.22 23:24:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin Peace in Afghanistan, maybe?
No no, you're wrong. Everything would be chaos and havoc if da soldiers didn't keep peace in the world. Without war and killing there can be no peace  --------- the EVE Crafting Blog |

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.05.22 23:26:00 -
[7]
Originally by: caka ringrawer Would the world change?
Not really noticeably for the worse for most of the "not USA" parts of the world, except the mildly decreased business the bases were bringing to local economies. It's in USA's detriment to pull'em back though, so they never will unless they really, really have to for some unforseen reason.
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

steveid
GK Lite Panda Team
|
Posted - 2010.05.22 23:26:00 -
[8]
A few things:
1) China would gain even more control over world resources to such an extent that within 15 years America would be bankrupt
2) Hundreds of thousands of people in America would be out of a job as they depend on the production of military consumables
3) World war three would break out as the rest of the world aimed to gain a balance with the two major superpowers after America. This would be precipitated by a North Korean invasion, backed in proxy by China followed by a takeover over Taiwan and probably Japan. In the middle east war would begin immediately through Israel and its rivals and without America's backing China would support India in its war with Pakistan. The likely result in this would be thermonuclear war.
4) Without America's backing Europe would pull together into the makings of a superstate and NATO would collapse. In all likelihood this superstate would be so impotent as to stay out of the wars until it was too late.
5) Inside of 20 years America would be at civil war Inappropriate signature removed. Zymurgist |

Ella C'Tronix
|
Posted - 2010.05.22 23:37:00 -
[9]
a) post is a troll post b) damage is already done, shouldn't have been there in the first place
Oh, and I almost forgot. I just made you read my signature. |

ReaperOfSly
Gallente 1st Cavalry Division Circle-Of-Two
|
Posted - 2010.05.22 23:42:00 -
[10]
The Second British Empire would happen of course. ____________________
|
|

digitalwanderer
Gallente DF0 incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 00:01:00 -
[11]
Originally by: steveid Edited by: steveid on 22/05/2010 23:27:45 A few things:
1) China would gain even more control over world resources to such an extent that within 15 years America would be bankrupt
2) Hundreds of thousands of people in America would be out of a job as they depend on the production of military consumables
3) World war three would break out as the rest of the world aimed to gain a balance with the two major superpowers after America. This would be precipitated by a North Korean invasion, backed in proxy by China followed by a takeover over Taiwan and probably Japan. In the middle east war would begin immediately through Israel and its rivals and without America's backing China would support India in its war with Pakistan. The likely result in this would be thermonuclear war.
4) Without America's backing Europe would pull together into the makings of a superstate and NATO would collapse. In all likelihood this superstate would be so impotent as to stay out of the wars until it was too late.
5) Inside of 20 years America would be at civil war
as an edit i'll tell you what would NOT happen. America would not be more liked. It would not be economically better off. It would not prevent terrorism, on the contrary it would increase it.
Well,that war may be happening in the next few weeks unfortunately,as the recent report from that soulth corea frigate that was sunk a few months ago came to the conclusion that only a torpedo could have caused that type of damage,specifically from a north corean submarine,so what action will be taken,be in terms of military operations or trade sanctions,will be answered by north corea as a excuse to start an all out war.
As for the rest of the points,it's already a fact that china is already a superpower to be taken seriously both economically and in military terms,and it's GDP is projected to surpass the US GDP within the next 10 years,at the current 10% + economic growth rate that China has been going thru for the last 20 years strait,with the US talking to china very softly about the fact that human rights abuse still happends in china,it is a communist country with no free elections at all,or that there's even an opposition party,or that protests from it's citizens are outlawed period,not to mention the tibet issue,but the oportunity to make business there is huge with the size of that market.
Meanwhile,in cuba,for many of the same reasons that also happen in china,a trade embargo and economic trade sanctions are still in place....Double standard anyone?
There's also the issue with the iraq war being started with fake information(weapons of mass destruction anyone?),which has already cost well over a trillion dollars,5000+ dead soldiers,30000 wounded with 12000 of those carrying a permanent disability for the rest of their lives.
The cold war with USSR is another and their respective ****ing match about who has the most military hardware is also another issue that made them spend a great deal of money on,with the USSR itself evnetually going completely broke and dissapearing.
So i think we can say that the reason why the US has a lot of military in the rest of the world,is mainly because of it's ****ups in external policy over the years,which made it a lot of enemies in the last 50+ odd years...This wasn't as much the case before world war 2 strangely enough.
|

jason hill
Caldari Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 00:14:00 -
[12]
my five quid on instant events .. i would not like to live in taiwan ... they would fall within 2 weeks . china would roll over them within that time . europe .... 6 weeks ...we rely on eastern eurepean fuel too much to the extent that we are in an already dangourus position that we need to depend upon unstable dictaterships .the arab states are essentialy fubar .... for obvious reasons
our north eastern oil has beeen squandered to the extent that that its cheaper to import it ..than it is to export it our only reliance would essentially be coal which we have oceans of ... but its not politically correct to extract in essence .. and i think im not the only one thinking of this ....to protect our soveriegn states is to have nukes
my five quid
destroy everything you touch |

Tobias Sjodin
Ore Mongers Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 00:17:00 -
[13]
/me spreads the tinfoil.
The world was such an awful place prior to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. XD
|

jason hill
Caldari Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 00:23:00 -
[14]
not at all this is a scenario
destroy everything you touch |

jason hill
Caldari Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 00:31:00 -
[15]
Originally by: jason hill not at all this is a scenario
this isnt a case of would be more of a case that might be.... which is totally different
destroy everything you touch |

digitalwanderer
Gallente DF0 incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 00:34:00 -
[16]
Edited by: digitalwanderer on 23/05/2010 00:35:05
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin /me spreads the tinfoil.
The world was such an awful place prior to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. XD
Believe it or not,but the US also started that problem about 25 years ago,when the USSR was occupying afghanistan,and the US supported local afghan factions with training and equipement to fight off that invasion,but under no circumstances those afghan factions in question,were believing that the US was doing this for the love of the afghan people,but to simply cause as much as much damage to soviet equipement and causualties on the soviet side as possible,all without directly involving american military personel.
Reagan called them freedom fighters for those old enough to remember,and one of his senior advsiors clearly told him that he was opening a pandora's box,but all he saw was the immediate benefits and not the long term consequences.
That's been the main perspective for US foreign policy really...What are the near term benefits and screw the long term consequences.
|

Royaldo
Gallente Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk Amarr branch.
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 00:34:00 -
[17]
Europe would fall to who?
|

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 00:35:00 -
[18]
France would step in and again become a major player on the international scene, yes France.
The US would go into terminal decline and soon rival the post industrial wasteland that is the UK.
I don't see China backing India, if anything they'd play Pakistan and India against each other.
Delenda est achura. |

Derovius Vaden
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 00:38:00 -
[19]
Originally by: steveid Edited by: steveid on 22/05/2010 23:27:45 A few things:
1) China would gain even more control over world resources to such an extent that within 15 years America would be bankrupt
2) Hundreds of thousands of people in America would be out of a job as they depend on the production of military consumables
3) World war three would break out as the rest of the world aimed to gain a balance with the two major superpowers after America. This would be precipitated by a North Korean invasion, backed in proxy by China followed by a takeover over Taiwan and probably Japan. In the middle east war would begin immediately through Israel and its rivals and without America's backing China would support India in its war with Pakistan. The likely result in this would be thermonuclear war.
4) Without America's backing Europe would pull together into the makings of a superstate and NATO would collapse. In all likelihood this superstate would be so impotent as to stay out of the wars until it was too late.
5) Inside of 20 years America would be at civil war
as an edit i'll tell you what would NOT happen. America would not be more liked. It would not be economically better off. It would not prevent terrorism, on the contrary it would increase it.
I love how Americans think that the entire world depends on them keeping it safe. Bring on the Chinese I say, it cant be any worse then the state we are in now.
What we need is a new world currancy besides the USD; if bottom droping out of the market wasnt proof enough that the US's overinflated consumption wasnt sustainable, I dont know what is. 
|

digitalwanderer
Gallente DF0 incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 00:43:00 -
[20]
Edited by: digitalwanderer on 23/05/2010 00:45:26
Originally by: Wendat Huron France would step in and again become a major player on the international scene, yes France.
The US would go into terminal decline and soon rival the post industrial wasteland that is the UK.
I don't see China backing India, if anything they'd play Pakistan and India against each other.
Well,for the most part,some areas in the US are already in serious decline for years now....Case in point is detroit,where 30 years ago it had the 6th largest GDP in the US,and exported the vast majority of what was made there,to other countries,and all of that is history these days.
As for India and pakistan,both have nukes,so if the situation really got critical for either side,here comes MAD....China wouldn't have anything to gain fromm that basically.
|
|

Thuranni
Eldjotnar
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 01:10:00 -
[21]
The world would probably be a better place.
|

Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 01:18:00 -
[22]
Everyone should bookmark this thread so that in another 10~20 years you can look it up and lulz about how stupid and narrow minded you all are. 
Originally by: CCP Zymurgist Get off the forums and go kill someone!
|

FunzzeR
Death of Virtue MeatSausage EXPRESS
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 01:28:00 -
[23]
Originally by: ReaperOfSly The Second Spanish Empire would happen of course.
Fixed
I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition. PRAISE THE SCOTTISH FOLD!!
THEIR WILL SHALL BE DONE!! |

Jhagiti Tyran
Invicta.
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 01:39:00 -
[24]
Originally by: steveid 1) China would gain even more control over world resources to such an extent that within 15 years America would be bankrupt
Easily solved.
|

Zions Child
Caldari Carthage Industries
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 01:47:00 -
[25]
China lies about its economic growth, and everyone knows it, except the Chinese. There is no such thing as GDP super expansion for the duration they've had it, and even if it is true, they're more than likely going to hit the ground harder than anyone if the world economy slows down enough.
As for the Chinese military, lol. More numbers does not = superior military, as evidenced in the Korean war, where US bases were overrun because they ran out of ammo. Something that could be easily rectified if we played a war with them intelligently.
Either way, the points are moot, because the powers that actually be are the mega-corporations like ConAgra, Dow, Royal Dutch Shell, etc. WWIII would hurt their profit margin, so they're not likely to let it happen. We all like to believe we live in democracies/republics/constitutional monarchies and aren't run by industry, but the truth is that corporations are the ones who hold the reins of World Politics.
As such, it is to their financial detriment to remove the U.S troops from their current locations, thus, only exceptionally strong local or American opinion would get the troops off of other lands. And even that isn't a guarantee.
Originally by: CCP Shadow *snip* Castration successful. Shadow.
MYNX for |

yfz3r0
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 02:38:00 -
[26]
Originally by: jason hill
Originally by: jason hill not at all this is a scenario
this isnt a case of would be more of a case that might be.... which is totally different
I'm really hoping that you ACCIDENTALLY quoted and replied to yourself 
|

stoicfaux
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 02:51:00 -
[27]
Edited by: stoicfaux on 23/05/2010 02:58:18
* Taiwan would return back to China. * Japan would have to scramble to re-militarize itself before China finished with Taiwan. * Afghanistan would probably fall back to feuding warlords or fall to the Taliban. * Pakistan taliban/insurgents would probably destabilize Pakistan. Pakistan has nukes, so either terrorists would get nukes or India and Pakistan would nuke each other as India steps in to prevent the destabilization of Pakistan. * India has a billion people and would probably jump on the chance to increase their military and exert regional influence. * Indo-china is going to light up in a tug of war between India, China, Japan, maybe Russia, and maybe even Australia. * The Middle East Arab states would probably make another try to wipe Israel off the map. * Israel might do something extremely preemptive when it longer has to worry about appeasing Washington. * The EU (especially the French and Germans) would pump up their military to compensate for the loss of NATO. * Russia might actually try to subjugate some of the former soviet republics. At the very least Russia would seek to expand/exert its global diplomacy and increase it's arms sales. * Russia and China might make snarling noises at each other, but I don't think there would be any direct confrontation. * Australia might wig out in fear of China expanding it's influence down to New Zealand. * No idea if Australia's current government is reactionary/conservative enough to pull a Falklands or Mussolini and try to do some (incompetent) empire expansion. * The UK would freak out and either really join the EU, or fire up a military-industrial complex and try to rebuild their navy and nukes to exert influence. * Central and South America would have a few wars as local dictators pull a few "****** Hussiens" and try to conquer their neighbors. * Mexico. Jesus, I don't even want to think of what would happen in Mexico if the US pulled out of world affairs. * North Korea would feel emboldened. * South Korea would [bleep] its pants and militarize. * Whether the Koreas wipe each other out depends on whether North Korea can make up for the loss of US subsidies and whether China can keep North Korea in check. * US arms manufacturers would have record world wide sales, which would increase the US economy's dependence on a military industrial complex to levels beyond that of the Cold War. * The UN would probably become much less useful as the US abstains from most votes and stops being the "world police." * Iran would make a play at being a regional power. * Iran's neighbors would build up and crash start nuclear weapons programs. * Israel would probably nuke Iran. * Canada would still be Canada.
Edit: forgot about Iran.
----- "Are you a sociopathic paranoid schizophrenic with accounting skills? We have the game for you! -- Eve, the game of Alts, Economics, Machiavelli, and PvP"
|

digitalwanderer
Gallente DF0 incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 02:54:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Zions Child China lies about its economic growth, and everyone knows it, except the Chinese. There is no such thing as GDP super expansion for the duration they've had it, and even if it is true, they're more than likely going to hit the ground harder than anyone if the world economy slows down enough.
As for the Chinese military, lol. More numbers does not = superior military, as evidenced in the Korean war, where US bases were overrun because they ran out of ammo. Something that could be easily rectified if we played a war with them intelligently.
Either way, the points are moot, because the powers that actually be are the mega-corporations like ConAgra, Dow, Royal Dutch Shell, etc. WWIII would hurt their profit margin, so they're not likely to let it happen. We all like to believe we live in democracies/republics/constitutional monarchies and aren't run by industry, but the truth is that corporations are the ones who hold the reins of World Politics.
As such, it is to their financial detriment to remove the U.S troops from their current locations, thus, only exceptionally strong local or American opinion would get the troops off of other lands. And even that isn't a guarantee.
Then why is the USA and every other major industrial nation for that matter,trying to establish as many commercial deals with china as possible,and this with regards to everything that can be produced in volume.
Look at where most home electronics and clothing and even the sneakers you buy are made there for the most part....All that stuff used to be made in the US 30 years ago,but not anymore,so it's a huge amount of jobs that have moved there because of cheap labour and pretty much non existant labour laws,not to mention that the chinese goverment keeps their national currency at a low value to make them even more competitive against stronger currencies.
And military wise,they're not a joke anymore,matching everything the US has except for aircraft carriers,and besides,they also have nukes too,so even the USA talks very softly when it comes to china,and the fact they're still a communist nation,human rights violations are all too frequent,their not a democracy in the least,and there's the whole tibet issue,and their claims to taiwan of course.
In short,if you're a shark,you don't go out hunting for other sharks just as large,as you might get hurt or even killed....
|

digitalwanderer
Gallente DF0 incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 03:07:00 -
[29]
Edited by: digitalwanderer on 23/05/2010 03:14:52 Edited by: digitalwanderer on 23/05/2010 03:09:16
Originally by: stoicfaux Edited by: stoicfaux on 23/05/2010 02:55:47 Edited by: stoicfaux on 23/05/2010 02:52:43
* Taiwan would return back to China. * Japan would have to scramble to re-militarize itself before China finished with Taiwan. * Afghanistan would probably fall back to feuding warlords or fall to the Taliban. * Pakistan taliban/insurgents would probably destabilize Pakistan. Pakistan has nukes, so either terrorists would get nukes or India and Pakistan would nuke each other as India steps in to prevent the destabilization of Pakistan. * India has a billion people and would probably jump on the chance to increase their military and exert regional influence. * Indo-china is going to light up in a tug of war between India, China, Japan, maybe Russia, and maybe even Australia. * The Middle East Arab states would probably make another try to wipe Israel off the map. * Israel might do something extremely preemptive when it longer has to worry about appeasing Washington. * The EU (especially the French and Germans) would pump up their military to compensate for the loss of NATO. * Russia might actually try to subjugate some of the former soviet republics. At the very least Russia would seek to expand/exert its global diplomacy and increase it's arms sales. * Russia and China might make snarling noises at each other, but I don't think there would be any direct confrontation. * Australia might wig out in fear of China expanding it's influence down to New Zealand. * No idea if Australia's current government is reactionary/conservative enough to pull a Falklands or Mussolini and try to do some (incompetent) empire expansion. * The UK would freak out and either really join the EU, or fire up a military-industrial complex and try to rebuild their navy and nukes to exert influence. * Central and South America would have a few wars as local dictators pull a few "****** Hussiens" and try to conquer their neighbors. * Mexico. Jesus, I don't even want to think of what would happen in Mexico if the US pulled out of world affairs. * North Korea would feel emboldened. * South Korea would [bleep] its pants and militarize. * US arms manufacturers would have record world wide sales, which would increase the US economy's dependence on a military industrial complex to levels beyond that of the Cold War. * The UN would probably become much less useful as the US abstains from most votes and stops being the "world police." * Iran would make a play at being a regional power. * Iran's neighbors would build up and crash start nuclear weapons programs. * Israel would probably nuke Iran. * Canada would still be Canada.
Edit: forgot about Iran.
Dunno if canada would still be in the clear,as the strongest thing we have is a lot of natural resources,which of course includes oil,and a lot of it too,at something like 160 billion barrels of oil reserves in the alberta oil sands alone,and 95% of current production is exported around the world,including china,then there's the melting ice caps in the north,which become usefull for ships to take shorter routes to reach their destinations,and there's also a lot of proven oil reserves there as well,which is currently under dispute between the US/canada/sweden/russia btw.
So we're already seeing a lot of countries working towards securing deals to natural resources to keep their economies growing not just now,but for the future as well,and the needs will only grow as time goes on,so the pressure keeps building up....How will this end is the main question?
Edit: we already have wars because of oil primarily...Iraq anyone?....Or how about kuweit further soulth?,which also has enourmous oil reserves too,so help from the US came fast,or how about venezuela,wich it's president nationalised the oil companies,so most of the profits go to the country itself.
|

digitalwanderer
Gallente DF0 incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.05.23 03:23:00 -
[30]
Even this whole situation with iran makes me wonder quite a bit,since they're the last of the big boys with a lot of proven oil reserves too,so controling that means controling the vast majority of the oil production from the middle east.
I'm not saying that iran's president isn't an extremist,since he's already stated he'd like nothing better than wiping israel off the map if he could,and not wanting their nuclear facilities to be inspected or insisting that their only for peacefull purposes,when at least one of them is hidden underground,is very suspect of course.
But whose oil reserves and the prospect of controling them definitely provides a large added bonus for sure....
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |