| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dondoran
   |
Posted - 2010.05.27 05:55:00 -
[1]
"The load balancing mechanism for missions in Dominion incorrectly prioritized high-load systems over low-load systems when selecting the location for mission objectives. Agents now prefer to send players to less loaded systems."
This means much less missions in Hisec and much more in lowsec.I think it would have been fair to make it a random thing and not doing it this way.
|
Widemouth Deepthroat
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 07:45:00 -
[2]
imo lvl5 shouldn't be in high sec anyway
|
Ophelia Ursus
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 07:47:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Widemouth Deepthroat
lvl5 shouldn't be in high sec anyway
|
Omir Kajil
Gallente
The POD Collective
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 07:52:00 -
[4]
Risk vs reward lolol
/me watches killmails on rattlesnakes go up considerably
But I digress. This one time at fat camp, i was flying a dominix, and then I was so hungry that i ate 3 planets and collapsed into a black hole, which ate my sig. |
Sader Rykane
Amarr
Midnight Sentinels
Midnight Space Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 08:42:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Sader Rykane on 27/05/2010 08:43:45
The only way I'de agree that Level 5's should ONLY be in low sec is if the following conditions were met:
1) All level 5's dealt omni damage
2) Level 5 rats switch targets like sleepers.
3) Level 5 payout and bounties increased by at least 2x.
Give me that and yes, I'll start running Level 5's in low sec. Until then they aren't worth the trouble or the headache unless I can run them without getting ****d by a PvP ship just because I'm PvE fit.
*EDIT*
Originally by: Omir Kajil
Risk vs reward lolol
/me watches killmails on rattlesnakes go up considerably
No one with half a brain cell is taking a Rattlesnake into low sec to run a level 5 when they'd make more running 4's.
Sig Gallery is currently down: Contact me ingame for prices.
|
Kormorant
Gallente
Oneirocritica Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 09:16:00 -
[6]
Running L5 missions in hi sec was a bug if you didn't know :)
A quirk of the allocation system that has been fixed. It was mentioned before... I think with correcting of courier missions.
Anyway, L5 are not really supposed to be soloable - especially in low sec. You kind of need friends.
Suck it up 
|
Sader Rykane
Amarr
Midnight Sentinels
Midnight Space Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 10:10:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Kormorant
Running L5 missions in hi sec was a bug if you didn't know :)
A quirk of the allocation system that has been fixed. It was mentioned before... I think with correcting of courier missions.
Anyway, L5 are not really supposed to be soloable - especially in low sec. You kind of need friends.
Suck it up
They are barely worth running solo and you want to add "friends" ?
Sig Gallery is currently down: Contact me ingame for prices.
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 10:55:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Widemouth Deepthroat
imo lvl5 shouldn't be in high sec anyway
|
Noran Ferah
Red Sky Morning
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 11:23:00 -
[9]
I will not be stopped.
I haz plan.
|
Gunnanmon
Gallente
The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 11:40:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Noran Ferah
I will not be stopped.
I haz plan.
Log in massive amounts of chars in the agent's system, then ask for a mission. Might be easier to join a big mission-running corp before trying this.
Signature locked for discussing moderation. Navigator
|
Noran Ferah
Red Sky Morning
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 11:49:00 -
[11]
My plan involves doing them in lowsec, just not in my rattlesnake anymore.
|
Gligan
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 11:54:00 -
[12]
why would people that want to PVE be forced to pvp.
Face it - online games are usually so successful because people get together and do dungeons. Today's MMO usually spawns an instanced dungeon where people can do PVE in a group without being bothered by their pvp foes.
Eve lacks that. Eve is 100% pvp all the time, every time. As soon as you leave the station there's a chance you won't make it back in the same ship.
But - what about lvl 4 missions? They're fairly safe. You usually kill the whole mission in 15-20 mins solo. Why would you want buddies? It's also pretty high income, on par with exploration , better than mining , close to what WH people are doing(especially when you factor in the time the WH people take to create a fleet, bathroom breaks and so on).
So what would a high sec lvl 5 mission do?
It's usually hard enough to force people to group. Wait... what ? MMO and grouping - this can't be good? I mean if you wanna group why not just pvp...
It would make people to fall into roles - tank, dps , logistic. Hmm specialized roles for a MMO - again that's something only reserved for pvp crowd.
yeah high sec lvl 5 is a bad bad thing.
|
Noran Ferah
Red Sky Morning
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 12:00:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Noran Ferah on 27/05/2010 12:01:40
Confirming that after DT, mission allocation was identical. All (mostly) to lowsec.
As to the poster above me, It was easy to make 1 bil every 2 days running l5's. On LP.
That is what they did.
|
Goose99
|
Posted - 2010.05.27 14:26:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Kormorant
Running L5 missions in hi sec was a bug if you didn't know :)
A quirk of the allocation system that has been fixed. It was mentioned before... I think with correcting of courier missions.
Anyway, L5 are not really supposed to be soloable - especially in low sec. You kind of need friends.
Suck it up
Not a bug. High sec lvl5s were around before Apoc and the allocation bug it produced. What "should be" aside, this is new.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |