Challenge keeps things interesting and actually can't be worst than what it is. High sec PVP fans say they love pvp, witch seems to be true, but I'd like to see what happens if they start getting flagged and spanked by other players just waiting flags, unlike know they're pretty much safe behind concord exploiting aggression mechanics.

I pretty much like the idea every action brings consequences and the fact no one should be safe, whenever it comes to make choices in high sec it shouldn't be the joke it is with neutral repps/jam/boost, there should be real consequences just like in low sec/null/wh space. Those are not trusting Concord mechanics to get it done the easy way.

That is my understanding. And since the suspect flag only applies to option number 3 then I would assume that it the "highsec PVP" that is being refered to.

I presume fighting would extend the length of the suspect flag, I'm also guessing you wouldn't be able to shoot a GSC because you wouldn't be able to pick up individual aggression against the owner/corp?

This is precisely what is wrong with all the existing game design in the first place.

Concord should work like the police in GTA, if you can make it to a station and change paintjobs, they forget everything you ever did.

it's useful for any who want to go around being a nuisance in highsec.

Personally, I don't understand how people think the existing aggro system is complicated. It's not. You do something against someone, they get aggro rights on you. It's basically a "do you deserve it?" equation. All this new "well, you're now a suspect but then you become a vigilante, then you can be a sheriff but you have to chew space-tobacco" crap is just some dude trying to justify his position in a company that can no longer keep track of it's own employees. Bureaucracy at work.

It's not as if two members of two wealthy nullsec alliances loaded to the teeth with technetium have been posting against the idea of immune RR!

I assume you mean "for obvious server performance reasons" there because from a gameplay standpoint, that stinks and is one of the things everyone hates about neutral RR as it stands.

Aggression Transfer is Bad

And in every type of space, sitting on a station and repping makes you 100% invulnerable. You'd have to be an idiot to die while motoring around the station in docking range repairing your friendlies.

Not only can they shoot you, but doing so only baits the DPS off of your friendlies while they continue to die. You can bait into low armor and then dock your precious Guardian up and then come right back out.

That's a joke. That should never have been allowed to go on as long as it has.

No one said it should be easy to pvp in hi-sec.

Good thing that he didn't, then.

In fact, if you want to cry about something, you've missed the really annoying change with the new system GÇö the one that will actually make a difference for thieves and canflippers: the safety system.

Um no - simply not true. Many folk try to flip their cans back - and there are many ways to successfully steal your can back if you take the time to learn them. And yes the goal is not to get the person to shoot at you but to flip the can - that way you and your friends can shoot at them. But of course if no one ever bothered to reflip the cans then there would be no need for ccp to force the safeties on its players.

We already get the big statement from CCP about null sec, what they intent it to be. With Incursion and Faction Warfare revamp, we get a blurred picture about low sec intention. So can we get a big statement about High sec and CCP intention for it?