| Pages: [1]  :: one page | 
      
      
        | Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
        |  Hestia Mar
 Calmaretto
 
 21
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.16 10:42:00 -
          [1] - Quote 
 As many of spend a lot of time running L4 missions we tend to know how to fit a ship, what triggers to keep an eye on, and what spawns are coming - especially if we check Eve-Survival before doing the missions.
 
 So...is there no way that CCP can randomise the missions so that we don't quite know what we're going to get when we warp in, and so that afk missioning is either less or completely not possible to do? I mean, last time I did Damsel, I killed a ship, BM'd it, warped out, warped back to the BM at 100km, dropped sentries, and waited until the litte diamond showed me where the Damsel was!
 
 The other possibility is to have many more ship restrictions - so lets have some L4's in which the biggest ship you can take is a BC, or lets have missions that have to be scanned down (the agent says "the location is somewhere in Dodixie system, but you'll need to scan it down"), so there is more interest.
 
 H
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Caleidascope
 Republic Military School
 Minmatar Republic
 
 115
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.16 12:09:00 -
          [2] - Quote 
 Um... if you feel so bored... why don't you go and run missions in low sec? All the danger and randomness you can us for...
 Life is short and dinner time is chancy
 Eat desert first!
 | 
      
      
        |  Pix Severus
 School of Applied Knowledge
 Caldari State
 
 67
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.16 14:36:00 -
          [3] - Quote 
 
 Caleidascope wrote:Um... if you feel so bored... why don't you go and run missions in low sec? All the danger and randomness you can us for... 
 Going into low sec in an expensive mission boat is a bad idea, nevermind the fact that you'll be gate ganked on the way to the mission anyway.
 | 
      
      
        |  Traejun DiSanctis
 School of Applied Knowledge
 Caldari State
 
 13
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.16 16:08:00 -
          [4] - Quote 
 I certainly like the idea of adding a little more excitement to missions. Variation would be a good way to do it.
 | 
      
      
        |  Zhilia Mann
 Tide Way Out Productions
 
 560
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.16 17:43:00 -
          [5] - Quote 
 
 Pix Severus wrote:Caleidascope wrote:Um... if you feel so bored... why don't you go and run missions in low sec? All the danger and randomness you can us for... Going into low sec in an expensive mission boat is a bad idea, nevermind the fact that you'll be gate ganked on the way to the mission anyway. 
 Confirming that going to low sec is instant death and shouldn't be done under any circumstances.
 
 Or rather:
 
 1) Take a slightly less expensive boat.
 2) Learn how to avoid obvious camps.
 3) Don't get camped in to a station.
 4) Profit.
 | 
      
      
        |  sabre906
 Old Spice Syndicate
 Sailors of the Sacred Spice
 
 416
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.16 18:40:00 -
          [6] - Quote 
 
 Zhilia Mann wrote:Pix Severus wrote:Caleidascope wrote:Um... if you feel so bored... why don't you go and run missions in low sec? All the danger and randomness you can us for... Going into low sec in an expensive mission boat is a bad idea, nevermind the fact that you'll be gate ganked on the way to the mission anyway. Confirming that going to low sec is instant death and shouldn't be done under any circumstances. Or rather: 1) Take a slightly less expensive boat. 2) Learn how to avoid obvious camps. 3) Don't get camped in to a station. 4) Profit. 
 Maybe he doesn't want to lose a cheap mission boat either. Maybe he wants to take a pvp fit, not do lowsec missions, and not be lol-pwned instead. It's only you that prefer carebears go to lulzsec in mission boats instead of pvp fits so you don't have risks.
  Standings Improvement Service
 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454
 | 
      
      
        |  Caleidascope
 Republic Military School
 Minmatar Republic
 
 115
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.16 19:41:00 -
          [7] - Quote 
 
 Traejun DiSanctis wrote:I certainly like the idea of adding a little more excitement to missions. Variation would be a good way to do it. CCP has already done it.
 Life is short and dinner time is chancy
 Eat desert first!
 | 
      
      
        |  Cray47
 Gravity Pipe
 
 0
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.16 19:41:00 -
          [8] - Quote 
 hey,
 I understand that doing the same missions over and over again can be quite frustrating.
 
 However, I am aware that a lot of players including me would get pretty angry if missions were to be randomized.
 
 I remember going to take a shower after agressing whole pockets and sending out drones to kill everything before I was back.
 I am sure a lot of drone boat pilots can feel me here.
 
 Regards,
 Cray47
 | 
      
      
        |  Traejun DiSanctis
 School of Applied Knowledge
 Caldari State
 
 13
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.17 08:02:00 -
          [9] - Quote 
 
 Caleidascope wrote:Traejun DiSanctis wrote:I certainly like the idea of adding a little more excitement to missions. Variation would be a good way to do it. CCP has already done it. 
 Could have fooled me. With the exception of missions like Dread Pirate Scarlet and a couple others, pretty much every mission is identical every time, no matter where or when you do it.
 | 
      
      
        |  Hestia Mar
 Calmaretto
 
 22
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.17 09:03:00 -
          [10] - Quote 
 
 Cray47 wrote:hey,I understand that doing the same missions over and over again can be quite frustrating.
 
 However, I am aware that a lot of players including me would get pretty angry if missions were to be randomized.
 
 I remember going to take a shower after agressing whole pockets and sending out drones to kill everything before I was back.
 I am sure a lot of drone boat pilots can feel me here.
 
 Regards,
 Cray47
 
 Without starting an argument about play styles and so on, i would say that if you mission that way you're not even playing the game at all - you're just using your broadband connection for the sake of having one...!
 
 My main flies a full T2 fit Navy Domi and I never afk mission - there's even less enjoyment if you don't have any input at all
 | 
      
      
        |  Daniel Plain
 Science and Trade Institute
 Caldari State
 
 254
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.17 09:13:00 -
          [11] - Quote 
 there's audiobooks on youtube. just sayin'
 
 "I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF | 
      
      
        |  Caitlyn Tufy
 Refuge of Hope
 Lemniskate
 
 13
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.17 11:15:00 -
          [12] - Quote 
 
 Pix Severus wrote:Caleidascope wrote:Um... if you feel so bored... why don't you go and run missions in low sec? All the danger and randomness you can us for... Going into low sec in an expensive mission boat is a bad idea, nevermind the fact that you'll be gate ganked on the way to the mission anyway. 
 I went into low sec with expensive mission boat (well, semi-expensive. CNR with a couple of faction items) before. You know what happened? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
 
 Zomg!
 
 Even did missions in a brand new Tengu in wartime. I barely got away with it, but it was fun as hell surviving that one :D
 | 
      
      
        |  Flurk Hellbron
 Science and Trade Institute
 Caldari State
 
 105
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.19 13:41:00 -
          [13] - Quote 
 
 Hestia Mar wrote:As many of us spend a lot of time running L4 missions we tend to know how to fit a ship, what triggers to keep an eye on, and what spawns are coming - especially if we check Eve-Survival before doing the missions.
 So...is there no way that CCP can randomise the missions so that we don't quite know what we're going to get when we warp in, and so that afk missioning is either less or completely not possible to do? I mean, last time I did Damsel, I killed a ship, BM'd it, warped out, warped back to the BM at 100km, dropped sentries, and waited until the litte diamond showed me where the Damsel was!
 
 The other possibility is to have many more ship restrictions - so lets have some L4's in which the biggest ship you can take is a BC, or lets have missions that have to be scanned down (the agent says "the location is somewhere in Dodixie system, but you'll need to scan it down"), so there is more interest.
 
 H
 Bad troll
 Drones don't fight structures....
 
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Traejun DiSanctis
 School of Applied Knowledge
 Caldari State
 
 15
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.19 14:58:00 -
          [14] - Quote 
 
 Flurk Hellbron wrote:Hestia Mar wrote:As many of us spend a lot of time running L4 missions we tend to know how to fit a ship, what triggers to keep an eye on, and what spawns are coming - especially if we check Eve-Survival before doing the missions.
 So...is there no way that CCP can randomise the missions so that we don't quite know what we're going to get when we warp in, and so that afk missioning is either less or completely not possible to do? I mean, last time I did Damsel, I killed a ship, BM'd it, warped out, warped back to the BM at 100km, dropped sentries, and waited until the litte diamond showed me where the Damsel was!
 
 The other possibility is to have many more ship restrictions - so lets have some L4's in which the biggest ship you can take is a BC, or lets have missions that have to be scanned down (the agent says "the location is somewhere in Dodixie system, but you'll need to scan it down"), so there is more interest.
 
 H
 Bad troll Drones don't fight structures.... 
 I'm fairly certain you're wrong on this one, brah.
 
 They won't auto-aggress to structures, but they will attack them if you command them to.
 | 
      
      
        |  Nestara Aldent
 Citimatics
 
 73
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.21 05:54:00 -
          [15] - Quote 
 
 Hestia Mar wrote:As many of us spend a lot of time running L4 missions we tend to know how to fit a ship, what triggers to keep an eye on, and what spawns are coming - especially if we check Eve-Survival before doing the missions.
 So...is there no way that CCP can randomise the missions so that we don't quite know what we're going to get when we warp in, and so that afk missioning is either less or completely not possible to do? I mean, last time I did Damsel, I killed a ship, BM'd it, warped out, warped back to the BM at 100km, dropped sentries, and waited until the litte diamond showed me where the Damsel was!
 
 The other possibility is to have many more ship restrictions - so lets have some L4's in which the biggest ship you can take is a BC, or lets have missions that have to be scanned down (the agent says "the location is somewhere in Dodixie system, but you'll need to scan it down"), so there is more interest.
 
 H
 
 About ship restrictions, hell no, those Tengus and Gilas and Ishtars wont be restricted in a meaningful manner, and they'll do the L4s as efficient as a well skilled battleship or sometimes even better (e. Gila/Ishtar vs. Serpentis).
 
 Randomized missions however yes, its about the only way to make grind bearable. I'd say even more omni-tank missions (thus favoring good hulls that can omni-tank) and that mission rats dont have clear damage type (e. Sanshas could start doing explosive/kinetic with missiles, not only em/thermal depending on the spawn).
 
 I mean, where is the challenge when you have eve-survival because rats and their behavior never change?
 | 
      
      
        |  nahjustwarpin
 Imperial Academy
 Amarr Empire
 
 28
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.21 07:39:00 -
          [16] - Quote 
 confirming, that grinding is boring.
 
 take a frigate and do some lvl1 missions in lowsec if you're bored and don't want to risk much.
 Or go to Serpentis Prime or any other pirate faction hub and do missions there. you can even join a corporation that is doing missions there.
 
 Hisec is anti-social. go to low/nullsec and meet new friends and enemies. start having fun in eve.
 | 
      
      
        |  Scien Inkunen
 School of Applied Knowledge
 Caldari State
 
 64
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.22 11:57:00 -
          [17] - Quote 
 
 Hestia Mar wrote:As many of us spend a lot of time running L4 missions we tend to know how to fit a ship, what triggers to keep an eye on, and what spawns are coming - especially if we check Eve-Survival before doing the missions.
 So...is there no way that CCP can randomise the missions so that we don't quite know what we're going to get when we warp in, and so that afk missioning is either less or completely not possible to do? I mean, last time I did Damsel, I killed a ship, BM'd it, warped out, warped back to the BM at 100km, dropped sentries, and waited until the litte diamond showed me where the Damsel was!
 
 The other possibility is to have many more ship restrictions - so lets have some L4's in which the biggest ship you can take is a BC, or lets have missions that have to be scanned down (the agent says "the location is somewhere in Dodixie system, but you'll need to scan it down"), so there is more interest.
 
 H
 
 If you are not a troll - you can do zillions things beside missioning which have more danger. If you dont know what are they, you are playing wrong game.
 Read the "Fart file" and you will understand the meaning of life !
 | 
      
      
        |  Corina Jarr
 Spazzoid Enterprises
 Purpose Built
 
 1094
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.23 04:23:00 -
          [18] - Quote 
 Some missions already have a bit of randomness (Dread Pirate being the most obvious).
 
 Most of the randomness is in spawn composition. One time there will be 4 frigates and 3 cruisers, the next there will be 2 cruisers and 5 frigates.
 
 
 I would like a little more randomness in some missions...
 
 But overall, I would prefer less rats with a balanced increase in damage/tank/bounties per rat.
 | 
      
      
        |  Teemo Is-OP
 Imperial Shipment
 Amarr Empire
 
 0
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.23 06:21:00 -
          [19] - Quote 
 missions were intended to be as boring, repetitive, and predictable as mining (almost). If you want randomised PvE encounters, there are other venues - even solo - WH's C1-C3, Low/Nullsec missions (due to pvp more often), and ratting (random drops and spawns). Or Incursions/higher class WH's if u dont mind working with other ppl.
 | 
      
      
        |  Nestara Aldent
 Citimatics
 
 73
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.23 06:30:00 -
          [20] - Quote 
 Theres no reason missions not to be randomized and less boring and feel less repetitive. Yes there is other PVE and missioning in null which can turn unexpected, but all thats no reason missions to remain as they are.
 | 
      
      
        |  Hestia Mar
 Calmaretto
 
 23
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.25 12:10:00 -
          [21] - Quote 
 
 Scien Inkunen wrote:Hestia Mar wrote:As many of us spend a lot of time running L4 missions we tend to know how to fit a ship, what triggers to keep an eye on, and what spawns are coming - especially if we check Eve-Survival before doing the missions.
 So...is there no way that CCP can randomise the missions so that we don't quite know what we're going to get when we warp in, and so that afk missioning is either less or completely not possible to do? I mean, last time I did Damsel, I killed a ship, BM'd it, warped out, warped back to the BM at 100km, dropped sentries, and waited until the litte diamond showed me where the Damsel was!
 
 The other possibility is to have many more ship restrictions - so lets have some L4's in which the biggest ship you can take is a BC, or lets have missions that have to be scanned down (the agent says "the location is somewhere in Dodixie system, but you'll need to scan it down"), so there is more interest.
 
 H
 If you are not a troll - you can do zillions things beside missioning which have more danger. If you dont know what are they, you are playing wrong game. 
 I agree there are many other things I could do - but time is an issue for me and so missions fit in quite well as an ISK-making option.
 
 I'm not gonna waste my precious game time repsonding to a null-sec CTA and sitting in a fleet, unmoving, for 3 hours (yes, I have been there, done that)
 | 
      
      
        |  Daniel Plain
 Science and Trade Institute
 Caldari State
 
 260
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.25 12:30:00 -
          [22] - Quote 
 
 Hestia Mar wrote:I'm not gonna waste my precious game time repsonding to a null-sec CTA and sitting in a fleet, unmoving, for 3 hours (yes, I have been there, done that) 
 1. buy a second screen
 2. open youtube.com
 3. type 'funny cats'
 4. ???
 5. profit
 
 "I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF | 
      
      
        |  Hestia Mar
 Calmaretto
 
 24
 
 
       | Posted - 2012.07.25 14:39:00 -
          [23] - Quote 
 
 Daniel Plain wrote:Hestia Mar wrote:I'm not gonna waste my precious game time responding to a null-sec CTA and sitting in a fleet, unmoving, for 3 hours (yes, I have been there, done that) 1. buy a second screen 2. open youtube.com 3. type 'funny cats' 4. ??? 5. profit 
 
 Dammit, why didn't I think of that...
 | 
      
        |  |  | 
      
      
        | Pages: [1]  :: one page | 
      
      
        | First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |