EVE Search - 2-3 man pvp camp that is impossible for goonswarm to kill

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

2-3 man pvp camp that is impossible for goonswarm to kill

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 639	Posted - 2012.07.17 22:59:00 - [1] - Quote It is possible to camp a low<>high gate in super expensive tech3 cruisers, and if you are about to die you are guaranteed 100% to escape and never lose your ship. Simply place your ship inside of a neutral orca who's at 0 on gate, and warp your pod away. Your ship will be returned when the superior enemy force leaves. Enjoy "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 639	Posted - 2012.07.17 23:06:00 - [2] - Quote Yes, you need to get the orca in there initially. Done easily with a cloak and a couple of scouts. Yes its possible to bump the orca off gate, But simply JUMP THE GATE before the orca is bumped off it. With a Teamspeak connection you are able to ensure all parties are aboard the orca before its jump to concord controlled airspace. The camp is currently successful and is active right now as we speak. Superior forces are being laughed at while this tiny camp of noboies is 100% impossible to kill. "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 639	Posted - 2012.07.17 23:09:00 - [3] - Quote Tarsus Zateki wrote: Because we wouldn't expend a considerable number of Tornadoes suicide ganking an Orca that pissed us off right? A tornado can not shoot what it can not see. When alphafleet appears, my pokemon go back in a special cloak'a'ball. "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 639	Posted - 2012.07.17 23:11:00 - [4] - Quote Tarsus Zateki wrote: Terminal Insanity wrote: The camp is currently successful and is active right now as we speak. Superior forces are being laughed at while this tiny camp of noboies is 100% impossible to kill. I to am good at making up utter bullshit. I'm currently receiving a back rub from Mila Kunis. y u no belief? more killmail, vicar? "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 639	Posted - 2012.07.17 23:18:00 - [5] - Quote Akirei Scytale wrote: Terminal Insanity wrote: Tarsus Zateki wrote: Because we wouldn't expend a considerable number of Tornadoes suicide ganking an Orca that pissed us off right? A tornado can not shoot what it can not see. When alphafleet appears, my pokemon go back in a special cloak'a'ball. so your orca is either on the gate, and liable to be alphad, or off the gate cloaked, and really hoping the 0.0 frigate pilots with years of experience decloaking ships off gates with windows in the order of seconds wont catch it. Pick one. One must first get alphafleet into position for a gank, which takes far more time then isboxer needs to dock up all my alts and jump into highsec+logout. Logging out will ensure the orca is not destroyed since it logged out before it was aggressed, and has acquired abilities such as immunity to broadsword infinipoint due to ccp. "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 639	Posted - 2012.07.17 23:20:00 - [6] - Quote Tarsus Zateki wrote: All these elaborate schemes are banking on the fact we could give a crap about the odd goon getting killed on a gate. I'm mean seriously, we're awful at internet spaceships. Im just enjoying my immunity from all forms of loss in a pvp sandbox "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 639	Posted - 2012.07.17 23:22:00 - [7] - Quote Forum Foreplay wrote: Wait, so you leave the gate, how is that successful, you got run off? by getting kills and harvesting tears of those who are unable to challenge my godliness. "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 639	Posted - 2012.07.17 23:41:00 - [8] - Quote Forum Foreplay wrote: ... Says the person who cant kill me. "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 642	Posted - 2012.07.18 00:19:00 - [9] - Quote Garreth Vlox wrote: ROFL, how long do you think that orca is gonna last? Besides who cares about a t3 kill that much, If I see an orca and a T3 on the same gate i'm killing the orca every time. 1) forever. 2) I do. 3) come try. "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 642	Posted - 2012.07.18 00:52:00 - [10] - Quote http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14049451 or even better; http://eve-kill.net/?a=system_detail&sys_id=5420 and note the time elapsed between each kill for the past... week. "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP

Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 643	Posted - 2012.07.18 01:14:00 - [11] - Quote Bonus points for keeping several ships in the orca so that when one is about to die, you can hop in your armor tanked one to finish the job "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 643	Posted - 2012.07.18 03:22:00 - [12] - Quote Azami Nevinyrall wrote: Terminal Insanity wrote: It is possible to camp a low<>high gate in super expensive (or shitfit) tech3 cruisers, and if you are about to die you are guaranteed 100% to escape and never lose your ship. Simply place your ship inside of a neutral orca who's at 0 on gate, and warp your pod away. Your ship will be returned when the superior enemy force leaves. Enjoy You never get away... Have 2-4 Smartbombing BSs jump in and burn back to gate whilest lighting smartbombs and scram everything, light cyno with recon and have as much stealthbombers jump in at range and push the orca through the gate, where a group of Tornados just landed. PODs blow up from smartbombs, gank Tornadoes take out Orca in highsec filled with shinys. Thrasher or 2 to take out Orca POD.... Oh wait, I did this before... Questions? This simply wouldnt work. 100mn AB tech3 cruisers can burn back to the orca, dock, and then the orca can jump into highsec, before your smartbombing battleships get anywhere near it to damage OR bump it. Unless of course im being an idiot and have my t3's 50km away from the orca... but i'll just choose to not be stupid about that. Richard Desturned wrote: Terminal Insanity wrote: Logging out will ensure the orca is not destroyed since it logged out before it was aggressed you're actually wrong there actually i am correct. If you log out without ANY aggression timers, your ship will warp exactly 1au away in a random direction, and then vanish after 60 seconds. It is -impossible- to interrupt this e-warp unless the ship was ALREADY agressed before the e-warp was initiated. Try it on sisi if you dont believe me. Log out a slow-warping ship, and then try to tackle it. And watch it e-warp anyway. If you manage to probe it out in its e-warp'd position within 60 seconds and tackle it, it will still vanish in 60 seconds. And if the player logs back in while its still there (or you wait for him to come back) you are unable to interrupt its e-warp back to its original position on the gate ether. The aggression mechanic change that happened fairly recently only effects ships that were ALREADY SHOT AT before they attempted to log out. "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
Terminal Insanity The Filthy Ones 652	Posted - 2012.07.18 16:41:00 - [13] - Quote Soldarius wrote: It's amazing how many ways people come up with not to pvp in Eve. OP, I find your idea less than stellar. But I'm not surprised. You're a gate-camper. 1. Position a fleet of alpha tornados on the hisec side, along with a prober. 2. Fire a shot at the Orca while T3 pilots are stowing their ships. 3. Laugh as your "unkillable" Orca jumps. 4. Laugh more as your "unkillable" Orca pilot logs out when he sees the hisec gatecamp. 5. Probe out aggressed Orca and kill it with suicide fleet. 6. Profit 7. (my favorite) Post on forums with kb links about how stupid and fail the entire concept was. If its so easy, come and do it. Nobody has been successful yet This is just typical 99%'er bs. You just hate my swag CQ cos all you can afford are spinners "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.