| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Xenuria
Gallente
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
   |
Posted - 2010.07.09 14:44:00 -
[1]
After a total of 1 month of scanning and documentation I can mathematically confirm that wormholes are not just extremely common in masalle, but guaranteed!
Wormholes can take us to untold wealth and riches or to a swift and violent demise. They are the Russian Roulette of outer space and encountering them in any system on a consistent basis is rare. However after doing the research I can say that I have documented at least 37 wormholes with 24 of them being unique and the remainder, recurrences.
You may ask yourself "what does this mean?".
This means that while there is a finite ammount of wormhole systems there is still a high probability of most if not all of them eventually making an appearance in Masalle. If you are looking for an empty wormhole system or a wormhole pos to blow up then masalle is your system.
My corporation plans to take full advantage of the wormholes in the masalle area and would welcome theory on why they are so common here. |
AltBitch
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:22:00 -
[2]
can you post the four-character WH IDs? any of them that are K162 are random, and 37 IDs in 30 days, or just over 1.2 per day, isn't unreasonable for high-sec systems in relatively small regions of the universe. I didn't do the same calculations, but that sounds similar to rates for WH appearing in high-sec systems in Everyshore, which is about the same size as Verge Vendor.
|
XXSketchxx
Gallente
Remote Soviet Industries
Important Internet Spaceship League
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:29:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Alt*****
37 IDs in 30 days, or just over 1.2 per day, isn't unreasonable for high-sec systems in relatively small regions of the universe.
qft
|
Xenuria
Gallente
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:31:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Alt*****
can you post the four-character WH IDs? any of them that are K162 are random, and 37 IDs in 30 days, or just over 1.2 per day, isn't unreasonable for high-sec systems in relatively small regions of the universe. I didn't do the same calculations, but that sounds similar to rates for WH appearing in high-sec systems in Everyshore, which is about the same size as Verge Vendor.
I am not talking about the entire region. I am talking about a single system. Masalle
There was 37 IDs in 1 month of time and out of all 37 of those IDs 24 of them were unique.
This means that 24 unique wormhole systems were accessible through masalle over the course of 1 month.
13 of those wormholes scanned down were wormholes that had appeared 1 time already in that system but in a different spot.
"My name is legion, for we are many" |
XXSketchxx
Gallente
Remote Soviet Industries
Important Internet Spaceship League
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:35:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Xenuria
Originally by: Alt*****
can you post the four-character WH IDs? any of them that are K162 are random, and 37 IDs in 30 days, or just over 1.2 per day, isn't unreasonable for high-sec systems in relatively small regions of the universe. I didn't do the same calculations, but that sounds similar to rates for WH appearing in high-sec systems in Everyshore, which is about the same size as Verge Vendor.
I am not talking about the entire region. I am talking about a single system. Masalle
There was 37 IDs in 1 month of time and out of all 37 of those IDs 24 of them were unique.
This means that 24 unique wormhole systems were accessible through masalle over the course of 1 month.
13 of those wormholes scanned down were wormholes that had appeared 1 time already in that system but in a different spot.
He's saying that its not unusual that a given system in high sec would get a bunch of wormholes. Think about it. Between C1, C2 and C3 wormhole systems, there are literally hundreds of static holes opening to high sec daily. Its thus not very unusual that a particular system would get a bunch of incoming wormholes from wormhole space.
Have you canvassed any other systems in the area? I have a hunch you will find much the same results.
The problem is you are looking for some "pattern." Unfortunately this is not the pattern you are looking for.
|
AltBitch
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:51:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Alt***** on 09/07/2010 15:53:38
it's good that you're exploring and looking to find a sweet-spot for WH, or a nuance on the game cod ethat puts certain systems at an advantage for some reason, but the basics of 37 ids in 1 system (Masalle) in 30 days isn't unique.
That's why I asked for the 4 character WH IDs. If you were always getting a M267 or something, THAT would be interesting, because it would represent a static C3 entrance from high-sec, which I haven't heard of before.
Also, just to make sure we're not talking apples to oranges -- you're not considering each unique cosmic signature ID in your scanning window to be a unique WH, right? I ask because the same instance of a WH will appear as 2 different scan signature IDs between 1 day and the next. If the life of the WH crosses a game downtime, the Scan ID will change after downtime and you'd be able to scan out the same WH on the next day, but it would appear as a different scanID.
(edit, changed "exit" to "entrance" to remove confusion)
|
Anthal
The Warp Squad
Deadly Unknown
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:11:00 -
[7]
Just FYI:
An M267 wormhole has a Class 5 origin, with a Class 3 destination. A 'static' High Sec to Class 3 does not exist, but a wormhole with a High Sec origin and a Class 3 destination would be an X702. The opposite is a D845, which can be 'Static'.
|
Xenuria
Gallente
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:29:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Anthal
Just FYI:
An M267 wormhole has a Class 5 origin, with a Class 3 destination. A 'static' High Sec to Class 3 does not exist, but a wormhole with a High Sec origin and a Class 3 destination would be an X702. The opposite is a D845, which can be 'Static'.
Are you saying that it is not possible to find a class 5 wormhole entrance in high-sec?
"My name is legion, for we are many" |
Anthal
The Warp Squad
Deadly Unknown
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:25:00 -
[9]
If my memory serves me correctly, the two wormholes for C5->HS and HS->C5 are D792 and M555, respectively. Both are 3b max, with 1b jumpable (Freighter sized).
AKA: I really need to document these someplace other than my head.
|
XXSketchxx
Gallente
Remote Soviet Industries
Important Internet Spaceship League
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:35:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Xenuria
Originally by: Anthal
Just FYI:
An M267 wormhole has a Class 5 origin, with a Class 3 destination. A 'static' High Sec to Class 3 does not exist, but a wormhole with a High Sec origin and a Class 3 destination would be an X702. The opposite is a D845, which can be 'Static'.
Are you saying that it is not possible to find a class 5 wormhole entrance in high-sec?
He was correcting the previous user for using M267 as a generic "to Class 3" wormhole. As stated, M267 is Class 3 destination from Class 5. Class 3 destination from high sec is X702.
If memory serves, high sec to Class 5 is M555. As far as I know these are not static, in fact nor are they limited to high sec. M555 is I believe a generic kspace -> C5 hole, much the same as R943 is a generic kspace -> C2 hole.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |