EVE Search - An idea that maybe reduce sever lag

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

An idea that maybe reduce sever lag

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lord Anubis	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:21:00 - [1] make all Anchorable cans pop after a month its that simple + it will get rid of so much crap advertising and will probley remove the sever load You cant beat Death But you can make the bastard work hard for it wtb Jerek Zuomi's Insignia
Lord Anubis	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:21:00 - [2] make all Anchorable cans pop after a month its that simple + it will get rid of so much crap advertising and will probley remove the sever load You cant beat Death But you can make the bastard work hard for it wtb Jerek Zuomi's Insignia
Helmuth Halbstein	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:26:00 - [3] shut up! "Helmuth Halbstein Caldari Gorilla" Cogito Ergo Zoom
Helmuth Halbstein	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:26:00 - [4] shut up! "Helmuth Halbstein Caldari Gorilla" Cogito Ergo Zoom
Ulendar	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:29:00 - [5] Originally by: Helmuth Halbstein shut up! Lame alt alert! Nice idea but how about this... Pop cans IF NOT USED within the timespan fo a month...or even two weeks. Most systems that have people active in it are FULL (literly) of anchored containers and most of the time its either spamm or the fact that the owners of the cans have moved on and dont give a rats ass about the tainers anymore... Regardless of which the case is, something needs to be done abtou all these stray containers. Either make it so people can salvage them if they are abandoned or make it so they pop after being abandoned. Originally by: cashman It's time for Eris to get a clue. CCP should make a statement about this. It's the exact same things as what Zombie did, you may not attack in "safe-areas" (empire/within sentry range) without loosing your ship.
Ulendar	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:29:00 - [6] Originally by: Helmuth Halbstein shut up! Lame alt alert! Nice idea but how about this... Pop cans IF NOT USED within the timespan fo a month...or even two weeks. Most systems that have people active in it are FULL (literly) of anchored containers and most of the time its either spamm or the fact that the owners of the cans have moved on and dont give a rats ass about the tainers anymore... Regardless of which the case is, something needs to be done abtou all these stray containers. Either make it so people can salvage them if they are abandoned or make it so they pop after being abandoned. Originally by: cashman It's time for Eris to get a clue. CCP should make a statement about this. It's the exact same things as what Zombie did, you may not attack in "safe-areas" (empire/within sentry range) without loosing your ship.
Helmuth Halbstein	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:30:00 - [7] alt? "Helmuth Halbstein Caldari Gorilla" Cogito Ergo Zoom
Helmuth Halbstein	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:30:00 - [8] alt? "Helmuth Halbstein Caldari Gorilla" Cogito Ergo Zoom
Lord Anubis	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:35:00 - [9] Edited by: Lord Anubis on 19/12/2004 15:35:48 ok then non active cans im just fed up about warping to a spot surrounded by cans no one uses with msg on them year or so old. As for the shut up remark. Grow up mate at least come out with y this is a bad idea You cant beat Death But you can make the bastard work hard for it wtb Jerek Zuomi's Insignia
Lord Anubis	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:35:00 - [10] Edited by: Lord Anubis on 19/12/2004 15:35:48 ok then non active cans im just fed up about warping to a spot surrounded by cans no one uses with msg on them year or so old. As for the shut up remark. Grow up mate at least come out with y this is a bad idea You cant beat Death But you can make the bastard work hard for it wtb Jerek Zuomi's Insignia
Braaage	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:37:00 - [11] Agree totally - but nothing stops them putting em right back. Limit the amount of text on them as well to say 15 letters. ___________________________________________ http://www.eve-tutor.com Picture based tutorial site for EVE-Online
Braaage	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:37:00 - [12] Agree totally - but nothing stops them putting em right back. Limit the amount of text on them as well to say 15 letters. ___________________________________________ http://www.eve-tutor.com Picture based tutorial site for EVE-Online
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:38:00 - [13] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 19/12/2004 15:41:25 Just make them skill dependant like they should've been from the beginning, Anchoring lvl1 5 containers, lvl2 10 and so on, with lvl5 being made a pre-requisite for anchoring POS'. Idea Lab. Convert Stations
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:38:00 - [14] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 19/12/2004 15:41:25 Just make them skill dependant like they should've been from the beginning, Anchoring lvl1 5 containers, lvl2 10 and so on, with lvl5 being made a pre-requisite for anchoring POS'. Idea Lab. Convert Stations
StinkFinger	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:40:00 - [15] How about this: Nerf propulsion so that same sized afterburners and mwds have crap acceleration, causing massive account cancelations... ..oh wait... --
StinkFinger	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:40:00 - [16] How about this: Nerf propulsion so that same sized afterburners and mwds have crap acceleration, causing massive account cancelations... ..oh wait... --
Lord Anubis	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:43:00 - [17] Edited by: Lord Anubis on 19/12/2004 15:45:08 sounds good so in the space of what 10mins we got an idea thats fair removes a fair bit of junk from the eveverse and maybe reduce sever load and lag. May take a bit of coding to implement but hey go for it. Would make most of us happy lol exept for the speed thingy but on that subject im from the camp that actully beniffeted from that both my indy and bs are faster now You cant beat Death But you can make the bastard work hard for it wtb Jerek Zuomi's Insignia
Lord Anubis	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:43:00 - [18] Edited by: Lord Anubis on 19/12/2004 15:45:08 sounds good so in the space of what 10mins we got an idea thats fair removes a fair bit of junk from the eveverse and maybe reduce sever load and lag. May take a bit of coding to implement but hey go for it. Would make most of us happy lol exept for the speed thingy but on that subject im from the camp that actully beniffeted from that both my indy and bs are faster now You cant beat Death But you can make the bastard work hard for it wtb Jerek Zuomi's Insignia
StinkFinger	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:57:00 - [19] Originally by: Lord Anubis Edited by: Lord Anubis on 19/12/2004 15:45:08 sounds good so in the space of what 10mins we got an idea thats fair removes a fair bit of junk from the eveverse and maybe reduce sever load and lag. May take a bit of coding to implement but hey go for it. Would make most of us happy lol exept for the speed thingy but on that subject im from the camp that actully beniffeted from that both my indy and bs are faster now Then you're from the camp that doesnt understand the propulsion changes. --
StinkFinger	Posted - 2004.12.19 15:57:00 - [20] Originally by: Lord Anubis Edited by: Lord Anubis on 19/12/2004 15:45:08 sounds good so in the space of what 10mins we got an idea thats fair removes a fair bit of junk from the eveverse and maybe reduce sever load and lag. May take a bit of coding to implement but hey go for it. Would make most of us happy lol exept for the speed thingy but on that subject im from the camp that actully beniffeted from that both my indy and bs are faster now Then you're from the camp that doesnt understand the propulsion changes. --
Lord Anubis	Posted - 2004.12.19 16:03:00 - [21] Originally by: StinkFinger Originally by: Lord Anubis Edited by: Lord Anubis on 19/12/2004 15:45:08 sounds good so in the space of what 10mins we got an idea thats fair removes a fair bit of junk from the eveverse and maybe reduce sever load and lag. May take a bit of coding to implement but hey go for it. Would make most of us happy lol exept for the speed thingy but on that subject im from the camp that actully beniffeted from that both my indy and bs are faster now Then you're from the camp that doesnt understand the propulsion changes. So things change (dont wont to debate this here) but you can do the same thing i was told when the proj changes were done Adapt or die lol or like me whine like crazy the new speed issues are no different from dual mwd execp you can only place one burner on that gives the same boost as 3 how have they got worse tell me You cant beat Death But you can make the bastard work hard for it wtb Jerek Zuomi's Insignia
Lord Anubis	Posted - 2004.12.19 16:03:00 - [22] Originally by: StinkFinger Originally by: Lord Anubis Edited by: Lord Anubis on 19/12/2004 15:45:08 sounds good so in the space of what 10mins we got an idea thats fair removes a fair bit of junk from the eveverse and maybe reduce sever load and lag. May take a bit of coding to implement but hey go for it. Would make most of us happy lol exept for the speed thingy but on that subject im from the camp that actully beniffeted from that both my indy and bs are faster now Then you're from the camp that doesnt understand the propulsion changes. So things change (dont wont to debate this here) but you can do the same thing i was told when the proj changes were done Adapt or die lol or like me whine like crazy the new speed issues are no different from dual mwd execp you can only place one burner on that gives the same boost as 3 how have they got worse tell me You cant beat Death But you can make the bastard work hard for it wtb Jerek Zuomi's Insignia
Siddy	Posted - 2004.12.19 16:05:00 - [23] Originally by: StinkFinger How about this: Nerf propulsion so that same sized afterburners and mwds have crap acceleration, causing massive account cancelations... ..oh wait... rofl -------------------------------------------
Siddy	Posted - 2004.12.19 16:05:00 - [24] Originally by: StinkFinger How about this: Nerf propulsion so that same sized afterburners and mwds have crap acceleration, causing massive account cancelations... ..oh wait... rofl -------------------------------------------
StinkFinger	Posted - 2004.12.19 16:10:00 - [25] Edited by: StinkFinger on 19/12/2004 16:11:05 Originally by: Lord Anubis Originally by: StinkFinger Originally by: Lord Anubis Edited by: Lord Anubis on 19/12/2004 15:45:08 sounds good so in the space of what 10mins we got an idea thats fair removes a fair bit of junk from the eveverse and maybe reduce sever load and lag. May take a bit of coding to implement but hey go for it. Would make most of us happy lol exept for the speed thingy but on that subject im from the camp that actully beniffeted from that both my indy and bs are faster now Then you're from the camp that doesnt understand the propulsion changes. So things change (dont wont to debate this here) but you can do the same thing i was told when the proj changes were done Adapt or die lol or like me whine like crazy the new speed issues are no different from dual mwd execp you can only place one burner on that gives the same boost as 3 how have they got worse tell me Acceleration sucks. I repeat, the acceleration is nerfed. It takes you twice as long to reach top speed as before. It also makes it impossible to manuever your ship. BTW, I'm refering to 10mn ab/mwd in a cruiser, or 100mn ab/mwd in a battleship. Why should ships using mods intended for them have to suffer the same penalties that were designed to hamper oversized fittings in frigs and cruisers? --
StinkFinger	Posted - 2004.12.19 16:10:00 - [26] Edited by: StinkFinger on 19/12/2004 16:11:05 Originally by: Lord Anubis Originally by: StinkFinger Originally by: Lord Anubis Edited by: Lord Anubis on 19/12/2004 15:45:08 sounds good so in the space of what 10mins we got an idea thats fair removes a fair bit of junk from the eveverse and maybe reduce sever load and lag. May take a bit of coding to implement but hey go for it. Would make most of us happy lol exept for the speed thingy but on that subject im from the camp that actully beniffeted from that both my indy and bs are faster now Then you're from the camp that doesnt understand the propulsion changes. So things change (dont wont to debate this here) but you can do the same thing i was told when the proj changes were done Adapt or die lol or like me whine like crazy the new speed issues are no different from dual mwd execp you can only place one burner on that gives the same boost as 3 how have they got worse tell me Acceleration sucks. I repeat, the acceleration is nerfed. It takes you twice as long to reach top speed as before. It also makes it impossible to manuever your ship. BTW, I'm refering to 10mn ab/mwd in a cruiser, or 100mn ab/mwd in a battleship. Why should ships using mods intended for them have to suffer the same penalties that were designed to hamper oversized fittings in frigs and cruisers? --
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2004.12.19 16:12:00 - [27] No trollfishing under this bridge! This was about secure can littering space not some damn afterburners, go whine to someone who cares. Convert Stations
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2004.12.19 16:12:00 - [28] No trollfishing under this bridge! This was about secure can littering space not some damn afterburners, go whine to someone who cares. Convert Stations
Johnson McCrae	Posted - 2004.12.19 16:16:00 - [29] Best cure is to do what they said would be done. All cans in .8 and up will be UNANCHORED, and will expire after 2 hours It ain't over till the fat lady falls on ya! [ 2004.10.09 02:50:23 ] (combat) Your 425mm Compressed Coil Gun I perfectly strikes Guardian Sentry, wrecking for 747.3 damage.
Johnson McCrae	Posted - 2004.12.19 16:16:00 - [30] Best cure is to do what they said would be done. All cans in .8 and up will be UNANCHORED, and will expire after 2 hours It ain't over till the fat lady falls on ya! [ 2004.10.09 02:50:23 ] (combat) Your 425mm Compressed Coil Gun I perfectly strikes Guardian Sentry, wrecking for 747.3 damage.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.