EVE Search - Petition too have propulsion changes reversed!!!!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Petition too have propulsion changes reversed!!!!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Cracken	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:22:00 - [1] Edited by: ***en on 20/12/2004 05:46:24
Cracken	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:22:00 - [2] Edited by: ***en on 20/12/2004 05:46:24
Negotiator	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:32:00 - [3] denied
Negotiator	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:32:00 - [4] denied
JoCool	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:33:00 - [5] Edited by: JoCool on 19/12/2004 22:33:51 also denied
JoCool	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:33:00 - [6] Edited by: JoCool on 19/12/2004 22:33:51 also denied
Senecus	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:33:00 - [7] im usually not flamin posts, but, how about a petition to have ***ens ******* removed?
Senecus	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:33:00 - [8] im usually not flamin posts, but, how about a petition to have ***ens ******* removed?
Clericuzio	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:35:00 - [9] not for ****, yeah the propulsion changes before missiles, was probably not the best course of action, but its made the system a lot better, and once missile changes are inplace, things will improve even more tho for now, how about having a nice steaming mug of STFU? =D whining is getting to me now your making me do it too --------------------------------------------- 2004.12.08 16:17:56 combat Your AFK at belt stupidity perfectly strikes your wallet wrecking for 10.43 million isk.
Clericuzio	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:35:00 - [10] not for ****, yeah the propulsion changes before missiles, was probably not the best course of action, but its made the system a lot better, and once missile changes are inplace, things will improve even more tho for now, how about having a nice steaming mug of STFU? =D whining is getting to me now your making me do it too --------------------------------------------- 2004.12.08 16:17:56 combat Your AFK at belt stupidity perfectly strikes your wallet wrecking for 10.43 million isk.

Cracken	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:40:00 - [11] Edited by: ***en on 19/12/2004 22:41:21 LOl all the pirate corp raven pilots replied. LOL rofl... also flaming not needed take your flaming somehwere else. And some people obviously don't read before posting LOl I love asshats.
Cracken	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:40:00 - [12] Edited by: ***en on 19/12/2004 22:41:21 LOl all the pirate corp raven pilots replied. LOL rofl... also flaming not needed take your flaming somehwere else. And some people obviously don't read before posting LOl I love asshats.
Negotiator	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:49:00 - [13] noone flamed you. they just said you are a stupid noob. where's the flame in that, dumbass? huh?
Negotiator	Posted - 2004.12.19 22:49:00 - [14] noone flamed you. they just said you are a stupid noob. where's the flame in that, dumbass? huh?
RollinDutchMasters	Posted - 2004.12.19 23:00:00 - [15] I'm signing the petition to get you a techII tissue. No more tears, mmmkay? Originally by: Sochin CCP has provided you with the tools you need to avoid crime. You're just too lazy/stupid to use them.
RollinDutchMasters	Posted - 2004.12.19 23:00:00 - [16] I'm signing the petition to get you a techII tissue. No more tears, mmmkay? Originally by: Sochin CCP has provided you with the tools you need to avoid crime. You're just too lazy/stupid to use them.
Clericuzio	Posted - 2004.12.19 23:12:00 - [17] Originally by: ****en Edited by: ****en on 19/12/2004 22:41:21 LOl all the pirate corp raven pilots replied. LOL rofl... also flaming not needed take your flaming somehwere else. And some people obviously don't read before posting LOl I love asshats. points to corp i ave to say we are universally feared raven pirates, I mean omg todaki gets more pod kills then anywhere else! again couldn't resist it, i'm in one of those moods --------------------------------------------- 2004.12.08 16:17:56 combat Your AFK at belt stupidity perfectly strikes your wallet wrecking for 10.43 million isk.
Clericuzio	Posted - 2004.12.19 23:12:00 - [18] Originally by: ****en Edited by: ****en on 19/12/2004 22:41:21 LOl all the pirate corp raven pilots replied. LOL rofl... also flaming not needed take your flaming somehwere else. And some people obviously don't read before posting LOl I love asshats. points to corp i ave to say we are universally feared raven pirates, I mean omg todaki gets more pod kills then anywhere else! again couldn't resist it, i'm in one of those moods --------------------------------------------- 2004.12.08 16:17:56 combat Your AFK at belt stupidity perfectly strikes your wallet wrecking for 10.43 million isk.
Ryo Jang	Posted - 2004.12.19 23:45:00 - [19] im not a pirate, and i think its fine. stop whining.
Ryo Jang	Posted - 2004.12.19 23:45:00 - [20] im not a pirate, and i think its fine. stop whining.

Jazz Bo	Posted - 2004.12.19 23:46:00 - [21] Denied. Can you imagine the crying and gnashing of teeth on the CA alliance chat? I can, and it brings a smile to my face. Originally by: DB Preacher Celestial Apocalypse - Brave souls fighting the endless smak.
Jazz Bo	Posted - 2004.12.19 23:46:00 - [22] Denied. Can you imagine the crying and gnashing of teeth on the CA alliance chat? I can, and it brings a smile to my face. Originally by: DB Preacher Celestial Apocalypse - Brave souls fighting the endless smak.
Brunis	Posted - 2004.12.19 23:58:00 - [23] Yeah lets have lightspeed Ravens and interceptor cruisers back! Lets all be able to fly at 3 AU/s without being in warp! More serius, adapt and wait for the missile changes (its not a nerf its a balance). /Brunis Another dog lifting its leg
Brunis	Posted - 2004.12.19 23:58:00 - [24] Yeah lets have lightspeed Ravens and interceptor cruisers back! Lets all be able to fly at 3 AU/s without being in warp! More serius, adapt and wait for the missile changes (its not a nerf its a balance). /Brunis Another dog lifting its leg
Sun Sliver	Posted - 2004.12.20 00:14:00 - [25] Originally by: Brunis Yeah lets have lightspeed Ravens and interceptor cruisers back! Lets all be able to fly at 3 AU/s without being in warp! More serius, adapt and wait for the missile changes (its not a nerf its a balance). and a good one at that. this patch (minus the timing) really has been good for combat, much more fun. If you dont like it then go do some complexes. i hear NPCs are attracted to whine, er wine.
Sun Sliver	Posted - 2004.12.20 00:14:00 - [26] Originally by: Brunis Yeah lets have lightspeed Ravens and interceptor cruisers back! Lets all be able to fly at 3 AU/s without being in warp! More serius, adapt and wait for the missile changes (its not a nerf its a balance). and a good one at that. this patch (minus the timing) really has been good for combat, much more fun. If you dont like it then go do some complexes. i hear NPCs are attracted to whine, er wine.
Slithereen	Posted - 2004.12.20 01:06:00 - [27] I'm not supporting this petition either, although I have been a big user of oversized ABs prior to the patch, with it prevailing in my most used setups. _______________________________________________ "Is it me or the bad guys just getting totally pathetic?"---Clover, Totally Spies, "Hope is wasted on the Hopeless."---Mandy, The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy. "Stars are holes in the sky from which the light of the Infinite shine through."---Confucius.
Slithereen	Posted - 2004.12.20 01:06:00 - [28] I'm not supporting this petition either, although I have been a big user of oversized ABs prior to the patch, with it prevailing in my most used setups. _______________________________________________ "Is it me or the bad guys just getting totally pathetic?"---Clover, Totally Spies, "Hope is wasted on the Hopeless."---Mandy, The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy. "Stars are holes in the sky from which the light of the Infinite shine through."---Confucius.
Jexa	Posted - 2004.12.20 02:48:00 - [29] Denied as much as I can deny anything. Heaven forbid players have to ADAPT their tactics. I mean, come on, 10mn ABs were never meant to go on frigs. No ship should be able to outrun a missile either. Deal with it, your skill-not-required tactic doesn't work anymore.
Jexa	Posted - 2004.12.20 02:48:00 - [30] Denied as much as I can deny anything. Heaven forbid players have to ADAPT their tactics. I mean, come on, 10mn ABs were never meant to go on frigs. No ship should be able to outrun a missile either. Deal with it, your skill-not-required tactic doesn't work anymore.

Kusotarre	Posted - 2004.12.20 04:08:00 - [31] Denied. The only missiles I ever use are defenders, and I like the propulsion changes. Just because the missile nerf hasn't been implemented yet doesn't mean we should continue to allow lame dual AB mallers and unhittable feroxes. Fix the missiles. Don't undo the propulsion changes.
Kusotarre	Posted - 2004.12.20 04:08:00 - [32] Denied. The only missiles I ever use are defenders, and I like the propulsion changes. Just because the missile nerf hasn't been implemented yet doesn't mean we should continue to allow lame dual AB mallers and unhittable feroxes. Fix the missiles. Don't undo the propulsion changes.
Cracken	Posted - 2004.12.20 05:33:00 - [33] Can a mod plz delete this. Obviously people are having a tough time seeing the real issues here sIghs.
Cracken	Posted - 2004.12.20 05:33:00 - [34] Can a mod plz delete this. Obviously people are having a tough time seeing the real issues here sIghs.
Bad'Boy	Posted - 2004.12.20 05:39:00 - [35] denied B.A.D.B.O.Y.: Biomechanical Android Designed for Battle and Online Yelling "Bad Boys,Bad Boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when WE come for yoU"
Bad'Boy	Posted - 2004.12.20 05:39:00 - [36] denied B.A.D.B.O.Y.: Biomechanical Android Designed for Battle and Online Yelling "Bad Boys,Bad Boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when WE come for yoU"
Logan Xerxes	Posted - 2004.12.20 05:44:00 - [37] I hearby declare this thread "OMGWTFBBQFISHSTICKSPWNSRD!!!111eleven!"
Logan Xerxes	Posted - 2004.12.20 05:44:00 - [38] I hearby declare this thread "OMGWTFBBQFISHSTICKSPWNSRD!!!111eleven!"
Kirex	Posted - 2004.12.20 05:48:00 - [39] Edited by: Kirex on 20/12/2004 05:52:46 Edited by: Kirex on 20/12/2004 05:48:40 Originally by: ****en Can a mod plz delete this. Obviously people are having a tough time seeing the real issues here sIghs. lol...funny hands ****en a tissue edit: ^^^ omg im a bad boy.....i said the word...."crac k"
Kirex	Posted - 2004.12.20 05:48:00 - [40] Edited by: Kirex on 20/12/2004 05:52:46 Edited by: Kirex on 20/12/2004 05:48:40 Originally by: ****en Can a mod plz delete this. Obviously people are having a tough time seeing the real issues here sIghs. lol...funny hands ****en a tissue edit: ^^^ omg im a bad boy.....i said the word...."crac k"

Harpia	Posted - 2004.12.20 11:06:00 - [41] DENIED. Please man, dont cry. Stand yourself and fight!
Harpia	Posted - 2004.12.20 11:06:00 - [42] DENIED. Please man, dont cry. Stand yourself and fight!
Pagefault	Posted - 2004.12.20 11:08:00 - [43] What do u guys think about: Interceptors (and maybe other ships) get 20% less sig penalty per skill lvl when using mwd !? So, if u got inty skill lvl5, u won't get any sig penalty from using a mwd. That would bring back small ships... And yes: Inties are most prominent example, one should examine this for other ships. Perhaps for all Tech2 ships?
Pagefault	Posted - 2004.12.20 11:08:00 - [44] What do u guys think about: Interceptors (and maybe other ships) get 20% less sig penalty per skill lvl when using mwd !? So, if u got inty skill lvl5, u won't get any sig penalty from using a mwd. That would bring back small ships... And yes: Inties are most prominent example, one should examine this for other ships. Perhaps for all Tech2 ships?
Leam	Posted - 2004.12.20 11:29:00 - [45] Denied, I like the changes.
Leam	Posted - 2004.12.20 11:29:00 - [46] Denied, I like the changes.
Estios	Posted - 2004.12.20 11:42:00 - [47] hee hee, I saw this ghey whine thread and then I saw it was up to 2 pages ...I prayed it wasnt getting support and opened it in fear, only to find such comfort in the word DENIED !!! If you wanna sign an a proper request support here: (16 pages of pure sign'age) Sign meh So HMV consider Andy Williams and Dean Martin to be "easy listening" do they? Tell that to my mate Dave, he's been deaf for 20 years.
Estios	Posted - 2004.12.20 11:42:00 - [48] hee hee, I saw this ghey whine thread and then I saw it was up to 2 pages ...I prayed it wasnt getting support and opened it in fear, only to find such comfort in the word DENIED !!! If you wanna sign an a proper request support here: (16 pages of pure sign'age) Sign meh So HMV consider Andy Williams and Dean Martin to be "easy listening" do they? Tell that to my mate Dave, he's been deaf for 20 years.
Typherin laidai	Posted - 2004.12.20 13:41:00 - [49] Hmmmmm so lil frig's/cepters cant rely on the fact that they CANT be hit anymore without being silly enough to be webbed :/ Woot .. Pld CCP Typherin LaiDai Care Negotitations Expert level 5 'Give me a position of power and I'l abuse it in an instant'
Typherin laidai	Posted - 2004.12.20 13:41:00 - [50] Hmmmmm so lil frig's/cepters cant rely on the fact that they CANT be hit anymore without being silly enough to be webbed :/ Woot .. Pld CCP Typherin LaiDai Care Negotitations Expert level 5 'Give me a position of power and I'l abuse it in an instant'

Embattle	Posted - 2004.12.20 13:46:00 - [51] Nope Your Miner II perfectly blows up in its mount, wrecking for 900000000 damage.
Embattle	Posted - 2004.12.20 13:46:00 - [52] Nope Your Miner II perfectly blows up in its mount, wrecking for 900000000 damage.
MadGaz	Posted - 2004.12.20 14:03:00 - [53] ------------------------------------------
MadGaz	Posted - 2004.12.20 14:03:00 - [54] ------------------------------------------
slothe	Posted - 2004.12.20 14:12:00 - [55] denied dula abs and mwd = nublar Say hello on our forum @www.aserea.com or join our public channel ingame "MLM Public" http://www.khainestar.com/eve
slothe	Posted - 2004.12.20 14:12:00 - [56] denied dula abs and mwd = nublar Say hello on our forum @www.aserea.com or join our public channel ingame "MLM Public" http://www.khainestar.com/eve
Cracken	Posted - 2004.12.20 15:20:00 - [57] Edited by: ***en on 20/12/2004 15:21:27 Edited by: ***en on 20/12/2004 15:20:44 The only people I've seen post are those who fly bs'es so LOl. The thing is the changes are unbalanced atm. Making missle ships uber "I'm so l33t because of game imbalance". Um.... your not L33t your just exploiting broken game mechanics just like 3k/s feroxes were. Most specifically the nerfing of oversized ab's on frigates was the issue this post was meant too address. Of course a lot of people just generally ignore that fact because "omg wOOt they made my bs uber." You made massive sacrifices too fit a 10mn ab on a frigate 3/4 or more of your powergrid was used too power the module trading offensive ability for the ability too not be hit unbalanced. Um.. nope lets see cap rechargers check oversized ab check 75mm railguns, check extra grid nope. Nuff said I'm seeing more whinging from people going denied than people who have posted other reasons maybe I should've named my thread better but I have learned a valuable lesson most forums trolls have A)No brains B)Can't read or think for themselves. Aka don't post here if you aren't supporting it.
Cracken	Posted - 2004.12.20 15:20:00 - [58] Edited by: ***en on 20/12/2004 15:21:27 Edited by: ***en on 20/12/2004 15:20:44 The only people I've seen post are those who fly bs'es so LOl. The thing is the changes are unbalanced atm. Making missle ships uber "I'm so l33t because of game imbalance". Um.... your not L33t your just exploiting broken game mechanics just like 3k/s feroxes were. Most specifically the nerfing of oversized ab's on frigates was the issue this post was meant too address. Of course a lot of people just generally ignore that fact because "omg wOOt they made my bs uber." You made massive sacrifices too fit a 10mn ab on a frigate 3/4 or more of your powergrid was used too power the module trading offensive ability for the ability too not be hit unbalanced. Um.. nope lets see cap rechargers check oversized ab check 75mm railguns, check extra grid nope. Nuff said I'm seeing more whinging from people going denied than people who have posted other reasons maybe I should've named my thread better but I have learned a valuable lesson most forums trolls have A)No brains B)Can't read or think for themselves. Aka don't post here if you aren't supporting it.
Cindy Goodwill	Posted - 2004.12.20 15:42:00 - [59] denied. no one got shafted here, ships got slower across the entire board. plus the afterburner is now finally a viable module ----------------------------------------------- Watch my leet everchanging dynamic signature \o/ http://www.games-on.nl/~cu2moro/evesigphp/icon.php?blaat=.GIF
Cindy Goodwill	Posted - 2004.12.20 15:42:00 - [60] denied. no one got shafted here, ships got slower across the entire board. plus the afterburner is now finally a viable module ----------------------------------------------- Watch my leet everchanging dynamic signature \o/ http://www.games-on.nl/~cu2moro/evesigphp/icon.php?blaat=.GIF

mahhy	Posted - 2004.12.20 16:00:00 - [61] Originally by: ***en The only people I've seen post are those who fly bs'es so LOl. The thing is the changes are unbalanced atm. Making missle ships uber "I'm so l33t because of game imbalance". I fly both frigs and BS and even the occasional cruiser. Still think the change is for the best. Oh, and none of the ships I fly regularly are missle ships! Originally by: ***en You made massive sacrifices too fit a 10mn ab on a frigate 3/4 or more of your powergrid was used too power the module trading offensive ability for the ability too not be hit unbalanced. You made sacrifices if it was a turret based ship. If it was a missle based ship there was almost zero sacrifice. The Crow and the Raven are two good examples of that. Maintain full offensive power while speeding along pretty much immune to turrets and in the Crows case avoiding the MWD sig radius penalty the other turret based Inties had to face. Pre-patch if you stuck an oversized AB on a Crusader you'd completely gimp any offense or defence. The current changes are much more balanced and you're just wrong.
mahhy	Posted - 2004.12.20 16:00:00 - [62] Originally by: ***en The only people I've seen post are those who fly bs'es so LOl. The thing is the changes are unbalanced atm. Making missle ships uber "I'm so l33t because of game imbalance". I fly both frigs and BS and even the occasional cruiser. Still think the change is for the best. Oh, and none of the ships I fly regularly are missle ships! Originally by: ***en You made massive sacrifices too fit a 10mn ab on a frigate 3/4 or more of your powergrid was used too power the module trading offensive ability for the ability too not be hit unbalanced. You made sacrifices if it was a turret based ship. If it was a missle based ship there was almost zero sacrifice. The Crow and the Raven are two good examples of that. Maintain full offensive power while speeding along pretty much immune to turrets and in the Crows case avoiding the MWD sig radius penalty the other turret based Inties had to face. Pre-patch if you stuck an oversized AB on a Crusader you'd completely gimp any offense or defence. The current changes are much more balanced and you're just wrong.
Cracken	Posted - 2004.12.20 18:06:00 - [63] Edited by: ***en on 20/12/2004 18:09:40 anyway the point is I was only thinking about this because as it is right now it is incredibly unbalanced seeing as no matter what ship you fly you meat a bs = dead. Seeing as flying with an mwd makes you turret mincemeat. And flying without you die from missles. Also making the frigates like the rifter which can't tank for s*** slower just makes the problem even more apparent it's only defence is speed which has now been taken away from it. You say fit an mwd sure if you wanna die go for it and try and take on any rat spwn jeez.... opps is that you floating along in a pod.
Cracken	Posted - 2004.12.20 18:06:00 - [64] Edited by: ***en on 20/12/2004 18:09:40 anyway the point is I was only thinking about this because as it is right now it is incredibly unbalanced seeing as no matter what ship you fly you meat a bs = dead. Seeing as flying with an mwd makes you turret mincemeat. And flying without you die from missles. Also making the frigates like the rifter which can't tank for s*** slower just makes the problem even more apparent it's only defence is speed which has now been taken away from it. You say fit an mwd sure if you wanna die go for it and try and take on any rat spwn jeez.... opps is that you floating along in a pod.
Leam	Posted - 2004.12.20 18:08:00 - [65] Originally by: ****en Edited by: ****en on 20/12/2004 15:21:27 Edited by: ***en on 20/12/2004 15:20:44 The only people I've seen post are those who fly bs'es so LOl. The thing is the changes are unbalanced atm. Making missle ships uber "I'm so l33t because of game imbalance". Um.... your not L33t your just exploiting broken game mechanics just like 3k/s feroxes were. Most specifically the nerfing of oversized ab's on frigates was the issue this post was meant too address. Of course a lot of people just generally ignore that fact because "omg wOOt they made my bs uber." You made massive sacrifices too fit a 10mn ab on a frigate 3/4 or more of your powergrid was used too power the module trading offensive ability for the ability too not be hit unbalanced. Um.. nope lets see cap rechargers check oversized ab check 75mm railguns, check extra grid nope. Nuff said I'm seeing more whinging from people going denied than people who have posted other reasons maybe I should've named my thread better but I have learned a valuable lesson most forums trolls have A)No brains B)Can't read or think for themselves. Aka don't post here if you aren't supporting it. 1)I just use BS for mining, i havent even large turrets skill, I always pvp in frigs, ceptor or cruisers. 2)oversized abs were never suposed to exist. if ccp would have removed em as soon as ppl started to use em, we wouldnt have this problem now. Changes are ok, frigs were way too fast, it will be perfect when ccp fix missiles and EW, so frigs wont need that uber speed. (They cant fix everything at once, at least that's what they say) P.S. I'll post here even not supporting it, this is a sign post, it allows you to see if a big part of the players agree with you or not. maybe you could find 100 ppl to sign it, but 1000 would say "denied"
Leam	Posted - 2004.12.20 18:08:00 - [66] Originally by: ****en Edited by: ****en on 20/12/2004 15:21:27 Edited by: ***en on 20/12/2004 15:20:44 The only people I've seen post are those who fly bs'es so LOl. The thing is the changes are unbalanced atm. Making missle ships uber "I'm so l33t because of game imbalance". Um.... your not L33t your just exploiting broken game mechanics just like 3k/s feroxes were. Most specifically the nerfing of oversized ab's on frigates was the issue this post was meant too address. Of course a lot of people just generally ignore that fact because "omg wOOt they made my bs uber." You made massive sacrifices too fit a 10mn ab on a frigate 3/4 or more of your powergrid was used too power the module trading offensive ability for the ability too not be hit unbalanced. Um.. nope lets see cap rechargers check oversized ab check 75mm railguns, check extra grid nope. Nuff said I'm seeing more whinging from people going denied than people who have posted other reasons maybe I should've named my thread better but I have learned a valuable lesson most forums trolls have A)No brains B)Can't read or think for themselves. Aka don't post here if you aren't supporting it. 1)I just use BS for mining, i havent even large turrets skill, I always pvp in frigs, ceptor or cruisers. 2)oversized abs were never suposed to exist. if ccp would have removed em as soon as ppl started to use em, we wouldnt have this problem now. Changes are ok, frigs were way too fast, it will be perfect when ccp fix missiles and EW, so frigs wont need that uber speed. (They cant fix everything at once, at least that's what they say) P.S. I'll post here even not supporting it, this is a sign post, it allows you to see if a big part of the players agree with you or not. maybe you could find 100 ppl to sign it, but 1000 would say "denied"
Cpt Akat	Posted - 2004.12.20 18:09:00 - [67] Denied
Cpt Akat	Posted - 2004.12.20 18:09:00 - [68] Denied
pshepherd	Posted - 2004.12.20 19:18:00 - [69] Denied
pshepherd	Posted - 2004.12.20 19:18:00 - [70] Denied

Shade Widow	Posted - 2004.12.20 19:18:00 - [71] The propulsion changes are something I would rather keep for many reasons. Denied ---
Shade Widow	Posted - 2004.12.20 19:18:00 - [72] The propulsion changes are something I would rather keep for many reasons. Denied ---
Kyroki Tirpellan	Posted - 2004.12.20 19:51:00 - [73] Denied! I can't imagine how you fail to see that the pre-patch propulsion system was completely broken with dual MWDs and all that cr@p. The patch fixed it quite nicely, and made ABs useful for other ship classes than indies (and them only because they couldn't fit MWDs). Peace through love, understanding and superior firepower. Real men structure tank!
Kyroki Tirpellan	Posted - 2004.12.20 19:51:00 - [74] Denied! I can't imagine how you fail to see that the pre-patch propulsion system was completely broken with dual MWDs and all that cr@p. The patch fixed it quite nicely, and made ABs useful for other ship classes than indies (and them only because they couldn't fit MWDs). Peace through love, understanding and superior firepower. Real men structure tank!
Rexthor Hammerfists	Posted - 2004.12.20 20:15:00 - [75] Signed i dont like groupfights - been flyin in speedships for months, goin alone in a frig is useles due the low dmg, cruisers are too slow and are sitting ****s now and also do not enough dmg (u enter a system with 10 enemies, meet a frig of them when u uncloak 15km from the gate, guess whatll happen?) and goin alone in bs will end in a mining op another reason why eve become so boring.. but im sure the alliances with their huge blobs are glad about it..
Rexthor Hammerfists	Posted - 2004.12.20 20:15:00 - [76] Signed i dont like groupfights - been flyin in speedships for months, goin alone in a frig is useles due the low dmg, cruisers are too slow and are sitting ****s now and also do not enough dmg (u enter a system with 10 enemies, meet a frig of them when u uncloak 15km from the gate, guess whatll happen?) and goin alone in bs will end in a mining op another reason why eve become so boring.. but im sure the alliances with their huge blobs are glad about it..
Alexis Valentine	Posted - 2004.12.20 21:57:00 - [77] I'm still flying a frigate and I have to say ... Denied
Alexis Valentine	Posted - 2004.12.20 21:57:00 - [78] I'm still flying a frigate and I have to say ... Denied
fairimear	Posted - 2004.12.20 22:10:00 - [79] denied (\_/) (O.o) (> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world Domination.
fairimear	Posted - 2004.12.20 22:10:00 - [80] denied (\_/) (O.o) (> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world Domination.

KristofferTr	Posted - 2004.12.21 09:19:00 - [81] denied..... Miner - KristofferTr Fighter - Whitelitch Tactical - Lafiele
KristofferTr	Posted - 2004.12.21 09:19:00 - [82] denied..... Miner - KristofferTr Fighter - Whitelitch Tactical - Lafiele
Arkathra	Posted - 2004.12.21 10:09:00 - [83] Denied. Flying my Malediction just got a whole lot more fun and interesting, w00t! "Don't look conspicuous; it draws fire." "Never draw fire; it irritates everyone around you." "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."
Arkathra	Posted - 2004.12.21 10:09:00 - [84] Denied. Flying my Malediction just got a whole lot more fun and interesting, w00t! "Don't look conspicuous; it draws fire." "Never draw fire; it irritates everyone around you." "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."


Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.