EVE Search - UKhan BoBed and Gooned

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

UKhan BoBed and Gooned

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.24 14:24:00 - [1] the funny thing is that Aralis will still be spinning ships in Misaba in two weeks time, only without the ability to claim his much trumpeted e-honour superiority... and I must say, if the shoe was on the other foot, UK would never condone it (and indeed we stood by CVA when the same thing happened to them) we're going to be in a new alliance before the timers in R3 are even out, so what exactly is Aralis hoping to gain? Perhaps he can answer that question directly ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.24 15:18:00 - [2] the relationship between UK and CVA, however, is quite different to that of UK and Sylph, and we stood up for CVA when their alliance was disbanded, and publically supported them in addition, Aralis as consistently droned on about e-honour, but these days nothing really comes as a shock with regard to him... so, whatever, i guess ;) ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.24 18:56:00 - [3] Originally by: Alphabits imo u'k dropped any claim to rp or ehonour when they hooked up with a non rp super block to defeat thier enemies (cva) and drive them out. CVA were the first to do this, in the siege of QR-K and 9UY. That is how UK came to lose its original space in Providence. Also, when CVA were disbanded, and it wasn't initially clear what happened, we immediately agreed not to opportunistically interfere. So, from our perspective, we've been pretty above board. The same can't be said for CVA, and to be honest, they're probably going to do themselves more harm than good because of it. ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.24 19:03:00 - [4] Originally by: Jade Constantine Goonswarm trolling in this thread is a bit poor. Its like an 40-a-day asthmatic producing an unimpressive low drone from a vuvuzela while their team goes out without scoring a goal. oh, god... post of the year..... lol ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.24 19:09:00 - [5] Originally by: Ander Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Jade Constantine Goonswarm trolling in this thread is a bit poor. Its like an 40-a-day asthmatic producing an unimpressive low drone from a vuvuzela while their team goes out without scoring a goal. oh, god... post of the year..... lol didnt bother reading this thread, but dammit butter dog. You on snow? Seriously you post every 5 minutes. Go to sleep, think you need it. its 8pm here in the UK, I okwe up at 10am... sorry if my 4 posts offended you :( ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.25 07:19:00 - [6] Originally by: Yakov Draken Your sort of forum profile could work great with someone like We Form Voltron - but not U'K. Anyone who takes these forums seriously is pretty lol. But I'm pleased our :words: made you rage so much you're driven to you're posting your own angry missives about them. I'll chalk that up as a win ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.25 11:42:00 - [7] Originally by: Sa'Shena Why do people keep likening this to when CVA got a Directors account hacked and it was disbanded when for U'K this is essentially a mole-operation where someone who's in leadership got **ed/bored and flipped a switch. One is not only wrong in game terms its also vaguely illegal (Since the Account is owned by someone and is forcibly taken) while the other is a jerk move but entirely legal both in game and out? I'll spell it out for you. When CVA was disbanded, we didn't know why to begin with. Neither we nor they knew initially it was a hack. Regardless, we agreed with them that it was a ty mechanic, so we agreed not to interefere until they got their ** together again. Think about that ;) ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.25 12:17:00 - [8] Edited by: Butter Dog on 25/07/2010 12:18:35 I'm assuming your IQ is below 100, and it's not worth us carrying on this little chat. The fact is we agreed not to interfere when CVA corps were kicked, and we didn't know it was a hack at the time. We agreed with CVA's assertion that it was a ****ty mechanic. Not that this really matters, CVA are going to be back in lowsec in a few weeks and we'll be in a new alliance in about 24 hours. They can stoop as low as they like, the end result will be the same. ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.25 15:19:00 - [9] Originally by: UVPhoenix2 You make a lot of assumptions. I see why everybody hates you. excuse me, but i care a lot how liked I am by people i dont know on internet spaceship forums it means everything to me ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.25 19:49:00 - [10] the funny thing is that goons enter a fury like no other when jade goads them - he really is the ultimate troll ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc

Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.26 07:28:00 - [11] Originally by: Nardman I don't know what everyone is complaining about and why people are comparing this to when CVA lost sov. When CVA lost sov it was because of a hacked account. U'K lost sov due to legitimate game mechanics. CVA deserved to have their space restored, U'k does not. We're not asking for it to be restored, and with the help of our new provi ~bff's~ we're taking back the stations for our soon-to-be-created new alliance. What is being said very clearly though, is this: When CVA got disbanded, no-one, including them, knew for sure what the reasons were. It latterly became clear it was a hacked account. But we agreed to no-sov warfare, and publically backed them up, not because we knew it was a hack (we didn't), but because we agreed with their own assertion that even if itwas legit, it's an utterly crap mechanic. So what a few people are poitning out, are CVA's desperate double-standards. But then again, they will do just about anything to try to get their spaceship kingdom back, but I have a feeling it will backfire somewhat ;) ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.26 10:58:00 - [12] Originally by: Strelsky Oh god... you're like a broken gramofone that keeps on repeating the same thing over and over... What you apparently don't seem to comprehend is, that CVA knew from the beginning that it's not any hacked director's account, but a legitimate action of somebody who doesn't ~like~ you anymore. You may now burst into tears over the unjustice of internet spaceships... And why would I be upset? Let's recap your alliances magnificent elite pvp achievements since Tarac kicked some corps and you shouted a lot on forums about it: 1. Lose two fleets trying to kill 4B co2 TCU, and not kill it 2. SBU XHQ, lose SBU's 3. Watch CVA lose fleets as their ihubs in other systems are destroyed 4. Sit and watch as KBP is reinforced 5. Sit and watch as 9uy is reinforced, disband gang of 30 BC's after not being able to find an FC 6. Try to bomb some HAC's as X-R is successfully reinforced again, and utterly fail ~elite pvp~ indeed... if anyone should be weeping here, it's not us ;) ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.26 15:22:00 - [13] Originally by: Shiroi Okami Wow, just, wow. I can't wait to see butter try and salvage that one. /me gets popcorn I understand and sympathise that your alliance performance over the past few days has been dismal, and you're keen to score forum points. That's okay, it's a natural reaction. However, trying to judge an alliances level of emo-rage using Black Necris, is like judging it's forum posting skills using me. It doesn't quite add up. Better luck on your next point-scoring attempt though. And I hope you, you know, win some fights in Providence soon ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2010.07.26 16:22:00 - [14] Edited by: Butter Dog on 26/07/2010 16:23:20 Originally by: Count MonteCarlo ye m8 we're getting completley STOMPED today Congratulations on winning 1 fight, hopefully that will give you the morale boost you needed. If you join my corp I'll give you a medal. We'll be seeing you later I assume? Do bring the machariels again ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.26 16:53:00 - [15] Originally by: Count MonteCarlo We sure do lose a lot of fights you sure do ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.26 17:01:00 - [16] Originally by: kra torii I love how all those are HYRA outnumbered are you trying to tell us something? ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.26 17:53:00 - [17] Originally by: Gladys Pank Good post. I believe it's been stated that the intention is to return the alliance to it's original owners once this 'chapter' has run its course. And I believe we're already told you to go **** yourselves ;) ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.26 19:47:00 - [18] well done, that crappy gang needed to die. Target painting BC's.... it made me want to weep (it was to counter a rzr gang, why they fought you i have no idea, it was only going to end one way) ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.27 06:23:00 - [19] Edited by: Butter Dog on 27/07/2010 06:22:49 Please save me from your T1 arty machs :( ps - tarac, you will probably have to sell the account and buy another discreetly, if you want meaningful roles in any corp again... although you may not want that, which is fine ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.27 07:40:00 - [20] 40% efficiency, how... ~elite pvp~ and congrats on holding the fie... owait ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc

Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.27 11:12:00 - [21] Edited by: Butter Dog on 27/07/2010 11:14:32 Probably because it incorrectly gives credit to Hydra for something they didn't do, since we now know Tarac wasnt a Hydra plant but just a classic old disgruntled director after a bit of e-fame and isk The rest is just lol. We've already told you guys we don't want the alliance name back, do you honestly think we'd have said that if it bothered us so much? I'd be more concerned about helping CVA get that foothold they so want, if I were you, as I hear R3 and N8 didn't work out so well Originally by: Suitonia anrgy :words: from self styled ~elite pvp~ corp the difference is, we don't pretend to be something we're not - the rage on your killboard at some of your less intelligent losses is quite something to behold ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.27 11:47:00 - [22] I can speak for our alliance leadership when I say: we don't want it back. That is the firmly expressed view of the decision makers. What a few randoms tell you is neither here nor there ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.28 10:15:00 - [23] no-one in UK 'blames' CVA for this, at least no-one sane no-one sane blames Hydra either it was the actions of one person, it was within game mechanics, and thats it however, trolling CVA for their lack of e-honour is pretty fun ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.28 12:49:00 - [24] Originally by: Haude OH AND GOOD RIDDANCE OF BUTTER DOG I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you, but I'm still here ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.28 15:27:00 - [25] The sweet irony is that UK were creaking at the seams before this happened, and the summer caused a whole raft of leaders and FC's to become inactive. However, since the disband, participation, drive, and morale seems to have rocketed. Corps who were planning on leaving are now staying. It's a good time. ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Circle-Of-Two	Posted - 2010.07.28 15:52:00 - [26] we joined Co2 and will stay here until we have completed certain ~objectives~ but then the UK corps will move to a new alliance... still freedomy RP type thing, the name is similar in style but totally different to ushra'khan ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.