For some reason everyone loves these two ships and well I dont that much lol.

I kill Drakes in cruisers and the cane has never really scared me either. A buddy of mine killed 2 Canes at the same time with 1 Cyclone and one of the two canes was flown by a good pilot in a well fitted Cane.

The Myrm is beyond awesome and I'll fight any cane or drake in one.

And as you said the Harb has great damage projection and it works well in fleets, eh isnt that you just saying it has its uses?!

Just cause everyone drank the kool aid doesn't make it true...

The drake and hurricane should be readjusted to the same level as the harbinger and the myrmidon.

Did you seriously make a thread to state that two battlecruisers are able to kill frigates and cruisers and this somehow makes them OP? Wtf?

Just no...all around just no..

Nuets are the primary defense against being swarmed by frigs, and most importantly, the main reason for people to think about cracking open that wallet and buying a bigger ship. Over half the players you run into in low sec are in frigates, not because they offer some tactical advantage, but because they are scared to fly a real ship.

As far as balance between the different races BC's, that's slated to be addressed, so nothing to talk about there. Lasers with scorch give autocannons a run for the money any day.

And a power grid nerf on minmatar? You must want artillery removed from the game because even with AWU5 there are minmatar ships that need multiple power grid mods to fit the max size artillery as well as a tank and prop mod, so no, I don't think they need a PG nerf at all.. Also look at the range on autocannons with a given ammo when you consider the paper dps. At one falloff it's half the paper dps.

TLDR
OP is an amarr pilot and seemingly one who has an aversion to flying man-ships (BC+) and this has caused him to request bc nerfs.

Either Amarr should be given more powergrid, or minmatar needs a reduction to balance the field.

Sure scorch makes pulses good, but compare beam lasers to artillery, its no contest.

Oh boy another "NERF THESE SHIPS BECAUSE I PROBABLY DIED TO THEM TO MUCH OR I CANT FLY THEM CORRECTLY" thread.

Learn to counter the ship. like really.

And let me laugh at you on several points.

Their tank and dps completely obsolete cruisers and creep into battleship territory.
Lol what. geddons can get 1.2k dps and 20k worth of armor. and they are the cheapest bs around.
Tempests definitly get more dmg. then a cane ever could.
Do i even need to point out the maelstrom or abbadon ?
And on the case of obsoleting cruiser , No ******* **** sherlock holmes. Thats the point of it being a step up from cruisers. they do more dps and tank. But yes lets nerf BC's because were all stupid and want every ship to be on the same level because your to stupid to figure out the class difference of ships on a game.

They are able to take on a wide variety of targets ranging from frigates to capitals.
Thats the point of the battlecruiser hull. they are DESIGNED to be versitile In RL and game.

The drake has very good damage projection and tank. It has the tendency to outlast and destroy any sub battlecruiser ships. I really cant beleive i saw this statement. Caracals can outrange a drake. and if your stupid enough to sit there and get plinked by a drake at 50kms in your t1 cruiser without outrunning it or warping you deserve to die.

The harbinger is a ship with good damage projections, but is more suited to fleets and has a strong weakness to neuts.
Id seriously love to see a harbinger fleet. But no ive seen more solo harbi's then canes.

The drake and hurricane should be readjusted to the same level as the harbinger and the myrmidon.
Stupid statement within itself. Every ship in eve has its own niche and has its own situations. If your seriously to stupid to relise this then quit eve and go play WoW.
Seriously go fight RvB with a drake or cane and see how fast they whelp you with t1 cruisers m8

I believe the hurricane and drake are simply too versatile and cheap.

Everyone and their grandmother flies one. Even low skilled poor noobs fly them.

Their tank and dps completely obsolete cruisers and creep into battleship territory.

They are able to take on a wide variety of targets ranging from frigates to capitals.

My thoughts on this as someone capable of flying 4 races of combat ship:

Minmatar and Caldari are OP

This may be true but it is a result of the old nano tactic resurfacing. Armor ships struggle to kite (key word struggle before someone tries to argue with me), Gallente have never recovered from the nano-nerf even with blaster buff and amarr may just have been caught up by the return of the nano-ship.

CCP should nerf the drake/cane

I'd have to agree that it seems a bit borked that AC's have such ease of fitting compared to the other guns.
I think cruiser blasters/ac's PG use should be rebalanced so that a full rack of mid lvl short range weapons (ion/220'mm) should fit on their gunboat BC with enough grid for MWD, 1600 plate and maybe a couple med neut or neut/injector. The largest guns (neutrons/425mm) should be 35% more PG use.
The amarr weapons should have PG adjusted the same but for heavy pulse laser. A tracking bonus to smaller guns might be in order to bring some relevance to them

This should make things a bit fairer overall, and liberate cruisers a little

No other weapon system allow you to fit a whole rack of your top tier guns and two neut. As said before, a harbinger cannot even fit one neut when he have all it's guns.

It's a more appealing way to balance then nerfing more then half of the ships in EVE.

CCP are on the case re ship balancing so you can stop bringing it up.
That said, other ships should be improved, not the good ones nerfed.