| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |

Mallak Azaria
385
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 02:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:Oh he mad. But is he wrong? Nope. Fitted properly, a Hulk cannot be profitably ganked.
Happy miner is happy because CCP is acknowledging that miners, as a group, are too stupid to make the correct fitting choices.. Happy miner is now glad that he is stupid. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
385
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 02:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:Oh he mad. But is he wrong? Nope. Fitted properly, a Hulk cannot be profitably ganked. Happy miner is happy because CCP is acknowledging that miners, as a group, are too stupid to make the correct fitting choices.. Happy miner is now glad that he is stupid. Yep. Happy Miner is proud that he's too stupid to survive without CCP holding his hand and leading him to water. Bet you that in 6 months we're gonna hear Happy Miner turn into Sad Miner complaining that CCP hasn't forced him to drink.
You can lead a horse to water... Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
395
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 08:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:End result: the mythical 22K EHP Mack apparently miners have to use or are "stupid pigs", everything both cargo and yield sacrificed for tank.
I'm going to go out on a limb here & say that you never thought of staggering your ice harvester cycles. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
395
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 10:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:End result: the mythical 22K EHP Mack apparently miners have to use or are "stupid pigs", everything both cargo and yield sacrificed for tank.
I'm going to go out on a limb here & say that you never thought of staggering your ice harvester cycles. Achieving what? Besides being easily flagged as a bot.
Achieving those unwasted harvester cycles because your cargo only holds enough for 1.5 cycles from 2 harvesters. Stagger by 30 seconds, don't mine afk & there's no problem with wasted cycles. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
395
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 11:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Manar Detri wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Manar Detri wrote:Actually to make this thing even clearer to you dear Richard Desturned. Every single argument you come up is garbage, you know why ? Because the alliance you are part of, goonswarm whined so long and hard that blapper titans got nerfed, just because you couldn't adapt to it.
You opened this can of whining worms, live with it. thank you for your opinion, faceless npc alt we tested setups 100 ways from sunday to counter "blapper titans," you know, the 20-30 dudes that decided coalition-level engagements at every turn you know, the ewar-immune ships with millions upon millions of EHP and better tracking than arty battleships? yeah, those "blapper titans" every "counter" we tested was either overhyped, unrealistic in TQ conditions or simply useless in addition, the growing number of titans was making other ships absolutely irrelevant. if titans were in the same state as they were before Crucible, our line members' entire gameplay in fleets would involve sitting on a titan just in case our own titan blob was in danger. how fun is that? so yes, compare this to the titan nerf - catalysts are, after all, just like titans You whined because you got killed. Miners whined because they got killed.
The thing is, Titans had to be nerfed because they weren't being killed, but could kill subcaps in 1 shot regardless of using a DD or not. There's a difference between lobbying for a change that is to the betterment of everyone involved & lobbying for a change that makes the game easier for you so you don't get blown up because you were too lazy or stupid to fit a tank. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
396
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 11:39:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:The thing is, Titans had to be nerfed because they weren't being killed, but could kill subcaps in 1 shot regardless of using a DD or not. Not if you DD'd wrong ship. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk2cCe5GF-c
I don't see how a random DD video relates to titans not dying. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
396
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 13:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
We'll just have to adapt by lowering suicide ganking & going on more safari's. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
396
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 13:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
Big Bossu wrote:I mean, it already isn't profitable to gank ravens.
Since when? Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
396
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 13:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
Manar Detri wrote:The 40-60 titan fleets wielded by the techboys could've been killed with a sizeable dread armada, you the goons just didn't have the balls to do it or didn't have enough pilots volunteering for it or possibly just didn't have enough dread pilots. Seems you didn't prepare for war enough. Just assuming you can plow through everything with 2 alpha mael fleet + scrubs fleet was shortsighted.
Now that being said, ccp didn't intend titans to kill subcaps with ease at this point in eve onlines life and that is the reason they were nerfed. But this was only brought to ccp's eyes by the huge amount of whine the goonswarm did when they couldn't win the war with the usual alpha mael fleet. Yes you whined only after it affected you, not before.
Now onto the miners problem, ccp has stated that ganking a ship in hisec is not meant to be profitable, that means you shouldn't be gaining more cash from suiciding and then salvaging a ship than you lose while doing it. Why is this important to ccp now? Well you guessed it, you dimwits went and took a crap on your own plate, you just had to gank and gank and gank. Now all the miners have had enough and whined, and as such ccp is doing the necessary changes.
After the changes, the ships are still gankable, it just takes more effort, and as has been said tons of times, idiots don't tank their ships. And really these things were being planned on since last summer. The reason the tanks were made better was goonswarms ice interdiction, and the growing love for hulkageddon.
Now i hope you atlast get it, you can whine as much as you whine it won't change the new reincarnations of mining ships.
Ps. now remember kids, titans were actually the counter to blob warfare which the cfc loves so much.
I've underlined the one thing that you actually got right. The rest of it sounds like stuff you've heard through several other people who had no idea what they were talking about & therefore isn't worth arguing about.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
397
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 14:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Love 2 Phoenix.
(Not really)
What are you talking about? Those ships are awesome If target is literally 0km away! Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
398
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 14:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:Ganking always has consequences. Even if it's not successful, you get a security status hit and lose a ship (without insurance). Grinding sec is a terrible, terrible thing.
It is. I can handle about 2 hours of sec grinding in a month. I'd rather mine than sec grind to be honest. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 14:46:00 -
[12] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:This is fun.
CCP dev's gave griefers a huge gift of buffed Catalysts and the new T3 BC's. We were then told by the griefers "adapt or die". So the more determined and resourceful of the miner species adapted, the balance stopped mining.
16 months later CCP gives high sec miners a counter to the Catalyst and Tornado.
I am sure that the truly intelligent and resourceful of the various griefer species will adapt. For the balance of the various griefer species, well, in Eve and as in nature, evolution will do what it does best.
You mean to say not being afk, fitting a tank & paying attention was never a counter? Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:06:00 -
[13] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:huge increase in griefing. Now it is the griefers' turn to adapt.
Griefers get banned in EVE, because it's bannable. Your definition of griefing that you brought with you from some other game is not actually griefing in this game. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:22:00 -
[14] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Togg Bott wrote: As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there. this guy gets it
He will unfortunately suffer the most in the end though. He has put in effort to survive & will be one of the few that don't deserve the inevitable hit to their wallets when veld goes back to 1 isk PU. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Togg Bott wrote: As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there. this guy gets it He will unfortunately suffer the most in the end though. He has put in effort to survive & will be one of the few that don't deserve the inevitable hit to their wallets when veld goes back to 1 isk PU. who cares if trit is 1isk/unit? that means ships will be pocket change, you'll mine for the same amount of time to buy the same amount of stuff. in real terms nothing has changed.
Except exhumers still use mostly moon goo for production & won't be overly affected by the cost of trit. In fact anything that is T2, faction/DS/Officer... Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:50:00 -
[16] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:tech is being nerfed too so prices will still come down. i have no idea how long the tech cartel has around, but a year ago trit was half of what it is now, so were hulk prices, they've both gone up at similar rates.
don't forget if people don't have isk to spend, demand goes down, as do prices. people can't spend what they don't have.
A year ago, Hulks were worth 195m. 195 is not half of 300. I was also buying trit at 1.59isk PU on average a year ago. If you really believe that miners not having much isk will make the price of everything go down, then I don't know what to say. Tech isn't the only valuable moon material that is mined.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 16:58:00 -
[17] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Togg Bott wrote: As a part time miner... i am sadened by the massive numbers of mining ship fail fit kills. it is now very easy to survive being ganked not by fitting a mining ship to be ungankable... you just have to fit a little better than the other guy. Gankers... and i have done this in the past myself (not miner ships but afk auto pilot to jita with mass loot in them). will go for the guy that offers them the most bling for their cost. always has been. but even with the upcoming changes... we will still see people fit T2 exhumers for max yield instead of tanking them. ganking will still be profitable (maybe not quite as profitable) because CCP cant change the bot/afk miners thought process.
this is in my opinion not going to kill the gankers off... instead its gonna give them many many new targets. balance will still be there. this guy gets it He will unfortunately suffer the most in the end though. He has put in effort to survive & will be one of the few that don't deserve the inevitable hit to their wallets when veld goes back to 1 isk PU. Official bet: I will give you 1 billion if within 6 months from the patch trit goes to 1 ISK pu (Jita IV price). If it does not, you will give me 1 billion instead. Chribba or Grendell will be used to hold my and your billion in the mean time. Deal?
Inevitable =/= 6 months. Nice try. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 17:16:00 -
[18] - Quote
Marconus Orion wrote:Just throwing this out there; what if the lower the system sec status the faster the mining laser cycle time?
Highsec miners would still mine in highsec & complain about how nullsec miners can make even more isk per hour than them. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
399
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 17:42:00 -
[19] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:Hulks will be like 100-150m with the tech nerf.
If it works as intended. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
400
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 18:56:00 -
[20] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:and then it's you mine or you tank
I find it unsurprising that you're unaware that you can actually mine AND tank just fine the ways things are now. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
401
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 22:12:00 -
[21] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Bolded the part your blinds seem to hide.
You forgot to bold the part where I gave a definitive time frame.
Oh that's right, because there's nothing to bold.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
401
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 22:14:00 -
[22] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Do you gank and empty freighter?
Ganking a freighter effectively empties it, so yes.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
401
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 22:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:To be fair, Ruby is a special snowflake. The filter between his brain and mouth (or fingers in this case) malfunctions often which forces him into constant shitposting and has suffered repeated forum warnings and bans because of it. Most of the pro-ganker crowd is happily posting on their main while the pro-miner crowd is unlikely to do the same in an effort to avoid the targeted ire of the vengeful ganker mobs.
I love it when people assume someones main was repeatedly warned then banned for reasons that they make up in their head.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
401
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 22:18:00 -
[24] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Do you gank and empty freighter? Ganking a freighter effectively empties it, so yes. Oh look, we got someone with fantasy inspirations.
You're the one that asked: Do you gank and empty freighter? I'd hardly call answering your question honestly to be a fantasy. You must be getting desperate.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
401
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 22:26:00 -
[25] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:So you REALLY go to the final straws and pretend everybody else are so stupid not to understand the meaning of my easy 4-5 lines of text?
Not at all.
Have a deep & thoughtful think about what you said in the quoted text.
Quote: Do you gank and empty freighter?
The rest of what you said was well structured & added to the present argument.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
401
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 09:19:00 -
[26] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:
Yet rogues continue to stun lock.
that hasn't happened since the hp buffs at the start of tbc nearly half a decade ago. you simply don't have enough combined stuns and dps to 100 -> 0 some one with the larger hp pools. then came resilience etc...
This is now a "Talk about [Insert random easy-mode MMO here]" thread. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
402
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 10:29:00 -
[27] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Pyotr Kamarovi wrote:There appears to have been a sharp reversal in trends here. Now, with CCP announcing that it is actually going to do something about the mining problem (which makes perfect sense, considering their shift towards minerals coming mainly from mining and not other sources, e.g: gun mining), there are far less threads from miners "whining" about being ganked, and then being trolled and heckled by gankers, and a proportionately larger number of threads from gankers "whining" about not being able to gank, and being trolled and heckled by miners, carebears, and people with sense. It's called "what goes around, comes around".
I fixed this for you because you still speak better English as a second language than most people who grow up with it do. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
403
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 11:55:00 -
[28] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Dave stark wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:
Yet rogues continue to stun lock.
that hasn't happened since the hp buffs at the start of tbc nearly half a decade ago. you simply don't have enough combined stuns and dps to 100 -> 0 some one with the larger hp pools. then came resilience etc... This is now a "Talk about [Insert random easy-mode MMO here]" thread. EvE is an easy mode MMO as well. This whole thread is created by bads who want to keep effortlessy farming other bads who are even worse. Actually, in WoW if you want to compete for any ladder you must stop keyboard turning and being a clicker, EvE does not even demand that.
Is there anything in that game that encourages you to learn how to play better? Is it one of those games where you drop equipment when someone kills you, or do you just respawn after a small amount of time with no real set-back? I ask because there is quite a bit more to EVE PvP than pressing a couple of buttons, blob-warfare being the exception. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
403
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 12:05:00 -
[29] - Quote
Docter Daniel Jackson wrote:All this crying is yummy :D
Crying is actually good for you. I try to make sure I cry at least once a week. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
416
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 14:27:00 -
[30] - Quote
Patrakele wrote:Hey, I just met you and this is crazy!
So here's the kitchen so sandwich maybe!
Teehehehe Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
417
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 14:51:00 -
[31] - Quote
In all seriousness, I may get my main back in to a Mackinaw just so I can have it AFK mine while I'm playing Skyrim or something. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
420
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 15:05:00 -
[32] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:Misanth wrote:Herr Wilkus, I'm too lazy to log in all my accounts to give you +likes, but pretend you just got a heap of them. Not only for the OP, replies was made of win as well.  See, that's the problem. People who suicide gank high-sec miners are the laziest PvP'ers. Now that it is no longer so easy to gank high-sec miners, gankers find it easier to whine on the forums instead of actually learning to PvP.
How does one learn how to shoot another player besides actually shooting another player?
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
450
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 16:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:How does one learn how to shoot another player besides actually shooting another player?
For example Red vs Blue.
What has EVE come to when someone has to actually join a corp to learn how to target another player & press F1? Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
450
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 17:10:00 -
[34] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:a shame that no matter how much they Trammelize hisec, they will never compete with WoW You have really to hope the current CEO and stake holders don't change and get replaced by "$$$$ in the eyes" quick short term money mongers a la EA.
That already happened. It didn't quite turn out the way they had hoped. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
450
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 17:17:00 -
[35] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:a shame that no matter how much they Trammelize hisec, they will never compete with WoW You have really to hope the current CEO and stake holders don't change and get replaced by "$$$$ in the eyes" quick short term money mongers a la EA. That already happened. It didn't quite turn out the way they had hoped. You have yet to see the real EA-alike directors in action. If you believe that little CCP brainfart was something serious you'd see MMOs that got totally gutted to the point of losing dozens of servers in 2-3 months, others that within 3 months off release were already 40% player base down and so on.
I don't usually play other MMO's past the free month phase. I prefere playing with myself. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
506
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 18:23:00 -
[36] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:please stop saying things that are entirely untrue, feel free to test this on sisi I don't have any friends. Richard Desturned wrote:outlaw pods have been legal targets since ever Stop lying.
Do you even play this game?
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
506
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 18:28:00 -
[37] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Do you even play this game? Yes.
I doubt it. Even day 1 trial newbies know that you can shoot outlaw pods in highsec.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
506
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 18:31:00 -
[38] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:I am not going to sit in a belt for 8 hours awaiting for the next Buddha to come. What for anyway? To kill a 2M ship that was mean to explode anyway and (since I don't use cheesy alts to circumvent consequences) get kill rights on me? hi you shoot it when it gets a GCC and it won't get kill rights Am I going to pop him before he pops the other guy? Because that would be the reason to do that defense.
If you can't alpha a destroyer, you're doing something wrong.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
510
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 22:01:00 -
[39] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:JamesCLK wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:an instacane does not use tracking computers I have no idea what I'm doing (you're right)! [Hurricane, Instacane] Counterbalanced Weapon Mounts I Counterbalanced Weapon Mounts I Counterbalanced Weapon Mounts I Tracking Enhancer II Tracking Enhancer II Tracking Enhancer II F-90 Positional Sensor Subroutines, Scan Resolution Script F-90 Positional Sensor Subroutines, Scan Resolution Script F-90 Positional Sensor Subroutines, Scan Resolution Script F-90 Positional Sensor Subroutines, Scan Resolution Script [Empty High slot] [Empty High slot] 720mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma M 720mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma M 720mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma M 720mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma M 720mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma M 720mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma M Medium Projectile Collision Accelerator I Medium Targeting System Subcontroller I Medium Targeting System Subcontroller I Locks a Catalyst in 1 second. A direct hit alphas an untanked Catalyst. Can I have a gold star now? Not enough dps to destroy that Catalyst.
Try this.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
588
|
Posted - 2012.08.28 16:08:00 -
[40] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Look at all these suicide ganker tears because they can't fit up a T1 destroyer for little to no ISK and solo gank a ship that cost 200m+ for the hull. Absolutely pathetic.
You can still suicide gank that shinny, but you will need to bring a few friends (you know, the thing you keep telling everyone in high sec to get...) and you will need to pony up a bit of ISK to do it. So dry those eyes already.
Well you know, miners that fit a good tank pre-patch couldn't be ganked by said solo ganker in a destroyer either. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
588
|
Posted - 2012.08.28 19:31:00 -
[41] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Look at all these suicide ganker tears because they can't fit up a T1 destroyer for little to no ISK and solo gank a ship that cost 200m+ for the hull. Absolutely pathetic.
You can still suicide gank that shinny, but you will need to bring a few friends (you know, the thing you keep telling everyone in high sec to get...) and you will need to pony up a bit of ISK to do it. So dry those eyes already. Well you know, miners that fit a good tank pre-patch couldn't be ganked by said solo ganker in a destroyer either. No...it took a whole 2 cheap fit destroyers instead of 1.
Only if the miner sacrificed the tank in favouring max yield/cargo. A good tank did not sacrifice itself for more yield & could not be profitably ganked.
Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
591
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 09:03:00 -
[42] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:No matter how you look at it, exhumers deserved better tank/ehp than they previously had. They are the highest end mining vessels you can fly, but they were far to weak even with tanks fit.
People too greedy, stupid or both made them appear too weak. Fitting a shield booster in the mids & continuing to fit cargo rigs & yield lows does not count as tanking your mining ship. Unfortunately a lot of miners could not get this around their heads. If I want to have an awesome armour tank on a ship, I have to sacrifice dps capability & mobility. If I want an awesome shield tank, I have to sacrifice utility & some dps if I want to have more mobility. It was exactly the same for miners.
As it stands now, if a miner wants to have a good tank, he doesn't have to sacrifice a thing because his Mackinaw not only has a carghold that lasts for an hour, but a base tank that rivals battlecruisers before fitting any mods. Please tell me how that makes them balanced? Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
591
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 09:58:00 -
[43] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:As it stands now, if a miner wants to have a good tank, he doesn't have to sacrifice a thing because his Mackinaw not only has a carghold that lasts for an hour, but a base tank that rivals battlecruisers before fitting any mods. Please tell me how that makes them balanced? Sorry, but untrue... the old barges were far too weak for the time and affort you had to put into skilling them. How long do you have to skill for BCs (in example a Drake) to use and tank them efficiently? A month? No comparison possible... concidering that miners have to learn many side skills, like refining and ore specialisation to be really effective at all... a L3 mission runner on the other hand...
You're trying to compare T2 hulls with T1 hulls in regards to skilling. Yes, training for T2 hulls does take longer than training for a T1 BC... So yes, you were correct in saying "No comparison possible". However, you can skill for a retriever & use it efficiently in a little over a week. The fact remains that if you want to be good at one thing, you have to sacrifice other capabilities. This no longer applies to mining ships. I mean you can literally make a Skiff tank better than a HIC & it's a fair bit cheaper too, all the while happily chewing away at whatever asteroid. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
591
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 12:21:00 -
[44] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frying Doom wrote:But are miners not sacrificing something? So tell me were do I put the 8 HAM launchers on a skiff? In normal ships you have tanking and guns but cant mine for crap. Mining barges cant shoot people but why can't they have mining and armour? They can. They always could. They just couldn't have Convenience, Tank, and the best yield in the game all at the same time. The Rokh had great yield, great tank, but was inconvenient. The Hulk (Cargo Rigged, 2 MLUs) had the best yield in the game, poor tank, and was pretty convenient. The Hulk (Tanked) had great yield, good enough tank, and reasonable convenience. The Hulk (All Cargo) had great yield, poor tank, and fantastic convenience. The Miners just got the idea that they were entitled to have the best yield in the game without having to give up anything else mining related. (By the way, claiming that Mining barges are giving something up by not being able to fit 8 missile launchers is like claiming the Abaddon's giving up something because it can't fit a whole rack of missile launchers instead of just 1, it's an insane argument and you look silly making it.) 8 missile launchers or 3 hybrid railguns, doesn't matter crap the fact is that barges give up the ability for offensive weapons to gain a mining advantage. And if you think the old Hulk had a good tank try flying around a Battleship or for that matter a battle cruiser with that crappy amount of tank and I'm talking the T1 battle ships or battle cruisers while you seem to think a T2 ship should have a crap tank and no ability to shoot back. I love the good enough tank reference, by what do you class as good enough? good enough to go boom with 3 or 4 catalysts? Personally I think your argument is insane. A fully tanked T2 ship should not be able to be swatted out of the sky by a handful of crappy T1 destroyers while not having the ability to fight back. Looks like you just want easy ganks, so why don't you just find some of those catalysts, there are plenty flying around. Why don't you go gank them or are you worried they can shoot back?
The point of those barge changes was to make it so they could not be profitably ganked at the base level. Here's a shocker: You could already do that. You could get them to 38k EHP with out using expensive modules & they could not be profitably ganked. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
591
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 13:02:00 -
[45] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:The point of those barge changes was to make it so they could not be profitably ganked at the base level. Here's a shocker: You could already do that. You could get them to 38k EHP with out using expensive modules & they could not be profitably ganked. Yea, sure... and now compare the (relative) amount of ISK you could make with that fitting in an hour, compared to a solo L3 mission runner that didn't spend half as much time skilling... still not even close on the SP/ISK investment vs. profit diagram. No mentioning the fact that nobody would try to suicide gank said mission runner while he is making his money in highsec. That's all I'm saying...
SP investment has nothing to do with the choices people make. Using your logic, it's unfair that someone can spend a few days training Trade skills & start raking in billions of isk each day. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
591
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 13:54:00 -
[46] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:The point of those barge changes was to make it so they could not be profitably ganked at the base level. Here's a shocker: You could already do that. You could get them to 38k EHP with out using expensive modules & they could not be profitably ganked. You might want to check that the fitting states "Effective HP: 26,653" not 38k, its only 36k in kinetic/thermal.
That is only 1 of many fits that were available with very litte in the way of shield training. With a little creativity it could easily go to 38k. If 3 month old ice miners can spend 500mil on an ice harvesting hardwire or 1 bil on a mindlink, then what's the problem with buying a 3% PG implant to increase tanking capability? The fact remains that when tanked properly, Hulks & Macks could not be ganked for profit unless they went out of their way to make it profitable.
Frying Doom wrote:It was just stupid that a T1 cruiser could have the same armour levels as a T2 mining ship that has no offensive capability.
T2 mining ships were for mining & did that really well. They also tanked really well if you bothered to try. Said T1 cruiser is a combat ship, not a strip miner. Also, I take it you've never seen a combat Hulk in action? Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
592
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 15:05:00 -
[47] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: Comparing the Hulk's capabilities to a Combat ship is silly and you should feel silly. It's like saying the Freighter's underpowered because it can't fit a DCII and a Cargo Expander. The equivalent to the Thorax's Magstabs are built into the hull. Adding more MLUs costs you your shot at defense.
Yeah because it would be stupid if a ship designed for mining with all these combat ships around to actually have reasonable defenses, the fact is exactly that it makes no sense at all to design a mining ship that can just get blown out of the water by any old crap T1 or 3 in the case of catalysts. As to adding more MLUs actually I haven't used them in years and the tank for such an expensive ship was a bloody joke. To use your freighter example, the old hulk was like having an obelisk with only 80k ehp but I suppose that would make a lot of sense to you as well. Your whole argument is it is so nasty now that 3 T1 destroyers can't kill a T2 ship with a Mass 7 times there combined mass. I noticed you didn't reply about ganking ships that can shoot back and I think that is the whole point to this thread. You want easy kills that can't shoot you back.
You keep bringing up cost & size comparisons when neither of them are valid arguments. I'm pretty sure the size, mass & cost of the WTC towers was a lot higher than the planes that brought them down.
What exactly is stopping a mining ship from shooting back? We all know they can use drones. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |

Mallak Azaria
592
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 15:54:00 -
[48] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:
You keep bringing up cost & size comparisons when neither of them are valid arguments. I'm pretty sure the size, mass & cost of the WTC towers was a lot higher than the planes that brought them down.
What exactly is stopping a mining ship from shooting back? We all know they can use drones.
You bring up a good point if you want to pack your ships with a volatile substance and smash into a hulk so you can die a permadeath while screaming for Allah, be my guest. Other than that it doesn't make much sense, kind of like firing a machine gun at a battleship and hoping it sinks.
Yet you & others keep bringing up the comparison. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |
| |
|