Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

243636
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 17:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
So I was thinking, the changes to mining ships will mean more isotopes on the market which should lower the cost of fuel blocks.
Flip over to the changes to technetium and alchemy. More Alchemy should mean more towers, which leads to more fuels blocks being consumed which will make the price of fuel blocks go up as demand increases.
Will the two balance each other out so overall no change in price?
Only problem is I can see mining changes leading to more isotopes on the market but there will be no extra PI products like coolant, mechanical parts ect. . . Is this why there are alot of big buy orders on for these at the moment? people stockpiling for after the patch?
If these PI items go up in price would this not then raise the price of fuel blocks?
Will we see the price of PI items go back to there heady heights of 6 months ago?
|

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
305
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 17:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

243636
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 18:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged.
Less ganking more AFK mining on a whole? |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
305
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 18:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
243636 wrote:Dave stark wrote:why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged. Less ganking more AFK mining on a whole?
yeah but do you really think those people who afk mine are aware that their mack is going to be mining a lot less ice, especially with a rig they're probably not aware of?
you over estimate people. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

243636
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 19:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:243636 wrote:Dave stark wrote:why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged. Less ganking more AFK mining on a whole? yeah but do you really think those people who afk mine are aware that their mack is going to be mining a lot less ice, especially with a rig they're probably not aware of? you over estimate people.
Well something has made the price of isotopes loose 15-20% since the patch was announced. I think it will be interesting to say the least to see which way this pans out.
I brought up my materials to make my fuel blocks for the next year so I hope my gamble will have paid off. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
305
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 19:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
243636 wrote:Dave stark wrote:243636 wrote:Dave stark wrote:why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged. Less ganking more AFK mining on a whole? yeah but do you really think those people who afk mine are aware that their mack is going to be mining a lot less ice, especially with a rig they're probably not aware of? you over estimate people. Well something has made the price of isotopes loose 15-20% since the patch was announced. I think it will be interesting to say the least to see which way this pans out. I brought up my materials to make my fuel blocks for the next year so I hope my gamble will have paid off.
people panic selling stockpiles because they think there's going to be some huge influx of miners. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1731
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 19:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
243636 wrote:Dave stark wrote:243636 wrote:Dave stark wrote:why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged. Less ganking more AFK mining on a whole? yeah but do you really think those people who afk mine are aware that their mack is going to be mining a lot less ice, especially with a rig they're probably not aware of? you over estimate people. Well something has made the price of isotopes loose 15-20% since the patch was announced. I think it will be interesting to say the least to see which way this pans out. I brought up my materials to make my fuel blocks for the next year so I hope my gamble will have paid off.
Perma hulkageddon has fizzled, last week ice mining systems at The Forge were back up again to 80+ in local instead of 25.
Plus a sizable number of people left for summer vacations and offlined their POS. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Slavemaster
ICC - Information Control Corporation
39
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 18:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
"Perma hulkageddon has fizzled, last week ice mining systems at The Forge were back up again to 80+ in local instead of 25.
Plus a sizable number of people left for summer vacations and offlined their POS"
this.... Oo |

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
190
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 19:05:00 -
[9] - Quote
Iv warned the eve community of the impending crash before.
If you trust the goons, you will foot the bill.
Speaking for myself, luckily iv liquidated 80% of my assets last week, still nearly 1B in losses are expected for my little tiny shop in the quorner, perhaps Im a little bit guilty of trust, myself. |

Javajunky
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 19:52:00 -
[10] - Quote
Bots come back in droves after this change. Everyone on the planet gets to AFK in ICE BELTS where they only have to dock like 2 x an hour. Seriously how could you not see this coming.
All Isotopes - 300 to 350 p/u Liquid Ozone 200 to 225 p/u Heavy Water 12 to 15 pu
By end of year... |

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
190
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
Javajunky wrote:Bots come back in droves after this change. Everyone on the planet gets to AFK in ICE BELTS where they only have to dock like 2 x an hour. Seriously how could you not see this coming.
All Isotopes - 300 to 350 p/u Liquid Ozone 200 to 225 p/u Heavy Water 12 to 15 pu
By end of year...
Indeed, cant blame just one piece of the puzzle.
Scripts and apps are supposedly the next big hit.
Edit part: oh and yes, if you've tired of the market, nows the perfect time to pull out and go PvP or do something you've always wanted to do. |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
619
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:27:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kara Books wrote: oh and yes, if you've tired of the market, nows the perfect time to pull out and go PvP or do something you've always wanted to do.
etny doesn't know how to do anything but mine, sorry This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
fofofo |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
106
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 23:40:00 -
[13] - Quote
Javajunky wrote:Bots come back in droves after this change. Everyone on the planet gets to AFK in ICE BELTS where they only have to dock like 2 x an hour. Seriously how could you not see this coming.
errr ... bots didn't need an ore bay boost, do you even know what a bot is?
If nothing else this lets the casual miners compete with all the bot trains out there, and not get ganked nonstop (another thing the botters had zero issues with.)
~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

243636
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 05:43:00 -
[14] - Quote
PI parts of fuel block manufacture are on the way up. How high will they reach if isotopes bottom out and supply saturates the market but PI goods supply cannot match it . Only Bob knows . .
 |

shar'ra matcevsovski
Hedion University Amarr Empire
113
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 13:43:00 -
[15] - Quote
eventually you want to take into account that there will be massive technetium raction farms that qill require also a lot of fuel, wich would affect the fuel block in the oposite way. |

243636
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 18:31:00 -
[16] - Quote
Well its already netted me more than 16 billion and I have built up quite a stock of materials which I expect to go up quite abit more after the patch. Just surprised only a few other buyers cottoned on early.
Robotics have made me 6B alone never mind Coolant/mechanical parts and enriched uranium.
Fuel blocks I sold several million units at 20k+ and then brought them back at 15-16k 3 weeks later.
Long live Patches  |

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
191
|
Posted - 2012.08.07 22:38:00 -
[17] - Quote
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:eventually you want to take into account that there will be massive technetium raction farms that qill require also a lot of fuel, wich would affect the fuel block in the oposite way.
Indeed, I also dont see massive hoards of increased mineral supplies flooding the markets, different ships doesn't mean there's going to be another flood of miners, just not as gankable as before is all.
But, they will increase in numbers, slowly but surely. |

GreenSeed
81
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 01:46:00 -
[18] - Quote
Unless all the high sec mining is done on skiffs, macks are easily gankable. A full yield mack used to mine 76 blocks an hour, now it mines 70... thatGÇÖs a reduction in extraction. The ehp of the old yield mack was 10k, now its 16k. Old macks on wholesale went for 150millon each, now 290m due to mat changes. And hulks? Who the hell would undock one of those now?
the point is, if the extraction of isotopes comes from full yield ships, then ganking is now more profitable than ever due to killing hulks when actually killing one, and also when killing a mack!.... lots of blue salvage? Oh yeah.
Cost of the gank? 2 dessies. Potential targets? Yield macks, half yield/half tank macks (DCUII + 2 invuls) and just about any hulk, really. Got 3 dessies? Well **** it, only skiffs are out of reach.
The real point is this; a full yield mack was affordable to lose. Now it isnGÇÖt. It must be tanked because itGÇÖs expensive as ****. A yield mack died to a dessie before and still does today, the difference is the cost of the barge, itGÇÖs 100% more expensive. If it is half tanked ehp climbs to 26k and the yield suffers even more, and goes down to 64 cubes/h and guess what, it dies 100% of the time to a double dessie gank... Am i really the only one who sees this?
The ehp buff? Now that was the real "fizzle". From the insane 48kehp yield macks we are down to 16kehp (with perfect skills, and t2 shield gang) can a single cat kill one? Not always... can two? 100% sure.
How long until miners begin to ***** about a 30 million gank killing their 300m ship? heh, didnGÇÖt take long for the bitching to start when the gank was 15m and their ship was 150m.
Also, ice prices were "stable" at around 1k p/u, they peaked at 1.3kp/u and since then they went down simply because 40m isk/h on highsec was too good to be true, the initial speculation before the patch actually raised prices, mostly due to what we now know as a fact, ice yield is down.
And yes some more miners will undock and mine 2 to 6 hours a week. woop de doo... the high sec isotope supply doesnGÇÖt come from the miners that mine and sell in the system station once or twice a week, it comes from the no lifers like myself that mine 1 - 2 million units a day. (i am, ofc, not even mentioning those damn bots)
My yield didnGÇÖt go up, it went down. All the while my risk cost went through the roof.
Now, please. Tell me how does this lower isotope prices?
Quite frankly 2 things have me puzzled, first how come Vaerah Vahrokha seems to agree that ganking is over because barges are now immortalGǪ I thought you were the smart one around here, unless you are buying lots of what others are trowing away. And the second thing is why corestwo isnGÇÖt being more smug about how horribly will this barge rebalance backfire, I mean if thereGÇÖs someone looking at the stupid production cost/gankability of the GÇ£newGÇ¥ barges, it has to be the gooons.
|

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
626
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 02:10:00 -
[19] - Quote
GreenSeed wrote: Now, please. Tell me how does this lower isotope prices?
Because being able to mine in a gank-proof ship with somewhat lower yield than the old mackinaw is better than getting zero yield because you're too afraid to mine at all. This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
fofofo |

Sunrise Omega
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
20
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 20:53:00 -
[20] - Quote
GreenSeed wrote:Unless all the high sec mining is done on skiffs, macks are easily gankable. A full yield mack used to mine 76 blocks an hour, now it mines 70... thatGÇÖs a reduction in extraction. The ehp of the old yield mack was 10k, now its 16k. Old macks on wholesale went for 150millon each, now 290m due to mat changes. And hulks? Who the hell would undock one of those now?
Ah yes, but now you can get nearly the same output out of a Retriever (which is only 4% less yield per hour then the Mack, if the Mack pilot has Exhumer IV). Slightly less EHP (about 10k EHP if tanked), you dock every 30 minutes instead of every 35 minutes, and your total ship cost is around 40-50M instead of 300-350M.
Unless the T2 Mack gets a bigger boost per level in the Exhumer skill then it currently has, I expect Retrievers to line the ice belts. |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
39
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 21:55:00 -
[21] - Quote
GreenSeed wrote:Unless all the high sec mining is done on skiffs, macks are easily gankable. A full yield mack used to mine 76 blocks an hour, now it mines 70... thatGÇÖs a reduction in extraction. The ehp of the old yield mack was 10k, now its 16k. Old macks on wholesale went for 150millon each, now 290m due to mat changes. And hulks? Who the hell would undock one of those now?
the point is, if the extraction of isotopes comes from full yield ships, then ganking is now more profitable than ever due to killing hulks when actually killing one, and also when killing a mack!.... lots of blue salvage? Oh yeah.
Cost of the gank? 2 dessies. Potential targets? Yield macks, half yield/half tank macks (DCUII + 2 invuls) and just about any hulk, really. Got 3 dessies? Well **** it, only skiffs are out of reach.
The real point is this; a full yield mack was affordable to lose. Now it isnGÇÖt. It must be tanked because itGÇÖs expensive as ****. A yield mack died to a dessie before and still does today, the difference is the cost of the barge, itGÇÖs 100% more expensive. If it is half tanked ehp climbs to 26k and the yield suffers even more, and goes down to 64 cubes/h and guess what, it dies 100% of the time to a double dessie gank... Am i really the only one who sees this?
The ehp buff? Now that was the real "fizzle". From the insane 48kehp yield macks we are down to 16kehp (with perfect skills, and t2 shield gang) can a single cat kill one? Not always... can two? 100% sure.
How long until miners begin to ***** about a 30 million gank killing their 300m ship? heh, didnGÇÖt take long for the bitching to start when the gank was 15m and their ship was 150m.
Also, ice prices were "stable" at around 1k p/u, they peaked at 1.3kp/u and since then they went down simply because 40m isk/h on highsec was too good to be true, the initial speculation before the patch actually raised prices, mostly due to what we now know as a fact, ice yield is down.
And yes some more miners will undock and mine 2 to 6 hours a week. woop de doo... the high sec isotope supply doesnGÇÖt come from the miners that mine and sell in the system station once or twice a week, it comes from the no lifers like myself that mine 1 - 2 million units a day. (i am, ofc, not even mentioning those damn bots)
My yield didnGÇÖt go up, it went down. All the while my risk cost went through the roof.
Now, please. Tell me how does this lower isotope prices?
Quite frankly 2 things have me puzzled, first how come Vaerah Vahrokha seems to agree that ganking is over because barges are now immortalGǪ I thought you were the smart one around here, unless you are buying lots of what others are trowing away. And the second thing is why corestwo isnGÇÖt being more smug about how horribly will this barge rebalance backfire, I mean if thereGÇÖs someone looking at the stupid production cost/gankability of the GÇ£newGÇ¥ barges, it has to be the gooons.
No way in hell a 26k EHP ship dies to dual destroyers if he got half a brain. With half a brain I doubt 4 destroyers would kill an awake person, and if you are planning to AFK mine, go full tank on it.
|

Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
289
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 22:03:00 -
[22] - Quote
243636 wrote:So I was thinking, the changes to mining ships will mean more isotopes on the market which should lower the cost of fuel blocks.
Flip over to the changes to technetium and alchemy. More Alchemy should mean more towers, which leads to more fuels blocks being consumed which will make the price of fuel blocks go up as demand increases.
Will the two balance each other out so overall no change in price?
Only problem is I can see mining changes leading to more isotopes on the market but there will be no extra PI products like coolant, mechanical parts ect. . . Is this why there are alot of big buy orders on for these at the moment? people stockpiling for after the patch?
If these PI items go up in price would this not then raise the price of fuel blocks?
Will we see the price of PI items go back to there heady heights of 6 months ago?
you look like michael jackson
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |

Cheekybiatch
Dark-Rising
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 02:26:00 -
[23] - Quote
Honestly I think Ice prices will go back down but this wont happen for a while same as the tech price people will try and keep the prices high till the monthly influx of mass ice and goo comes floating in so give it a good 2 months for setup then the people trying to keep the price high will cash in and get out as the price crashes. |

Valari Nala Zena
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 14:01:00 -
[24] - Quote
Oh the ice prices will go down believe me.
Iv'e seen friends log on i haven't seen for years, just to mine, and some of them hated mining before....
The skill to mine has been reduced, tank increased, yield difference is negligible. For example the mack, the ore bay is insane, people can just afk and drag after 30 mins, and yield close to hulk. Just check the prices of the mack, the demand of it went in the sky.
The help channel is flooded with people asking questions about the mining changes all the time, it even annoys the people who are in there to help.
Local is spiking with miners in my used to be quiet belt, but then i'm not helping, even i have logged in 3 additional accounts.
Want my advice, if you got any stocked ice materials, sell it now, cuz dem prices r goin down!
|

Red zeon
Sacred Templars RED.OverLord
5
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 02:12:00 -
[25] - Quote
also now is a good time to pop haulers couple jumps from jita hauling macks :P that alot of profit and alot of people hauling em |

Xylorn Hasher
Sumiyoshi-Kai
38
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 08:14:00 -
[26] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged.
Glacial Mass prices drops from 340K ISK/u to 270K ISK/u laready in Mimmy space in just few days. Answer is if you can make ISks being AFK you will do it. |

Pinstar Colton
Sweet Asteroid Acres
230
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 17:38:00 -
[27] - Quote
Clear Icicle is crashing hard too.
The only thing I can think of that might be moderating the decrease in ice prices is the influx of POSes. Every moon containing cobalt in my neck of low sec has been snapped up moon mining + reacting POSes.
As fuel gets cheaper and cheaper, more and more POSes will go online as it'll be cheaper to fuel them. In the cat-and-mouse game that is low sec, there is no shame in learning to be a better mouse. |

Arec Bardwin
Perkone Caldari State
706
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 19:21:00 -
[28] - Quote
Isotopes prices will tank HARD. Out of curiosity I went to a system near Jita with 3 ice belts in it; literally hundreds of Mackinaws and Retrievers chewing away. |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
149
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 16:02:00 -
[29] - Quote
Arec Bardwin wrote:Isotopes prices will tank HARD. Out of curiosity I went to a system near Jita with 3 ice belts in it; literally hundreds of Mackinaws and Retrievers chewing away.
Question is: how low will the prices be before people don't bother to log in their mining alts and dock every 30 minutes to unload ore? 300? 250? It was not that long ago when 180k per block was considered a good price to sell high sec ice at. I have already seen some regions buy orders drop to around 200k. |

243636
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 21:17:00 -
[30] - Quote
Well with Coolant up over 50% since my original post and mechanical parts up over 75% I think this is a prediction that paid off quite profitably. 
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |