Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Ultim8Evil
Ministry Of Eternal Disorder
|
Posted - 2010.09.19 00:48:00 -
[1]
I'm guessing I'm not the first person to notice that "Primae Noctis" is Latin for "The First Night"... also know as "the Lord's Right"
This was a Medieval custom where the feudal Lord was legally allowed to take the virginity of his subject's daughters.
Who came up with the names and why? 
If you're reading this, you've read too far and now you're on my sig. Concentrate on what I said before you got to this bit. Ok? |

Phyress
|
Posted - 2010.09.19 00:56:00 -
[2]
I noticed this only a few moments ago as well, and I have to wonder the same thing.
Also, the custom had variations, such as the right being to the 'first night' of a marriage.
|

captain foivos
|
Posted - 2010.09.19 00:59:00 -
[3]

Originally by: CCP Navigator This thread is so bad that even locking it does not do it justice.
|

Cyn0 A17
|
Posted - 2010.09.19 15:21:00 -
[4]
It needs a gun slot or two so we can see battle noctis fleets, and thus taking the virginity of all who comes upon it.
PS:Like 2 guns and 6 neuts or something that would be nice.
|

Aamrr
|
Posted - 2010.09.19 20:06:00 -
[5]
[Noctis, Surprise!]
Small 'Vehemence' I Shockwave Charge Small Rudimentary Concussion Bomb I Small YF-12a Smartbomb Small 'Notos' Explosive Charge I Small 'Vehemence' I Shockwave Charge Small YF-12a Smartbomb Small Rudimentary Concussion Bomb I Small 'Notos' Explosive Charge I
Small Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I, Cap Booster 200 Small Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I, Cap Booster 200
Damage Control I Beta Hull Mod Reinforced Bulkheads Beta Hull Mod Reinforced Bulkheads Beta Hull Mod Reinforced Bulkheads
|

Hax Zoidberg
|
Posted - 2010.09.19 21:42:00 -
[6]
No such thing happened historically. Probably because any lord exercising such a right would have soon after been chopped to pieces by the peasants. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur
|

Execer
Apex Consortium DEM0N HUNTERS
|
Posted - 2010.09.20 15:16:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Hax Zoidberg No such thing happened historically. Probably because any lord exercising such a right would have soon after been chopped to pieces by the peasants. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur
It happened in Braveheart...it must have happened!
|

Hack Harrison
Caldari
|
Posted - 2010.09.23 09:44:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Execer
Originally by: Hax Zoidberg No such thing happened historically. Probably because any lord exercising such a right would have soon after been chopped to pieces by the peasants. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur
It happened in Braveheart...it must have happened!
They will never take our freedom!!!
|

Seraph Castillon
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.09.23 10:09:00 -
[9]
Mel Gibson is a moron. That probably has something to do with it.
|

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.23 10:50:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Execer
Originally by: Hax Zoidberg No such thing happened historically. Probably because any lord exercising such a right would have soon after been chopped to pieces by the peasants. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur
It happened in Braveheart...it must have happened!
And some of us Scottish peasants would happily chop Mel Gibson to pieces too. If he wants to experience authentic history rather than hollywood make believe then I would suggest that being hung, drawn and quartered for real should do the trick. _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |
|

Aylara
|
Posted - 2010.09.23 10:57:00 -
[11]
It probably has something to do with all CCP's female employees. But most likely with mothers and daughters of male CCP employees 
|

Jason1138
|
Posted - 2010.09.23 19:02:00 -
[12]
instead of talking about how dumb mel gibson is, maybe we could get back to talking about how dumb these names are?
just seems kind of childish, whether there is a historical basis in fact or not. are we going to be treated to two new hacs named "motherF" and "ucker" too?
|

Seriously Bored
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.09.23 20:15:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Jason1138
just seems kind of childish, whether there is a historical basis in fact or not. are we going to be treated to two new hacs named "motherF" and "ucker" too?
Confirming that I name my ships after this convention.
|

Krathos Morpheus
Legion Infernal
|
Posted - 2010.09.24 13:43:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Hax Zoidberg No such thing happened historically. Probably because any lord exercising such a right would have soon after been chopped to pieces by the peasants. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_de_seigneur
You are very wrong, fact is that it wasn't written in any law and it wasn't anything official, but in the feudal system, the lord could do almost anything he wanted with his subjects as per the "Ius Maletractandi" (lord's right to mistreat his servant). Some of those were officially recognized, while others were just traditional and oral, not written anywhere. It might or might not been a feud that practiced it, but we can find a few documents forbidding the practice (ie: The arbitral sentence of Guadalupe), what leads to think that someone forced the prohibition. Foremost, there was this "tradition" of violating women from inferior establishments institutionalized by the lord. All of this changed in the XII century, when canonic matrimony were recognized to feudal servants (until then, god blessing was reserved to nobility only) and they started to claim their rights and breaking the silence law that prevailed until then. A bad habit, a privilege, a feudal right becomes a crime. In resume, it probably happened in some cases before catholic marriage was allowed; it indeed happened although not necessarily on the wedding night; it did raised riots (ie: Remensa peasant's riot in Spain); and it wasn't a recognized right, but a tradition, a consequence of the full submission to the lord, and the fear to his power. What you seem to forget is that peasants had very little power against the lord, so they accepted every abuse and thought that was the natural order of things, specially on the early medieval. It's like muslim's women nowadays, they accept their position as god's will.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |