| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Harlem Assasin
   |
Posted - 2010.10.14 00:40:00 -
[1]
Hello All,
I have started this topic as instructed by CCP in response to a petition i started about a week ago. After much time doing alliance logo design for many friends. as a whole we have decided that its about time CCP adds the feature for custom designed Corp logos as well. but it is not something that we can get accomplished without the support of the eve members. so i am starting this thread in hopes of getting peoples feedback and support to push for this feature. for those eve members who are not sure what the custom logo feature is for alliances it can be viewed at this link... http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Alliance_logo_submission_process
I encourage you to post your thoughts, feedback and support to make this an option for corporations as well. with your support we hope to make it possible to make your corp "brand" as unique as the members within it.
Please be sure and check the "support this topic" box when posting your responses to this thread
|
Fournone
|
Posted - 2010.10.16 00:22:00 -
[2]
The problem is CCP = logo n@zis.
The current restirctions for an alliance logo is
1) 3 months since formation
2) apropriate
3) sized right
Even when they follow those rules some people still have a problem getting CCP to approve thier logos, it would be cool (which is why I support it), but not probable. 
|
De'Veldrin
Minmatar
CareBears on Fire
The Obsidian Legion
|
Posted - 2010.10.16 01:29:00 -
[3]
My only problem with this is corporations come and go so fast, that I can see cases where the corp that submitted the logo is folded by the time it actually makes it into the game not only being likely, but common.
No, sorry, I can't support this, despite "Yeah that'd be cool" attraction.
--Vel
|
Aineko Macx
|
Posted - 2010.10.16 05:29:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: De'Veldrin
My only problem with this is corporations come and go so fast, that I can see cases where the corp that submitted the logo is folded by the time it actually makes it into the game not only being likely, but common.
The requirement to ship logos with a patch is a stupid requirement on CCPs side. You don't have to wait for a patch until you see new characters portraits, they have a backend that serves them on demand, even on the internet side. While submitted corp logos still need to undergo verification and approval by a CCP employee, technically that should be very doable.
Supported.
________________________
CCP: Where fixing bugs is a luxury, not an obligation. |
hjgjgfgfgsj
|
Posted - 2010.10.27 16:07:00 -
[5]
Supported
|
hjgjgfgfgsj
|
Posted - 2010.10.27 16:10:00 -
[6]
oops
|
De'Veldrin
Minmatar
Green-Core
The Obsidian Legion
|
Posted - 2010.10.27 16:11:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Aineko Macx
Originally by: De'Veldrin
My only problem with this is corporations come and go so fast, that I can see cases where the corp that submitted the logo is folded by the time it actually makes it into the game not only being likely, but common.
The requirement to ship logos with a patch is a stupid requirement on CCPs side. You don't have to wait for a patch until you see new characters portraits, they have a backend that serves them on demand, even on the internet side. While submitted corp logos still need to undergo verification and approval by a CCP employee, technically that should be very doable.
Supported.
Regardless of whether the requirement is "stupid" or not, it is still the requirement, and until that requirement changes, I can't support the idea.
Don't misunderstand me - I like the idea - I think it would certainly help add flavor to the game. You could even make it cost a few $$ to cover the time to review them (and thin out the bulk submission idiots).
But unless CCP's process for doing so changes, it's unfeasible, so I can't support it. Let me know if you get confirmation that CCP is willing to change their process, and I'll change my vote in a heartbeat. (Hint Hint CSM?)
--Vel
|
M'aak'han
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 19:47:00 -
[8]
Could go well within CCP's plan for microtr... oh wait, I didn't say the word !
Would be nice, supported.
And maybe they would change their means for implementing logos should the need arise.
|
Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises
R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 20:08:00 -
[9]
If you see how many fairly old alliances are without logos in game, do you really think adding another kind of logo to the "to be reviewed" queue is going to be a good thing?
This signature is useless, but it is red.
|
Xeross155
New Eden Renegades
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:20:00 -
[10]
You see, this is actually a good idea however the current process for reviewing logo's is just not going to work any more.
Instead of reviewing every logo submission can't it be the other way around, review a logo if there's enough complaints about it, this way CCP doesn't have an OMGWTFBBQ huge queue and this would actually be viable.
~Xeross
---------------------------------------------
Xeross' ventures into EVE |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |