Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Juan Sezole
Darth Marvin's Shrubberies
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:36:00 -
[1]
Okay Im no great fan of TEST, or IT/BOB/T20.
The issue that has me worried is the inconsistant and quite frankly blatantly biased descision making of the GM's in this issue.
We know that GM's are basically free to do as they wish citing the "interpritation" get out clause. However when bias is as clear as this and the GM wagon train is circling for all its worth (No public discussion of this decision?? Are you serious??)it is time to call in a 3rd party to investigate what exactly happened and why. While I understand that many feel the CSM is a talking shop for CCP to fill with hot air, it is instances like this that they SHOULD be investigating.
CCP you want to regain the credibility you have lost YET AGAIN by a biased decision? Open your doors to the CSM and let them investigate.
|
De'Veldrin
Minmatar Green-Core The Obsidian Legion
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:38:00 -
[2]
Oddly enough, isn't that what the CCP Internal Affairs division already does? --Vel
|
Lady Spank
Amarr Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:39:00 -
[3]
IT were the only ones initially to petition it.
The use of extended downtime to take sov is blatantly wrong.
Everyone else has got in on the act and all downtime actions have been dealt with.
CRY LESS, the sensationalism only makes you look more stupid.
~_~
|
Juan Sezole
Darth Marvin's Shrubberies
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:41:00 -
[4]
With CCP's previous history of internal inquires (T20, Ferrogel et al), I would be safe in saying that any result that a CCP employee came out with would be biased towards the company.
This needs a nominally neutral party, one that is not paid by the very people who made the decision.
|
WhiteSavage
Gallente Ever Flow Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:42:00 -
[5]
Wow yes lets waste everyones time with something non-controversial at all. Goons/test are making fools of themselves all over eve, the correct response is to ignore the ******s.
|
Orion GUardian
Caldari
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:42:00 -
[6]
afaik the other TCUs form other alliances were removed as well so it is no real favourism per se. Because the DT TCU onlining is kind of an exploit
|
Juan Sezole
Darth Marvin's Shrubberies
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:44:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Lady Spank IT were the only ones initially to petition it.
*troll*
To be honest its a simple matter that this has never been punished before, the original punishment was to offline the TCU's and then *shock horror* they "accidently" get destroyed, and then rather than respawning the TCU's offline in the systems the GMs just shrug their shoulders and walk away from it.
It has never before been called an exploit (see previous instances of this being done) and the actions of the GMs are suspect in the least.
|
Buck Marui
Caldari State War Academy
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:45:00 -
[8]
Since when was the CSM capable of running investigations, I think you have misjudged there purpose and there reach to be honest, they don't have access to the resources they need to do what you are suggesting, they bring the issues we raise as the playerbase to CCP that's all. |
Joe SMASH
You Got A Purty Mouth
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:45:00 -
[9]
Originally by: WhiteSavage Wow yes lets waste everyones time with something non-controversial at all. Goons/test are making fools of themselves all over eve, the correct response is to ignore the ******s.
This.
TEST is acting like a toddler that did not get his binky and is now throwing a tantrum. Grow the **** up. **** happens that you may not like over the course of your life. Throwing a tantrum like a 3 year old is not going to help your cause at all. -----------------------------------
Originally by: Kali Zero Warp core stabilizers are like condoms. Nice and safe, but they make it a little less fun for everyone involved.
|
Juan Sezole
Darth Marvin's Shrubberies
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:46:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Orion GUardian afaik the other TCUs form other alliances were removed as well so it is no real favourism per se. Because the DT TCU onlining is kind of an exploit
Again the point remains that the other TCU's were only removed AFTER petitions.
I am happily awaiting the banning of Market Trading exploitation, contract scammers and anyone who is using in game mechanics to gain an advantage.
Do you think this will happen? well only if its a ITBOB petition
|
|
Joe SMASH
You Got A Purty Mouth
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:47:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Juan Sezole well only if its a ITBOB petition
And thus proving OP is a ******. -----------------------------------
Originally by: Kali Zero Warp core stabilizers are like condoms. Nice and safe, but they make it a little less fun for everyone involved.
|
WhiteSavage
Gallente Ever Flow Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:49:00 -
[12]
...Ok Test alt. Please attempt to waste everyone's time more. In fact you should send an angry letter. Because nobody cares.
|
Nyhlus
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:50:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Orion GUardian afaik the other TCUs form other alliances were removed as well so it is no real favourism per se. Because the DT TCU onlining is kind of an exploit
TESTs were removed hours before the others. The others were removed after TEST petitioned for fair treatment. This tactic has been used for years and it wasn't a problem until it happened to an alliance that CCP has shown favoritism before.
|
Juan Sezole
Darth Marvin's Shrubberies
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:51:00 -
[14]
Originally by: WhiteSavage ...Ok Test alt. Please attempt to waste everyone's time more. In fact you should send an angry letter. Because nobody cares.
Coming from Sys-Fail, no wait thats too easy im sure theres some kittens to drown around here, it would be more challenging
|
Lost Hamster
Hamster Holding Corp
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:53:00 -
[15]
CMS has nothing to do with this. Test was using unfair advantage, and they got punished. End of story. Live with that, or stop posting and quit the game.
Goons/Test always tried to **** up the game, they tired numerous times to use exploits etc.
|
Juan Sezole
Darth Marvin's Shrubberies
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:55:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Lost Hamster CMS has nothing to do with this. Test was using unfair advantage, and they got punished. End of story. Live with that, or stop posting and quit the game.
Goons/Test always tried to **** up the game, they tired numerous times to use exploits etc.
Why BOB Alts are the best
|
Aessoroz
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:56:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Lost Hamster CMS has nothing to do with this. Test was using unfair advantage, and they got punished. End of story. Live with that, or stop posting and quit the game.
Goons/Test always tried to **** up the game, they tired numerous times to use exploits etc.
Hey, IT had a unfair advantage when the Delve sov fell, we demand a rollback!
|
Xercodo
Amarr INESTO Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:56:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Juan Sezole
Originally by: Orion GUardian afaik the other TCUs form other alliances were removed as well so it is no real favourism per se. Because the DT TCU onlining is kind of an exploit
Again the point remains that the other TCU's were only removed AFTER petitions.
I am happily awaiting the banning of Market Trading exploitation, contract scammers and anyone who is using in game mechanics to gain an advantage.
Do you think this will happen? well only if its a ITBOB petition
i would like to point out that contract scams are a built in mechanic and is works as intended, however this whole TCU thing was not intended to be possible, hence the onlining timer that allows counter attack
when people find a way around that built in vulnerability then it sure as hell is an exploit
-------------------------------------------------- The drake is a lie
|
Nyhlus
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:56:00 -
[19]
Edited by: Nyhlus on 03/11/2010 15:59:17
Originally by: Lost Hamster CMS has nothing to do with this. Test was using unfair advantage, and they got punished. End of story. Live with that, or stop posting and quit the game.
Goons/Test always tried to **** up the game, they tired numerous times to use exploits etc.
We used a game mechanic that every 0.0 alliance has used, including IT.
|
WhiteSavage
Gallente Ever Flow Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:58:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Juan Sezole
Coming from Sys-Fail, no wait thats too easy im sure theres some kittens to drown around here, it would be more challenging
Wow really? YOu mad?
Dude nobody cares about your temper-tantrum... bashing someone's alliance has NOTHING to do with it. (Coming from someone who hides behind an alt) If you'd like I'll post with a different alt... is this what you want? Keep your thread on topic... or keep flailing that seems to be working for ya.
To flail; Def: to beat or thrash about, uncontrollably
|
|
Joe SMASH
You Got A Purty Mouth
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:59:00 -
[21]
Until TEST crawls out from under Goon's skirt and survives on it's own, no one will care about them except the members. Your alliance is a joke. Your leadership is a joke. Your membership is a joke. You are a scar on the face of Eve and I hope each and every one of you who spam petitioned gets perma-banned for wasting GM's time from other legit petitions.
And before you say it: YES, I AM MAD that I have to shift through one alliances **** posts all over the forums. I KNOW IT IS A COOL STORY, BRO! -----------------------------------
Originally by: Kali Zero Warp core stabilizers are like condoms. Nice and safe, but they make it a little less fun for everyone involved.
|
Juan Sezole
Darth Marvin's Shrubberies
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 16:00:00 -
[22]
Originally by: WhiteSavage
Originally by: Juan Sezole
Coming from Sys-Fail, no wait thats too easy im sure theres some kittens to drown around here, it would be more challenging
Wow really? YOu mad?
Dude nobody cares about your temper-tantrum... bashing someone's alliance has NOTHING to do with it. (Coming from someone who hides behind an alt) If you'd like I'll post with a different alt... is this what you want? Keep your thread on topic... or keep flailing that seems to be working for ya.
To flail; Def: to beat or thrash about, uncontrollably
:Sigh:
No im not an alt, I am an honest to goodness main, dont beleive me check on BC.
Paranoia - Def you
|
Cailais
Amarr Atomic Heroes The G0dfathers
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 16:05:00 -
[23]
This is such a non-event.
Despite the best efforts of TEST frankly nobody cares. I certainly don't want the CSM wasting its time poking about CCPs cupboards.
C.
the hydrostatic capsule blog
|
Factor Fett
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 16:15:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Juan Sezole ...it is time to call in a 3rd party to investigate what exactly happened and why. ...
People afraid of losing ships ... decided to put the TCUs up shortly before an extended downtime for patch maintenance. Knowing this was going to happen, they circumvented a massive mechanic for claiming sovereignty, and in-so-doing used an exploit to capture multiple systems without needing to field the appropriate fleets to defend their TCUs. ---Quendishir
|
Totally Rafiki
Amarr Crimson Nation
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 16:18:00 -
[25]
Test is really making themselves look stupid.
And consistently demanding that everyone care/respond positively to their personal struggles would be entertaining if it wasn't SO annoying. If any of this was legitimate TEST/goons wouldn't be running around spamming/trolling our dead, boring, broken forums. ......... Verba Non Facta |
Zeke Mobius
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 17:07:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Totally Rafiki Test is really making themselves look stupid.
And consistently demanding that everyone care/respond positively to their personal struggles would be entertaining if it wasn't SO annoying. If any of this was legitimate TEST/goons wouldn't be running around spamming/trolling our dead, boring, broken forums.
obvious it/bob/kenzoku/gm/dev alt trying to spin their crap
|
Sphit Ker
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 17:09:00 -
[27]
haha im no CSM but hereÆs my thought anyway. YOU ARE BOTH WRONG
Altho dropping the TCUs before the extended downtime was kind of lame, the systems were UNCLAIMED, there was nothing to defend per se. IT had no horse in this race. IT had no business crying fool over some systems they donÆt even fracking own.
The following statement is not my signature. The preceding statement is my signature. |
Furb Killer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 17:10:00 -
[28]
It was a nice try from TEST, but dont whine when it doesnt work out as planned. Even my pet hamster understands that this is a reasonable decission from GMs since normal gameplay limitations were evaded, and my pet hamster is dead.
|
Joe SMASH
You Got A Purty Mouth
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 17:11:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Zeke Mobius
Originally by: Totally Rafiki Test is really making themselves look stupid.
And consistently demanding that everyone care/respond positively to their personal struggles would be entertaining if it wasn't SO annoying. If any of this was legitimate TEST/goons wouldn't be running around spamming/trolling our dead, boring, broken forums.
obvious it/bob/kenzoku/gm/dev alt trying to spin their crap
obvious test/goon/nc alt trying to spin their crap -----------------------------------
Originally by: Kali Zero Warp core stabilizers are like condoms. Nice and safe, but they make it a little less fun for everyone involved.
|
Dead Jesus
Gallente PeaceMakers.
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 17:11:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Juan Sezole
Originally by: Orion GUardian afaik the other TCUs form other alliances were removed as well so it is no real favourism per se. Because the DT TCU onlining is kind of an exploit
Again the point remains that the other TCU's were only removed AFTER petitions.
I am happily awaiting the banning of Market Trading exploitation, contract scammers and anyone who is using in game mechanics to gain an advantage.
Do you think this will happen? well only if its a ITBOB petition
The point is ALL the TCU's that were removed, were removed after petitions. So where is the inconsistency?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |