| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
   |
Posted - 2011.01.04 13:51:00 -
[1]
My PI Production Cost Projection (Forge Prices) spreadsheet has been updated to use Eve-Central for current price information, following the closure of Eve-Metrics.
The version that used global prices no longer works and I have neither the time or inclination to support two version and will therefore be removed shortly, feel free to make a copy.
|
Arcii
Amarr
Secret Squirrel Readiness Group
Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2011.01.04 15:49:00 -
[2]
Thanks a lot! :)
|
Rohnda
|
Posted - 2011.01.04 16:38:00 -
[3]
! so awsome
|
LordRechin
|
Posted - 2011.01.05 08:29:00 -
[4]
I a little confused my friend, even thou i have used this spread sheet i only use from it min/max price, but this spread sheet can be used for much more, can you tell me how you are using it in steps, lets say for a wide comodity like Mecanical parts, and Consumer Electronic, and Robotics. What do you look at first ?
Hope this is not a bad question...
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.05 14:19:00 -
[5]
The first post has been updated to include some explanation of the operation of the spreadsheet.
 Originally by: LordRechin
I a little confused my friend, even thou i have used this spread sheet i only use from it min/max price, but this spread sheet can be used for much more, can you tell me how you are using it in steps, lets say for a wide comodity like Mecanical parts, and Consumer Electronic, and Robotics. What do you look at first ?
Hope this is not a bad question...
Mechanical Parts
These current cost 9,796.96 per unit to manufacture from P1.
They current sell at 10,475.00 per unit.
A manufacturing profit per batch cycle of 2,165.35.
Consumer Electronic
These current cost 7,768.00 per unit to manufacture from P1.
They current sell at 5,999.00 per unit.
A manufacturing loss per batch cycle of -9,565.40.
The price at cost plus profit should be around 8,933.20.
Robotics
These current cost 58,549.87 per unit to manufacture from P1.
They current sell at 56,700.03 per unit.
A manufacturing profit per batch cycle of 632.17.
If you look at Column I, anybody can see that most P1 goods are selling for less than the value of their component parts.
|
Herakales
|
Posted - 2011.01.05 14:40:00 -
[6]
does this sheet auto correct pricing from Eve Central. And thanks btw
|
Berikath
|
Posted - 2011.01.05 15:29:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Wyke Mossari
The first post has been updated to include some explanation of the operation of the spreadsheet.
Originally by: LordRechin
I a little confused my friend, even thou i have used this spread sheet i only use from it min/max price, but this spread sheet can be used for much more, can you tell me how you are using it in steps, lets say for a wide comodity like Mecanical parts, and Consumer Electronic, and Robotics. What do you look at first ?
Hope this is not a bad question...
Mechanical Parts
These current cost 9,796.96 per unit to manufacture from P1.
They current sell at 10,475.00 per unit.
A manufacturing profit per batch cycle of 2,165.35.
Consumer Electronic
These current cost 7,768.00 per unit to manufacture from P1.
They current sell at 5,999.00 per unit.
A manufacturing loss per batch cycle of -9,565.40.
The price at cost plus profit should be around 8,933.20.
Erm- it's a loss of 9565.40 or a profit of -9565.40; a loss of -9565.40 is actually a profit ;). Picky, I know, but meh.
I suppose you could make a pretty decent argument that goods with another use (T2 production/POS fuel) would need to have a reasonable margin, but goods that are just intermediaries to higher level goods (i.e., components for eventual P4 production) are nowhere near as sure to require a margin. There are people who already have their production lines streamlined to completely bypass importing or exporting P3s and many P2s, so the market on those items is going to be fairly dead compared to the actual amount used; any sizable production won't be able to supply themselves at the prices you figure, so it's a moot point either way.
*** [ SIG] ***
Wish list for PI:
*One-click input routing
*Copy product, inputs & outputs in factories
*Launchpad upgrades: twice the space, twice the cost, half the hassle!
[ /sig ] |
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.06 13:51:00 -
[8]
The prices from Eve Central do not require any 'correction'.
The impact of import/export duty is negligible compared to the overall discrepancy.
|
Durnin Stormbrow
|
Posted - 2011.01.06 15:54:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Durnin Stormbrow on 06/01/2011 15:57:09
Originally by: Wyke Mossari
If you look at Column I, anybody can see that most P0 goods are priced higher than the market value of their products.
Fixed for you.
Shipping product has a cost. P1s have a higher isk/m3, so their shipping cost is a lower portion of their delivered value.
|
Snarly Pete
|
Posted - 2011.01.07 07:18:00 -
[10]
You are a directors wet dream, go put that **** to use at an actual job, companies love ppl that can make excel say things.
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.07 11:46:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Durnin Stormbrow
Originally by: Wyke Mossari
If you look at Column I, anybody can see that most P0 goods are priced higher than the market value of their products.
Fixed for you.
0.0 & WH planets yield much more P0 than hi-sec (much much more), but it needs to be moved to market. Shipping product has a cost. P1s have a higher isk/m3, so their shipping cost is a lower portion of their delivered value.
Yes, that's much better wording and I've shamelessly pinched it for the first post.  Thanks.
Originally by: Snarly Pete
You are a directors wet dream, go put that **** to use at an actual job, companies love ppl that can make excel say things.
It's always good to have efforts recognised. Thank you.
AIH I'm an Enterprise Software Architect IRL.
|
Ralyndris
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 05:04:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Ralyndris on 13/01/2011 05:04:32
Edited by: Ralyndris on 13/01/2011 05:03:55
Hi,
Would it be possible to to activate the Make a copy option. I've used the earlier eve-metrics version and I really liked it. I did modify the sheet to show me Domain prices since that is where I go for my Buy/Sell orders
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 13:50:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Ralyndris
Hi,
Would it be possible to to activate the Make a copy option. I've used the earlier eve-metrics version and I really liked it. I did modify the sheet to show me Domain prices since that is where I go for my Buy/Sell orders
If you have a google account and are logged into you should be able to make a copy, if you can't I don't know why.
|
Droxlyn
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 14:35:00 -
[14]
To find the Best profit, you need to be willing to use from multiple previous tiers at the same time. If you lose money making P3s in the process of making p4s from p2s, then just buy the p3s and idle the p3 processors for that batch.
I've made P1 to P4 planets, but they are a tight fit with Advanced CCs and only run the P4 factory 50% of the time (at least for the hardest P4, WWMF and the other hard one.) This planet had a burn time of 36 hours producing 18 P4s. (2 ports, 18 p2 factories, 3 p3 factories, 1 p4 factory)
P2 to P4 planets generally can support 2 to 4 P4 factories depending on the inputs. These planets run for about 30 hours at full tilt. 2 ports, 16 p3 factories, 4 p4 factories. (easy p4), the medium/hards take 2, 18, 2.
On the other extreme of endurance, A P3 to P4 planet can burn for up to 100 hours before exhausting a spaceport's capacity. But almost a full week can be achieved for a P2 to P3 facility.
Anyway, that's my insanity for the day. Don't limit yourself to buying all the same level inputs if more can be made by buying at multiple levels.
Drox
|
Bernice 9000
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 03:35:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Bernice 9000 on 14/01/2011 03:39:19
thank you, it is a very good spreadsheet.
One suggestion though(which I've done on a copy I took) is on the Sale+profit % estimate column, remove the IF logic which states that if an item is already profitable do not show the % increase estimate. For instance, I know Robotics might be profitable, however I want to know how 15% profit looks like(doing this shows that while some things like Robotics is profitable... it is a meager profit.)
With regard to manufacturing considerations... all of these commodities are underpriced, imo..
|
Louis deGuerre
Gallente
Malevolence.
Imperial 0rder
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 12:21:00 -
[16]
Looks sexy !
Might want to add this to Evelopedia Planetary interaction Tools
-----
Malevolence. is recruiting. Dive into the world of 0.0 !
|
Nicky's Tomb
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 16:48:00 -
[17]
Big thanks for the spreadsheet mate. Good to know it's no longer using Eve Metrics.
Anyone know where "Planetary Vehicles" go to? I mean is there a demand for them? Worth investing in them since they are selling for something like 1/8th production value?
|
Louis deGuerre
Gallente
Malevolence.
Imperial 0rder
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 13:19:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Nicky's Tomb
Big thanks for the spreadsheet mate. Good to know it's no longer using Eve Metrics.
Anyone know where "Planetary Vehicles" go to? I mean is there a demand for them? Worth investing in them since they are selling for something like 1/8th production value?
They're only use to make Integrity Response Drones (with Gel-Matrix Biopaste and Hazmat Detection Systems) which is used to make POS/Sov Structures.
-----
Malevolence. is recruiting. Dive into the world of 0.0 !
|
You What
Smokers' Heaven
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 13:33:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Louis deGuerre
They're only use to make Integrity Response Drones (with Gel-Matrix Biopaste and Hazmat Detection Systems) which is used to make POS/Sov Structures.
And new CONCORD capital mods in the upcoming patch
|
Tapopo
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 13:48:00 -
[20]
Very nice. I can quit using the one I made(that does not auto-update).
Many thanks. Very well laid out.
|
Mavnas
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 20:12:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Mavnas on 15/01/2011 20:16:27
I remember when I first started PI and I set up three planets producing stuff. Then a bit later I realized that with a handful of manufacturing thingies, I could bypass the whole extraction and make relatively massive profit exploiting the mismatch between P3 and P4 pricing.
Unfortunately, this required too much micromanagement, and it seemed more efficient to shoot stuff and salvage it for delicious, delicious armor plates.
edit: The other thing was that the profits couldn't be scaled up because of the tiny scale of some of the intermediate goods' markets. (This also used to be a big problem in Pirates of the Burning Sea, where theoretical opportunities didn't always payout due to the market being what it was.)
|
Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists
|
Posted - 2011.01.16 16:05:00 -
[22]
Will the (global prices) version be modified to use EVE-central too?
And I've modified my copies a bit. Can I make them usable again if I copy and paste the new price sheet into the old version?
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.16 17:07:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Che Biko
Will the (global prices) version be modified to use EVE-central too?
And I've modified my copies a bit. Can I make them usable again if I copy and paste the new price sheet into the old version?
Sorry I won't be updating the global priced version, the way Eve Central handles global prices quite different from the way the Eve Metrics did and I don't have the time.
|
Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists
|
Posted - 2011.01.18 04:22:00 -
[24]
Ok, since this is new to me, I have some further questions.
Can you point me to some info about how "Eve central handles global prices"?
And could you estimate if it would it be easier to copy my global version (changes mostly to (the price used in) the profit/cost formulas) and modify the price sheet or to copy the new forge version and modify the formulas and price sheet?
And with the forge version, can I make my copy of the old forge version work again by copy/pasting the price sheet of the new version into it?
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.18 14:26:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Che Biko
Can you point me to some info about how "Eve central handles global prices"?
http://eve-central.com/home/develop.html
Originally by: Che Biko
And could you estimate if it would it be easier to copy my global version (changes mostly to (the price used in) the profit/cost formulas) and modify the price sheet or to copy the new forge version and modify the formulas and price sheet?
It would probably be easier for you to modify your own version, since you should only need to change the price sheet.
Originally by: Che Biko
And with the forge version, can I make my copy of the old forge version work again by copy/pasting the price sheet of the new version into it?
Unless you copied a very old version, that is what the new Forge version is, a copy of the old forge version with prices from Eve-Central.
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 11:21:00 -
[26]
Bumping thread because some still think they can make ISK buying and process P0 goods.
|
Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 20:44:00 -
[27]
I've successfully modified my own sheets, though it took longer than I thought because of my inexperience in using googledocs and me goofing up but...when I finished my forge sheet, it was a piece of cake to make the global version. All I had to do was remove the region part of the API URL.
So now I'm thinking it was not a code based thing why you stopped supporting the global version, as they are nearly identical. So what's wrong with the global prices Eve-Central provides?
|
Zircalla
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 21:33:00 -
[28]
I have a sheet very similar spreadsheet that I used extensively in the earlier days of the original PI. It was developed with a wormhole operation in mind, though, so there is a slight cost adjustment added due to high volume (P1 materials, generally), but also a raw extraction rate factor figured in - if you did no P2 or above at all (only P1), then your total extraction would go up and even when the p2 was more 'profitable', your ability to produce equivalent units goes down (few extractors, more basic or adv. processors). The idea was to maximize the total actual profit, not just the profit on the unit regardless of units produced. I am not sure that this is figured in here, or is it? I did not dig all the way through it.
|
Lennvas
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 19:12:00 -
[29]
That looks like a cool spreadsheet, althought I have some problems with it. There is CSV HTML Text openoffice excel pdf. As what sort of file should I save it, in such a way that the file is still able to download the corrent prices? And how do I make the file download these prices?
|
EvilCheez
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 19:40:00 -
[30]
logon to google docs and then click the link in this thread and choose copy from the file menu.
|
Lennvas
|
Posted - 2011.01.23 22:08:00 -
[31]
Edited by: Lennvas on 23/01/2011 22:35:45
I think I found an error. AN(total import tax) includes all the import taxes of the required materias(found in V-AD-AL).
But column L(cycle component cost)is the sum of V-AD-AL and AN(among other stuf. So AN contains the import taxes twice.
Now it seems to work fine, but suddenly while I was examining it(not changing anything), multiple boxes went empty but not whole rows or columns. Its essentially the same as what happened before with the downloaded version for excel.
Any idea what happened?
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.26 12:19:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Lennvas
I think I found an error. AN(total import tax) includes all the import taxes of the required materias(found in V-AD-AL).
But column L(cycle component cost)is the sum of V-AD-AL and AN(among other stuf. So AN contains the import taxes twice.
Fixed. Nice catch.
Originally by: Lennvas
Now it seems to work fine, but suddenly while I was examining it(not changing anything), multiple boxes went empty but not whole rows or columns. Its essentially the same as what happened before with the downloaded version for excel.
Any idea what happened?
That happens sometimes when the spreadsheet is unable to load the latest prices from Eve-Central. Unfortunately I don't think there is anything I can do about it.
My personal work-around is to save a local copy as a PDF or CSV just in case that happens while using the spreadsheet.
|
MegabitOne
Caldari
The Black Ops
|
Posted - 2011.01.27 13:27:00 -
[33]
Did you ever think about using the quicklook api?
http://api.eve-central.com/api/quicklook?typeid=34&usesystem=30000142
34 is the typeid of tritanium
30000142 is the sytem id of Jita
This will get you all buy and sell orders for Jita (unbiased by the other The Forge prices in the api call you use now). No way to get Jita 4/4 prices alone though 
It's a lot of work to get Jita lowest sell/highest buy prices instead of those for the whole The Forge region, but they would be more accurate...
It's a truckload more of data of course and you'ld only need highest buy/lowest sell. You can't specify multiple items either, but since PI only deals with 83 items I think it's doable... (at least when GoogleDocs can handle xpath expressions!)
---
I'm not as bad-ass as some of my corp mates, but I'll pwn you anyway!
-= In God we trust, all the others pay cash =- |
Ifandbut Reborn
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2011.02.06 22:50:00 -
[34]
Thanks for this tool. It was a bit confusing at first but after reading your explanation a few times I think I got the hang of it. I'm just starting with PI and this will save me lots of time checking to see if I should sell the P1 or process it into P2.
I do have one question. How often does it update the prices from eve-central automatically?
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2011.02.07 15:47:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Ifandbut Reborn
How often does it update the prices from eve-central automatically?
I cannot control that aspect and it doesn't seem to be documented by Google. Experience suggests a refresh occurs every time somebody new loads it and therefore in practice measured in (tens) of minutes.
I try to ensure that I upload all PI materials to eve-central at least once a day, obviously with others using the uploader, popular items get updated a lot more often.
|
Ifandbut Reborn
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2011.02.07 23:10:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Wyke Mossari
Originally by: Ifandbut Reborn
How often does it update the prices from eve-central automatically?
I cannot control that aspect and it doesn't seem to be documented by Google. Experience suggests a refresh occurs every time somebody new loads it and therefore in practice measured in (tens) of minutes.
I try to ensure that I upload all PI materials to eve-central at least once a day, obviously with others using the uploader, popular items get updated a lot more often.
Well I made a copy of it to include the regions I am most active in. So, I wonder how I can force my copy to update.
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2011.02.09 16:40:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Ifandbut Reborn
Originally by: Wyke Mossari
Originally by: Ifandbut Reborn
How often does it update the prices from eve-central automatically?
I cannot control that aspect and it doesn't seem to be documented by Google. Experience suggests a refresh occurs every time somebody new loads it and therefore in practice measured in (tens) of minutes.
I try to ensure that I upload all PI materials to eve-central at least once a day, obviously with others using the uploader, popular items get updated a lot more often.
Well I made a copy of it to include the regions I am most active in. So, I wonder how I can force my copy to update.
Force a browser refesh should do that, SHIFT+CTRL+R or Shift+Click Refresh.
|
Horizonist
Yulai Guard 2nd Fleet
Yulai Federation
|
Posted - 2011.02.09 16:45:00 -
[38]
It will be very interesting to see how PI prices develop over the coming month. I think it should be carefully considered that many people might train PI themselves to compensate for the rising prices, which could actually bring them down somewhat.
|
Greg Huff
|
Posted - 2011.02.23 02:36:00 -
[39]
Just as PI prices must rise.... so must this thread. (bump)
|
Sassums
Gallente
The Night Crew
|
Posted - 2011.03.09 00:53:00 -
[40]
I am slightly confused on which set of columns I should be looking at.
So Columns G-J show the cost and sell value of moving the resources from Raw to Processed (T1)?
And Columns K-N shows the cost and sell values of moving the processed stuff (t1) to t3 components?
I am extracting all my raw resources and processing them into "processed materials", then I am exporting them to a factory planet which turns them into T2 components. Then Finally on the same planet they are turned into T3 components - at the current time producing Robotics.
The T2 stuff is Mechanical Parts, Consumer Electronics, Coolant, and Enriched Uranium
Making POS Fuel.
I am interested in making something else that would be profitable as well. But I am having trouble reading the charts.
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.05.24 10:15:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Sassums
I am slightly confused on which set of columns I should be looking at.
So Columns G-J show the cost and sell value of moving the resources from Raw to Processed (T1)?
And Columns K-N shows the cost and sell values of moving the processed stuff (t1) to t3 components?
I think I got it now, so columns G-J indicate what it would cost if I bought the T1 components and turned them into the final product, while the columns K-N should the value of producing the items from scratch, or am I reading it wrong
I am extracting all my raw resources and processing them into "processed materials", then I am exporting them to a factory planet which turns them into T2 components. Then Finally on the same planet they are turned into T3 components - at the current time producing Robotics.
The T2 stuff is Mechanical Parts, Consumer Electronics, Coolant, and Enriched Uranium
Making POS Fuel.
I am interested in making something else that would be profitable as well. But I am having trouble reading the charts.
Columns G-J show the cost of production from bought P1. If you are extracting this is still a valid cost estimate based on the accounting principle of prudence.
Columns K-N show the cost of production from bought manufacturing components. So for example at Tier 4 for the cost of the Tier 3, etc.
At the moment there are very items that can be produced profitable because the market is over supplied. Look for green cells in columns I & M.
|
Krozgor
|
Posted - 2011.05.24 22:56:00 -
[42]
Edited by: Krozgor on 24/05/2011 22:56:47
So, does this conclude that even when extracting, export/import costs are offsetting sell prices for produced Tier 4 items?
Has CCP commented on this at all? What reason do we have to do PI at this stage?
|
Tsual
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.05.25 11:53:00 -
[43]
Thanks for the work Wyke, very helpfull.
Originally by: Wyke Mossari
Update : 21/01/2011
Advanced commodities have risen in price but this has largely be offset by increases in production costs and they remain unprofitable. Most other PI goods at all tiers remain on the market below their true production cost, despite problems with new ECUs. Production efficiency experts advise that PI planets should be separated into specialised extraction and production/processing planets.
Conclusion : Price of PI goods will rise further.
from what I see the contrary happened, which would point at oversupplied markets and not enough demand.
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.05.25 13:20:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Tsual
Thanks for the work Wyke, very helpfull.
Originally by: Wyke Mossari
Update : 21/01/2011
Advanced commodities have risen in price but this has largely be offset by increases in production costs and they remain unprofitable. Most other PI goods at all tiers remain on the market below their true production cost, despite problems with new ECUs. Production efficiency experts advise that PI planets should be separated into specialised extraction and production/processing planets.
Conclusion : Price of PI goods will rise further.
from what I see the contrary happened, which would point at oversupplied markets and not enough demand.
That was made in January under the old extraction system. The PI index at eve-tools show the peak was towards the end of March.
The new extraction regime changed everything, it was easier and as a result more people do PI. My position had changed by April (1),(2),(3).
I think another big influence of the current price crash (across the market) is the change made to the sell dialog box, which makes creating sell orders at the buy price very likely instead of performing instant sales.
|
Sheriam Bayanar
|
Posted - 2011.05.25 16:50:00 -
[45]
Edited by: Sheriam Bayanar on 25/05/2011 16:51:54
Originally by: Droxlyn
To find the Best profit, you need to be willing to use from multiple previous tiers at the same time. If you lose money making P3s in the process of making p4s from p2s, then just buy the p3s and idle the p3 processors for that batch.
I've made P1 to P4 planets, but they are a tight fit with Advanced CCs and only run the P4 factory 50% of the time (at least for the hardest P4, WWMF and the other hard one.) This planet had a burn time of 36 hours producing 18 P4s. (2 ports, 18 p2 factories, 3 p3 factories, 1 p4 factory)
P2 to P4 planets generally can support 2 to 4 P4 factories depending on the inputs. These planets run for about 30 hours at full tilt. 2 ports, 16 p3 factories, 4 p4 factories. (easy p4), the medium/hards take 2, 18, 2.
On the other extreme of endurance, A P3 to P4 planet can burn for up to 100 hours before exhausting a spaceport's capacity. But almost a full week can be achieved for a P2 to P3 facility.
Anyway, that's my insanity for the day. Don't limit yourself to buying all the same level inputs if more can be made by buying at multiple levels.
Drox
The greatest level of endurance is a full extractor to P3 level planet. If the yields are there for that planet you can run it for a good 22 days before it'll fill up with finished p3 product. At current robotics prices that's around 67 million a month from the stuff (at current buy order prices, so no babysitting your sell orders). All you have to do is log in every couple of days to bring your extractors back online.
It's not the most efficient, but it's by far the easiest way to make enough for your monthly plex.
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.06.12 19:26:00 -
[46]
Minor update to robotics profitability sheet.
|
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 09:35:00 -
[47]
New sheets added for Coolant & EU.
The majority of items continue to be loss making.
|
Grukni
|
Posted - 2011.07.21 19:36:00 -
[48]
ArenŠt the export taxes for P1 0.76 instead of 0.72?
|
electrostatus
Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2011.07.22 03:20:00 -
[49]
I have made a program that'll let you determine the costs it takes to make any product depending on how you made it. But I'm flying blind because I don't know if that's what people want and I don't know what else to add to it.
―
Vexo M > He turned the drives up to 11 |
Grukni
|
Posted - 2011.07.24 16:22:00 -
[50]
Edited by: Grukni on 24/07/2011 16:23:01
Is there a reason beyond my comprehension of why the P1 material costs for C3 components are taken from the price index? P1 material costs for C1 and C2 columns are taken from the Unit Cost from P1.
|
Charles Case
GoonWaffe
|
Posted - 2011.07.29 16:12:00 -
[51]
hey Wyke Mossari, you're a pretty cool cat
[limegreen]Your signature has been deemed inappropriate. If you have any questions about this please Mail the Mods be sure to include a link to your signature. -Darth P |
Wyke Mossari
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.07.29 18:52:00 -
[52]
Edited by: Wyke Mossari on 29/07/2011 18:53:07
Originally by: Grukni
Edited by: Grukni on 24/07/2011 16:23:01
Is there a reason beyond my comprehension of why the P1 material costs for C3 components are taken from the price index? P1 material costs for C1 and C2 columns are taken from the Unit Cost from P1.
I'd forgotten about that, it is was minor fudge to handle the third component of rows 81/82 being a P1. I've changed it now to make all other third components be handled the same as C1 & C2 and made just those two the special cases.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |