EVE Search - [Proposal] Spreading Incursions

All Channels

Assembly Hall

[Proposal] Spreading Incursions

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Goose99	Posted - 2011.01.29 17:27:00 - [1] Incursions should not just disappear after a week. If left undone they should spread to nearby constellations. Incursions need to be persistent and carry consequence when ignored. The entirety of Mother Russia must be basked in Sansha's green glow. Sov null have been breast-feed in their comfort zone for far too long, we must bring the involuntary pve to them. Whenever you undock in eve, you subject yourself to pve. Make it so that moon-goo stop producing during incursions too.
Corina Jarr	Posted - 2011.01.29 17:32:00 - [2] I like this. It means that leaving things unchecked could become a major problem for the risk averse carebares in null. And of course, the non risk averse will take their fleets, kill the Sansha, and then return to what they were doing.
Lekla en Chasteaux	Posted - 2011.01.29 19:02:00 - [3] I would honestly think that the major problem with this is that in low sec, if an incursion began, it would run rampant in the system since no one would clear it, and it would just spread to all of low sec eventually, making low sec a giant incursion. On second thought, supported.
Herping yourDerp	Posted - 2011.01.29 21:23:00 - [4] no incursions would become a chore for nullsec alliances low sec incursions will never be done so the lowsec ones will be there forever and spread until all low is covered.
nugget906	Posted - 2011.01.29 21:33:00 - [5] Originally by: Herping yourDerp no incursions would become a chore for nullsec alliances Exactly
Goose99	Posted - 2011.01.29 21:40:00 - [6] Russian incursion is down 1%, someone's doing it.
Omara Otawan	Posted - 2011.01.29 22:03:00 - [7] Originally by: Herping yourDerp no incursions would become a chore for nullsec alliances low sec incursions will never be done so the lowsec ones will be there forever and spread until all low is covered. Global cynojam for all of lowsec? Sign me up
Arushia Nova Labs New Eden Research.	Posted - 2011.01.30 03:39:00 - [8] Looking at the history of incursions so far: Araz -> Kakol Joas -> Kalangin It appears they already do spread to neighboring constellations, even if completed. (Perhaps if they're not completed within X days.) Watching now to see what happens in the constellations near Algintal, as that one was completed the fastest. New Eden Research, where your research gets done!
sabre906	Posted - 2011.01.30 05:32:00 - [9] Originally by: Arushia Looking at the history of incursions so far: Araz -> Kakol Joas -> Kalangin It appears they already do spread to neighboring constellations, even if completed. (Perhaps if they're not completed within X days.) Watching now to see what happens in the constellations near Algintal, as that one was completed the fastest. The 2 gallente incursions were the first to go down. Neither spawned nearby. I don't think it's a factor atm.
lwxsky oli FACTS on EVE OWN Alliance	Posted - 2011.01.30 05:38:00 - [10] I like this idea.
OC 2av2	Posted - 2011.01.30 20:26:00 - [11] Originally by: Goose99 Incursions should not just disappear after a week. If left undone they should spread to nearby constellations. Incursions need to be persistent and carry consequence when ignored. ^this part supported
Mara Rinn	Posted - 2011.01.30 23:03:00 - [12] Originally by: Omara Otawan Global cynojam for all of lowsec? Sign me up +1 Nullsec alliances could also curate Sansha incursions to give them free cynojamming in border systems. -- [Aussie players: join ANZAC channel]
Goose99	Posted - 2011.01.31 02:18:00 - [13] Originally by: Mara Rinn Originally by: Omara Otawan Global cynojam for all of lowsec? Sign me up +1 Nullsec alliances could also curate Sansha incursions to give them free cynojamming in border systems. They already do that now. The difference is those border incursions don't spread home.
Fournone	Posted - 2011.01.31 02:43:00 - [14] Originally by: Herping yourDerp no incursions would become a chore for nullsec alliances. I would support for this reason alone.
Marconus Orion Global Criminal Countdown	Posted - 2011.01.31 05:25:00 - [15] Change it so moon goo output reflects that of the Sansha influence of the constellation. Sansha have 100% influence then 0% moon goo output. Sansha have 70% influence then moon goo output is 30%. Change it to that and you have my support.
Kogh Ayon	Posted - 2011.01.31 05:46:00 - [16] If you want to use incursion to kill macros, you made it WRONG. Not support
Maxx Overseer Decrypt Enterprise	Posted - 2011.01.31 07:12:00 - [17] first time I seen them I was starting an alt, doing explor tut, and I went into a jump. Next think I knew was there they were and I could not even turn my ship around. well short story I got pop, then I laugh my ass off only in eve this could happen. well what do I think, I love it and we should see more of them and I don't mean in low sec. I mean look out carebears, well at least it will keep them on though toes... yes Eve needs them, it keeps the spice in the game.... --- --- ---
Maxsim Goratiev Imperial Tau Syndicate	Posted - 2011.01.31 08:40:00 - [18] Originally by: Lekla en Chasteaux I would honestly think that the major problem with this is that in low sec, if an incursion began, it would run rampant in the system since no one would clear it, and it would just spread to all of low sec eventually, making low sec a giant incursion. On second thought, supported. OP has a valid argument, pirates always think they can force "PVP"(called ganking, ya know) down "carebares" throats, let's try another way round for once. And I would absolutely fall off my chair laughing if they would take away sovereignty or system upgrades Or i can imagine sansha mothership chasing people around the system. ANd if lowsec becomes one giant incursion, to hell with, that's more useful than what it is now!
OC 2av2	Posted - 2011.01.31 12:44:00 - [19] Originally by: Maxsim Goratiev Originally by: Lekla en Chasteaux I would honestly think that the major problem with this is that in low sec, if an incursion began, it would run rampant in the system since no one would clear it, and it would just spread to all of low sec eventually, making low sec a giant incursion. On second thought, supported. OP has a valid argument, pirates always think they can force "PVP"(called ganking, ya know) down "carebares" throats, let's try another way round for once. And I would absolutely fall off my chair laughing if they would take away sovereignty or system upgrades Or i can imagine sansha mothership chasing people around the system. ANd if lowsec becomes one giant incursion, to hell with, that's more useful than what it is now! Gosh, dude! I hope CCP can hear you and I hope they will do that
Shinjin Malvek Phoenix Accord	Posted - 2011.01.31 14:07:00 - [20] Excellent, I hope this happens. It's about time something has some real consequences other than the (if your stupid your ship go's pop) lol
JitaPriceChecker2	Posted - 2011.01.31 14:19:00 - [21] Edited by: JitaPriceChecker2 on 31/01/2011 14:19:00 Of course i support , otherwise it is justm pointless feature that was wasted hours of delelopers time.
Saxton Hale	Posted - 2011.01.31 14:25:00 - [22] Kinda supported. If undefeated the Incursion should move to an adjacent constellation, but the original would despawn.
Ogogov Gallente Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.01.31 14:58:00 - [23] Originally by: Maxsim Goratiev Originally by: Lekla en Chasteaux I would honestly think that the major problem with this is that in low sec, if an incursion began, it would run rampant in the system since no one would clear it, and it would just spread to all of low sec eventually, making low sec a giant incursion. On second thought, supported. OP has a valid argument, pirates always think they can force "PVP"(called ganking, ya know) down "carebares" throats, let's try another way round for once. And I would absolutely fall off my chair laughing if they would take away sovereignty or system upgrades Or i can imagine sansha mothership chasing people around the system. ANd if lowsec becomes one giant incursion, to hell with, that's more useful than what it is now! Yeah I can see it now... incursions magically appear everywhere except delve.
Illwill Bill Noxious Intention	Posted - 2011.01.31 15:32:00 - [24] Supported. Originally by: CCP Navigator Great story but you probably want this in CAOD so feel free to post there with your main.
kaster puste	Posted - 2011.01.31 15:44:00 - [25]
FarmerCounter	Posted - 2011.01.31 19:30:00 - [26] Not supported. When you try to punish players, They will not get to low sec or 00 but just quit the game. Maybe you dare to bet if they will but the CCP will not to.
Goose99	Posted - 2011.01.31 19:41:00 - [27] Originally by: FarmerCounter Not supported. When you try to punish players, They will not get to low sec or 00 but just quit the game. Maybe you dare to bet if they will but the CCP will not to. Good. Those sov-null farmers should quit. Plenty of people more than willing to go there and take their places if not for the mom blobs.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.