| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sweet Redemption
   |
Posted - 2011.01.30 05:08:00 -
[1]
2011.01.30 04:34:00
Victim: Sweet Redemption
Corp: Brutor Tribe
Alliance: Unknown
Faction: Unknown
Destroyed: Hurricane
System: FD-MLJ
Security: 0.0
Damage Taken: 22074
Involved parties:
Name: HellSWAT (laid the final blow)
Security: 2.9
Corp: Pure Blood Baneslayer Angels
Alliance: NONE
Faction: NONE
Ship: Typhoon
Weapon: Bane Rage Torpedo
Damage Done: 13158
Name: Carth Oansi
Security: 0.4
Corp: XII Legion
Alliance: Fidelas Constans
Faction: NONE
Ship: Kronos
Weapon: Kronos
Damage Done: 6785
Name: somerandom18
Security: 5.0
Corp: Gallus Eternus
Alliance: Fatal Ascension
Faction: NONE
Ship: Revelation
Weapon: Revelation
Damage Done: 1632
Name: atrophocy
Security: 0.3
Corp: Genos Occidere
Alliance: HYDRA RELOADED
Faction: NONE
Ship: Curse
Weapon: Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator I
Damage Done: 499
Name: Sir Patchy
Security: 4.1
Corp: The-Forsaken
Alliance: Ethereal Dawn
Faction: NONE
Ship: Phantasm
Weapon: Heavy Pulse Laser I
Damage Done: 0
Name: nocaffiene
Security: 1.9
Corp: Black Nyx Corp
Alliance: Doomsday Testing
Faction: NONE
Ship: Phobos
Weapon: Warp Disruption Field Generator I
Damage Done: 0
Name: XLoneStarX
Security: 4.1
Corp: Savage Blood Claws
Alliance: NONE
Faction: NONE
Ship: Rokh
Weapon: 425mm Prototype I Gauss Gun
Damage Done: 0
Destroyed items:
Gyrostabilizer II
Photon Scattering Field I
Warp Disruptor II
Power Diagnostic System I, Qty: 2
425mm Medium 'Scout' Autocannon I, Qty: 4
EMP M, Qty: 1780 (Cargo)
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I, Qty: 3
EMP M, Qty: 195
Dropped items:
Damage Control II
Gyrostabilizer II, Qty: 2
Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
425mm Medium 'Scout' Autocannon I, Qty: 2
Carbonized Lead M, Qty: 2500 (Cargo)
Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon I Microwarpdrive
Hobgoblin I, Qty: 6 (Drone Bay)
EMP M, Qty: 195
The above players were in the FFA3 room (BC's and smaller) on the test server in Battleships and one Dreadnought..
Thank you for your time.
|
Freak13h3
Minmatar
Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
|
Posted - 2011.01.30 06:30:00 -
[2]
pics or it didn't happen.
oh, wait... http://i51.tinypic.com/e6rm9x.jpg
;)
|
DonHel
Gallente
Kentucky Fried Capsuleer
|
Posted - 2011.01.30 06:40:00 -
[3]
|
Avon
Caldari
Versatech Co.
RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2011.01.30 10:43:00 -
[4]
According to the statement from CCP Oneiromancer, only somerandom18 has actually broken the rules.
Signature removed, please only use English on the forums. Zymurgist
Okay sweet-cheeks xxx. Avon |
Sir Patchy
|
Posted - 2011.01.30 16:45:00 -
[5]
As stated by CCP Oneiromancer
The FFA beacons are not part of the test server rules. They are simply guidelines.
ALSO
Name: Sir Patchy
Security: 4.1
Corp: The-Forsaken
Alliance: Ethereal Dawn
Faction: NONE
Ship: Phantasm
Weapon: Heavy Pulse Laser I
Damage Done: 0
a PHANTASM is a CRUISER which is SMALLER than a BATTLECRUISER
thank you :)
----------------------------
I saw a girl with "Guess?" on her shirt. I said fake, and she slapped me! |
Sweet Redemption
|
Posted - 2011.01.31 03:55:00 -
[6]
 Originally by: Sir Patchy
As stated by CCP Oneiromancer
The FFA beacons are not part of the test server rules. They are simply guidelines.
ALSO
Name: Sir Patchy
Security: 4.1
Corp: The-Forsaken
Alliance: Ethereal Dawn
Faction: NONE
Ship: Phantasm
yeah i wasnt accusing you sir or nocaffeine.. i was just simply to lazy to remove the ships of the correct size.
Weapon: Heavy Pulse Laser I
Damage Done: 0
a PHANTASM is a CRUISER which is SMALLER than a BATTLECRUISER
thank you :)
|
Headerman
Minmatar
Metanoia.
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.31 06:43:00 -
[7]
And the rev hadn't aggressed you, and i can't see his guns firing. Most likely he warped to the wrong FFA beacon
|
Niveon
|
Posted - 2011.01.31 10:28:00 -
[8]
Name: somerandom18
Security: 5.0
Corp: Gallus Eternus
Alliance: Fatal Ascension
Faction: NONE
Ship: Revelation
Weapon: Revelation
Damage Done: 1632 |
Kysal
|
Posted - 2011.01.31 13:24:00 -
[9]
Unfortunately this is not conclusive evidence. What could have happened here is that the target warped to the FFA 2 beacon, got shot by some people, warped to FFA 3 and was then killed. Somerandom may simply have made a mistake in following him and been leaving just as the screenshot was taken. He may even have been fleet warped to a location he thought was something other than the FFA3 beacon. What this picture does prove is that he was in FFA 3, but it does not entirely prove his intent or fault in doing this.
This is further supported by the fact that somerandom was in fact not locking the target and was 180km away.
In cases that limit the rights of individuals, the most common way of interpretating laws or rules is in a narrow sense. Therefore if it be not proven that somerandom intentionally warped to FFA 3 with the intent of engaging in combat it would be a wrongful application of rules.
I do realize that these rules are entirely subject to the decision of CCP but in cases of permanent bans it is worth it to review the details carefully before making decisions.
|
Captain Mastiff
|
Posted - 2011.01.31 15:30:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Kysal
Unfortunately this is not conclusive evidence. What could have happened here is that the target warped to the FFA 2 beacon, got shot by some people, warped to FFA 3 and was then killed. Somerandom may simply have made a mistake in following him and been leaving just as the screenshot was taken. He may even have been fleet warped to a location he thought was something other than the FFA3 beacon. What this picture does prove is that he was in FFA 3, but it does not entirely prove his intent or fault in doing this.
This is further supported by the fact that somerandom was in fact not locking the target and was 180km away.
In cases that limit the rights of individuals, the most common way of interpretating laws or rules is in a narrow sense. Therefore if it be not proven that somerandom intentionally warped to FFA 3 with the intent of engaging in combat it would be a wrongful application of rules.
I do realize that these rules are entirely subject to the decision of CCP but in cases of permanent bans it is worth it to review the details carefully before making decisions.
FFA ship types are only guidelines and not server rules, the only rule that effect ship sizes in FFA beacons is rule 2 which mean capital ships wishing to "free for all" should only be at FFA2 and FFA2 only along with fighters and fighter bombers.
AFAIK it is very difficult to prove that the capital ship had any relevance to the kill as it is your word against his.
|
T Pain
|
Posted - 2011.02.01 20:36:00 -
[11]
oneiromancer is trying to change rules that have stuck for 6yrs.....other ccp and bh/isds will enforce them guidelines ARE RULES. oneiromancer might say w.e to not hve to worry about it but others will dock/move u or ban u for repeated action...they did break rules.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |