| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

RaptorXL
Caldari Tax Evasion R US
|
Posted - 2011.02.03 05:49:00 -
[1]
Edited by: RaptorXL on 03/02/2011 05:53:04 There has been several threads about this issue.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=707499 or http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=777872 or http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Boost_Nighthawk_%28CSM%29
It was even an item to vote for in the CSM list of top 200 issues.
It's the only Command ship which can't fit a gang link with it's fit! Defeats it's own purpose!
CCP, please address this issue!
|

Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.02.03 09:18:00 -
[2]
Of course. I also would like to see command ships as a whole looked at again. :)
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|

Ranka Mei
|
Posted - 2011.02.03 11:54:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Ranka Mei on 03/02/2011 11:54:52
Originally by: Liang Nuren Of course. I also would like to see command ships as a whole looked at again. :)
^^ This.
With the advent of the Tengu, Nighthawk just isn't worth it any more. Not that it no longer has any purpose, but relative to the amount of skills required for a Command ship, the Nighthawk just doesn't offer enough extra to warrant the high requirements. Nighthawk, sorry to say, currently is just a slightly better Drake. --
|

Massive Dragon
Genos Occidere Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2011.02.03 13:35:00 -
[4]
im going to get behind this. needs a look at least. do you fear me? |

Crazy KSK
|
Posted - 2011.02.03 17:39:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Liang Nuren Edited by Crazy Of course. I also would like to see command all ships as a whole looked at again. :-)
-The Cat
|

Jag Kara
Dirty Work Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.02.03 21:37:00 -
[6]
It would be nice to see field commands able to run a link while doing pve or pvp fits. As well as fleet command getting a better bonus to links, because at the moment, any T3 can run 3 links, warp cloak, warp through bubble, and be unprobable, while doing a better bonus in less than half the training time.
Additionally, it would be nice to see the armor rep (such as the one proposed in another thread to give local tank bonuses the abil to bonus incoming rep, change to resistence bonuses, or shield/armor health) bonus on the minmatar and gallente command ships overhauled to get them more than just gang work. As well as the few other minor tweaks needed, such as falloff bonus for the claymore, more bandwidth for the eos, longer range to the damnation, and vulture bonus' flipped to missile velocity and flight time instead. In Soviet Russia, carebears gank YOU! |

Angelica Winters
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 15:50:00 -
[7]
I agree that all command ships need a review.
|

Fon Revedhort
Monks of War DarkSide.
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 19:44:00 -
[8]
Looks obvious. ---[center] Please resize your signature to the maximum file size of 24000 bytes. Zymurgist |

Sepheir Sepheron
Caldari Between Ordeals
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 20:16:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Angelica Winters I agree that all command ships need a review.
This, no thumbs up for 'just the nighthawk.'
|

Laechyd Eldgorn
Caldari Certified Household Sweeping Consulting
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 23:09:00 -
[10]
Powergrid is not only issue with nighthawk but certain other caldari ships also, like cerberus. They're hard to equip with micro warpdrive when buffer tanking while equally buffer tanked minmatar ships are just fine since autocannons don't take so much powergrid.
This probably leads back in history when missiles always hit and you could fit multiple micro warpdrives, but after countless nerf this and that..
I doubt it ever gets fixed.
|

Gypsio III
Dirty Filthy Perverts
|
Posted - 2011.02.05 12:06:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Sepheir Sepheron
Originally by: Angelica Winters I agree that all command ships need a review.
This, no thumbs up for 'just the nighthawk.'
Indeed. While for a long time I've moaned about the NH's anaemic PG, the entire class of field CS is now broken and needs a rework.
|

LarpingBard
|
Posted - 2011.02.05 12:07:00 -
[12]
woot
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2011.02.05 12:59:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Liang Nuren Of course. I also would like to see command ships as a whole looked at again. :)
-Liang
This. The whole command ship lineup needs a review, with the Nighthawk and Eos being the most egregious examples.
(I'd say something about the Astarte, but people aren't even trying to fly that ony more.)
Malcanis' Law: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of "new players", that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players. |

Cathy Drall
Royal Amarr Institute
|
Posted - 2011.02.05 13:24:00 -
[14]
I'm planning to fly one so they better fit it!!! 
"Im not nearly as paranoid as people think I am" |

HeavyWave
|
Posted - 2011.02.06 18:54:00 -
[15]
Bump!
|

Ephemeron
BeerTia Maniacs
|
Posted - 2011.02.06 22:45:00 -
[16]
Personally I find that Command Ships are obsolete given the existence of t3
T3 can do everything that T2 BC can do - better. The only thing going for t2 BC is they are cheaper, but still expensive to lose. Even with extra grid on Nighthawk, I'd still pick Tengu. Maybe if Nighthawk had extra mid slot, then I'd seriously consider it using as a Drake on steroids.
|

Ranka Mei
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.02.07 00:26:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Ephemeron Personally I find that Command Ships are obsolete given the existence of t3
T3 can do everything that T2 BC can do - better. The only thing going for t2 BC is they are cheaper, but still expensive to lose. Even with extra grid on Nighthawk, I'd still pick Tengu. Maybe if Nighthawk had extra mid slot, then I'd seriously consider it using as a Drake on steroids.
I'd like it to have an extra hardpoint, rather. --
|

Raid'En
|
Posted - 2011.02.07 03:13:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Ephemeron
T3 can do everything that T2 BC can do - better. The only thing going for t2 BC is they are cheaper, but still expensive to lose.
never reused my night since i have my tengu. they really need something ---------------- ** Wormhole Trading ** |

Antihrist Pripravnik
4S Corporation Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2011.02.07 03:18:00 -
[19]
as always... +1
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |