Xel Set
   |
Posted - 2011.02.10 18:00:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Jovan Geldon
Originally by: Dlardrageth
Originally by: Rick Rocks'Hard
[...]
This is CCP's game, they do and have done a damn good job at what they do.
WTH?  You must be new to this game...
Quote:
No one wants the same old chronies calling the shots, I thought that was the point of electing CSM's
And what makes you think the majority of older/veteran players cares a whit about CSM? 
Originally by: Hirana Yoshida
Originally by: Ai Mei
Plus most 0.0 alliance leaders are hated by the majority non 0.0 eve.
You can be fairly sure that most 0.0 people hate the leaders too, but they suck it up and muddle along like with real world politicians 
You are being soooo wrong, m8. We love our high&mighty leader in so many ways that Romeo&Juliet looks like a cheap B-movie in comparison. 
This is quite possibly the worst post I have read today. Congratulations, Sir.
Actually, _your_ awful post is the worst one in the thread thus far. You denigrate without identifying the aspects with which you take issue. So, good job failposting about failposts. Next time consider pointing at yourself, because your exhibited ability to both reason and communicate are an arrogant embarrassment, though, prototypically, you don't seem to realize it.
That being said, removing jumpbridges seems like an overreaction and a bad idea because doing so removes a facet of the game with the capacity to be used in a variety of interesting, strategic ways. If there is a nerf solution to more variety in pvp, entirely removing jumpbridges may be said to go too far.
Goons and nullsec dwellers with a similar CSM agenda represent not only a substantial part of the player base, but a portion of the player base that may be said to be very actively engaged in the full measure of the game. They have every right and reason to take as much of the CSM as they can, and they will represent a large body of reasonably like-minded constituents beyond their own membership if they do. There's nothing sinister about it. If you fail to persuade enough votes against them, a reasonable majority will have spoken.
|