Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Hakaru Ishiwara
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 14:42:00 -
[1]
Per http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1486288 we had some new bling to check out. All that I'm currently seeing is a server error message of "The page cannot be displayed because an internal server error has occurred" when accessing https://testforums.evegate.com/
Are teh new forums still open for player review?
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 14:43:00 -
[2]
No, second round of testing is finished. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
Hakaru Ishiwara
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 14:47:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Tippia No, second round of testing is finished.
Rgr that.
@ CCP: Unsticky yer post and put up a nicer landing page. You have to be recovered from your fanfest hangovers by now.
|
Hakaru Ishiwara
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2011.03.31 03:53:00 -
[4]
Bump. CCP fix yer stickies.
|
Dr BattleSmith
PAX Interstellar Services
|
Posted - 2011.03.31 04:11:00 -
[5]
* Feedback ignored: Check. * Code broken: Check. * Privacy violated: Check. * Exploits included: Check.
It's ready.
**** WHITEWOLF CCP Nathan: "the data does not seem to support that polished quality sells better than new features." |
mkmin
|
Posted - 2011.03.31 04:16:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Dr BattleSmith * Feedback ignored: Check. * Code broken: Check. * Privacy violated: Check. * Exploits included: Check.
It's ready.
Any particularly new privacy violations, or just the same old ass humping CCP gives our privacy?
|
Apollo Gabriel
Brotherhood Of Fallen Angels Etherium Cartel
|
Posted - 2011.03.31 05:00:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Dr BattleSmith * Feedback ignored: Check. * Code broken: Check. * Privacy violated: Check. * Exploits included: Check.
It's ready.
what does your sig refer to about White Wolf? Is CCP Nathan a failed WW employee?
***** Signature may appear without warning! ***** Please do not feed the trolls, it builds dependency.
|
Estel Arador
|
Posted - 2011.03.31 05:34:00 -
[8]
My impression was that the second round of testing wasn't very active. Might have something to do with apparent futility of providing feedback. Granted, a few glaring issues were tackled, but mostly CCP is steaming ahead without any consideration for users.
|
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2011.03.31 21:16:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Estel Arador My impression was that the second round of testing wasn't very active. Might have something to do with apparent futility of providing feedback. Granted, a few glaring issues were tackled, but mostly CCP is steaming ahead without any consideration for users.
I think you've summed it up nicely.
Originally by: Allestin Villimar Also, if your bookmarks are too far out, they can and will ban you for it.
Originally by: Torothanax Low population in w systems makes afk cloaking unattractive. |
Bhattran
|
Posted - 2011.03.31 23:28:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Dr BattleSmith * Feedback ignored: Check. * Code broken: Check. * Privacy violated: Check. * Exploits included: Check.
It's ready.
CCP DeliversÖ
--WIS/Incarna/Ambulation where microtransactions come to play, and uh bars.-- |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |