EVE Search - 0.0 Nerf Vote

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

0.0 Nerf Vote

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Abinadi9 Gallente NerdHerd	Posted - 2011.04.05 18:40:00 - [1] Blah blah blah I know CCP won't listen. Go voice your opinion. Go to http://www.evethink.com and vote whether or not you want the patch to go through. Vote honestly. It's API verified so if you have 1 account you get 1 vote. I'm sure people will troll. But honestly, if 1000 people go on the record against this... at least they were on the record. I think that CCP has gone, as Kirk Lazarus says, full [mentally handicapped]. Thank you, Abinadi9 http://www.evethink.com
Mitch Taylor Caldari Dark-Rising	Posted - 2011.04.05 19:44:00 - [2] Im going to call it now, people will vote no to the removal of their easy isk. Shocking stuff. The Dark is Rising...
Horizonist Gallente Yulai Guard 2nd Fleet Yulai Federation	Posted - 2011.04.05 19:51:00 - [3] Originally by: Mitch Taylor Im going to call it now, people will vote no to the removal of their easy isk. Shocking stuff. ^
Ace Frehley Minmatar Mercenaries of Andosia Northern Coalition.	Posted - 2011.04.05 19:54:00 - [4] if all you care about is your stupid sanctums, you dont belong into 0.0 anyway. Go and isk-farm somewhere else....
boo3916 Caldari D00M. Northern Coalition.	Posted - 2011.04.05 20:07:00 - [5] i vote yes, and also while there at it do away with jumpbridges and titan bridges that will be the best nerf against the blobs
Erichk Knaar Caldari Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group	Posted - 2011.04.05 20:10:00 - [6] In before nefarious plot to harvest API keys, for some nefarious purpose.
RDevz Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.04.05 20:42:00 - [7] Originally by: boo3916 i vote yes, and also while there at it do away with jumpbridges and titan bridges that will be the best nerf against the blobs Quite. In the good old days of moving a battleship 3 regions to accomplish a strategic objective via gates before getting doomsdayed by a remote-DDing titan that was 1 meter outside of a POS forcefield, there were no blobs. Returning to those times will certainly stop blobbing.
Capricorn 0ne Caldari Heaven's Army Fidelas Constans	Posted - 2011.04.05 20:47:00 - [8] Please interceptors to their pre-nurf level's as well. srsly guais RUST GSBG 2LGT2QT
ROXGenghis Caldari Missions Mining and Mayhem Merciless.	Posted - 2011.04.05 21:31:00 - [9] Wanted to vote "yes" to the patch, but didn't want to give up my account info to a third party to do so :( - sig
Abinadi9 Gallente NerdHerd Intrepid Crossing	Posted - 2011.04.05 23:35:00 - [10] Well if CCP would like to run the poll so it's "trusted" then I would gladly move it to their site. But since they didn't even bother to ask the CSM, why would they ask you.
Vertisce Soritenshi Gallente O.W.N. Corp OWN Alliance	Posted - 2011.04.05 23:57:00 - [11] If almost 100 pages of protesting didn't stop the change already...why would a vote on a third party site? Here is the almost 100 pages for your perusal... Linkage. Frankly I agree...it's a stupid idea...and CCP has already stated how much they just don't give a ** about what we think on the matter. It is going to happen. Adapt or die. NO BOOBIES LEFT BEHIND!**
Headerman Minmatar Metanoia. Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.04.06 00:35:00 - [12] Edited by: Headerman on 06/04/2011 00:36:07 I would vote no, but i am at work so i can't get my API info. This would make high 0.0 sec systems with limited moons and roid belts even more worthless to everyone. Why pay for sov on a worthless system? What renter would want such a system as well?
The Ringer Gallente SniggWaffe FREE KARTTOON NOW	Posted - 2011.04.06 00:37:00 - [13] Haha delve is worth something now, and pure blind http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Pure_Blind#sec hahahahhahahahahahahahahahah
CBBOMBERMAN Gallente Eclipse Industrials Quantum Forge	Posted - 2011.04.06 16:43:00 - [14] the vote is clear. BIG gap http://www.evethink.com/?viewvote=true
Myz Toyou Minmatar APOCALYPSE LEGION	Posted - 2011.04.06 16:52:00 - [15] Originally by: Vertisce Soritenshi It is going to happen. Adapt and die in your blob of drakes farmed in easy mode. fixed
TommyMc88 Minmatar Macabre Votum Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2011.04.06 17:15:00 - [16] Originally by: CBBOMBERMAN the vote is clear. BIG gap http://www.evethink.com/?viewvote=true Holy **, even I didn't expect it to be that much a landslide.. gg CCP. CCP you players want it? You players get it! :D lol j.k ** you guys we want moniez.
Spurty Caldari V0LTA VOLTA Corp	Posted - 2011.04.06 17:25:00 - [17] Edited by: Spurty on 06/04/2011 17:25:04 You lack some perspective, so here's some: a whopping ........260ish people are upset at this game change. a tiny wee 350,000,000+ people aren't upset at this game change. Hoppit!
Mr Peanut420 Caldari Therapy. R.A.G.E	Posted - 2011.04.06 17:39:00 - [18] Wow that's great logic. That's like tv rating people assuming everyone loves a show even though everyone with rating trackers hated it. Extrapolate.
Jugs Malone Gallente Dark Skies Coalition	Posted - 2011.04.06 18:41:00 - [19] Originally by: Abinadi9 Blah blah blah I don't care and you're not having my API. Should you not be off earning isk instead of wasting your time with silly votes?
Kan'loch Lacoud Amarr Autistic Sharks Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.04.06 18:47:00 - [20] This is a bogus site created for the sole purpose of API harvesting. I voted with the user ID & API key of 'derp' and it still let me vote. Derp. I can fly frigates and cruisers.
Jonii Minmatar Woopatang Primary.	Posted - 2011.04.06 19:00:00 - [21]
Viribus Gallente Autistic Sharks Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.04.06 19:10:00 - [22] YES IT IS TRULY THE SANCTUMS THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR BLOBS, NOT IDIOTIC DOMINION MECHANICS You morons this is CCP's shortsighted attempt to curb inflation, unfortunately they are dumb and didn't spend more than thirty seconds thinking about it and don't realise they can slow down the ISK faucet by partially replacing anom bounties with LP or something. And that's just off the top of my head. But nope let's just shove entire coalitions into constellations and make it viable for nullsec ratters to grind L4s in highsec. Brilliant job CCP.
Katana Kitty Caldari Evil Monkey Asylum	Posted - 2011.04.06 19:37:00 - [23] Cry more Oh noes my botszzzz cant make teh isk dey does oh noooeess More tears pls
SXyWhile Gallente Echo Roaming Industries	Posted - 2011.04.06 20:00:00 - [24] Nobody gives A FLYING ** about the patch. It makes no difference to anything. Let's tell CCP to fix ship agility, velocity, webs, and snake implants. That's far more important, you ing piece of ing **. - S
SXyWhile Gallente Echo Roaming Industries	Posted - 2011.04.06 20:03:00 - [25] Originally by: boo3916 do away with jumpbridges and titan bridges Thank God someone is still thinking in this game. Love you boo. Keep playing forever! - S
Viribus Gallente Autistic Sharks Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.04.06 20:51:00 - [26] Whining about the nano nerf still? It's like I'm really in 2008
Aedron Caldari F.R.E.E. Explorer EVE Animal Control	Posted - 2011.04.06 21:08:00 - [27] sov mechanics need to change. I've always believed "balance" in a game leads to boring game play. While these changes are a good initial step, I believe that clumping together all the resources in a single area just makes it too easy for these sov holding power blocks to gain dominance over a relatively small area of space. Scatter the resources of the game and remove the ease of travel (jump bridges and jump freighters) and you will get smaller groups controlling more strategic locations, more groupings means more diversity and ultimately choice for players. You could even put rare moons into W-space or even K-space which is connected to the main block of systems via W-Space which is way out of jump ranges (which would force high end products to be flown via W-space)
iciingdeath Amarr APEX ARDENT COALITION Controlled Chaos	Posted - 2011.04.06 22:59:00 - [28] **** YOU CCP Simple
Spurty Caldari V0LTA VOLTA Corp	Posted - 2011.04.06 23:02:00 - [29] Quote: CCP BROKE MY ROCKET JUMP!!!!! WAAAH good grief, whatever happened to embracing change? You've all turned into your own grand-fathers. Hoppit!
iciingdeath Amarr APEX ARDENT COALITION Controlled Chaos	Posted - 2011.04.06 23:07:00 - [30] Point was to make 00 better, why would a small alliance take up useless system if they can't make isk. Someone tell me. Because we all know the big boys will keep the tec moons. Pure stupidity to think this will benefit or make 00 better in anyway. It might cause a few alliance to fall but make bigger groups even bigger. CCP are a bunch of idiots.
Leyla Khaled Amarr SON OF RAVANA League of Reprobates	Posted - 2011.04.07 06:44:00 - [31] You are all victims of EVOLUTION!
ScheenK Gallente Invicta.	Posted - 2011.04.07 08:15:00 - [32] Originally by: iciingdeath Point was to make 00 better, why would a small alliance take up useless system if they can't make isk. Someone tell me. Because we all know the big boys will keep the tec moons. Pure stupidity to think this will benefit or make 00 better in anyway. It might cause a few alliance to fall but make bigger groups even bigger. CCP are a bunch of idiots. go cry more fa.g just because MM and razor wont let their fail pet alliances have any of the good space
Derwent Caldari Deez Nuts. Nut Up Or Shut Up.	Posted - 2011.04.07 08:27:00 - [33] Q(Q)uit yer whining. Everyone was happy to belt rat before anomalies came along. ______________________
viper09 Amarr vipers bastards Pandorum Invictus	Posted - 2011.04.07 08:51:00 - [34] personaly i think we will find alot more pvp now as belt ratting means idiots who dont pay attention die very fast. i wonder how many nice shiny faction bs get popped within first month of this taking place
Lord DarkBear Caldari FISKL GUARDS RED.OverLord	Posted - 2011.04.07 09:15:00 - [35] I think the changes are great! I ratted in belts long before sanctums and it worked fine. 0.0 is about conflict and pvp not ratting in sanctums all day. Will it be harder on some people.. well sure it will but thats all part of this game. Your like spoiled kids.. when someone take your candy away from you because you couldn't stop eating it and got fat and lazy. Remember that this change was requested by the player base and nothing CCP decided to do just out of the blue. There is tons of forums post on the subject. This vote are worth 0. The only one that will even care to vote are those who whining and crying as much as you are. Most of us don't even care and wont vote anyway. Right now you got 270 no votes.. thats not even a % of the 350000 eve accounts.
Andski Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.04.07 09:49:00 - [36] Originally by: Lord DarkBear 0.0 is about conflict and pvp No. There's far more risk in doing PvE activities (ratting, mining, etc.) in 0.0 than in high-sec. Logically, it should be more lucrative to do this stuff in 0.0 than in high-sec.
Derwent Caldari Deez Nuts. Nut Up Or Shut Up.	Posted - 2011.04.07 11:39:00 - [37] Originally by: Andski Originally by: Lord DarkBear 0.0 is about conflict and pvp No. Logically, it should be more lucrative to do this stuff in 0.0 than in high-sec. And it still is... PM me when u find a BS rat in high-sec or even a High-end roid/moon ______________________
Myz Toyou Minmatar APOCALYPSE LEGION	Posted - 2011.04.07 11:55:00 - [38] Originally by: Andski Originally by: Lord DarkBear 0.0 is about conflict and pvp No. There's far more risk in doing PvE activities (ratting, mining, etc.) in 0.0 than in high-sec. Logically, it should be more lucrative to do this stuff in 0.0 than in high-sec. There is more reward in 0.0, aboard your Hulk for those juicy Ark & Crok roids little Goon.
Naomi Halloran Gallente Disciples of Night Dominion of Darkness	Posted - 2011.04.07 14:01:00 - [39] Eh, not that I'm likely to ever see null-sec space again, so I'm indifferent to it. I can see both sides of this debate, though. Either way, it's not going to be pretty, one way or the other. --- "Ye Gods, Mardonius, what men have you brought us to fight against? Men that fight not for gold, but for glory!"
Christopher AET Gallente Segmentum Solar Intergalactic Exports Group	Posted - 2011.04.10 19:02:00 - [40] Thanks for putting up the vote abin. From our convo's a few weeks back i am sure you know my response.
Trinity Faetal Gallente Little Garden	Posted - 2011.04.10 20:40:00 - [41] this looks lik a mass api-fishing scam.
Andski Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.04.10 21:49:00 - [42] Originally by: Myz Toyou Originally by: Andski Originally by: Lord DarkBear 0.0 is about conflict and pvp No. There's far more risk in doing PvE activities (ratting, mining, etc.) in 0.0 than in high-sec. Logically, it should be more lucrative to do this stuff in 0.0 than in high-sec. There is more reward in 0.0, aboard your Hulk for those juicy Ark & Crok roids little Goon. Mad? Mining's a terrible way to make ISK in 0.0.
Kytus Bos Caldari Muppet Factory Northern Coalition.	Posted - 2011.04.10 22:12:00 - [43] It kind of fails as a survey when the page is telling you how to vote
Beowulff Schaefer Amarr Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.04.10 23:48:00 - [44] Folks, I think you are looking at this the wrong way. The question is not to the player base. IMO the questions are to CCP: - What metrics will indicate to you that this change was a success? - What metrics will indicate to you that this change was a failure? - What are the current metric deltas and how do you interpret that? If CCP is being thoughtful about changes in their product then they should have a pretty articulation of what they are measuring and how it's changing over time with anom change. I personally am interested in what their goals are, how they measure those goals, and how those measures are moving over time. If they are silent or generally quiet about how they are tracking the effects of this change then chances are they are just messing around with the game at their whim.
Koraeth Amarr Paxton Industries -Mostly Harmless-	Posted - 2011.04.11 13:40:00 - [45] Wow, that's a nice API collection page you got there. You people aren't actually putting in your API information are you? That's a great way to find alts on accounts, and other useful information from the limited API key... [url=http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=Koraeth][/ur
Abinadi9 Gallente NerdHerd Intrepid Crossing	Posted - 2011.04.13 00:32:00 - [46] Originally by: Koraeth Wow, that's a nice API collection page you got there. You people aren't actually putting in your API information are you? That's a great way to find alts on accounts, and other useful information from the limited API key... What would I found out via API honestly? Limited API... so wallet... skills... character names... Don't vote with your spy accounts and you'll be fine... The key isn't saved but as it goes, no you shouldn't trust anyone in Eve. -Abin
Abinadi9 Gallente NerdHerd Intrepid Crossing	Posted - 2011.04.13 00:34:00 - [47] Originally by: Kan'loch Lacoud This is a bogus site created for the sole purpose of API harvesting. I voted with the user ID & API key of 'derp' and it still let me vote. Derp. No it didn't... No where on there do I see "derp???" :-P -Abin
Latino lover Minmatar SEX WITH PENYS	Posted - 2011.04.13 01:31:00 - [48] Carebears tears BEST frickin tears -- In GIGI we trust !!

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.