| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Avis Johnson
Cobalt Armada
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 16:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
Let's say that you had the ability to make it look like, to someone who was a rube, you were causing an exploit in the game. Would that be grounds for reversal of transactions and/or banning? |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
7325
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 16:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
If it's not an exploit it's not an exploit "Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á |

Avis Johnson
Cobalt Armada
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 16:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
Coo cool. Thank you very much. |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations
13
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 17:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
my understanding is that if you claim to use an exploit when scamming, even if its not an exploit, that it is still against rules.... someone said he got in trouble for it when he he claimed such a thing in jita trying to get people to part with their isk. I don;'t know for sure though. See Bio for isk doubling rules. -áIf you didn't read bio, chances are you helped fund those who did. |

lanyaie
507
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 17:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:If it's not an exploit it's not an exploit
what it said I dont post often, but when I do i'm probably trolling you Currently offering 100% legit hulkageddon security sponsored by the mittani, send 50m to me and 50m to him |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
7325
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 20:58:00 -
[6] - Quote
lanyaie wrote:Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:If it's not an exploit it's not an exploit what it said
This is becasue I'm a ginger, isn't it?  "Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á |

Riku Klayton
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 22:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:lanyaie wrote:Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:If it's not an exploit it's not an exploit what it said This is becasue I'm a ginger, isn't it? 
Hohoho, wow... lol. Lan wtf xD o7 |

Cat Casidy
Percussive Diplomacy PERCUSSIVE PIZZA TIME DIPLOMACY
56
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 06:25:00 -
[8] - Quote
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:lanyaie wrote:Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:If it's not an exploit it's not an exploit what it said This is becasue I'm a ginger, isn't it? 
Lanyaie's just jealous, she has to dye hers. SLAPD - Star Scientist, I science stars |

Sun Win
Lead Farmers Kill It With Fire
66
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 09:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
Avis Johnson wrote:Let's say that you had the ability to make it look like, to someone who was a rube, you were causing an exploit in the game. Would that be grounds for reversal of transactions and/or banning?
I think this is close enough to the line that you should petition it in advance and see what CCP says. If say it is OK and then some later GM tries to ban you, you'll have a record of getting permission. |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
2710
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 10:36:00 -
[10] - Quote
The problem you are making for yourself with this course of action is that CCP are complete morons and will probably just take the 'admission of exploiting' at face value rather than correctly investigate your situation before banning you. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
2710
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 10:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
Sun Win wrote:Avis Johnson wrote:Let's say that you had the ability to make it look like, to someone who was a rube, you were causing an exploit in the game. Would that be grounds for reversal of transactions and/or banning? I think this is close enough to the line that you should petition it in advance and see what CCP says. If say it is OK and then some later GM tries to ban you, you'll have a record of getting permission.
Didn't work for Aperture Harmonics re tracking disruption mechanics and it didn't help Hydra in the ATX practice either. CCP have no consistency when it comes to rulings made via petitions. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
122
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 16:07:00 -
[12] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Sun Win wrote:Avis Johnson wrote:Let's say that you had the ability to make it look like, to someone who was a rube, you were causing an exploit in the game. Would that be grounds for reversal of transactions and/or banning? I think this is close enough to the line that you should petition it in advance and see what CCP says. If say it is OK and then some later GM tries to ban you, you'll have a record of getting permission. Didn't work for Aperture Harmonics re tracking disruption mechanics and it didn't help Hydra in the ATX practice either. CCP have no consistency when it comes to rulings made via petitions.
"is everything in worm holes working as intended"
lol |

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc
204
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 02:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:lanyaie wrote:Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:If it's not an exploit it's not an exploit what it said This is beca sue I'm a ginger, isn't it?  She's just jealous she can't scare grown-ups as easily as she can scare children. -á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters i'm strangely comfortable with it" -Mittens |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
7325
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 03:07:00 -
[14] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:lanyaie wrote:Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:If it's not an exploit it's not an exploit what it said This is beca sue I'm a ginger, isn't it?  She's just jealous she can't scare grown-ups as easily as she can scare children.
I was mad, I was called 'it'  "Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á |

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc
204
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 03:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:I was mad, I was called 'it'  Don't be mad, some people just don't have an eye for beauty. -á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters i'm strangely comfortable with it" -Mittens |

lanyaie
508
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 23:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:Reaver Glitterstim wrote:Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:lanyaie wrote:Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:If it's not an exploit it's not an exploit what it said This is beca sue I'm a ginger, isn't it?  She's just jealous she can't scare grown-ups as easily as she can scare children. I was mad, I was called 'it' 
Don't be mad, you can always change your gender with our current technology level redo your face here and there...yeah...you could become..average, your personality is another story tho What do I put in here?
|

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
7325
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 23:20:00 -
[17] - Quote
lanyaie wrote:
Don't be mad, you can always change your gender with our current technology level redo your face here and there...yeah...you could become..average, your personality is another story tho
That totally needs to be an option in Eve, except there should be a percentage based chance that the surgery gets botched with hilarious consequences 
And I could totally change my personality, but then you would be ungraced by my sudden lack of presence "Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á |

Nerath Naaris
Pink Winged Unicorns for Peace Love and Anarchy
148
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 05:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
If you are talking about the "Hey all, I found an exploit: just right-click on my name then "give money", type in 9999999999999999999 and you will receive this sum. All the devs do it if they need cash"-scam, that one is going on forever, so I assume it already has been petitioned and considered legal by CCP. Forum-unbanned since 2011.10.20. |

Kalel Nimrott
Wishful Desires Inc. Armada Assail
44
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 08:14:00 -
[19] - Quote
Thread about gingers |

Beachura
Perkone Caldari State
17
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 11:56:00 -
[20] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Sun Win wrote:Avis Johnson wrote:Let's say that you had the ability to make it look like, to someone who was a rube, you were causing an exploit in the game. Would that be grounds for reversal of transactions and/or banning? I think this is close enough to the line that you should petition it in advance and see what CCP says. If say it is OK and then some later GM tries to ban you, you'll have a record of getting permission. Didn't work for Aperture Harmonics re tracking disruption mechanics and it didn't help Hydra in the ATX practice either. CCP have no consistency when it comes to rulings made via petitions.
Aperture Harmonics as reported in the rooks and kings battle report asked CCP once via petition and CCP clearly replied with a no, this is an exploit. Not happy with this answer they asked a blanket question covering sensor mechanics, a blanket question recieved a blanket answer, CCP said yes to the blanket question and they used this to abuse the gun mechanic, ignoring the original ruling.
This was the reason they were punished. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |