Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Pr1ncess Alia
|
Posted - 2011.05.19 14:02:00 -
[1]
Min? Cal? Does Gal have anything worth doing now?
I think .5 is where it's at now? Or is everyone flocking to 1.0/0.9 sites to avoid gank city?
--- Players are losing faith and loyalty in CCP due previous expansions not living up to player expectations. The CSM and CCP agreed that expectation management can be improved |
Isebella Ahih
Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.05.19 14:10:00 -
[2]
Why do you think there are any at all? Seems to me the reason for this patch was to get people to spread out, Not to move he hubs. |
Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2011.05.19 14:35:00 -
[3]
Its quite an interesting question, .5s will have slightly better rewards thanks to sec, bur will simultaneously have slightly more risk thanks to slower concord response. There are so many agents I would imagine there wont be any real hubs in either case. Which can onlybe a good thing for all concerned.
|
Pr1ncess Alia
|
Posted - 2011.05.19 14:35:00 -
[4]
My guess is just as there will always be trade hubs, there will always be mission hubs.
Some systems will offer more appeal than others
-.5's not close to .4's -volume of agents in a given station/system -proximity to storyline agents
etc etc
I'm sure we will see dispersion but again, my guess is users of old hubs will simply gravitate to new hubs.
--- Players are losing faith and loyalty in CCP due previous expansions not living up to player expectations. The CSM and CCP agreed that expectation management can be improved |
Foralai Altrus
|
Posted - 2011.05.19 14:44:00 -
[5]
Any system with a large number of agents will be popular.
And depends on the focus of the mission runner, some hubs will be for mining missions. Others for combat or hauling.
|
sarah mcjimmy
|
Posted - 2011.05.19 14:50:00 -
[6]
Missions given in 0.5 systems have always had a better payout.
The way I see it is that every agent will now be used rather than just top tier (highest quality) in that specific corp. This will then give mission runners a larger potential portion of space to call home.
Rather than increase in gankings, I see the opposite as players disperse to these new areas.
|
Adrie Atticus
Tactical Vendor of Services and Goods Partners of Industrial Service and Salvage
|
Posted - 2011.05.19 14:52:00 -
[7]
They'll go where there is no risk of getting low-sec missions, have sec status of 0.5 and preferably 2 or more agents which they want to use. I bet there aren't many systems like that out there, wait for a week and find the new Motsu and resume ninjasalvaging.
|
Morgan Polaris
|
Posted - 2011.05.19 15:02:00 -
[8]
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/The_Forge/Jita
pick one...
|
Rhivre
Caldari TarNec
|
Posted - 2011.05.19 15:08:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Pr1ncess Alia Min? Cal? Does Gal have anything worth doing now?
I think .5 is where it's at now? Or is everyone flocking to 1.0/0.9 sites to avoid gank city?
Gallente has some nice pockets that could be viable, depending on the new agent locations, will have to see if people bother, or just plug away at the same old locations.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |