|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Amber Villaneous
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 18:32:00 -
[1]
The slippery slope just got steeper. Fugg You CCP. Reason #67(made up number) why my 5 subs will not be renewed when they expire, CYA bubye.
|
Amber Villaneous
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 20:42:00 -
[2]
Originally by: CCP Atlas 3) This project is not about CCP making money. Whether we charge $100 or $50 or $10 for a commercial license won't make a big difference to our balance sheet. $99 is the lowest that we estimated that we could reasonably go and still justify the cost of the service. If this is too high for app developers, this is something that could possibly be revisited.
What service? I have seen nothing that indicates something new will be added. Or do you mean the SERVICE of granting a liscence?
How about the old addage "If it ain't broke don't fug with it"
|
Amber Villaneous
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 21:08:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Lex Starwalker Bottom Line:
EVE Online is an IP, and CCP is 100% within their rights to do this. It's good business sense. It's not right for others to make money off someone's IP without the owner of the IP being compensated. That's why we have copyright laws to begin with. This is the real world. No free rides.
Bottom Line:
You are are idiot.
People are making their game better, more enjoyable, easier to play and filling in the gaps CCP does not provide. And, as an IP CCP is well within their rights to to say "Thank you" and then STFU and not dig into the pockets of the people helping them.
|
Amber Villaneous
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 22:01:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Jaddar Edited by: Jaddar on 15/06/2011 21:28:51 First of all, you all seem to have missed the part in which they ask for constructive criticism.
You are completely missing the point. What is the point in "constructively criticizing" an idea that should not exist in the first place?
You don't "constructively criticize" the the dog Shiite on your shoe, you cuss at it, scraape(seriously, sc**** is filtered?) it off and beat the dog that left its shiite on your lawn.
|
Amber Villaneous
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 23:58:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Holy One CCP has been a bit dizzy in the past to be perfectly honest - they've risked their copyright and other rights by not enforcing a licensing system long before now.
If the issue is "copyright and other rights" the na free liscense could easily be incorporated into the eula/tos or added to every API download even.
Since this is coming from BizDev=Marketing=Money not LawDev=Covering Our Asses I don't think it's reasonable to assume it is all about copyright.
|
|
|
|