| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Alara IonStorm
   |
Posted - 2011.06.26 22:51:00 -
[1]
Hello all, with the up and coming emergency Meetings between the CSM and CCP it is expected that they will be addressing player concerns about the direction and future of EVE Online. There are many issues in EVE that have led to players falling off the game over the years and especially with the current crisis. I have started this thread to gauge player opinions accross a number of different issues that have continually popped up through out the game.
I have created a list of features with a Ranking System for importance to the community so the CSM's and CCP can reference in there meetings. Please respond by typing the number of the question and the letter to indicate it's importance.
1. Micro Transactions in EVE Online and the fears about Selling Out or Pay to Win Items in a Sub Based Game.
A. I will not tolerate them at all.
B. I dislike them but will accept grudgingly Vanity Items
C. Vanity Items only is acceptable.
D. Certain Services can be Provided.
E. In Space Items are not an Issue with me.
2. Incarna and the Hanger System.
A. I will only take the old veiw back.
B. I am really in favour old veiw.
C. I will accept Door if it is on a permenant basis
D. I would not mind phasing out Door eventually but it needs to stay till load time decrease.
E. Phasing Door does not bother me.
3. Hybrid Turrets
A. It is unacceptable that this has been ignored for so long,
B. Rebalce both the guns and the ship soon
C. Turret Rebalance is required.
D. It could use a bit of Balance.
E. Not a major Concern.
4. FOTM Ships. There are ships whos use has gotten so high the eclipse most of the other types. Fleets are made up mostly of a single ship type while others are or are considered sub par.
A. The over use of a particular ship or race is Game Breaking.
B. Rebalance of exosting Ships, Speeds and Turrets is something that should be on the Forefront.
C. More Mixed Fleet Options would improve Gameplay, tactics and Participation.
D. FOTM is not too out of hand.
E. Ships should be left to Lesser Roles and only a few should be universally viable.
5. Super Capital Ship Inbalance
A. It is destroying Large Fleet Warfare fix ASAP
B. It is to much of a Standard Fleet Ship already.
C. The problem will get worse in time.
D. They are too rare right now biut still OP.
E. No Issue in there Numbers.
6. UI and Gameplay accessiblity improvements, like new POS Management System or a clearer UI.
A. My Ability to play is Severly effected by the bad control system Revamp now.
B. Needs to be an important focus in the future.
C. It is an annoying issue. Could use some work.
D. Small Fixes here and there.
E. I can operate it fine thank you.
7. Botting and the Sale of RM Goods.
A. Destructive to the in game economy, CCP is not doing enough.
B. Damages the game and needs to be looked into with more zeal.
C. The issue could use a bit more attention.
D. CCP has done good work on the issue and should continue to do so.
E. Issue is not a priority.
8. Faction Warefare
A. Forgotten for Far too Long we want tit Overhauled Completely.
B. Should be more relevent to the 4 Empires, New Content and Reworks Required
C. More Content is needed.
D. Fix the few minor issues and move on.
E. Forget about it and focus on new stuff.
9. Low Sec.
A. It is a Wasteland and Needs a complete Overhaul.
B. A better Balance between Pirates/PVP'ers and Other Residence needs to be looked into.
C. Content would improve it.
D. Perhaps a small upgrade of rewards.
E. Leave it as is and move on.
10. CCP Openess with there players and how they handled the Crisis.
A. Trust in them is completely gone.
B. They were to slow to respond and did not look into the issue.
C. More Open Conversation in the future.
D. It was ok they could have done better.
E. Response was Fine.
Thank You for voicing your Issues. Fly Safe.
|
Alara IonStorm
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 22:54:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Alara IonStorm on 26/06/2011 22:56:00
A Handy Tally of your Responses will be kept here.
1. Micro Transactions in EVE Online and the fears about Selling Out or Pay to Win Items in a Sub Based Game.
A. 0
B. 0
C. 0
D. 0
E. 0
2. Incarna and the Hanger System.
A. 0
B. 0
C. 0
D. 0
E. 0
3. Hybrid Turrets
A. 0
B. 0
C. 0
D. 0
E. 0
4. FOTM Ships. There are ships whos use has gotten so high the eclipse most of the other types. Fleets are made up mostly of a single ship type while others are or are considered sub par.
A. 0
B. 0
C. 0
D. 0
E. 0
5. Super Capital Ship Inbalance
A. 0
B. 0
C. 0
D. 0
E. 0
6. UI and Gameplay accessiblity improvements, like new POS Management System or a clearer UI.
A. 0
B. 0
C. 0
D. 0
E. 0
7. Botting and the Sale of RM Goods.
A. 0
B. 0
C. 0
D. 0
E. 0
8. Faction Warefare
A. 0
B. 0
C. 0
D. 0
E. 0
9. Low Sec.
A. 0
B. 0
C. 0
D. 0
E. 0
10. CCP Openess with there players and how they handled the Crisis.
A. 0
B. 0
C. 0
D. 0
E. 0
|
Teako
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 22:57:00 -
[3]
Why waste your time with this. You know the CSM will just be shown the door. Its simply buying time and hope people forget. CSM have been treated like garbage always. And it will continue so. This time they are just also misused the same time.
Zulu couldnt even say anything in his blog. And not even a sorry for what CCP have done.
|
TimeToTank
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 23:01:00 -
[4]
since they arnt miracle workers and this list is like being a kid in a candy store ill stick with the main points that need addressing.
1.A
2.C
3.A
4.C/D
5.C
6.(cant say i dont run a POS)
7.B
8.B
9.B
10.A
Numbers 1 and 10 need MAJOR LOOKING AT with number 3 closely followed... i mean come on... its been YEARS and they have known rails to suck tons...
|
enjar
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 23:03:00 -
[5]
1. B
2. B
3. C
4. A (drakes!!!!)
5. C
6. D
7. A
8. A
9. A
10. A
|
Kah'Roor
The Flaming Sideburn's
Waterboard
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 23:05:00 -
[6]
1. C
2. B
3. E
4. B
5. B
6. C
7. B
8. B
9. A
10.C
|
Kaethe Kollwitz
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 23:09:00 -
[7]
as far as im concerned they can fly all the way there.
go to hotel.
freshen up.
sleep.
travel to CCP.
then say: "mt for in game advantage y/n?"
then get back on the plane.
cheers.
|
Boaz Hedion Merkava
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 23:10:00 -
[8]
Would be easier if you made this a google survey
|
Jet Aeon
Gallente
Two Smoking Barrels
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 23:12:00 -
[9]
 Originally by: Alara IonStorm
1. Micro Transactions in EVE Online and the fears about Selling Out or Pay to Win Items in a Sub Based Game.
E. In Space Items are not an Issue with me.
2. Incarna and the Hanger System.
D. I would not mind phasing out Door eventually but it needs to stay till load time decrease.
3. Hybrid Turrets
E. Not a major Concern.
4. FOTM Ships. There are ships whos use has gotten so high the eclipse most of the other types. Fleets are made up mostly of a single ship type while others are or are considered sub par.
D. FOTM is not too out of hand.
5. Super Capital Ship Inbalance
C. The problem will get worse in time.
6. UI and Gameplay accessiblity improvements, like new POS Management System or a clearer UI.
B. Needs to be an important focus in the future.
7. Botting and the Sale of RM Goods.
D. CCP has done good work on the issue and should continue to do so.
8. Faction Warefare
B. Should be more relevent to the 4 Empires, New Content and Reworks Required
9. Low Sec.
E. Leave it as is and move on.
10. CCP Openess with there players and how they handled the Crisis.
E. Response was Fine.
|
Sader Rykane
Amarr
Midnight Sentinels
Midnight Space Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 23:12:00 -
[10]
You are bringing up a lot of issues that are not relevant or important in context of our current crisis.
This survey is clearly biased, try again.
|
|
|
Alara IonStorm
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 23:16:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Sader Rykane
You are bringing up a lot of issues that are not relevant or important in context of our current crisis.
This survey is clearly biased, try again.
These issues have been with the community for a long time. If you only wish to post the ones you care about that is perfectly fine.
Many people feel the latest Crisis is just another Issue ignored. I want people to have options to which ones are important. If 1/2/10 are ally you are focused on you can just post those.
|
Sader Rykane
Amarr
Midnight Sentinels
Midnight Space Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 23:20:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Alara IonStorm
Originally by: Sader Rykane
You are bringing up a lot of issues that are not relevant or important in context of our current crisis.
This survey is clearly biased, try again.
These issues have been with the community for a long time. If you only wish to post the ones you care about that is perfectly fine.
Many people feel the latest Crisis is just another Issue ignored. I want people to have options to which ones are important. If 1/2/10 are ally you are focused on you can just post those.
They need to focus on the important; secondary and tertiary issues can be addressed in their current orders of important as decided by CCP.
- I don't care about super caps.
I don't use Hybrids.
I couldn't give any less of a **** about low sec.
The CSM needs to focus on what made this particular expansion suck so hard, and this issue only. Once thats resolved we can business as usual in regards to the normal common game balance problems.
|
Mars Theran
Caldari
EVE Rogues
EVE Rogues Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 23:25:00 -
[13]
1. Micro Transactions in EVE Online and the fears about Selling Out or Pay to Win Items in a Sub Based Game.
F. http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1540203&page=1#1
2. Incarna and the Hanger System.
F. I will and do use CQ, but believe CCP should re-instate the hangar system until such a time as it can be phased out in favor of an option which leaves you in your ship and pod, and is less graphically intensive, while remaining as functional as the Hangar system and at the same time being more immersive.
3. Hybrid Turrets
B. Rebalance both the guns and the ship soon
C. Turret Rebalance is required.
A. It is unacceptable that this has been ignored for so long.
4. FOTM Ships. There are ships whose use has gotten so high the eclipse most of the other types. Fleets are made up mostly of a single ship type while others are or are considered sub par.
C. More Mixed Fleet Options would improve Gameplay, tactics and Participation.
B. Rebalance of existing Ships, Speeds and Turrets is something that should be on the Forefront.
A. The over use of a particular ship or race is Game Breaking.
5. Super Capital Ship Imbalance
A. It is destroying Large Fleet Warfare fix ASAP
B. It is to much of a Standard Fleet Ship already.
C. The problem will get worse in time.
6. UI and Gameplay accessibility improvements, like new POS Management System or a clearer UI.
B. Needs to be an important focus in the future.
C. It is an annoying issue. Could use some work.
7. Botting and the Sale of RMT Goods.
A. Destructive to the in game economy.
D. CCP has done good work on the issue and should continue to do so.
8. Faction Warfare
B. Should be more relevant to the 4 Empires, New Content and Reworks Required
C. More Content is needed.
D. Fix the few minor issues.
9. Low Sec.
B. A better Balance between Pirates/PVP'ers and Other Residence needs to be looked into.
10. CCP Openness with there players and how they handled the Crisis.
C. More Open Conversation in the future.
D. It was okay they could have done better.
Thank You for voicing your Issues. Fly Safe.
|
Alara IonStorm
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 23:44:00 -
[14]
1. B
2. B
3. B
4. B
5. C
6. D
7. C
8. C
9. B
10. B
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |