EVE Search - Moving ice-belts to null-sec...

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Moving ice-belts to null-sec...

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Kendra Wilkinson	Posted - 2011.07.20 05:24:00 - [61] Edited by: Kendra Wilkinson on 20/07/2011 05:24:51 I was in high sec yesterday and here what i've see in a ice belt
Corina's Bodyguard	Posted - 2011.07.20 05:25:00 - [62] Hmm, thats what I see every time I cloak up in null.
catinboots Minmatar Vintage heavy industries	Posted - 2011.07.20 05:33:00 - [63] Originally by: Kendra Wilkinson Edited by: Kendra Wilkinson on 20/07/2011 05:24:51 I was in high sec yesterday and here what i've see in a ice belt What is this obbsesion with ponies these last few months , they turning up everywhere and who started this ________________________________________ Minmatar are like jedi knights, we use ductape as our force, it has a darkside and a sticky side
Headerman Minmatar Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2011.07.20 05:44:00 - [64] Originally by: P42ALPHA Originally by: Headerman Originally by: Awesome Tough Guy ... could actually be a good thing. Would mean much less POSes in EVE, meaning much less boring ** to shoot. It would make inhabitating a WH even more of a commitment, which in turn, would make alot of WH's empty again (the way they really should be to be honest). It would mean even more competition over the few ME/PE slots in high/low-sec (I'm actually not sure if this would change prices much though) The only bad thing I can see with this change is that it'd make high-sec POSes not worth it at all And FYI I'm not a 0.0 dweller, currently I live in a c4 WH Congratulations on the most stupidest idea since eve began. Someone owns a high sec pos. LAWL ** you. I hate high sec, all those neuts EVERYWHERE.
Kehro Urgus Gallente Ab Obice Saevior	Posted - 2011.07.20 06:01:00 - [65] Originally by: Headerman Originally by: P42ALPHA Originally by: Headerman Originally by: Awesome Tough Guy ... could actually be a good thing. Would mean much less POSes in EVE, meaning much less boring ** to shoot. It would make inhabitating a WH even more of a commitment, which in turn, would make alot of WH's empty again (the way they really should be to be honest). It would mean even more competition over the few ME/PE slots in high/low-sec (I'm actually not sure if this would change prices much though) The only bad thing I can see with this change is that it'd make high-sec POSes not worth it at all And FYI I'm not a 0.0 dweller, currently I live in a c4 WH Congratulations on the most stupidest idea since eve began. Someone owns a high sec pos. LAWL ** you. I hate high sec, all those neuts EVERYWHERE. This from the man who was once fearful of being shot by asteroids in low sec and wanting nothing to do with null.
Headerman Minmatar Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2011.07.20 06:08:00 - [66] Hey man, i only mined because you always vomited at the prospect of mining urself
Ehdward Caldari Nex Exercitus Raiden.	Posted - 2011.07.20 06:49:00 - [67] Originally by: Listar Jombardo Originally by: Ehdward The population of nullsec is 5%? Seems like a pretty big 5%... Even less if you just count the one, who realy and ONLY live in 00. If you count the one with 1 ALT in 00 but 3 MAIN in highsec it might be 5%. But it's fun to see this 5% to constantly cry "nerv highsec" . fact: for every pur 00-player there are 1000 pure highsec player. fact: if CCP realy nerf highsec as hard as this 5% cry for, CCP would lose most of their custumers. fact: CCP will do everythink to NOT lose most of their custumers ;) fact: this nerf highsec cry babys either run RMT-Bot Armys or want more targetdummys which can't shot back No true Scotsmen go to hisec? Your math seems totally off too, but going beyond that, it's just flat out stupid to pretend that hisec and nullsec are two separate games. Can people stop making up statistics and making up strawman scenarios involving CCP sacrificing babies to the monocle gods?
Rhes Minmatar GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.07.20 06:49:00 - [68] Originally by: catinboots Originally by: Rhes Originally by: catinboots Of course you don't your alliance is one of those who cheated their way into dominance , just like many of the other large 0.0 alliances there so many allegations about RMT, botting and exploiting game mechanics/ bugs by you idiots , there has to be some truth in it , just proof me wrong and i will apologize Have you stopped beating your wife yet? what s the matter, can t defend yourself with something more rational More rational than the wild accusations you've made about my alliance with nothing to back them up?
catinboots Minmatar Vintage heavy industries	Posted - 2011.07.20 07:10:00 - [69] Originally by: Rhes Originally by: catinboots Originally by: Rhes Originally by: catinboots Of course you don't your alliance is one of those who cheated their way into dominance , just like many of the other large 0.0 alliances there so many allegations about RMT, botting and exploiting game mechanics/ bugs by you idiots , there has to be some truth in it , just proof me wrong and i will apologize Have you stopped beating your wife yet? what s the matter, can t defend yourself with something more rational More rational than the wild accusations you've made about my alliance with nothing to back them up? It s not only your alliance nor did i say it was only the goons , neither is this personal and indeed i can't back up these accusations , but be fair how many allegations about RMT and botting by the large 0.0 alliances are there now , too many to ignore ________________________________________ Minmatar are like jedi knights, we use ductape as our force, it has a darkside and a sticky side
Awesome Tough Guy	Posted - 2011.07.20 16:43:00 - [70] All i see is whine and no imagination, guess i shouldn't be surprised though thumps up for the few good posts in here
Cipher Jones Minmatar	Posted - 2011.07.20 16:58:00 - [71] Edited by: Cipher Jones on 20/07/2011 16:58:35 Originally by: Corina's Bodyguard Hmm, thats what I see every time I cloak up in null. No. Are those ponies crying? They in fact are not, which means they are not nullsec ponies with a cloaked ship in the system. Quote: All i see is whine and no imagination You reap what you sow. . Adapt and overcome or become a monkey on an evolution poster.
Ladie Scarlet GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.07.20 19:54:00 - [72] Originally by: catinboots indeed i can't back up these accusations You've literally become Fox News...repeat the lie long enough and people start to believe it.
Tza Omi	Posted - 2011.08.16 20:58:00 - [73] Originally by: Rhes Originally by: catinboots Of course you don't your alliance is one of those who cheated their way into dominance , just like many of the other large 0.0 alliances there so many allegations about RMT, botting and exploiting game mechanics/ bugs by you idiots , there has to be some truth in it , just proof me wrong and i will apologize Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Have you stopped blowing your boyfriend?
Orian Okha	Posted - 2011.08.16 21:05:00 - [74] Lets move everything to null. Even Concord
Mr Kidd	Posted - 2011.08.16 22:05:00 - [75] Originally by: Awesome Tough Guy ... could actually be a good thing. Would mean much less POSes in EVE, meaning much less boring **** to shoot. It would make inhabitating a WH even more of a commitment, which in turn, would make alot of WH's empty again (the way they really should be to be honest). It would mean even more competition over the few ME/PE slots in high/low-sec (I'm actually not sure if this would change prices much though) The only bad thing I can see with this change is that it'd make high-sec POSes not worth it at all And FYI I'm not a 0.0 dweller, currently I live in a c4 WH You're thought towards this issue demonstrates a lack of perspective. Highsec POS's aren't there to bore you. They're there to fulfill specific purposes for those that own them...it has nothing to do with you. If they bore you so much might I suggest you go attack an enemy's POS in nullsec...oh wait, did your RMT overlords give you permission? As for w-space...more of a commitment. Sorry, but we're pretty committed to existing in w-space. For those of us without attachments to hisec, we have no lifeline if a fleet shows up on our door step. In fact, we have no way to know a fleet is going to show up on our door step. There is no way for us to have intel networks several radii deep to tell us a fleet is on its way because our sphere of influence ends at the next randomly spawned entry into our system. If ice is removed from hisec, I'll not only have to maintain a w-space presence which I greatly cherish, but, if I want to keep everything under the same corp name I'll have to maintain a nullsec presence in order to mine it. For the small corp, this is impossible. It means that like tech. nullsec would have an essential resource necessary for the entirety of the game. And I've no doubt, like tech. nullsec will horde ice product to see that price shoot through the roof.
Cipher Jones Minmatar	Posted - 2011.08.16 22:59:00 - [76] Originally by: Caldari Citizen20090217 Originally by: Awesome Tough Guy ... could actually be a good thing. Would mean much less POSes in EVE, meaning much less boring **** to shoot. It would make inhabitating a WH even more of a commitment, which in turn, would make alot of WH's empty again (the way they really should be to be honest). It would mean even more competition over the few ME/PE slots in high/low-sec (I'm actually not sure if this would change prices much though) The only bad thing I can see with this change is that it'd make high-sec POSes not worth it at all Quoting another "stop wormholes killing my 0.0 bot income" post. You win the forums dude. . Adapt and overcome or become a monkey on an evolution poster.
Herping yourDerp	Posted - 2011.08.17 00:33:00 - [77] highsec is fine the way it is, lowsec needs a reason to go there nullsec would be fine if there weren't coalitions and moon minerals rotated locations every week or so.
Kengutsi Akira	Posted - 2011.08.17 00:41:00 - [78] Originally by: Ladie Scarlet It's on the list of things we're going to do while we control the CSM. It's right after we move all level 4 missions to lowsec. why not move all missions and belts to nullsec lol ------------------------------------ "You know, my foot oughta vandilize your ass"
Ladie Scarlet GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation	Posted - 2011.08.17 02:08:00 - [79] Originally by: Kengutsi Akira why not move all missions and belts to nullsec lol That would be silly. If we clear out highsec too much we won't have anybody to suicide gank.
Kengutsi Akira	Posted - 2011.08.17 03:03:00 - [80] Originally by: Ladie Scarlet Originally by: Kengutsi Akira why not move all missions and belts to nullsec lol That would be silly. If we clear out highsec too much we won't have anybody to suicide gank. Isnt that what miners are for? ------------------------------------ "You know, my foot oughta vandilize your ass"

Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.