|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 43 post(s) |
|
CCP Soundwave
C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.08.03 15:14:00 -
[1]
Originally by: StarScream Xion I'm sure I'm not going to be the only person who asks, 'but what about low-sec?'
This release will be about 0.0. What I'd like to do though, is repeat the process we've done for 0.0 on Low-sec, but that would be at a later time.
|
|
|
CCP Soundwave
C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.08.03 15:19:00 -
[2]
Originally by: VaL Iscariot "Nullsec features and content should always remind players why they left safe space, and never make them think about going back"
Was this considered when you applied the Nerf-Bat to half of null sec with the whole system security thing? No Havens or Sanctums in any system with a security above -.25? A few losses in and I was broke with no real income source beyond my market toon. That only goes so far, as one needs gold to breed gold. I made decent isk running the forsaken sites because they have a high chance to spawn a faction rat, but it didn't take long for others to realize this too and my income stream was terminated. Thus I went back to high sec/low sec to grind missions, and run tasty Radar sites. That was 6 months ago, and have I've not even considered going 'back' to null sec: The Land of Boredom. Go team.
Nullsec isn't guaranteed to make everyone happy. If you like empire better, that's life.
|
|
|
CCP Soundwave
C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.08.03 15:28:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Ajurna Jakar in the name of teamwork i'd say change the nullsec sanctums for something similar to vanguards et al. requireing teamwork and providing decent profit.
That's an interesting idea.
|
|
|
CCP Soundwave
C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.08.03 15:42:00 -
[4]
Originally by: EnderCapitalG
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
Originally by: VaL Iscariot "Nullsec features and content should always remind players why they left safe space, and never make them think about going back"
Was this considered when you applied the Nerf-Bat to half of null sec with the whole system security thing? No Havens or Sanctums in any system with a security above -.25? A few losses in and I was broke with no real income source beyond my market toon. That only goes so far, as one needs gold to breed gold. I made decent isk running the forsaken sites because they have a high chance to spawn a faction rat, but it didn't take long for others to realize this too and my income stream was terminated. Thus I went back to high sec/low sec to grind missions, and run tasty Radar sites. That was 6 months ago, and have I've not even considered going 'back' to null sec: The Land of Boredom. Go team.
Nullsec isn't guaranteed to make everyone happy. If you like empire better, that's life.
Except in the current state of the game there's almost no reason to not live in Empire, especially after the recent Agent buffs compared to all of the nullsec nerfs that were put in before you decided to buff nullsec in six months.
I completely disagree. There's less safety but also higher profits. As mentioned though, it doesn't cater to anyone. If you want to run level 4s in Motsu over anomalies, that's certainly your choice.
|
|
|
CCP Soundwave
C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.08.03 16:30:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Vincent Athena
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
Nullsec isn't guaranteed to make everyone happy. If you like empire better, that's life.
That is in direct contradiction to:
"# Everyone should be able to see how to get involved
* For a given nullsec feature or activity, any player should be able to figure out a plan that ends with them participating in that activity/feature"
Also there is my situation. Here the issue is I do not get The Rush.
I disagree, you're equating ability with willingness, which isn't the case. You should be able to participate in nullsec, but if you PREFER highsec, that's entirely legitimate.
|
|
|
|
|